Off-duty police officer shot multiple times in St. Louis

St. Louis Police Captain Michael Sack said a 28-year-old officer, who has been with the department for four years, remained in critical condition Saturday after being shot multiple times in his personal vehicle by an unknown assailant. (KSDK)

An off-duty St. Louis police officer remained in critical condition Saturday after being shot multiple times in his personal vehicle by an unknown assailant.

The shooting occurred near the intersection of Breman Avenue and North 25th Street in North St. Louis just before 4 p.m. Friday, a local NBC affiliate reported.

St. Louis Police Captain Michael Sack said the 28-year-old officer, who has been with the department for four years, is in critical but stable condition. His injuries are believed to be non-life threatening.

“An off-duty officer had been driving down this street in his personal vehicle when he came across an occupant or occupants in another vehicle,” Capt. Sack said in a press conference. “We don’t know what transpired, but the occupant or occupants of that other vehicle opened fire at the officer.”


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/21/off-duty-police-off... 

Views: 1054

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They know what transpired , this is revenge for what they think we done to them. And buma and holden are sitting in washington dc laughing at this and say (about time)

IT IS BEGINNING !!!!!!!!!!!....CIVIL WAR, CHAOS AND ANARCHY IN AMERICA............MORE AND CONTINUED VIOLENCE......AS OBAMA-NATION, ERIC HOLDER, AND AMERICAS'  RACE PIMPS.....CHEER AND ENCOURAGE THIS DESTRUCTION OF OUR SOCIETY !!!!!!!!!!!

Yep. Remember obummers buildup of FEMA camps? His executive order of increased self power to declare Marshall law? His gun control laws? Illegal immigration to help offset increased conservative votes because of his intense effort to ruin the U. S. And this Cuba thing, increased trade to help the Cuban peoples? BS! Years of trade from European, Russian, and other communist countries only help the Castros and their anti American friends. Didn't do a thing for the populace!

The FEMA camps were put all over under Bush, and the "Cuba thing" began also with Bush - how soon we forget.  But then Americans are well known for their short bad memories. FEMA camps began under Bush 41 and then under Clinton.  But really blossomed under GW Bush. 

In case no one can remember (we know how notoriously bad American's memories are), Bush (both of them) were in cahoots with Castro back when they made deals to give up (sacrifice)  the little boy Elian Gonzales who's mother gave her life to get him to America, and they committed Treason to do it. The both Bushes (Govr Jeb and then prez GW Bush) unlawfully had Feds raid Florida and a home in Florida with guns flying all over the place - including in the face of this terrified little boy,  to kidnap a 6 year old boy for Castro.  The boy was lawfully here, he had touched American land, and lawfully was able to stay, and was here a few months, but Castro wanted him back, and the Bush boys (Jeb and GW) swung into action to obey Castro and give him what he demanded no matter how Un-Constitutional and unlawful and Treasonous it was, or how many rights were trampled on that family and our state !  So Obama in this Cuba thing,  is just continuing GW Bush's agenda.    AS govr, Jeb Bush should have never allowed a Federal kidnapping and assault to happen in this state ! But he helped them instead of forbidding it, and gave free reign to DC to do whatever they wanted to this family = citizens of Florida !!
 
And then some idiot would want this guy as a president ?  He sold out his state and people and betrayed us - and he'd do the same thing to the country, just as his brother and father did ! Don't forget the Bush roots !

Amazingly no one can actually give a valid location for these fema camps -do you really think that it woudln't be easier all the way around to eliminate the disidents ?

Marshall law, fema camps..............how easy could it get?!

Oh yes they have and it's been on TV as well as on the net for the past 15 years !  Where ya been ?

DC tries to stop it but it's gotten through many times. Locations, pictures, etc.

amazing that you are so out of touch, the little boy, Elian was sent back under Clinton, and his attorney general Janet Reno.  Wow before you open you mouth better check some facts. Wow!!!!!!!

It was the Bush boys who did the most dealing with Castro.  Not so much Clinton that anyone could see. And that was actually surprising since Jeb Bush was just a new governor then.  And some senator from New Hampshire I think it was, that did the most negotiating - have no idea why him. .  Bill Clinton's involvement was minimal.  Reno's was a lot.  We hated her.   But this happened in early  2000 (yes GW was not yet prez he was campaigning and still Texas Govr yet I think at that time).   But it was GW that basically got his brother Jeb ( govr of Fla)  to open Florida to the Feds and help them by "staying out of their way".   And Janet Reno was almost run out of the state when she retired and wanted to move back home outside of Miami.. .. yes I remember. There was a lot of behind doors dealings with Cuba through the whole thing.  But we never forgave Jeb Bush - and he also has the  Terry Shindler Sheivo case (2005) on his record too that he did not do his duty and take charge of after his first few feeble attempts -  and did not stand for Elian at all - - Jeb Bush did not stand for our State or our people at all.

Oh, I don't.   Bush signed the Agenda 21 in 1992.   Prescott Bush was up to his

ears in cahoots with the OWO also way back when.    People need to brush up on history, it tells all.

majority if those FEMA Camps are just Rumors. there suppose to be  3 where I live and there are none. They are as follows National Guard Training facility with Vehicles, County Sheriff Academy  and Training Facility, the Last an empty field with no barbed wire fencing.. all at prior military bases... Sacramento Army Depot, Mather AFB and McClellan AFB.. look it under Google Earth and see if you can find a compound..

Robert,
Your right about the false FEMA camps. Be even the left are say it only to cause trouble and more disbelief in the people. Causing fear is there goal and starting a war is just the key Obama needs to shut down the government and declare Martial Law then we would see every Muslin in America on the streets fighting for Obama, and to place a Islamic flag over the White House!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

Breaking — West Virginia Lawmakers Invite Persecuted Pro-Second Amendment Counties In Virginia To Join Their State

West Virginia lawmakers introduced legislation to invite persecuted pro Second Amendment Counties to join their state.

The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution to remind Virginia residents from Frederick County that they have a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia.

West Virginia freedom fighters broke away from Virginia Democrat slave owners during the Civil War.

This week West Virginia has once again invited persecuted Virginia pro 2-A counties to come join their state.

Sounds like a winning plan!

Resolution 8 reads as follows:

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 8

(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter, Linville, Sypolt, Bibby, Hill, Ellington, Higginbotham, J. Kelly, Mandt, Pack, Dean and P. Martin)

[Introduced January 14, 2020]

Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia

Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and

Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and

Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and

Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and

Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and

Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and

Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and

Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and

Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and

Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and

Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and

Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia.

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service