Why is it that when a Muslim student that is an avowed member of ISI, and brings an IED to school, is  not even mentioned by the MSM as a terrorist threat to the school?  I believe it is because he is Muslim and he does not fit the Liberals narrative of a school terrorist, like Nikolas Cruz did because he used a gun and was NOT Muslim.  Muslims are the darlings of the Liberals and can do no wrong.  Just think what would have happened to our country with immigration if Hillary had become president.  this Youth should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.  He is a danger to society, not just his school.  Why did the MSM ignore this incident in your opinion, and what can be done to insure that the citizenry knows of such danger to our society?

Views: 67

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Certain groups are now "approved", just like in Nazi Germany.

"Out" are white males, Christians, conservatives, gun-holders, constitutionalists, Trump voters, home-schooled students and stay at home Moms.

"In" are the fascist women, homosexuals, trannies, commies, social justice warriors, gender junkers, Sol Alinskyites, Leninites, Marxists, Globalists, hillary/billary and obama fans, and of course, Opra. Oh, and muslimes. They are so peaceful that for sure, under their rule, we will all coexist (right to the death).

It is like Nazi Germany in some ways.  We are not allowed to disagree with the fascist women, homosexuals, LGBT, Communists, SJW, and Obama fans and Hillary fans are trying to change the narrative of our President.  They have not accepted that Donald Trump is our President.  Muslims are to be treated with kid gloves.  Anything that represents Christianity must be removed so they are not insulted.  This sounds like the removal of the Jews.  Christianity is persecuted and told it is "bad"  The Muslims are seriously a major threat to the US.Please read the following plan for the Muslim Brotherhood's Plan to take over America.

https://clarionproject.org/muslim_brotherhood_explanatory_memorandum/

  • .

It is about the numbers. They are quiet until the numbers reach a certain percentage, then they whine and complain like democrats. Then they become violent. The police and government back off. The jihad is then nearly complete. More numbers. More aggression. Then the hate, the rape, the killings, the culling.

They are foul in their thinking and demonic in their emotions.

Your comments is weird, there is 535 Members of Congress, who are they and why are they allowing such issues in America?

 Who are they connected to?

United Nations

The EU

The UK, of which all most all the seats are held by Muslims.

The 535 Members of Congress are Jewish, British,German, and others from other countries.

The members of the US Congress and the Senate are Americans.  They are not mainly 1st generation immigrants, though some may be.  There are 2 Muslim members of Congress.  Most are Protestant, than Catholic. then it is split into other religions.  Jewish, Mormons, Orthodox Christians, Unitarians,  The following web site is where I got the info.  The Muslim Brotherhood - did you read the info on  them in the reply to Jea9?  You really should read it.  It explains their plan to take over the US.  The Muslims are planning to take over the US and implement Sharia Law here.  They have 33 no go zones-encampments in the US.`where they are amassing weapons.  They do not let non Muslims go into these areas.  The Muslims are dangerous.  Islam is NOT a religion of peace.  They are lying when they say that.Never trust a Muslim.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/3/religious-makeup-of...

They are not Americans,

 Nice reply though,

 If you have 535 Members of Congress, and 51 senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives, and they hold seats of Parliament of the British Empire as well as Israel, holding seats of (CFR) Council on Foreign Relations, and connect the DNC dots for CAIR: CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations - CAIR

 To Change the Constitution from COS- Convention of States to 51 Senators with all the power, is Unconstitutional.

 Most Jews that live in America are not supported in their views of Muslims by Jews that live in Israel.

 Israel and most Muslim Countries are at war but all of the Muslim Countries are listed as a Country and not a state as, Israel is listed.

 The Magna Carta of Israel as a State is well noted by the British Empire.

great post.  yes approved is right any God fearing; constitution loving; gun toting American is well under attack.   God forbid we want our flag saluted or our national anthem wow you would think what in the world we are asking.  When I see the mexican flag being waved if u want that ok go to mexico and stay there w/my blessings.   

yes they want our country gone and boy it is up to us now to vote them out and we must.   CA; IL; NY all of them shear disasters.   

I am afraid we are past the point of just voting. When Goudy doesn't even do his job...

When RINO's McConnell and Ryan are holding up all the rest of Trump's nominees for judgeships...

When the R's have done almost nothing in the way of oversight of the witch hunt or of stopping the witchhunt after over a year of nothing....

When Hellary walks free...

When Hellary and Abedin still have security clearances...

and more

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service