Wednesday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
'scumbag/liar-Schiff Show' Roundup:
Republican Rebuttal
__6Yfqn-z_8vpz7R5RQ4x4IHaCjargb_6tjJUvI_Gmb5HIvdE3yvEdlqygXiyH62S8TnutmI-DovI3NyiNRxjo9mKG1EJTvPwdw6K4V6Gh49_dHlu-oe_Bb497EqtYfwsGuH3bVnGTqGxkqbJh08U_vKzdKlubx4MedrE5A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson  
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
The Dems' Lose-Lose Situation
AYnTJkpL20lvWRNvoU8bTlZ2G6nhzfdrfYyjiTM645k8k9wtg43qfDG8JHPAI3EV3WbtClrebkikqtMOUsdEx1ixx5fI-2lRrQRmhjpW_fQ10ZKmE8E=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By William L. Gensert
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Having forced the nation to endure weeks of himself pretending to be god and trumpeting hearsay testimony as "revelatory," scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff has retired to his candlelit study to write in his own carefully drawn blood his “Impeachment Report.”... From there it goes to scumbag liar-Nadler, who will concur. After that, liar-Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats have a decision to make as to how they will proceed. And none of their options are good. Unlike the desperately difficult to find “win-win” situation, they have created for themselves a “lose-lose” proposition. Democrats find themselves in quite the quandary. They have been planning Donald Trump’s impeachment since the second Wednesday of November 2016. The more manipulative among them, those of the “insurance policy,” were taking precautions even before then Lisa Page’s recent profession of purity of heart notwithstanding. Yet, despite their solipsistic insistence that they are the “thinking” party, the party of “science,” and of candidates with a thousand plans and ideas, Trump always seemed to have the Democrats flummoxed. The day after they took Robert Swan Mueller III away from watching the Weather Channel and propped him up like Elvis Presley’s coat to testify in front of “House Colostomy Bag” scumbag liar-Jerrold Lewis Nadler’s committee and he showed himself to be a mere figurehead more interested in what was for lunch than what was in his own report, they rolled out the “new charges, same swamp” faux “whistleblower," Eric Ciaramella, a nice Italian boy. They could have shown some humility and let it drop, after having wrongly and relentlessly publicly chased the man for more than three years only to be reduced to claiming that an innocent man screaming, “I’m innocent” was obstructing justice. Confident that Americans hated Donald Trump, and with the next election less than two years away, they could have concentrated on their jobs -- you know, as legislators -- but they just couldn’t pull the trigger on doing the right thing. Because, despite always calling Republicans, “haters,” their hatred of Trump was not only their prime but absolute motivation. Yet, as much as it motivated, it blinded. They just had to take another shot at the king. And so, we had the embarrassingly unfair impeachment inquiry.  Even then, after all their plans, all their ideas, all their machinations in designing a made-for-TV pseudo-impeachment where all the rules were stacked against the president and his supporters on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, they still failed. This is scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff’s committee and it’s important to note that a committee on “intelligence:" is headed by not only a known moron, but a most dangerous of morons, a moron who doesn’t know he’s a moron. Just as dinky/liar-Warren is 1/1024 Native American, scumbag/liar-Schiff is 1/1024 genius. liar-Nancy Pelosi, the Democrat House Majority Leader, is decidedly no idiot. She is an effective Majority Leader, who unlike Republican Majority Leaders, has a unique ability to hold her caucus together when it counts.  Think scumbag/liar-nObamaCare. Well, liar-Nancy was trepidatious about impeachment from the get-go. She knew and said that any impeachment would need to have broad bipartisan and public support. What changed?...
.
Professor Jonathan Turley
 Opening Statement – Video and Transcript
64SsZTWOMVPXBi3WNyLk_A5QohTXC1fA_1Fhj-kwdhh1lOwHxAuY7_gGwqXJF0I1DlEQVd-v9LrexBL_Xegjv0hGznrMCzYIJ4wHo2VFodQgKZ1Xunzh8-RjLN9R9-DJMmkN=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor and not a supporter of President Trump, warned House lawmakers today against impeaching a President without merit... Mr. Turley said that to impeach Trump based on the current evidence “would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment.” Chairman scumbag liar-Nadler, ranking member Collins, members of the Judiciary Committee, my name is Jonathan Turley, and I am a law professor at George Washington University where I hold the J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Chair of Public Interest Law. It is an honor to appear before you today to discuss one of the most solemn and important constitutional functions bestowed on this House by the Framers of our Constitution: the impeachment of the President of the United States.Twenty-one years ago, I sat here before you, Chairman scumbag liar-Nadler, and other members of the Judiciary Committee to testify on the history and meaning of the constitutional impeachment standard as part of the impeachment of President scubag/liar-William Jefferson Clinton. I never thought that I would have to appear a second time to address the same question with regard to another sitting president. Yet, here we are. Some elements are strikingly similar. The intense rancor and rage of the public debate is the same. It was an atmosphere that the Framers anticipated. Alexander Hamilton warned that charges of impeachable conduct “will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused.” As with the scumbag/liar-Clinton impeachment, the Trump impeachment has again proven Hamilton’s words to be prophetic...  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/04/professor-jonathan-turley-opening-statement-video-and-transcript/  
.
Is it Time to Designate CAIR 
as a Terrorist Organization?
kmYPtsirFzpDwXRXG46uaz5zOODzpO79bM9NKttmomZzfbzhwRiOFG0xN3caGoBmSFKKBFQ-HrjRXh8_D5l3HW7V8LrI-30NTkNREG0rLjQrCHVrpfA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Mario Alexis Portella
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Last week's stabbings by Usman Khan, a devout Muslim who murdered two people and injured three others on London Bridge, by far overshadowed the arrest of Zachary Clark, 40, of Brooklyn, New York, the day before Americans celebrated Thanksgiving... Clark, who faces up to forty years in prison, was charged with one count of attempting to provide material support to ISIS, and one count of distributing information relating to explosives, destructive devices, and weapons of mass destruction. The arrest, as U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman for the Southern District of New York stated, was made possible through surveillance by the Joint Terrorist Task Force. The force included cops mainly Muslims themselves going undercover in Muslim areas to become more familiar with them and gain background info for future investigations or leads on possible attacks. While there is nothing wrong with such practices in defense of innocent lives, Islamic advocacy groups such as the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), with headquarters in Washington, D.C., have publicly opposed such programs, ranting that they are religiously and racially motivated to discriminate against Muslims. And there is a reason for this: CAIR is linked to Islamic terrorist groups. CAIR’s mission is “to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.” Yet, as detailed at length by the Center for Security Policy, since its founding in 1993, CAIR has presented itself publicly as a benign Muslim American "civil rights organization." But from that time to this, the United States government has known that CAIR actually is an entity founded by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian franchise: Hamas, a group officially designated since 1994 as a terrorist organization. Evidence of CAIR’s true character as a U.S.-based instrument for political warfare and fundraising for Hamas -- and the federal government’s certain knowledge of the truth -- did not come to light until the largest terrorism financing trial in the nation’s history: the 2007-2008 Holy Land Foundation prosecution. In the course of that trial, FBI Agent Laura Burns testified about the wiretap and surveillance transcripts of two planning sessions held in Philadelphia in October 1993 and leading up to the organizational meeting of CAIR. Specifically, she presented proof that CAIR’s mission was to assist “Sister Samah,” its founders’ hardly opaque code-name for Hamas, as the prospect of its terror designation loomed. Some of its employees and board members have also been charged with terrorism, such as Randall "Ismail" Royer. An American convert to Islam, Royer served as CAIR's communications specialist and civil rights coordinator. Today he sits in jail on terrorism-related charges...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/is_it_time_to_designate_cair_as_a_terrorist_organization.html 
Supreme Court shows little appetite for 
expanding gun rights in arguments 
over repealed New York regulation
x-Idg0RflQ5NV27g4CXXhCQmUnbNutUTCawd1QtfmujEuK3YK02aTOkkWrrkobItWS6gqk3t5nsMrlBWBoIrM4WlX1-X3Ut5Lqb3ZWXSu8oQpUNoJwHZcdNG-d8jBbLNSeI2acPknrV9kxDqrohZJapl3nzKOKWekwLwtAgQRDaJRjGl=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Tucker Higgins
{ cnbc.com  } ~vThe Supreme Court seemed unlikely to deliver a major win for gun-rights activists during arguments on Monday in the first significant Second Amendment case the justices have heard in nearly a decade... The case was challenging a New York City gun regulation that barred the transport of handguns outside of the city, even to a second home or firing range. After the court agreed to hear the case, though, the city did away with the regulation and the state passed a law that prevented the city from reviving it. While court conservatives including Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito seemed eager to use the case to address the reach of the Second Amendment, it appeared likely after an hour of arguments that Chief Justice John Roberts would side with the court’s liberals to dismiss the matter altogether as moot in light of the repeal of the regulation. The dispute had one of the highest profiles of the court’s term. The court has not addressed gun legislation since deciding two landmark cases in 2008 and 2010, which held that the Second Amendment protected the individual right to keep guns for the purpose of self-defense in the home. A decision in thew New York case is expected by July, in the midst of the 2020 presidential election. The nation’s gun laws have become one of the key issues in the Democratic race amidst an uptick in mass-shooting deaths and youth-led activism, though substantive new legislation is seen as all-but-impossible for the foreseeable future under divided government. Paul Clement, who argued on behalf of three gun owners in New York and a state affiliate of the National Rifle Association, argued that the case was still active because the city had not been required to say the regulation was unconstitutional. Clement also argued that even under New York’s new regulations, gun owners could still be penalized if they did not travel with their handgun directly to a firing range or home outside the city, such as if they stopped for coffee...  https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/02/supreme-court-shows-little-appetite-for-expanding-gun-rights.html   
MSM Now Compares Trump 
Supporters to ISIS Followers
elr-dj-noezOmcpqupOh-Lj47XSGUpArrlaR0Sox89pxdJwvnkfyktK3TGjZZ_qAPQ5SzUuJjAsO2W4A2QCGr24B2S9S4m3Qoa9z-2s1rH7FF0_Xdfn3tTQSIjRDhO8FqvEZGTjRY-bAhSrBGdZbfozDHPj7BJVadRDTUE6mt0DvpFr_0ghcsWN3Tw-y9wJBY8bxbLg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Meira Svirsky
{ clarionproject.org } ~ The latest trope against American people who support President Trump is to say they are like ISIS followers, as pointed out by The Daily Caller... “True believers” said with a depreciating and knowing chuckle, a catch-phrase of the mainstream media to indicate they are akin to members of a cult – “dead enders.”  Watch MSNBC contributor Malcolm Nance on “Hardball with Chris Matthews” say that Trump supporters and ISIS followers are “very similar”: “I’ve seen a lot of phenomenon in my life. I’ve seen a lot of operations. You know, the behaviors that I am seeing here, and this is anecdotal, are very similar to the way that ISIS members are,” Nance says. “They are true believers — and this is their reality and they will not surrender it. You know, they’re dead-enders.” Afterwards, Matthews agrees, saying, “Malcolm, I love your attitude. As we say in Philly … you got it. Thank you for coming on tonight.” At the same time, other media outlets were pumping out the comparison of Trump supporters to cult members. CNN’s Brian Stelter, among others, pushed a new book written by “mental health counselor” Steven Hassan, the author of “Cult of Trump,” who contends that Trump supporters are you guessed it part of a “destructive cult.” Hassan, whose credentials include being a former member of “The Moonies,” opines that the president is using mind control over his “loyal and dependent and obedient followers.” MSNBC host Joy Reid also pushed the cult trope, saying “There’s a lot of evidence that is a racial and religious cult of personality, in which his base is solidly among the white evangelicals that almost worship him and say that he’s the chosen one of God.”... MSM are totally sick and wrong.  https://clarionproject.org/msm-now-compares-trump-supporters-to-isis-followers/?utm_source=Clarion+Project+Newsletter&utm_campaign=afdfad3987-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_12_04_02_35&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_60abb35148-afdfad3987-6442509&mc_cid=afdfad3987&mc_eid=b83b13a9b5 
.
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
'scumbag/liar-Schiff Show' Roundup:
Republican Rebuttal
__6Yfqn-z_8vpz7R5RQ4x4IHaCjargb_6tjJUvI_Gmb5HIvdE3yvEdlqygXiyH62S8TnutmI-DovI3NyiNRxjo9mKG1EJTvPwdw6K4V6Gh49_dHlu-oe_Bb497EqtYfwsGuH3bVnGTqGxkqbJh08U_vKzdKlubx4MedrE5A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  “The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry is not the organic outgrowth of serious misconduct; it is an orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.” That’s the summation of a 123-page report issued by House Republicans Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, and Michael McCaul. “The evidence presented does not prove any of these Democrat allegations, and none of the Democrats’ witnesses testified to having evidence of bribery, extortion, or any high crime or misdemeanor.”

“The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry paints a picture of unelected bureaucrats within the foreign policy and national security apparatus who fundamentally disagreed with President Trump’s style, world view, and decisions,” the report concludes. “Their disagreements with President Trump’s policies and their discomfort with President Trump’s actions set in motion the anonymous, secondhand whistleblower complaint. Democrats seized on the whistleblower complaint to fulfill their years-old obsession with removing President Trump from office.”

That pretty well sums it up. The Republican report is a “prebuttal” of sorts for the report expected later today from House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff, who will attempt to make the case for impeachment as a layup to House Judiciary Committee hearings that begin tomorrow. scumbag/liar-Schiff says he’s rushing his report because of the dire circumstances: “This is a threat to the integrity of the upcoming election, and we don’t feel it should wait, in particular when we already have overwhelming evidence of the president’s misconduct.”

We pause to note that scumbag/liar-Schiff’s report waited while Democrats took a week-long Thanksgiving break.

Meanwhile, Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler finally released his first list of witnesses.  According to The Wall Street Journal, “The Judiciary panel’s impeachment hearing on Wednesday will be its first on the matter, and it will hear from a group of experts on what constitutes an impeachable offense. Four academics are scheduled to testify on the opening day: Noah Feldman of Harvard Law School; Pamela Karlan of Stanford Law School; Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina School of Law; and Jonathan Turley of George Washington University Law School.”

Finally, in a development that would be no surprise whatsoever, “House Democrats are debating whether to expand articles of impeachment to include charges beyond abuse of power in the Ukraine controversy,” reports The Washington Post. “Members of the House Judiciary Committee and other more liberal-minded lawmakers and congressional aides have been privately discussing the possibility of drafting articles that include obstruction of justice or other ‘high crimes’ they believe are clearly outlined in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report — or allegations that Trump has used his office to benefit his bottom line.”

Translation: Democrats think combining the fizzled impeachment coup 1.0 (Trump/Russia) with its coup 2.0 sequel (Trump/Ukraine), is the combo to defeat Trump. Color us skeptical.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67116?mailing_id=4701&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4701&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center