Madonna: "I Have Thought An Awful Lot About Blowing Up The White House"

Views: 527

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Any person who expresses strong feelings must have a reason for doing so. A "Hear is the way I feel, and this is why I feel it" statement, a purpose, rather than just yakking at a mob outing.

Most of these "mobbers" apparently think , if they can at all, that purpose is unnecessary, that it restricts real protest by confining it to something that might be resolved rather than an open menu of pre-school poppycock and rank bull-poop.

It is impossible to take these people serious, especially when the media excuses them and the fact that many of them are being paid to protest.

If you believe for a moment that this is serious stuff then take a look at those with a microphone. Madonna and Michael Moore are ridiculous, proven jokes, so as spokestoad and spokesslut what does that tell you about the attendees?

Obama/Clinton lovers. Haters of righteousness and truth. In short, despicable. 


You are correct. These nut jobs don't have a clue!!!

One thing you can be sure of though, is if you or I said the same thing, we would both be sitting in a jail cell right now and who knows how long we would be there. Especially, if we said it while barrack hussein obama was president. 

Long live Trump!!!

Totally agree!

Is the Secret Service going to arrest her?,she threatening our President,she needs to be in jail.

No she is a famous liberal with a history of drug abuse.


No, I’m not crazy. Yesterday, at the Million Woman March Madonna said that she has “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House”. That “blowing” part is where she cast her vote for Trump’s reelection. It wasn’t long ago that Madonna promised to do some blowing for anyone who voted for Hillary but when the election was over she reneged. Her fans found out that there was no fellatio in their future. Madonna lied and that is when she cast her vote. Those who were lied to are going to cast their vote for Trump out of anger at the misleading liar.

Oh, Madonna isn’t going to blow up the White House either - she’s all talk and no action!

Action is not required when dealing with threats of physical violence against our political representatives whether they be president or dog catcher. The single criteria is the mere threat of physical harm to one of them. 

I do suspect, however, that a threat to the president - even if said president is Mr. Trump - would be handled with greater alacrity than the same threat made to the county dog catcher.  

WHEN is Madonna going to be arrested?  She did, after all, make a threat of physical violence to the White House, and by inference, to the president so she qualifies for arrest on that count.

There also are thousands of witnesses present as well as those who saw it live on TV

Did madonna talk the way Monica  did?

Madonna is the reason Hillary lost.

Remember, she offered sexual favors for anyone who would vote for Hillary.  Even the deceased wouldn't take her up on it.

when will any of this be investigated? i am waiting


First the "twit" Madonna says she has thought about blowing up the White House.....and then in the same breath she says, "Please choose love?"  Besides being a contradiction in her "moral compass" - she is the epitome of the "loons" that have drifted so far left they have no sense of reality, no sense of responsibility nor do they have any values that even resonate with the ability to distinguish between "right & wrong" behavior or a sense of service to others.......  




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service