A strong majority of Democrats would cancel the 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump if it meant President Obama could serve another term, a new poll found.

Data provided to The Hill by the conservative polling outlet WPA Research found that 67 percent of Democrats would take a third term for Obama over a potential Clinton administration.

Only 28 percent said they’re ready to move on from the Obama White House, while 6 percent are undecided.

Obama is enjoying a surprisingly strong approval rating for a president serving out the final months of his second term.

A Washington Post-ABC News survey released this week found Obama’s net approval rating approaching 80 points in positive territory among Democrats. Former President Bill Clinton was at about 60 points positive within his own party at this point in 2000, while former President George W. Bush was under 40 with Republicans.

At the same time, a Gallup survey from April found Clinton’s net approval rating among Democrats hitting a new low. She had a 63-point net positive approval rating last November. That plummeted to only 36 points in April.

read more:

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/286105-major...

Views: 821

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Screw Ball Left-Wing Democrats!! There are Term Limits in our LAWS!!

There are several sets of laws, now....ours and theirs.  

When did a little thing like the Constitution stop OScumBag!

Well, if he gets this crap through, I'll declare OPEN SEASON on Obumbum!

The Constitution has never stopped Obozo

Larry, that is an excellent observation.  Why is that?  I don't get it.  The Constitution is the law...right?  I even think the Supreme Court has subverted the Constitution, like with Obamacare.  I have always believed the Supreme Court should only be able to render a decision with a super majority.  Never a simple majority, 5/4, but a 7/2 super majority.  The justices should have to duke it out, convince opposition to see it their way.  Even a 6/3 would be better.  The way I see it, most, if not all, decisions are derived based on ideology. 

What scare me was the 4/4 vote on Immigration. The Constitution CLEARLY gives that to Congress. It's right there in black and white. Yet 4 liberal judges ignore the Constitution and vote to let Obama make his own laws. If Hillary gets elected we are totally screwed.

Larry, exactly.  Is it that 4 of those justices don't know or understand the Constitution?  Simply put, an example; Article II Section 1 Clause 5 to run for the presidency, in part:...attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States...  So, if someone 30 years old ran for president and brought before the Supreme Court, would they have anything less than a unanimous decision?  Would a 5/4 decision be a huge news story?  Why would 5 say a person has to be 35 where 4 would say it was ok to be less than 35.  I know.  It's a silly analogy, but it is the best I can do for now. 

Laws! Laws don't apply to Dems. Maybe they'll commission an executive crown as well. These are definitely dark times that we are living in.  

Laws will apply to Dems as soon as the Fascist Agenda is fully implemented..!

The IGNORANT idiots..!

*Edited Offensive Word, Please Re-Read the members rules*

I think that is in the Constitution but they don't follow that.  They conveniently ignore it whenever it suits them.

"What difference does it make?" Hillery or obama both are the same when it comes to making America Great again.....worthless!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

Judicial Watch->  Emails Show Dossier-Connected Obama State Dept Officials Set ‘Face-To-Face’ Meeting On ‘Russian Matter’ Shortly Before 2016 Election

Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation on Thursday released 84 pages of documents showing Obama’s State Department was central to pushing the ‘Trump-Russia’ hoax shortly before the 2016 election.

The email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a very close associate to Christopher Steele, show them discussing a ‘face-to-face’ meeting in New York on a ‘Russian matter’ in September of 2016.

Via Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch and The Daily Caller News Foundation today released 84 pages of documents, including a September 2016 email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a close associate of dossier author Christopher Steele, discussing a “face-to-face” meeting on a “Russian matter.”

(In June 2016 Nuland permitted a meeting between Steele and the FBI’s legal attaché in Rome. Nuland told CBS News that the State Department knew about the Steele dossier by July 2016.)

According to an op-ed Winer wrote for The Washington Post in 2018, also in September 2016, “Steele and I met in Washington and discussed the information now known as the “dossier… I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nuland, who indicated that, like me, she felt that the secretary of state needed to be made aware of this material.”

A September 17, 2016, email exchange between Nuland and Winer – that was classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy – discusses the political situation in Libya, but also brings up a “Russian matter:”

From: Winer, Jonathan
Sent: September 17, 2016 at 12:40:00 PM EDT
To: Nuland, Victoria J
Subject: Re: Libya Update

Would like to discuss this and a Russian matter.

From: Nuland, Victoria J
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:31 PM
To: Winer, Jonathan
Subject: Re. Libya Update

In ny face to face?

From: Winer, Jonathan
Sent: September 17, 2016 at 1:56:05 PM EDT
To: Nuland, Victoria J
Subject: Re: Libya Update

Yes that was [sic] be good.

From: Nuland, Victoria J
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:58 PM
To: Winer, Jonathan
Subject: Re. Libya Update

Good. I’ll reach out when im there Sunday. [Redacted]

If Victoria Nuland’s name sounds familiar it’s because she has been on Judicial Watch’s radar for a long time and in many of TGP’s previous reports.

In December 2018, Judicial Watch released documents revealing that Victoria Nuland was involved in the Obama State Department’s urgent gathering of classified Russia investigation information and disseminating it to members of Congress within hours of Donald Trump taking office.

In a related lawsuit, Judicial Watch is suing the State Department communications between Ambassador Nuland and employees of Fusion GPS, as well as top ranking Department of Justice, FBI, and State Department officials.

“The Obama State Department was central to the effort to target President Trump with the Russia smear,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These new emails further show that senior Obama State Department advanced the Russiagate hoax just before the 2016 presidential election.”

Tom Fitton   @TomFitton
 

BREAKING: Obama State Department was central to the effort to target President @RealDonaldTrump with the Russia smear. New emails show how senior Obama State Department advanced the Russiagate hoax just before the 2016 presidential election.

Embedded video

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service