Tuesday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Many University Campuses Are 
Playgrounds for Insanity
David Limbaugh
  

AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Socialism and the Jews: A Brief History
p9NHzmUuyKRZCA9nZrEVrnuN-e3tTo9L-uuoY3B6iBz4eLHsMmZsNGT1xSFaTaJD8uAcl7yQrJpjhBSDXN5c05j7oEs44Zngi-byvU6xE0c3g5EhMa5F5Up3=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Joshua Muravchik
mosaicmagazine.com } ~ In late January 1989, almost exactly 30 years ago, the economic historian Robert Heilbroner wrote this epitaph: Less than 75 years after it officially began, the contest between capitalism and socialism is over... capitalism has won...Capitalism organizes the material affairs of humankind more satisfactorily than socialism. That verdict, pronounced by a leading economist who also happened to be a career-long socialist, expressed what seemed to be a global consensus on an issue that had torn the world apart for generations. For a moment, relief and joy at the end of the cold war and of the larger debate behind it soothed the pain of the many nations that had been blighted, some quite horribly, by the lethal fantasy of socialism. Yet, ominously, socialism, so recently considered over and done with, is now back, including in the United States and the United Kingdom, with apostles at high levels of government and with polls showing its rising popularity. Among those with special reason to be wary of this return from the grave are Jews, for no other people has had so fraught and tumultuous a relationship with the socialist idea and the socialist reality. Indeed, Jews have played an unmatched role among both socialism’s genitors and socialism’s victims. Before we return to the present, some history is in order...  https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/history-ideas/2019/04/socialism-and-the-jews-a-brief-history/  
.
Senator Lindsey Graham Outlines Deep State Exit
MDq8RQY7cw-FcwciAYS19LYaRIdxW6V_mt7fo55CfN9Jso1ThU2cBOGZ_2l2mvfjdkU8W9eurbdrbG6ODYU3r43lXzWd1hvDW1KAVWnJQs-PPx6kdEyR-3Co4t5e6aHumjJkpwgT44oLDzGd8KsTwZQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby sundance
theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Those who participated in the 2015/2016 surveillance and spy operations, which evolved into the 2017 through today soft-coup effort, are relying on a defense that Russia ‘hacked’ the 2016 election... This false narrative is how the corrupt administrative state will defend themselves. Pay close attention to this interview and note how Senator Graham supports that narrative saying: “the Russians hacked into John Podesta’s e-mails, the campaign manager for the Democratic candidate for President. The Russians hacked into scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, the candidate for the Democratic Party.” This ‘Russia-hacking narrative’ is the DC ‘chaff and countermeasures‘; when combined with their ‘by-the-book‘ justifications, it becomes their unified defense. Once you accept their baseline, it becomes much more difficult to expose their unlawful conduct. MARGARET BRENNAN: We just heard about this tragic shooting. It was an AR-15-style semi-automatic weapon. Hate crimes seem to be on the rise– SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Right. MARGARET BRENNAN: –in this country. What do we need to do to combat this, prevent it? SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Well, I think somebody interdicted the shooter, thank God, and it could have been worse, but in– I think in California you can’t buy a gun until you’re twenty-one. So let’s find out how this guy got the gun, what his motives were and I’m a big supporter of protective orders, allowing local law enforcement to go to a judge if there’s ample evidence somebody is becoming a danger to themselves or others. About fifteen states have such laws. I’m trying to get a national grant program to incentivize states to pass laws to allow local law enforcement to go to judges to take guns out of hands of people that are showing really disturbing signs or danger signs. And I think in Parkland that would have made a big difference, here I don’t know...
.
New Pentagon Initiatives Address Cybersecurity
Challenges, Industrial Base Fragility
bXQKcYhPUClRzS0yeCy7hG1uGC349Qkw1LDXokyZzCEok_iE4L9CEvuV1SFYWKP6G7Iw41MDCUTaDqlBYgVaLut4VC6R65G80MiczA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Megan Eckstein
news.usni.org } ~ The Pentagon’s acquisition community is going after two major sources of risk within the industrial base: the cybersecurity of companies that do business with the Defense Department... and fragility within certain critical suppliers. Ellen Lord, under secretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, said Thursday at the U.S. Naval Institute annual meeting that “cybersecurity is probably the largest emerging threat we have.” “However, we have these high-level National Institute of Standards and Technology standards that we say industry has to comply with. It is not particularly easy to understand how to comply with a hundred and twenty-some separate requirements,” she said. “So what I’ve mandated is, this year we will come up with a National Cybersecurity Standard with metrics, and we will develop third-party independent auditors who can go and audit against those cybersecurity standards. This is very similar to ISO standards for quality. In that way, we will be able to discriminate between a company that is really cyber-secure and one that is not.” The Navy has had its share of challenges in this area recently, with companies working with the Navy on undersea warfare research or acquisition projects being especially prone to cyber attacks. The Washington Post reported in June that a contractor working with the Naval Undersea Warfare Center in Rhode Island on a supersonic anti-ship missile was hacked by the Chinese government. In December, The Wall Street Journal reported on a Navy review of cyber vulnerabilities that highlighted many attacks in recent months, mostly tied back to China...
.
Diversity and The Death of Free Speech
KFIh6lU1AlOfdhZPxqdOjobbvqO1AUTZqzlDpVOQvuWYJ1Jc7KQH9l-C8hy4y1lUL8x2GRYs_B3NKKj1bX3UyP6EvGS5V4nCDwVzy4P6WQOp4sfDtB8sN25Eao6i_1vVt-D1a-sl7LHH85KDwrcpBik=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby John Glynn
spectator.org } ~ This is an age of trigger warnings and safe spaces. The notion of free speech is an illusion. This is especially true on college campuse. However, this wasn’t always the case... There was a time, not that long ago, when college students were encouraged to expand their minds further. To do so, students were encouraged to open their minds, to consider and debate controversial opinions. After all, the world is an unpredictable place, full of beliefs that are as divisive as they are varied. College was designed to prepare you for the real world. Please note that I use the word was for a very specific reason. For millions of Americans, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are inviolable principles. An attack on any of these ideals is an attack on democracy. On the other hand, millions of others are enamored by the idea of conditional free speech. Those of a sensitive nature must be provided with trigger warnings and safe spaces, maybe even an emotional support animal. Free speech is encouraged… but only if the speaker subscribes to a very specific ideology. Unfortunately, like the worst hostage negotiators in the world, college administrators around the country are acquiescing and giving into the demands of the Social Justice Stasi. Of all the colleges in the United States, perhaps Middlebury is the most spineless. On the 24th of April, Ryszard Legutko, a Polish philosopher and member of the European Parliament, was scheduled to speak at the invitation of Middlebury’s Alexander Hamilton Forum. Interestingly, the forum’s site states the following: We seek to offer students an opportunity to think critically about the relevance of political and constitutional theory to a range of contemporary debates in American public life. Essential to this mission is our aspiration to contribute to a culture of reasoned, civil discussion and debate across political and intellectual differences...   https://spectator.org/diversity-and-the-death-of-free-speech/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=545575b16a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_29_03_58&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-545575b16a-104608113  
.
‘Queer Feminist Mermaid’ 
Surfaces to Challenge Susan Collins
rBP7GBAcfVzfizGsm1FNM-ts0yJ2w60ATUDe-VUIBR1egLSXGChRbGpAmHksFtLEh55iHd54fpeAA4C5xShYxneRPkI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Brent Scher
freebeacon.com } ~ Sensing the lack of a Democratic candidate willing to challenge Sen. Susan Collins (R., Maine), a "queer feminist mermaid" named Bre Kidman—politically mobilized by the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation fight... has filed to enter the race. Collins has represented Maine in the Senate since 1997, and each of her three reelection fights have ended with double-digit margin victories. But Democrats responded to her deciding vote to confirm Kavanaugh by vowing to make her run for a fifth term a real challenge,  expecting a crowded field of candidates to step up to the plate. That hasn't materialized. The first Democratic candidate to file for the race is Kidman, currently a part-time attorney and active artist in the community, and it was a bit of an accident. "My launch came out from under me—I didn't realize people were watching the filings so closely," Kidman told the Washington Free Beacon after the filing was reported by the local Sun Journal. The first-time politician decided to run after training from the Victory Institute, which runs programs for potential LGBTQ candidates. Kidman hopes to be the first gender nonbinary queer elected to the U.S. Senate. On  Facebook, Kidman is described as a "criminal defense attorney by day and radical fat queer/performance artist/model/musician/activist most other times." On Spotify, Kidman is "Bee Kay Esq." and the biography is the same...
.
.AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Many University Campuses Are Playgrounds for Insanity

David Limbaugh
 

If you think the left hasn’t taken over university life in America, you are probably not paying close enough attention or in denial.

I’m not just talking about the liberalism of the professors and the core curriculum but about all of college life. There are glaring examples of leftist extremism everywhere you turn, and they’re so loony that even sane liberal parents should be concerned.

In September, a Michigan State University student awoke from his nap to an apparently unbearable sight, according to The College Fix. His roommate was watching a video of conservative commentator Ben Shapiro. I can guess what some of you must be thinking as you read this: “I sure am glad my kids were never exposed to such provocations, such obnoxious, inconsiderate and uncaring roommates.”

You are probably also thinking, “But if my kid had been the subject of such a triggering event, I hope he would have had the presence of mind to exercise self-help and extricate himself from the hostile environment.”

In this instance, the innocent victim didn’t react violently. He calmly booted up his own computer and filed a complaint against his roommate with the administration’s bias reporting system. Kind of makes you well up with vicarious pride, no?

“Ben Shapiro is known for his inflammatory speech that criticizes and attacks the African American community,” wrote the student in his complaint. “I thought hate had no place on MSU’s campus yet MSU has roomed me with someone who supports hate speach” (misspelling in the original quote).

As a parent you will also be gratified to learn that the university dutifully dispatched an investigator to dig into this urgent matter and to work for a “room change if the claimant would like one.”

A few observations. Ben Shapiro communicates directly and refuses to bow to the gods of political correctness, but his speech is not inflammatory unless you define that as any utterance that leftist students disagree with and therefore unreasonably consider to be incendiary. Nor does Shapiro attack the African American community, and the false allegation that he does is far more inflammatory than anything he says in his podcasts or speeches.

That a major university would even dignify a complaint so frivolous on its face is deeply disturbing. In a sane campus situated in a sane world, a sane administration would have informed the offended student that universities are institutions of higher learning that promote freedom of academic inquiry. It would have told the student that he, not his innocent roommate, is the one who has the problem. He would have to learn that differing political viewpoints are not grounds for psychiatric alarm or switching roommates.

If, on the other hand, the Shapiro-friendly roommate had persistently accosted the offended snowflake in a ceaseless effort to proselytize him, that might be a different story. But in this case we are talking about a roommate minding his own business and watching a video on his own computer. As long as leftists all around us continue to portray mainstream conservative speech as hate speech and inherently racist, sexist, homophobic and all of the rest — and that’s exactly what they do — then we’ll see such faux controversies continue to proliferate. Our leftist culture is indoctrinating kids from the crib to the academy that conservative ideas are so heinous that merely harboring them in the presence of a liberal is a microaggression that demands redress. If I’m exaggerating, then please explain the aforementioned incident — and hundreds of others like it.

I’m sure you realize that if my word limit for this column were 70,000 words, I could fill it with similar examples. Let me leave you with a few more from The College Fix, lest you think I’m blowing conservative smoke. For more, check out the website.

Wake Forest University is hosting a series of “listening sessions” for faculty and staff of color (no white people allowed) to promote “inclusivity” in response to a student protest over “white supremacy.” Don’t bother to look up the definition of “inclusivity.” Leftists have seized control of our dictionaries, too. LOL.

During a guest lecture at Boston University, a University of Washington professor who specializes in “whiteness studies” reportedly railed against colorblindness, saying that white people who see people as individuals rather than as members of their race are “dangerous.” I hope I don’t need to remind you that this is wholly out of phase with the teachings of the universally revered Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. — not to mention just outright bizarre.

I shouldn’t have to issue a disclaimer, but as a matter of self-protection I will: Nothing I’m saying here is to diminish actual displays of racism when they occur. They can and should be addressed. But it should be obvious that the political left has bastardized our language by redefining terms to demonize political opponents and suppress their speech.

Incalculable damage is being done by characterizing differing opinions as “hate” and “racist” when they are nothing of the sort. Leftists are causing immeasurable suspicion, distrust and divisiveness in teaching that conservatives and/or Trump supporters are bigoted. Such slanders are exacerbating the very conditions they purport to address, and people need to speak out against this destructive trend in our culture and on our campuses.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/62623?mailing_id=4233&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4233&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center