If Nothing is Good Enough for Dreamers, That’s What We Should Give Them... Nothing!

From: http://totalconservative.com/nothing-good-enough-dreamers-thats-give/


This past week has been somewhat extraordinary when it comes to President Trump and the issue of immigration. On Wednesday, after clearly “winning” the Schumer Shutdown and forcing the Democrats back to the negotiating table, President Trump made the earth-shattering revelation that not only was a weak sort of amnesty available for the Dreamers but that he was willing to consider a path to full citizenship. Trump said that if the Democrats could come off $30 billion in funding for the border wall, place strict limits on chain migration, and put an end to the Diversity Visa Lottery, he was willing to offer DACA recipients the chance to become citizens in 10-12 years.


Whoa.

These comments did not land well among many of Trump’s supporters, some of whom saw it as a clear betrayal of his campaign promises. Breitbart took an unusually combative stance against the president, for instance, labeling him “Amnesty Don” for what they perceived as an unnecessary surrender to the Democrats. Sen. Ted Cruz told reporters this week that he could not believe that Republicans were “inexplicably” running to the left of Obama to break their promises to voters. There were even a few rounds of MAGA-hat burnings from supporters who felt the president had betrayed them.
But if the reaction on the right was bad, the reaction on the left was even worse.
The pro-illegal immigration group United We Dream released a statement rejecting the deal and calling the president a racist.


“Let’s call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note,” said Greisa Martinez Rosas, the advocacy director for United We Dream (and an illegal immigrant herself). “Trump and Stephen Miller killed DACA and created the crisis that immigrant youth are facing. They have taken immigrant youth hostage, pitting us against our own parents, Black immigrants and our communities in exchange for our dignity. To Miller and Trump’s white supremacist proposal, immigrant youth say: No.”


Well, Ms. Rosas, your “dignity” was never on the table. It’s your legal status as an American that’s at issue, and that is not the forgone conclusion that you seem to believe it is. You don’t seem to understand that you have NO legal leg to stand on and that it is ONLY by the graciousness of actual American citizens that you have any chance of staying. You talk about Trump using Dreamers as bargaining chips without realizing that you have NO bargaining leverage. Illegal immigrants who turn their nose up at a deal like this are the ultimate choosy beggars, and we’re beginning to sympathize with people who would like to see all of you rounded up and deported tomorrow.


This week may have been the final proof that there is no good reason for Trump to negotiate with the open-border terrorists that call themselves the Democratic Party. It’s a loser politically and it’s a loser culturally. Let DACA expire and let the Democrats explain to Hispanic activists why they wouldn’t accept a deal. We’re rapidly losing interest in the so-called “plight” of young illegal immigrants.

Views: 63

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Someone closed this post for replies... I have reopened  it.

“Let’s call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note,” said Greisa Martinez Rosas, the advocacy director for United We Dream (and an illegal immigrant herself).  Perhaps it is time to PICK UP Mr. Rosas and immediately air drop him in Mexico or whatever *-hole he came from.

Why do we allow illegal aliens to have a soap box at all... Mr. Rosas is just one of many socialist revolutionaries who are not in America not for the love of our country or economic reasons... They are here to destroy America, to turn it into another shit-hole of a nation, to make it a communist den of rats and thieves.

Where are the USCIS and DHS agents... when you need them. Off harassing or jailing men like the Ammon Bundy or shooting patriots like Randy Weaver and LaVoy Finicum... How about Deporting this bum... Rosas.

I came back to fix my typo errors

Good Enough for Dreamers, they like to Rape White Girls, DACA Coming to America In All 50 States

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service