Tuesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
People Who Hate Their Country Won't Serve It
CYT7XxiejOUqyxeyOmGDWeo8z897BeOz_VAGQ2j5GhEC4Hqpu7_pbORj9Q-wnUnfZXGqzh2jBQqEheWYSTkfFqN0vo-Ns-5OJ3VEiymU5sS5yfTHmtYG10TDO_aOdOBUnew4xWuzLxOxgnV7APvWPwv-Dmzx8VY2WG8IUW8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Brian Mark Weber  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Federal Government of Somalia, U.S. conduct airstrike against al-Shabaab terrorists  
JnbZsWBUnoDAjRUKgw8_PQj7xvi3VCG90zZUUvXk62uGEA00US9ib-_MUG1X_g3aoGnjclj6HTMyaUyxrF2DKW76GxBkv-ZhcR7Et4654b0Yb_ltNqXEM6zY9jmcXf_7iAHSO5mI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by africom.mil ~ In coordination with the Federal Government of Somalia, U.S. Africa Command conducted an airstrike targeting al-Shabaab terrorists... in the vicinity of Qunyo Barrow, Somalia, Jan. 16. “Al-Shabaab presents a threat to America, the African people, and our international partners,” said U.S. Army Maj. Gen. William Gayler, director of operations, U.S. Africa Command. “They are a known terrorist affiliate of al-Qaeda, who continue to radicalize and actively recruit. Persistent pressure on the network helps prevent its broader spread.” Initial assessment concluded the airstrike killed two (2) terrorists. We currently assess no civilians were injured or killed as a result of this airstrike. U.S. Africa Command will continue to work with its partners to transfer the responsibility for long-term security in Somalia to the Federal Government of Somalia and its Member States. In support of the Federal Government of Somalia, U.S. forces will use all effective and appropriate methods to assist in the protection of the Somali people, including partnered military counterterrorism operations with the Federal Government of Somalia and Somali National Army forces.
.
The Ruling Class Impeachment
NJZ-guP9oMsWCwiHvwTXwa1jUv1Br8oqCs8ApSHh66tc0b-ZOrOSTF6nqSxTvrrWx-uflQT3b8r08ONOknFfJf5kDjG-EQOBNt9a4_kWmjivfD5GxaqLNC-nBFqrM1lx5FsxLKeDnBRcGShlB1ZMxFlWQiA6kD5HtEE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by JEFFREY LORD
{ spectator.org } ~ January 20, 2017 — three years ago today. The headline in the Washington Post: The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun... The time the article was posted? 12:19 pm — exactly 19 minutes after Donald John Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. The very first sentence began this way: The effort to impeach President Donald John Trump is already underway. This week that campaign will begin to reach its conclusion as the impeachment trial of the President begins. Make no mistake what we are about to see. This is the continuation of a slow motion coup d’état by what can only be called the American Ruling Class. It is a televised middle finger to millions of Americans who elected Donald Trump for a reason — to put an end to an arrogant, frequently bipartisan, Ruling Class. A Ruling Class drunk on power and awash in corruption. As the week begins, recall scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s infamous campaign remark: You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up… they are irredeemable. And not to be forgotten this week as well is this telling remark from then-candidate Barack scumbag/liar-nObama in 2008: You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the scumbag/liar-Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations. However the trial of the President proceeds — on the road to his already foregone acquittal — right there in those words of scumbag/liar-Clinton and scumbag/liar-nObama is the underlying reason for this impeachment. Take a hard look at the absolute resistance by liar-Pelosi, scumbag/liar-Schiff and company to calling Hunter Biden — and ex-Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden — as witnesses. In an impeachment in which they insist that there must be witnesses, they furiously resist calling the loose lips liar-Bidens. Why? Because to do so will reveal just how corrupt the Ruling Class has become in its quest for power and money. The Hunter Biden dealings in Ukraine and China are merely the tip of the massive iceberg of corruption by Ruling Class elites who exploit their family connections in a seemingly endless quest for money and even more power...  https://spectator.org/the-ruling-class-impeachment/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=6f14fa791f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_01_20_02_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-6f14fa791f-104608113  
.
What's Next for the Iran Nuclear Deal?
-urlYw7CJXpNmCD8PjFD2CdoWZYIJ2MeBHPHqoHtVbmq6DQ-CFPhbMwm1V3Kcw18bN5snYNWDQx_DPvc2rKIrwHUOg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Soeren Kern
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ Britain, France and Germany, the three European signatories of the Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)... have activated the agreement's dispute mechanism in an effort to force Tehran into compliance with its commitment to curb its nuclear program. The three European countries — also known as the E3 — triggered the so-called Dispute Resolution Mechanism (DRM) on January 14, a week after Iranian authorities  announced that they would no longer be bound by any of the agreement's restrictions in terms of the numbers or type of centrifuges that they can operate or the level of uranium enrichment that they can pursue. The DRM (Paragraphs 36 and 37 of the JCPOA) starts the clock on a process that could result in the return of international sanctions on Iran. The deal's signatories now have up to 30 days to resolve their differences, although that time period can be extended by consensus. If the dispute cannot be solved, the matter could be brought before the UN Security Council and could result in the re-imposition of sanctions that had been lifted under the deal. That effort, however, could also easily be blocked by a Chinese or Russian veto. Iranian authorities said that they were justified in violating the deal because the United States broke the July 2015 agreement by withdrawing in May 2018. In a statement, the E3 foreign ministers rejected Tehran's argument: "We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPOA. Contrary to its statements, Iran has never triggered the JCPOA Dispute Resolution Mechanism and has no legal grounds to cease implementing the provisions of the agreement." The E3 stressed that their objective was to save the JCPOA: "We do this in good faith with the overarching objective of preserving the JCPOA and in the sincere hope of finding a way forward to resolve the impasse through constructive diplomatic dialogue, while preserving the agreement and remaining within its framework. In doing so, our 3 countries are not joining a campaign to implement maximum pressure against Iran. Our hope is to bring Iran back into full compliance with its commitments under the JCPOA."...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15466/iran-nuclear-deal-what-next 
NSC Russia Expert Escorted From White House Under Intelligence Investigation
8iXm8MSwf3JjTrTeBEfkTw0ma9uzwaeZ_S83DsIwj9Ri4fHaxL8AHh3rksqNec6IYzhjCzuuXsMXhEtZCvAdn7k9Nk8J1tpihygx5mL0I3UHOBbIvvFivaOXXkvFbjwQyQU8pVy44P_aLVMkr9Q4Eg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ CT held off reporting on this explosive story until we could see if a tell-tale consequence surfaced; perhaps it has... On Friday the National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs, Andrew Peek, was escorted from the White House grounds and is currently under a security investigation. There are few details about why Peek was physically removed and is under a very serious investigation; however, some of Andrew Peek’s professional background details tell a story. The connection to Gen. John Allen is a MASSIVE warning flare. Andrew Peek, the senior director for European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council, has been placed on administrative leave pending a security-related investigation, people familiar with the situation tell Axios.Andrew Peek came from the State Department.  Because the appointment happened in the past two months, it would appear Andrew Peek was recommended by the Dept. of State and accepted for the NSC post by National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien. Here’s how it looks:  Andrew Peek was a mole. A resistance spy sent into the Trump administration as part of the allied deep state resistance effort. Someone caught him attempting to access something, and here’s how CTH can tell. The biggest flare that identifies Andrew Peek’s ideology is the connection to former U.S. General John Allen. CTH has tracked Allen for several years; he was used as part of scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s campaign. He spoke at the DNC convention for scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton...
.
President Trump Convention 
Speech to American Farm Bureau
2sBK_HitxVS-TQVcCMYdFTgMjttJGO1IurqdCLeSuC1Dej-PWA-ZhlOG7NbKuNBFxNzhhdqRHqxeGeGUpCetfR-YR_3CrBhyPlxiDbsdYI1cEKWNIQxBQtKFQADWJysHcJZo9geg0CkhWJVNjpYOMCdCig=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Sunday evening President Donald Trump delivered a key-note speech during the American Farm Bureau National Convention.
.
Democrat Radicalism Creating a Dangerous Void
By Fletch Daniels
{ americanthinker.com } ~ The media generally speak of Democrats as falling into one of two wings, usually contrasted as the progressive wing or as some mythical establishment moderate wing... commie-Bernie Sanders and his squabbling squaw sidekick are placed in that first wing, while loose lips liar-Joe Biden is always slotted into the second one alongside the blooming meatball. But, at this point, Democrat politicians so fear their deranged leftist base that if there are indeed two wings, both are sprouting from the left side of the albatross, which could explain why the debates are so circular and tired as to even prompt a sad sigh from Van Jones. When all of them are for and against the same things, what's the point in tuning in? When Malarkey isn't challenging Americans to push-up contests or protecting his son's privileged position with mouth open at a foreign cash beer bong, he sounds as though he is feeling the Bern. All of these candidates are a product of the same Democrat base, which is how we landed at this point where the so-called Democrat moderates of today would have been considered dangerous radicals just a few short years ago. If you put together a radical menu, they are all ordering just about everything on it. Destruction of the energy industry? Order up a super-sized portion of that. Abortion über alles? I'll take a side of that and throw in some infanticide, please. Government health care? Naturally. The green new $90-trillion nightmare? Hey, just print more money and start killing cows. Destruction of national borders and open invitation for all the world's unskilled workers to flock to America to receive taxpayer largesse? It's the compassionate thing to do. Gun confiscation? Treating Iranian protestors like inconvenient lepers?  Reparations? Keep those refills coming...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
People Who Hate Their Country Won't Serve It
CYT7XxiejOUqyxeyOmGDWeo8z897BeOz_VAGQ2j5GhEC4Hqpu7_pbORj9Q-wnUnfZXGqzh2jBQqEheWYSTkfFqN0vo-Ns-5OJ3VEiymU5sS5yfTHmtYG10TDO_aOdOBUnew4xWuzLxOxgnV7APvWPwv-Dmzx8VY2WG8IUW8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Brian Mark Weber:  There was a time in America when each generation learned about love of country and the importance of service. It didn’t matter whether a kid grew up in the Bronx or in a small town in Mississippi. Despite our geographic and cultural differences, there was a common thread that tied us all together.

What happened to that America?

During Ronald Reagan’s farewell address in 1989, the former president asked, “Are we doing a good enough job teaching our children what America is and what she represents in the long history of the world? Those of us who are over 35 or so years of age grew up in a different America. We were taught, very directly, what it means to be an American.”

Reagan continued, “We absorbed, almost in the air, a love of country and an appreciation of its institutions. If you didn’t get these things from your family you got them from the neighborhood, from the father down the street who fought in Korea or the family who lost someone at Anzio. Or you could get a sense of patriotism from school. And if all else failed you could get a sense of patriotism from the popular culture.”

This is one of the most striking differences between America in 1989 and in 2020. Millions of young people today are taught by their parents, teachers, and certainly by Hollywood elites that the country they were born into is racist, sexist, and unworthy of patriotic pride. The very founding principles of our nation are unjust and deeply flawed, they say.

Even the Declaration of Independence, humanity’s greatest document of freedom, is now regarded by young Americans as the product of racists, oppressors, and purveyors of genocide. And we wonder why our children grow up to reject the very notion of service to country. Instead, they envision a future in which our traditions, institutions, and values are burned to the ground amid the battle cries of “social justice” warriors.

“Today, neither right-wing populists nor left-wing social reformers seem to have much faith left in those principles,” Dan McLaughlin writes at National Review. “The former are willing to discard them whenever temporary advantage can be gained in the tribal culture war, and the latter see American principles as the enemy.”

Is it any wonder that our military lacks representation from urban and coastal population centers, where American values are more likely to be denigrated than inculcated, and where parents and grandparents are less likely to have served? And is it any wonder that the opposite is true in smaller towns and in more conservative families and communities, where love of country is still the rule rather than the exception?

“More and more, new recruits are the children of old recruits,” Dave Phillips and Tim Arango report in The New York Times. “In 2019, 79 percent of Army recruits reported having a family member who served. For nearly 30 percent, it was a parent — a striking point in a nation where less than 1 percent of the population serves in the military.” According to their research, significantly fewer numbers of recruits come from northern states or big cities on the coasts such as New York or Los Angeles.

They add, “In communities where veterans are plentiful, teachers, coaches, mothers, uncles and other mentors often steer youths toward military service. In communities where veterans are scarce, influential adults are more wary.”

Put more bluntly, liberals and their progeny are less likely to serve, and recent research seems to validate the claim that more conservative regions of the country are generally more pro-military.

Sociology professors at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley published research indicating that party affiliation has shifted in the U.S. military. Denise Marie-Ordway writes at Journalist’s Resource that the research shows “among those [service personnel] who came of age before World War II, 55.4 percent identified as Democrats, 38.3 percent identified as Republicans and 6.2 percent considered themselves Independents. Fast forward several decades and party ties look quite different. About a third of veterans who turned 18 between 1972 and 2016 identified as Democratic. Just more than half said they were Republican, and 16.7 percent were Independent.”

If our country seems to be coming apart at the seams, we need look no further than this seismic shift in military service and the root causes behind it.   

~The Patriot Post

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Bonnie

    I agree with you on those issues

  • WHAT HAPPENED THE KIDS ARE BEING TAUGHT NOTHING OF OUR HISTORY OR AMERICA HERSELF AND WHY WE ARE GREAT.  THEY ARE BEING TAUGHT GREEN ENERGY AND HATE OF THIS NATION.  TIME TO REVERSE THAT QUICK

This reply was deleted.