The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The GOP Senate Takes a Swing at
liar-nObamaCare
by Michael Swartz
.
Former AG Lynch Facing
Possible 5-10 Years Behind Bars
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Loretta Lynch is in some potentially serious legal jeopardy, potentially going to prison, according to Judge Andrew Napolitano... A letter sent to former Attorney General Loretta Lynch by the Senate Judiciary Committee asked Lynch multiple questions, one of which was, “During your time in the Justice Department did you ever have communications with former DNC Chairwoman Rep Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, her staff, her associates, or any other current or former DNC officials about the liar-Clinton email investigation?” Dagen McDowell asks Judge Andrew Napolitano if Lynch can be forced to testify. He replies, “Yes, of course they can force Loretta Lynch to testify.” He says, “There is enough evidence here, just on the basis of the little snippets given to the Senate Intelligence Committee by former FBI Director Jim Comey that Mrs. Lynch was either conflicted or working at odds with the Justice Department and in behalf of Mrs. liar-Clinton’s campaign and the DNC when she told them to use different terminology in the investigation.” He says “The terminology may be indicative of a mindset on the part of Attorney General Lynch that she was going to do whatever she could to prevent Mrs. liar-Clinton from getting indicted and the Senate Judiciary Committee is entitled to inquire into that.”... http://rickwells.us/napolitano-former-ag-lynch-facing-possible-5-10-years-behind-bars/
.
Rape Survivor Fighting for Campus Carry Laws
by Trey Sanchez
{truthrevolt.org} ~ A student at Florida State University who was raped at knifepoint is fighting for campus carry laws so that students don’t have to rely on campus police who are always just minutes away... In a Facebook post, Shayna Lopez-Rivas is pictured standing in the same place her attack happened, advocating for her Second Amendment rights to no longer be denied while on campus. “Here I am in the same spot where I walked away broken 2 years, 7 months, and 14 days ago,” Lopez-Rivas writes. “I drove on campus that night a stressed-out student, loaded with schoolwork that needed to get done. I drove off campus that night a victim of one of the most vicious, violent attacks a human being could endure.” Taking the picture, Lopez-Rivas said, was very cathartic because she had avoided walking near that spot for so long. But she no longer wants to be just a victim and points to something in the picture that motivates her fight:... http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/rape-survivor-fighting-campus-carry-laws
.
Fed-up media launch assault on 'lying' media
by Alicia Powe
{wnd.com} ~ Days after James Hodgkinson unveiled his homicidal intentions against conservatives with a gun attack on Republican members of Congress who were practicing for a congressional baseball game... conservative journalists rallied in front of the White House to demand an end to attacks on and assaults against Trump supporters. They are making the demands not just of those who are violent, or potentially violent, but of the mainstream media, the Democratic Party and the party’s liberal supporters. Jack Posobiec, journalist and author of “Citizens for Trump,” told WND he organized the rally “because it is time to stand for peace.”... http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/media-launch-assault-on-lying-media/
.
I can’t believe Chuck
clown-Schumer finally ADMITTED it on live TV
by David Rutz
{freebeacon.com} ~ Senate Minority Leader Chuck clown-Schumer (D., N.Y.) acknowledged Sunday that Democrats questioning the party's messaging problems have a point in the wake of another House election defeat... clown-Schumer said on ABC's "This Week" that the main lesson from Democrat Jon Ossoff's four-point loss in Georgia's special House election race is that the party needs a "strong, bold, sharp-edged, and common-sense economic agenda." Democrats poured more than $30 million into the race to flip the seat from red to blue but came up short... http://freebeacon.com/politics/schumer-admits-messaging-problem-heck-democrats-stand-for/
.
Trump Should APPOINT 2nd Special
Prosecutor To INVESTIGATE MUELLER
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Rush Limbaugh has an idea to fight fire with fire that he acknowledges some will laugh at and some legal types may roll their eyes at... but it’s one way to counter the witch hunt that is currently underway. That idea is to appoint a special prosecutor to look into Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller. It would be even better if the individual chosen is a career partisan Republican, though that would be much harder to find than the dime a dozen corrupt, politically motivated Democrat. He says, “Before you start snickering, there is a period of time where Mueller may have been colluding with Comey, before Mueller was named the Special Counsel. Who knows, Mueller may have been involved with Comey in leaking, we don’t know. But we know that Mueller and Comey are best buds, they’re BFFs, supposedly. It is entirely within the President’s purview, if he wants to investigate the investigator he can.”...http://rickwells.us/limbaugh-trump-should-appoint-2nd-special-prosecutor-to-investigate-mueller/
.
.
The GOP Senate Takes a Swing at liar-nObamaCare
By Michael Swartz: Practically from the day the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — much more well-known as liar-nObamaCare — was signed into law by its namesake, Republicans in the House proposed bill after bill to repeal it. As a campaign issue, opposition to government intrusion into health care propelled the GOP to a smashing, Tea Party-aided victory in the 2010 midterm elections that put them back in control of the House of Representatives, where they could then pass those liar-nObamaCare repeal bills they had proposed.
Unfortunately, those repeal bills ran into the predictable roadblock of Democrat leader Harry dinky-Reid in the Senate, so the excuses began: We only control one-half of one-third of the government, they told us. True enough — House Republicans could do little to overcome the Senate or Barack liar-nObama's veto. Yet once the actual liar-nObamaCare law took full effect, Americans learned that not only would we not be able to keep our doctors and our plans as promised, but that $2,500 per family in promised savings was a fantasy as well. The GOP told us they'd repeal liar-nObamaCare if only they had control of the Senate, too — which voters delivered to them in 2014.
Still, frustration with the system boiled over, and the much-predicted liar-nObamaCare death spiral began. Yet even as insurers bolted from failing state insurance exchanges, participants' premiums and deductibles surged ever higher, and an increasing number of people decided the tax penalty was less onerous than staying with health insurance that cost thousands of dollars a month out-of-pocket, Republicans found themselves with a 2016 presidential candidate who criticized liar-nObamaCare but favored many of its provisions. As president, Donald Trump has been less than helpful in crafting legislation — he threatened House conservatives for opposing the House bill and celebrated the bill in a Rose Garden ceremony, but then called that same bill "mean" when talking to the Senate.
Once the party of limited government, Republicans are now cowed by the Left's charge that they "sabotaged" liar-nObamaCare, and they appear unable to live up to their repeated promise of repealing this onerous legislation.
In March, the House made its first attempt at reform. It didn't even get a floor vote, although a modified version 2.0 barely passed a month later. It was something, albeit unimpressive. The Senate then turned up its nose at the House version and drew up its own plan, which they revealed yesterday.
Unless you're a serious policy wonk, it's doubtful you'll read the entire 140-plus pages of this "discussion draft." With the possible exception of senators like West Virginia's Joe Manchin, a centrist Democrat whose state went all-in for Donald Trump, we can expect uniform Democratic hysteria. Not that their caterwauling means anything, because Republicans are considering this measure via reconciliation rules, meaning a simple majority is all they need. So the fate of the Senate version would seem to rest on perhaps a half-dozen senators who are either at the moderate center or farthest right on the GOP spectrum.
Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee and Ron Johnson have announced they "are not ready to vote for this bill," though they're "open to negotiation."
While some believe this bill is a modest step in the right direction, many observers give the Senate proposal a thumbs-down. "With this bill, Senate Republicans are betraying the promises they made on the campaign trail for the better part of seven years," writes analyst Sally Pipes. "If it passes, the GOP will have cemented the basic architecture of liar-nObamacare into place — wittingly or not." She notes that the Senate bill preserves most of the premium subsidies and Medicaid handouts to states, with cuts in the latter not taking effect until the out years beyond this election cycle. Yet Elizabeth McKee of Americans for Tax Reform, also writing in the Washington Examiner, praises the Senate bill for all the tax breaks it gives to middle-class families hit hard by the myriad hidden taxes in liar-nObamaCare.
It's worth noting that one major victory would be the elimination of the utterly rotten individual mandate — which requires Americans to purchase health insurance under penalty of law.
Lost in the translation, however, are some other ideas that Republicans promised to look into when repealing liar-nObamaCare, such as tort reform. Tweaking around the edges isn't going to rework a system that gets bogged down in defensive medicine, increasing time and expense just to guard against a malpractice suit.
A key difference in the approaches taken by the GOP Congress and their Democrat counterparts from eight years ago is the rush that the Republicans seem to be in to get this bill through. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wants to take this bill from "discussion draft" to floor vote before the Senate leaves on its Independence Day recess. And while we're not talking about the 2,000-plus mind-numbing pages in the liar-nObamaCare bill, the GOP version is still 140 pages. Democrats have harped on the bill being crafted in secret, which Republicans themselves once decried when Democrats did the same thing concocting liar-nObamaCare. Now that the GOP plan is out, the focus seems to be on the Medicare cuts that actually are several years removed from being a reality — but which make for good Demo talking points to spoon-feed the mob.
In a perverse way, the Left should be pleased with the damage they've done. The argument is no longer about whether health care should be an entitlement for everyone, but only how we pay for it. When Republicans concede the point about extending personal health insurance subsidies well up the income ladder to the fringes of the white-collar class, that battle is lost. When the insurance industry is so dependent on the decisions of Uncle Sam that they stop selling policies in certain areas because there's no guarantee they'll be made whole if they lose money, we've shifted from a capitalistic free market to a con game in which the American taxpayer is the mark.
All that being said, is it too much to ask Republicans to go to bat and deliver on seven years of promises?
~The Patriot Post
Comments