Obama Flips on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq

Kevork Djansezian/Getty
Obama will take Iraq's word for now that U.S. soldiers won't be prosecuted by the country's courts as they defend Baghdad.

President Obama pulled U.S. forces out of Iraq in 2011 because he couldn’t get Iraq’s parliament to offer U.S. soldiers immunity from Iraqi prosecution. But now Obama is promising to send in hundreds of special operations forces based on a written promise that these soldiers will not be tried in Iraq’s famously compromised courts for actions they are taking in defense of Baghdad.

POLL: Has Obama's foreign policy set the stage for the birth of an Islamic Caliphate? 

The U.S. military and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel have opposed sending any special operations teams to Iraq until there is a written agreement from Iraq’s government that they will not be prosecuted under Iraqi law. On Monday, the White House spokesman said those promises were provided in an exchange of diplomatic notes. The delay in getting that agreement is one of many reasons why the Pentagon and the White House were reluctant to support air strikes inside Iraq—despite lobbying from Secretary of State John Kerry and his aides. 

“We remain confident that the military advisers will have the protections they need,” said Bernadette Meehan, a spokesperson for the National Security Council. “They are going to Iraq with the full support of the Iraqi government. We are working through the mechanism for assurances and we hope to [have it] resolved soon.”

The debate has echoes of 2011, when then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton favored keeping more troops in Iraq past 2011 than President Obama. 

read more:


Views: 832

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wow, so we just took their word for it.  How stupid.  No proof in writing.  OK, then I want to borrow 5 million dollars and not sign that I did.  I'll pay you back. Same thing.

Isn't that what he did with ObamaCare?

   The work of Lying MuSLIMes my Gawad this man is a disaster walking on 2 spindly legs up right.

only he has a tail and horns!

I am retired military...and I feel so sorry for those in uniform today...to have to serve under this commander in chief.....his screwed up and weak foreign policy has been responsible for more deaths..and many of his orders and policies are illegal anyway....and do not even recognize him as the president much less the commander in chief.

Shouldn't it be Commander and Thief?

My son wanted to enlist in the Army and I urged him to wait until Obama is out of power!!!!   And that's pretty telling since most of my family have served, some of them career.   I never thought I would ever tell someone not to serve his/her country, but this evil man is NOT a friend to our military, or to our Country for that matter.

Another setup and lie. Keep pissin on the Troops obama and watch what they will end up doing.


Barry is the exception to the 'get it in writing' rule.  He wouldn't honor it even if it was gold plated in writing. 




These days getting it in writing does not guarantee anything! LIAR=untrustworthy forever!

This is no stupider than Poland and Isreal trusting oblamebush to have their backs. Or the Ukraine.




Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel


CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.


“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service