Check out the fiery Calif. town hall that SHATTERS the MSM’s immigration, anti-Trump mantra to smithereens

The small town of Cudahy, near Los Angeles, got a big surprise at a recent town hall meeting.

Officials were hammered by supporters of President Donald Trump for declaring itself a sanctuary city more than a year ago.

But what many might not have expected about these particular Trump supporters is they don’t fit the demographic, let alone the narrative, liberals and the mainstream media want people to believe about those who don’t support sanctuary cities

see more here: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/02/17/check-fiery-calif-town-hall-...

Views: 809

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is fabulous!! This needs to happen everywhere. Give'm hell!

i cant think of a better place for this to happen but right in the heart of looneyville

These people need to be empowered... they need to be educated regarding their legal right to recourse ... too, remove the City Council and Mayor... There needed to be a draft referendum presented during this Town Hall meeting... too,recall the entire city council and mayor. The referendum should have been introduced from the floor, immediately seconded, and a motion to have it passed by a voice vote carried to its logical conclusion... a formal and legal demand for the resignation of all members of the City Council and Mayor... subject to new elections by a date certain...

We must empower such individuals with constructive  KNOWLDGE... in meaningful ways which address their dilemma.  These groups need to be better organized and given access to legal council regarding legislative and remedial actions available too discipline or remove corrupt or inept members of THEIR GOVERNMENT.  It does little to simply complain ... there needs to be effective action taken.

This latino tells it like it is.  I am pretty sure there are going to be a lot of sorry communist leaders out of a job soon.  Like the man said,we ain't playing around

The great awakening...people of color are tired of the scamming, say everything do nothing Democrat Bolsheviks who's goal is to keep them Poor with their hand out to Big Govt. and dumb.

I love these two "We The Peoples"!  MAGA!

It's interesting to note that the city council felt the need to have armed security present.  Why would "the government" fear "the people" at a town council meeting unless they knew that they were not representing the populace?

This goes to show you that MOST AMERICAN TAXPAYERS who aren't "HIGH" on drugs DO NOT want to spend their money on worthless illegal scumbags who hate us & just want us to support their lazy asses & their families! It may take an "Open Season" to rid us of this disease but it's going to get done!! Lets take care of our OWN HOMELESS & VETERANS who want to help themselves succeed-FIRST!!!!!

looks like America is finally waking up....

Gave me chills! Shared both! Just WOW!

Liberals can't think of anything worthwhile to say the words  YOU ARE A RACIST comes out.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service