Tuesday PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Florida Legislature Votes to End 
Sanctuary Cities
SsglPwfcqJAmxvLqsayxqJgOE12P0_8Gof2zKiKaWVXVKGarFfUsekoWv9x9I5hCDcszJomA_tRg2gGlwCrHHJix1pDXQGexuNs65zOOlBSU48suAmr8o2x4gd3l5oqQpDFQEhyL-llJPy3tKqJCbWceywcBjZpOG7Vkw7M=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Arnold Ahlert
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
‘Completely 100 Percent Wrong:’ Lindsey
Graham Calls Out Judge Nap
On Obstruction Question  
zR9lcZaqTQy1WJqt_zAMJ0firLI_RzXcICWB4kPJOzvIpSzg9D89i1OGTZv6MY45rFl9fvTTFx9rbH4I1t4lQy4lZIVZKuKG_doMYwGjk0Vr3OAsDQOuZIRSeCA7Gpyxo5UIJZ6zo_i-GYuF9MFh5pawOfQKotklqdPCEc55m-GTPWjwr-kOYXs5DBoL0ycme6xTXspW4tidVjEB9-Nr=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Scott Morefield
dailycaller.com } ~ GOP Senator Lindsey Graham countered Fox News analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano’s interpretation of whether or not President Donald Trump committed obstruction of justice... directly after Napolitano’s Monday night Fox News appearance. Appearing before Graham on “The Story with Martha MacCallum,” Napolitano had argued that any attempt “to interfere with the government” is illegal, even if that attempt amounted to nothing.“If your purpose is to interfere with the government in order to save yourself, not to help the government, then you have committed the crime of obstruction,” he said. “My best to Senator Graham,” Napolitano said as the camera switched to the senator before the commercial break. Graham started his conversation with MacCallum by answering a question about the judge’s argument...
VIDEO 1 Obstruction question:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSN8q-9PXSc
VIDEO 2 Graham calls out Judge Nap:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdGoKiLx4DM
.
The Russian Collusion 
Hypocrisy of Northeast Democrats
ZGQm9jLYTB-s2KPK2idENwcx0vCytkWucdzPZwnc1vxbFbc-GPAkRRTA_dPG1UYaZrJLF-cPEvF1tGJ6FiauFhLbzH5Qe5TXSvz_S779fCdr4qhRyKBzgD8T56p-txJQUK-vKQE4Y4wBRNikgToEmeb2k6pCxJMK8lyvOEtmBgYt=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby H. Sterling Burnett
{spectator.org} ~ The dirty cop-Mueller report is in, and one thing couldn’t be clearer: dirty cop-Mueller’s team, despite its best or worst efforts, found no evidence Donald Trump or anyone on his campaign team colluded... with Russia to undermine the 2016 U.S. election. Despite dirty cop-Mueller’s clear conclusion on this point, Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren (D-MA) — who, not coincidentally, is running to be her party’s presidential nominee — and Rep. scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler (D-NY) continue to lead an inane crusade to nail Trump for imagined crimes. However, if dinky-Warren and scumbag liar-Nadler are truly worried about efforts to further Russian interests at the expense of the United States, they should look closer to home for active co-conspirators. For example, Democratic politicians from their home states of Massachusetts and New York, although likely not colluding with Russia, are directly promoting policies that further Russian President Vladimir Putin’s interests — and all at the expense of the United States. Massachusetts and New York have declared war on domestic production and transportation of fossil fuels. Many Democrats in those states have made it clear they would rather import fuel sources from Mother Russia than from the United States. Lawmakers in Massachusetts and New York have blocked construction of critical pipelines to carry U.S. natural gas to and through their states. New York has even banned fracking to produce domestic natural gas. These policies have prevented the creation of thousands of jobs related to construction and oil and gas production in their states, increased energy costs for their residents, reduced local and state revenues, and increased air pollution — benefiting, directly or indirectly, Russia’s government...
.
Listen to Joe diGenova
vYzAF8jmHlV4P80dIhyEPyrymI3MMamDMpF_048uXy3xNzgSnfmXJgWB3YysaSWBR418jX2lUMWqK6TXkdIli0ZK5v-o3JzckYKxzOpMgj57L_u16Xm1SLXeltWQhngIidpJ21Fe-vauTHeHCDM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby George Parry
{spectator.org} ~ Now that the Russian collusion hoax has been debunked, and not even the scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton acolytes who comprised Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s office saw fit to charge the president with obstruction of justice... the party is about to get very rough for the FBI, Justice Department, and CIA leaders who concocted the hoax and who illegally spied on American citizens. On April 10, 2019, Attorney General William Barr testified before the Senate Appropriations Committee that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign had been spied upon by U.S. intelligence agencies. According to Barr, the “question was whether it, the spying was adequately predicated.” Barr was careful to state explicitly that he had made no determination as to whether there was an adequate justification for the spying, but that he was going to investigate to resolve the issue. Clearly Barr was talking about the eponymous and unverified Steele dossier which was used by the FBI and Justice Department to obtain FISA warrants to intercept the communications of Trump campaign associate Carter Page and, by extension, everyone in or out of the Trump campaign with whom he communicated. Predictably Barr’s testimony resulted in a tidal wave of apoplectic outrage by Democrats and their media adjunct. Some denounced Barr as a shill for Trump while others called for his impeachment. Now it appears that Barr was only hinting at the enormity of what is actually being investigated. Joseph diGenova is the former U. S. Attorney for the District of Columbia and a former legal counsel to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. He has also been a frequent commentator on Fox News and Washington’s WMAL Radio. Throughout the Trump-Russia collusion fiasco and Team dirty cop-Mueller’s investigation of the president, diGenova has proven to be a reliable source of information as to what was happening behind the scenes. His pronouncements and predictions have consistently proven to be true. On April 24, 2019, diGenova appeared on the Ingraham Angle and made his most explosive predictions yet. Here’s the link to the video. What follows below is a partial transcript of his remarks starting at 27 seconds into the broadcast...  https://spectator.org/listen-to-joe-digenova/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=9112009672-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_30_03_58&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-9112009672-104608113  
.
Two U.S. Warships Pass Through 
Taiwan Strait in 7th Transit Since 2018
gKsmFx_kWqEtSOp64ChhJD72as6r03b52klrWlxhkJpFRM2HO_XbBL4p1OQuqh83UJJUwltkkCysXBq2JyfcB4y5PdgodI4Osfqm6-zkh7h_K0gAaVLu54AG5VI86wCGnSu_TD0Z3H6pysHk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Sam LaGrone
news.usni.org } ~ Navy file photos of guided-missile destroyers USS William P. Lawrence (DDG-110) (top) and USS Stethem (DDG-63) (bottom)... Two U.S. guided-missile destroyers conducted a transit through the strait separating Taiwan and mainland China on Sunday, U.S. 7th Fleet officials told USNI News on Monday. USS Stethem (DDG-63) and USS William P. Lawrence (DDG-110) passed through the 110-mile-wide strait in an overnight transit. “The ships’ transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the U.S. commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. The U.S. Navy will continue to fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows,” Cmdr. Clay Doss, a U.S. 7th Fleet spokesman, told USNI News in a Monday statement. U.S. officials said that Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) interactions with the two destroyers were “safe and professional.” Chinese Foreign Minister Geng Shuang told reporters Monday that Beijing had paid “close attention” to the transit. “The Taiwan issue is the most important and sensitive issue in Sino-U.S. relations,” Geng said, according to The Japan Times...
.
Sea Hunter Unmanned Ship Continues
Autonomy Testing as NAVSEA Moves
Forward with Draft RFP
9y5BwgNGEdmRtV58zJUMI30DXSPQqriiU9YWuPMhBYWwUIdragJ5ON6i0H3F4cdqtCP9k2zLF52bxyRDOke6vLz7KAo4KtV7DiHwdO2UggAvzXSkw6B5pSm3wg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
SRvp0noVECiZ8OHZoDS9VZWVo9nKhJBaJ_3ZjXjEcD1pPlxTdVCCXHyby3fXw1lEMa3n_wNHe-137Gb6L5noocxjCHW6OzrMUgQ7e7EsKrQQsIkfCfriUwXf-A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Megan Eckstein
news.usni.org } ~ The Navy released a draft request for proposals for its Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle as the Office of Naval Research continues to prove out the autonomous control system on a first test ship... The MUSV program – whose role in future fleet operations continues to grow as the Navy looks to become more distributed and more reliant on unmanned ships and planes to supplement manned ones – began as a DARPA research initiative and moved to ONR in January 2018. Robert Brizzolara, the MUSV program manager, told USNI News on April 25 at the Defense Department’s annual Lab Day at the Pentagon that ONR has been focused on building an extensive body of evidence to prove to the fleet the reliability of the MUSV hull and the autonomous control system that lets it sense its way through the seas. Brizzolara said the 132-foot hull has good range and endurance, good sea keeping and an impressive payload capacity due to its size. With no crew requiring berthing, plumbing and other needs, the ship can save on space and weight – and therefore cost. “The combination of no people onboard and lower cost means that a commanding officer, when it becomes an operational asset, could put it in much more hazardous areas and he or she could take more risks with it,” he said. “And if they had enough of them, they could be willing to lose some, and they wouldn’t care because they’re cheap and there’s no people on them. So that’s the benefit.”...
.
.AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Florida Legislature Votes to End 
Sanctuary Cities
SsglPwfcqJAmxvLqsayxqJgOE12P0_8Gof2zKiKaWVXVKGarFfUsekoWv9x9I5hCDcszJomA_tRg2gGlwCrHHJix1pDXQGexuNs65zOOlBSU48suAmr8o2x4gd3l5oqQpDFQEhyL-llJPy3tKqJCbWceywcBjZpOG7Vkw7M=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Arnold Ahlert:  The Florida state legislature has taken a stand against the American Left’s penchant for selective law enforcement. Last Wednesday, the GOP-controlled House passed a bill banning so-called sanctuary cities that harbor illegal aliens and refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The vote was 69-47 along party lines. On Friday, the state Senate passed its version of the ban by a 22-18 margin. Negotiations between the House and Senate will now commence until an identical bill can be sent to Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis for his signature.
 

Barring major changes, the law prohibits local governments from ignoring detainer requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and requires them to hold suspected illegals in jail until the feds can take them into custody. A failure to do so could precipitate fines of up to $5,000 per day. The House version of the bill would also allow lawsuits to be filed against local governments for personal injuries or wrongful deaths tied to sanctuary policies, and suspend or remove government employees or elected officials who refuse to enforce immigration laws.

That very welcome part of the statute stands in stark contrast to the immunity that shields many sanctuary-city officials, most recently upheld by a three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That panel  refused to allow the family of Kate Steinle to sue the city of San Francisco after their daughter was killed by Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a seven-time convicted felon who had been deported five times. Despite ICE’s request for a detainer, former San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi released Zarate, who was ultimately convicted of a firearms charge, but acquitted of murdering Steinle. Following that stunning verdict, Ellen Canale, a spokeswoman for Mayor Ed Lee, made it clear the death of an innocent citizen at the hands of an illegal alien felon wouldn’t alter the status quo one iota. “San Francisco is and always will be a sanctuary city,” she asserted.

Florida is on the verge of preventing similar outrages and, unsurprisingly, Democrats and their leftists allies are apoplectic. Prior to the bill’s passage there were protests staged at the Capitol, and district offices were besieged by sit-ins. The ACLU issued a “Florida Travel Alert,” warning that “Florida residents, citizens and non-citizens, and travelers could face risks of being racially profiled and being detained without probable cause.”

Or, illegal aliens who have no business being in Florida could be detained, prosecuted, and ultimately deported in accordance with federal immigration law.

The Left also played the economics card. The American Business Immigration Coalition sent a letter to the state’s elected officials declaring that “anti-immigrant” legislation will “inflict long-lasting damage to the state of Florida” to the tune of “an annual loss of $121.4M in taxes and $3.5B in GDP, threatening the economic prosperity and safety of all Floridians.”

The letter also trotted out the same tiresome talking points the Left has long used to justify wholesale law-breaking. It stated that the bill “gives traffickers another tool to terrorize and enslave their victims,” that the agricultural industry will be “devastated,” and that both the “documented and undocumented are less likely to commit a crime than native-born citizens.”

Traffickers can only “enslave” those willing to sneak across the border, which remains wide open because a purposefully do-nothing Congress beholden to the globalist agenda allows it — and because the hundreds of sanctuary cities across the nation further incentivize that contemptible reality. That the state’s agricultural industry that would be “devastated” without illegal workers is an argument eerily similar to the onemade by pre-Civil War southern plantation owners who claimed to need slave labor to remain economically viable. And if there’s a more bankrupt argument than the insidious notion that Americans should abide a “reasonable” number of wholly avoidable crimes — including murder and rape — solely to accommodate leftist desires to “fundamentally transform” America, one is hard-pressed to imagine what it is.

Yet another propaganda point was disseminated by The Washington Post. “While the definition of sanctuary cities varies, most analysts say Florida does not have any,” the paper asserts.

If that’s the case, then this bill won’t pose any problem.

But that’s not the case, and no one made that clearer than Miami Police Chief Jorge Colina, who told a Spanish-language radio station that he’d rather be thrown out of the police department than follow the proposed law. “I don’t care if you have papers or don’t have papers, where you came from, or who your parents are,” Colina said. “That’s not my job. My job is to make sure everyone in this city is safe.”

No, a police chief’s job is to enforce the Rule of Law — period. Perhaps Gov. DeSantis, who has already  successfully suspended Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel for his colossal failure of leadership in the Parkland atrocity, will address Colina’s defiance — along with that of every other similarly recalcitrant law-enforcement official — in a similarly no-nonsense manner.

Neptune Beach Republican Cord Byrd, who sponsored the House initiative, spoke to the real issues in play here. “We are more than just a job center. We are a nation of citizens governed by law,” he said. Sen. Joe Gruters, sponsor of the Senate legislation and chairman of the Florida Republican Party, echoed those sentiments. “This bill is about public safety and making sure we remove the criminal element of illegals that are here,” he said. “The president has a laser focus on the failures of Washington in terms of immigration policy, and I think that has made this effort easier.”

Those failures are monumental. According to a recent study by the Pew Research Center, approximately 775,000 illegals reside in Florida, and more than 20% of students attending Florida schools have at least one parent who is an illegal alien.

Yet those figures are likely low-ball estimates. On Nov. 28, 2018, Pew stated that the number of illegals in the U.S. declined to 10.7 million as of 2016.

That a Yale-MIT study pegged the number closer to 22 million? That ICE is currently holding 50,223 migrants, one of the highest total numbers on record? That the pace of illegal border crossings in 2019 alone is  approaching 1.2 million?

The globalist agenda must be served, even if it requires rank propaganda, overt lying, or outright law-breaking to do so.

How twisted is their thinking? In his book Violent Borders, University of Hawaii professor Reece Jones spells it out: “By refusing to abide by a wall, map, property line, border, identity document, or legal regime, mobile people upset the state’s schemes of exclusion, control, and violence.”

No, they don’t. “Mobile people” make an utter mockery of the Rule of Law and legal immigration. Moreover, sanctuary cities are nothing more than a secessionist movement promoting itself as social justice.

The Miami Herald provides great insight into their twisted thinking. “Florida is part of a recent trend of states pushing such policies,” it states.

Enforcing immigration law is “trendy”? Americans have been besieged by such ideological bankruptcy for far too long. Florida just stepped off the propagandist bus. Bravo.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/62651?mailing_id=4238&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4238&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center