When A U.S. President IS Muslim Brotherhood! (Part 2)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On September 7, 2014:
OBAMA DOUBLE-BOGEYS ISIS STRATEGY!-Posted on Big Peace-By BEN SHAPIRO-On September 10, 2014:
On Wednesday evening, President Obama gave his long-awaited speech spelling out his carefully planned strategy to deal with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The speech was brief by Obama standards – approximately fifteen minutes – and well-articulated.
Sadly, it was also deeply problematic on virtually every strategic and rhetorical level.
Obama led off his speech by stating that his own policies in drawing down American troops had somehow forwarded American security, although he couldn’t explain why – and although the highest percentage of Americans now feel threatened by terror since before September 11. After dismissing the current terror threat as an inevitability – “We cannot erase every trace of evil from the world” – he then turned to ISIS.
And his first words were a lie: “ISIL is not Islamic.”
This would come as a shock to the Islamic State. What are they, Buddhist? And why do so many Muslims support their goals? But Obama forged forward with his paternalistic lecture of the beautiful nature of Islam, stating, “No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.” Apparently, some religion condones the killing of innocents, even if it is a minority segment of a broader religion.
After explicating the well-known evils of ISIS – their brutality, their execution of captured prisoners, their murder of children and rape of women and attempted genocide against the Yazidis – Obama talked in convincing terms about their threat to the region and the world.
Then, finally, he turned to his vaunted strategy.
“American power,” he said, “can make a decisive difference, but we cannot do for Iraqis what they must do for themselves, nor can we take the place of Arab partners in securing the region.” This is, as the president is so fond of saying, a false choice: American power is required to create the security preconditions on the ground necessary for stability. Obama proved that when he removed all American troops from Iraq in 2011, leading to the rise of ISIS.
So, what exactly did Obama recommend? After fibbing about the new “inclusive” Iraqi government – the new prime minister is backed by Iran, and his interior minister pick heads a Shiite milita group, so it’s a little early to celebrate – Obama then suggested that America would “lead a broad coalition to roll back this terror threat.”
“First,” Obama said, “we will conduct a systematic campaign of airstrikes against these terrorists…I will not hesitate to take action against ISIL in Syria, as well as Iraq. This is a core principle of my presidency: if you threaten America, you will find no safe haven.”
It is worth noting here that President Obama has no interest in consulting with Congress concerning such airstrikes, largely because they are unanimously supported. That unanimous support would seem to be a reason for going to Congress under a nonpolitical wartime leader. But for Obama, it’s a reason to ignore Congress and seize political credit for himself.
“Second,” Obama continued, “we will increase our support to forces fighting these terrorists on the ground.” And here, suddenly, Obama wanted Congressional help in giving resources to unnamed Syrian fighters in the opposition: “I again call on Congress to give us additional authorities and resources to train and equip these fighters.”
This was a clever political maneuver – after seizing all political credit for widely popular airstrikes by ignoring Congress, Obama now plans to avoid culpability for handing guns and cash to the unnamed and magical Syrian opposition by thrusting Congress into the debate. In truth, Obama should go to Congress for approval on both airstrikes and funding; he has in the past refused to go to Congress for either. His decision to split the baby is an obvious attempt to manipulate the process for political gain.
To further pressure Congress, Obama also stated that Congress had to hand resources to the anonymous Syrian opposition because American troops would not be involved in this battle. In a statement that must have comforted the members of ISIS, Obama refused to contemplate at any point in the future American troop involvement in the battle against ISIS.
“Third,” Obama said, “we will continue to draw on our substantial counterterrorism capabilities to prevent ISIL attacks.” We have been doing that for a few decades now. But Obama’s true addition to the strategy of using counterterrorism intelligence came a few sentences later, when he promised to “chair a meeting of the UN Security Council to further mobilize the international community around this effort.”
Presumably, this will involve writing strongly-worded letters.
Fourth, Obama stated, “we will continue providing humanitarian assistance to innocent civilians who have been displaced by this terrorist organization.”
And that was it. The vaunted strategy was complete.
“This is American leadership at its best,” Obama said, complimenting himself on his strategic genius. “We stand with people who fight for their own freedom, and we rally other nations on behalf of our common security and common humanity.” So far, that strategy is working beautifully. Except for the fact that America did all that in Iraq, then left the place to ISIS and Iran.
There were a few other doozies: Obama said that we would pursue the same strategy against ISIS that we used “in Yemen and Somalia for years,” a statement that does not inspire confidence, given the fact that Yemen and Somalia continue to be terrorist hellholes, as even Nicholas Kristof pointed out.
Obama also said that “we are strongest as a nation when the President and Congress work together, so I welcome congressional support.” Except with regard to America’s border, apparently.
Obama awkwardly transitioned to domestic policy concerns, linking 9/11 with the Great Recession and then touting his skewed record. That was one way of distracting from his awful foreign policy record. He used a second method moments later, when he deployed his greatest weapon: his mouth, from which he unleashed a massive cloud of rhetoric. He declared American leadership “the one constant in an uncertain world”; he blathered about America having the “capacity and the will to mobilize the world against terrorists” (Turkey and Qatar would beg to differ); he bloviated about America rallying “the world against Russian aggression, and in support of the Ukrainian peoples’ right to determine their own destiny” (except in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine); he jabbered nonsensically about Ebola virus; he lied that America had “helped remove and destroy Syria’s declared chemical weapons”; he explained that “From Europe to Asia—from the far reaches of Africa to war-torn capitals of the Middle East – we stand for freedom, for justice, for dignity” (except for the South China Sea, Boko Haram, Libya, or Israel, of course).
Obama concluded by telling the story of a Yazidi who said, “We owe our American friends our lives.” He did not mention that the Yazidis would never have been trapped on a mountain in the first place, their children dying of dehydration, had Obama not forfeited a country America had helped secure.
— Ben Shapiro is Senior Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the new book, The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against The Obama Administration (Threshold Editions, June 10, 2014). He is also Editor-in-Chief of TruthRevolt.org. Follow Ben Shapiro on Twitter @benshapiro.
What is ISIS and Obama’s “Strategy” Towards It?-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On September 11, 2014:
CLAIM: “AMERICA IS SAFER” AMIDST MIDDLE EASTERN TURMOIL
by Sharon Rondeau
(Sep. 11, 2014) — On August 30, British Prime Minister David Cameron placed his nation at the highest alert level in response to the rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq and the general threat of “poisonous Islamic extremism.”
Fears that ISIS could strike the United States, particularly on the 13th anniversary of the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history on Thursday, were articulated as well-founded by Frank Salvato on The Roth Show earlier this week as reported by host Dr. Laurie Roth. Salvato stated that approximately 200 members of ISIS are poised on the U.S.-Mexican border readying for an attack against the United States.
On September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 people were killed in Washington, DC; Shanksville, PA; and New York City at the World Trade Center, reportedly by Islamic terrorists mainly from Saudi Arabia.
Each year since the attacks, two vertical columns representing the Twin Towers are illuminated in a “Tribute of Light” against the night sky to those who lost their lives.
On Tuesday, a 28-page classified report on the financing role played by Saudi Arabia in the 9/11 attacks was highlighted by several members of Congress in a bipartisan press conference at the National Press Club.
ISIS, or ISIL, has reportedly been growing in strength and numbers since 2010, when U.S. troops left Iraq under uncertain political conditions. ISIS has seized U.S. armaments given to the Iraqi army, many of whose members ISIS murdered in cold blood over the summer.
Founded in 2006 under the name “Al Qaeda in Iraq,” ISIS is a Sunni Muslim terrorist organization which seeks to establish an Islamic caliphate across the Middle East. Many of its fighters broke away from “opposition” groups in Syria which the U.S. funded under Obama and over the spring and summer, conquered large areas of Iraq and eastern Syria in a dominoes-like rampage, killing thousands and destroying or looting some of the oldest antiquities in the world.
In an address to the nation on Wednesday, Obama attempted to assure his “fellow Americans” that “America is safer” since he has occupied the White House. However, Americans cannot know if the “commander-in-chief” is a “fellow American,” as many indicators point to a foreign birth and fraudulent identification documentation. Obama employs Muslims with ties to radical terrorist groups, including The Muslim Brotherhood, and appears to be an apologist to Islam as Christians, Yazidis, and other religious minorities in Iraq are butchered, raped, tortured, and sold into further slavery by ISIS.
Obama has been supplying Syrian “rebel” fighters since November 2012 or earlier, and part of his purported strategy to combat ISIS is to “train and equip” those attempting to oust Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad. In 2011, the toppling of Muommar Gaddafi in Libya eventually led to the rise of Islamic extremism and resignation of the interim government last month following the deaths of four Americans on September 11, 2012 about which the Obama regime misled its “fellow Americans.”
The rebels Obama has been supplying have admitted ties to Islamic extremists and Sharia law.
On July 26, the U.S. State Department warned Americans not to travel to Libya.
The “Arab Spring” supported by the Obama regime led to Muslim Brotherhood-supported Mohamed Morsi‘s rise to the Egyptian presidency, although short-lived upon his deposition by popular protest on July 3, 2013. Morsi is now facing charges of murder and collaborating with Egypt’s enemies.
In Syria, the Arab Spring evolved into a civil war which has claimed more than 100,000 lives since 2011.
In his September 10 speech, Obama attempted to separate ISIL from “Islam” by stating, “Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not ‘Islamic.’ No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.”
Daniel Greenfield of FrontPageMag reports, however, that “It was the Syrian crisis that turned ISIS into an army. Some of the groups now loyal to ISIS once fought alongside the Syrian opposition that he would like to arm.” Obama also conceives of training Syrian fighters in Saudi Arabia with congressional approval and funding.
In an apparent effort to further convince Americans that he is capable of leading a battle against ISIS, Obama said, “And in two weeks, I will chair a meeting of the UN Security Council to further mobilize the international community around this effort.”
Obama’s chairing of the United Nations Security Council in 2009 was seen as a treasonous act.
On May 31, Obama released five hardened Taliban terror leaders from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in exchange for a reported deserter from the U.S. Army, Bowe Bergdahl. House Armed Services Committee leaders have researched and determined that Obama plainly broke the law by using taxpayer funds to release the terrorists without the required 30-day notice to Congress.
In an interview with Atty. Stephen Pidgeon, primary author of Articles of Impeachment drafted against Obama in July, Pidgeon told The Post & Email that Obama “trained, funded, financed and armed ISIS.”
Obama stated that he will not commit ground troops back into Iraq to fight ISIS.
Obama’s purported half-brother, Malik Obama, has been widely reported to be the global financier of The Muslim Brotherhood. Obama has placed individuals with ties to radical Islamist organizations in positions of power and influence in the U.S. government.
On the southern border, prayer mats and other items indicative of Islam have been found, and Middle Easterners have reportedly entered the country in significant numbers beginning as early as 2010 along with the “unaccompanied alien children,” gang members, and recidivist criminals released by the Obama regime into the general population.
Pastor and radio show host Carl Gallups, who has been close to the criminal investigation carried out by the Maricopa County Cold Caes Posse into the birth certificate forgery posted on the White House website, said on his show in late July that Obama “comes from a deep Sunni background.” Gallups’ son Brandon then amplified the discussion to say that “Obama has ties to Saudi Arabia.”
Many suspect that Obama refused to release his college transcripts and applications because they would reveal that his higher education was financed by Saudi Arabia.
Putative Secretary of State John Kerry has admitted that ISIS poses a threat to the U.S. and called for “the world’s help” in combating the barbaric terrorist organization.
Less than two weeks before his September 10 speech, Obama said he “didn’t have a strategy yet” to use to quell ISIS. Now, however, he wishes to launch airstrikes in Syria, an idea which Bashir al-Assad embraces even as Obama plans to bolster the “rebels” fighting Assad.
Saudi Arabia reportedly will join Obama in his “mission,” whatever that might be.
THE NUCLEAR OPTION: A FOREIGN POLICY CONDUCTED IN A DRUG-ADDLED HAZE!-Posted on Big Peace-By CHARLES HURT-On September 11, 2014:
See, kids, this is why you don’t do drugs. And this is why you will always eventually regret voting for somebody who boasted of all the coke and dope he did while smoldering about his absentee father.
President Choom Gang has demilitarized our military. He sends the Department of Health and Human Services to the Mexican border to welcome and take care of tens of thousands of illegal children streaming across. And now he wants to deploy American troops into West Africa to combat the Ebola virus.
Boy, is this confusing. Mr. President, with all due respect:
Are you still smoking dope?
Just when you thought things could not get any more disastrous, President Obama announces plans to drag America back into some degree of the war on terrorism.
It is a war we would not need except for his utter malfeasance as commander in chief and blithe disregard for already-spilled American blood and treasure.
It is a war he ran two political campaigns promising to get us out of.
It is a war he has always argued we did not need.
Worst of all, it is a war America’s soldiers will have to fight every step of the way with one eye cast behind them to see if the politicians in Washington — especially their commander in chief — are still with them. Will those politicians once again abandon the troops and their deadly mission as soon as the political winds shift?
In an honest world without all the pot haze, confusing munchies and addiction tremors, Mr. Obama would now admit what the majority of Americans already realize, according to latest polling: This presidency is a failure.
If Mr. Obama was elected on any cogent platform other than the vague and hip promise of “hope and change,” it was because of his credentials as the anti-war candidate.
It was this single claim that gave him the opening to challenge Hillary Rodham Clinton for the 2008 Democratic nomination in the first place. It also vaulted him well past all the other Democrats in the field who had voted for the Iraq war.
And against the original mad warrior John McCain, the general election was a breeze for the anti-war crusader.
So even before Mr. Obama won the White House, he was telegraphing to our entire world of enemies that he would beat a hasty retreat if elected. Once he became president, he began withdrawing from the fields of battle. He all but deserted Iraq.
Now, everybody acts all surprised that into this vacuum marched new enemies even fiercer and more deranged than the last ones.
That the president is even considering renewing the war on terrorism is a convincing exoneration of his predecessor’s “strategery” for combating terrorism. And it is a crushing repudiation of the entire premise of the Obama presidency.
What is heart-wrenching about all of it is that it will be America’s brave men and women in uniform who will, dutifully, carry out this zany, rearguard mission launched entirely to provide political cover for a bunch of politicians back home before another election.
Seriously, it was better when Mr. Obama did not have a strategy. And even better when he was loafing around with the Choom Gang smoking weed and snorting coke.
Remember, kids: Don’t do drugs.
Terrorism Isn’t the Problem…Islam Is!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On September 11, 2014:
A BELIEF SYSTEM INCOMPATIBLE WITH FREEDOM
by Dr. Laurie Roth, ©2014
(Sep. 11, 2014) — Is there ever a time we will get sick of the word and political games regarding our treatment of Islam? “It is a religion of peace,” former President Bush reminded us again and again after 9-11. Sorry, Bush, but you were wrong. As the current Islamic murderers wipe out everyone in sight in Iraq and Syria, Obama is quick to remind us in his latest inspired speech… “ISIL is not Islamic.” Apparently, according to Obama, all the groups who torture, behead and murder others are terrorists, hiding perhaps in Islam but not reflective of Islam at all.
The only problem with this endless “peace” propaganda about Islam is that it reflects only the dementia, intimidation and lies of the person speaking.
Obama talks about “routing out militants” from ISIS. The tragic and deadly truth is that there are no good guys or bad guys in Islam or routing out anything. Rather, there are over 1.5 billion in this family who believe in the words and holy books of Islam that reflect the teachings of Muhammad and Allah. The Koran, Hadith and Sharia law reflect the skeletal core of their belief system and how they live their lives.
ISIS VS. ISIL: WHY OBAMA STANDS ALONE: What’s behind the choice of name of Mideast terror group?-Posted on WND.com-On September 11, 2014:
WASHINGTON – President Obama may have had a difficult time formulating a strategy to deal with the ISIS crisis, yet he alone has been almost obsessively resolute in referring to the group as “ISIL.”
In some of Obama’s briefings on ISIS, he has gone so far as to spell out ISIL.
Puzzling to reporters and pundits, the use of ISIL by Obama has prompted a bevy of theories.
ISIS was the original name of the al-Qaida offshoot. It’s an acronym that stands for Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. But, months ago, ISIS changed its name to ISIL – the Islamic State in the Levant. More recently, ISIS chose to be known simply as Islamic State.
Most news organizations, pundits and policymakers chose to stick with ISIS, perhaps to discourage the ISIS shell game of frequent name changes. Obama, though, has stuck with ISIL.
His determination took on almost comical tones in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd that aired Sunday.
Obama: “I’m preparing the country to make sure that we deal with a threat from ISIL.”
Todd: “Obviously, if you’re going to defeat ISIS, you have used very much stronger language.”
So confusing was the discussion, it forced Todd to clarify for viewers: “Obviously we refer to it at NBC News as ISIS. The Obama administration, president, says the word ISIL. The last S stands for Syria, the last L they don’t want to have stand for Syria.”
Todd apparently was suggesting the Obama administration would like Americans not to associate ISIS with Syria.
Capitol Hill Democrats decided earlier this week to go with ISIL – but for multicultural reasons. Isis was the name of a deity popular among feminists, many of whom named their daughters after her. It seems Isis Martinez, a woman in Miami, has been gathering signatures on a petition to the media to use ISIL.
Fox News’ Harris Faulkner suggests Obama is “tipping his hat” to ISIS by calling it ISIL.
“Levant is a bigger territory,” she said. “That’s why they want to embrace that name, and it includes many, many more countries than just Syria.”
Obama and Putin!-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On September 12, 2014:
by Paul R. Hollrah, ©2014
(Sep. 12, 2014) — As you tuck your children and grandchildren into bed tonight, take a long hard look at them and consider what they may have to face tomorrow, next week, and in the years ahead. And think for a minute or two about who it is that holds their lives, and yours, in their unsteady hands.
Then picture, if you will, a scene in the White House Situation Room, far beneath the Oval Office, where those who hold our lives in their hands… Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, and Michelle Obama, the entire “brain trust” of the Obama administration… are seated around a long table. They are discussing the ramifications of sending U.S. military might against the butchers of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), balanced against the impact such actions would have on Obama’s legacy, and the impact they might have on Democratic prospects in the November General Election.
One of the items on the table in front of them is the transcript of a September 11, 2013 New York Times op-ed by none other than Vladimir V. Putin, the president of Russia, who has no qualms about thumbing his nose at Barack Obama as he invades and occupies the Crimean Peninsula and large portions of eastern Ukraine. His decision to communicate directly with the American people through the editorial pages of the Times is a clear indication of how little respect he has for the former “community organizer” from Chicago.
As an indication of the extent to which Obama has fallen out of favor with the leftist editors and publishers who helped elect him, the Times editorial board chose not to waste a single column-inch of newsprint defending Obama against Putin’s well-crafted attack (one popular female comic has quipped that Obama’s approval ratings are now so low that the Secret Service has assigned him a new code name. His new Secret Service code name is Ebola).
Referring to Obama’s plan to wage an “unbelievably small” attack on Syrian forces… as in poking at a hornets’ nest with a very long stick… Putin set a very clever trap for Obama. He wrote, “The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious leaders… will result in more innocent victims and escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s borders. A strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism (emphasis added)…” Frightened off by those cautions, Obama decided not to attack and yet everything Putin predicted came to pass.
Now that we’ve come to know the bloodthirsty nature of the Islamic State a bit better, Putin appears to be the voice of reason, while Obama dithers, plays golf, and attends fundraisers. And while tens of thousands of men, women, and children are slaughtered by ISIS, a major force in the Syrian conflict, no one in the Obama administration seems to know what to do about it. Given more recent events in Syria and Iraq with the emergence of ISIS, now known as the Islamic State, one would think that Obama might lie awake at night regretting that, instead of drawing pointless red lines in the sand, he’d made some sort of accommodation, either with the Syrian dictator, Bashar al-Assad, or with the moderates who opposed him.
What Obama and his “brain trust” apparently failed to comprehend in failing to arm Islamic moderates in Syria was that the “new wave of terrorism” of which Putin spoke is not likely to be limited to the suburbs of Damascus, the northern provinces of Syria, the north and west of Iraq, or the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. The “new wave of terrorism” that Putin predicted will likely find its way to the streets of New York, Chicago, Washington, and other U.S. cities.
ENTIRE LEADERSHIP OF ISIS OPPOSITION WIPED OUT BY ‘UNEXPLAINED’ EXPLOSION!-Posted on Breitbart.com-By OLIVER LANE-On September 11, 2014:
Obama Meets With Hezbollah-Supporting Cleric on 9/11: ‘Meeting follows conference at which Ted Cruz was booed off stage for defending Israel’!-Posted on Washington Free Beacon-By Alana Goodman-On September 11, 2014:
September 11: America and the World!-Posted on Patriot Update-By Nick Adams-On September 11, 2014:
Devout Muslim Groups Celebrates 9/11 Attacks!-Posted on Atlas Shrugs-By Pamela Geller-On September 11, 2014:
Obama: The Father of ISIS!-Posted on TheBlackSphere-By Kevin Jackson-On September 11, 2014:
Rush Limbaugh Drops a Bombshell Proving Barack H. Obama is Guilty of Treason!-Posted on Conservastive Tribune-On September 12, 2014:
Can Obama wage war without consent of Congress?-Posted on Associated Press-By STEPHEN BRAUN-On September 12, 2014:
Of politicians and moral courage!-Posted on CarolinGlick.com-On September 12, 2014:
What This Veteran Just Wrote Should Make Every American Infuriated at Barack H. Obama!-Posted on Conservative Tribune-On September 12, 2014:
MUSLIM KILLED N.J. TEEN ‘FOR BEING AN AMERICAN’: ‘Radio host launches campaign to publicize fact domestic terrorism already in U.S.’!-Posted on WND.com-By BOB UNRUH-On September 12, 2014:
Terrorist Exchanged For Bowe Bergdahl Now Top ISIS Commander!-Posted on National Report-On September 13, 2014:
When A U.S. President IS Muslim Brotherhood! (Part 4)-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On September 18, 2014:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Articles of Impeachment and Impeachment Proceedings)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On August 12, 2014:
Letter to our NM U.S. Representative Michelle Lujan-Grisham (re: Release of five key Taliban Guantanamo detainees in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On June 7, 2014:
9/11 TRUTH SEEKERS: THE ‘LUNATIC FRINGE’ IS WHOM?-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On May 25, 2014:
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
Letter to NM Representative (re: Request For Congressional Investigation Into Mysterious Downing of Chinook Helicopter in Afghanistan)!
Blowing a whistle on Benghazi: There’s no hiding four murders! (Part 1)
Price for Justice: One of many Benghazis!
Did Saudis Buy Obama 2008 Election?
Is Obama The Godfather of The Islamic Revolution?
Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?
Is Israel the next Arab Facebook Campaign?
Muslim Brotherhood Declares War on America-Will America Notice!
Should Americans Fear Islam?
Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security?
What do American Citizens Know About “Sharia Law” and is It Something That We Should Know More About?
The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!
The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 1):
Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s 2008 Campaign’!
Who Is George Soros?
CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up!
Why did a black preacher from Harlem have a “hit” placed on his life?
Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away (Part 23)!
Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!
Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!
Extensive Research Into Senator Obama’s Background Completed on November 3, 2008:
Where Is America Today?
GENERAL CEMENTS PLAN TO END OBAMA’S REIGN: ‘Working in Washington now to implement radical solution’!
Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!
A Republic, If You Can Keep It!
The Fightin Side of Me!
When Injustice Becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed articles and/or blogs, please copy website link and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
“Food For Thought”
Hello: Are Americans Going To Wake Up Before The Lights Go Out?-God Bless America!