Karl Rove hits Rand Paul for Bill Clinton bashing

Karl Rove took a shot at Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Tuesday for attacking Bill Clinton over his “predatory” behavior toward Monica Lewinsky, saying that it’s not good strategy for running for president.

But Rove said he’s not sure Paul has a strategy.

“Frankly, Rand Paul spending a lot of time talking about the mistakes of Bill Clinton does not look like a big agenda for the future of the country,” Rove said on Fox’s “America’s Newsroom.”

Paul keeps talking about the Clintons, Rove said, because people keep asking him about it.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/karl-rove-rand-paul-bill-clin...

Views: 757

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Rove, has lost his mind.  Why do we care what he says?  Do we need to remember the things he has said about the Tea Party?  Brush him off.  The Clintons will be running for President.  In this political climate who you are attached to affects you politically.  A vote for Hillary is the same as same as saying that workplace sexual exploitation of women is okay.  Who is in a war against women again?

Karl Rove trying to minimize Rand Paul is laughable. Does he really think like a progressive or what? Take his little white board and shove it.

Karl Rove, RINO and elitist in the D.C. circle. I despise this Washington insider. He cost us about 3 senate seats in the last election.

And 2 presidential elections. Rove is always on the wrong side because that is where he gets his money. Soros and the unions are behind him and that isn't good for We the People.

Rove just wants communism to win the day, that would put him in the winners circle.

This POS has got to go. What a fool with his white board. He's a criminal left over from the Bush era. Laughable.

I would have thought by now that the Republican elite would have realized that the truth is more important than PC. Guess not.

Taking the occasional shot at the "Horny Hick" AKA "Slick Willy" has got to be good for the soul. Rand, and others continue to put forth alternatives to Democrat's nonsensical Bills which are out of hand ignored by the Democrats. The MSM follows the party line and bashes them for blocking those Bills with no alternatives which is a blatant fabrication on their part. 

I have disliked this idiot for years ! 

Did we attack Rove when he was so far of on the last election,,,maybe we should have

Does anyone care what rove has to say anymore?  He needs to move to a retirement home in California.  He can pontificate to all the residents there.

SSGT, '69 - '73, 321st Combat Support Group, 319th AMS Fire Control

No, he needs to report to Bellevue mental hospital for a permanent stay.

I would rather he report to the gallows for a drop.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service