Tues/Med PM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
commie-AOC 'Ignorance' 
Deepens Demo Race-Card Rift
E6-BAYoGK2_6Y1uF7EGKKbx7xxb2Yg7THSt13wfalxQWNYx-JqsaRmNLhEpzq3AiJopZY2XKGpbYl2cAPRY8CPbJEAHepfgklzDZIHxKUna2b3UCXgVM3oZUrsPH2X_MgIftDAUgh-O87Ls0vubXbX8w5DdX9pbVRfoqJ28=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Why John Roberts’ Citizenship Decision 
Is Legally And Politically Corrupt 
PcI35BVN46ekX7kM9G6c0S6zIWzVqKMhx5DRBJrLYdF_RIZPOHtXdb4zrw9mbTJZbYP_L2WJwh-z_K1CKKiqA2UDXlKeYt35Qj1S2iDSoHrOdWnYy8VjxiCBxOaHpas__wIBxVZwVfVuWHw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Ben Weingarten
thefederalist.com } ~ Are we a nation of laws or a nation of men? Previously, the most radically leftist federal judges had failed this test on cases pertaining to the Trump administration... Now the highest court in the land has joined them. The fight over whether the simple question, “Is this person a citizen of the United States?” could appear on the 2020 U.S. census already implicated major issues of public policy, including immigration, national sovereignty, and voting rights. But the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the matter has now transcended these issues to challenge the rule of law itself, once again raising the question: Who is really “violating norms,” “undermining institutions” and creating “constitutional crises”—President Trump, or his Resisters?The majority opinion in Department of Commerce v. New York, delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts, reads like former FBI director scumbag-James Comey’s infamous  statement regarding former secretary of state scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s email server. It presents a methodical, compelling case that should result in a just decision, only to undo the case on the most baseless of grounds. Roberts’ opinion affirms that including a question about citizenship in the decennial census is constitutional, writing that the “Enumeration Clause…permits Congress, and by extension the Secretary of Commerce, to inquire about citizenship on the census questionnaire.” It affirms that the process by which it was to be reinstated was “reasonable, and reasonably explained,” consistent with the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). That should have been the end of it. As Justice Clarence Thomas put it in a separate opinion: “Our only role in this case is to decide whether the Secretary complied with the law and gave a reasoned explanation for his decision. The Court correctly answers these questions in the affirmative…That ought to end our inquiry.”...  https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/15/john-roberts-citizenship-decision-legally-politically-corrupt/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=9f5335681a-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-9f5335681a-83771801   
Why Trump’s Approach To Renewable Fuel 
Mandates Is A Win-Win For Farmers
And Refineries 
V9Eu_qbYactXAjUtGSYp8svTOYkChUHJlMaA9JWcNYjnNgKonqTWUb21HJR3F8KWd26Kvl_-ihM-xa3Z0rvpZd7POb1EBZfdsvC0IP6lsY2APFGhFe7WvGQzeCjRheb_r4cZ-Iv6XeI=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Joseph R. Pitts
thefederalist.com } ~ All legislators know that every action has an equal and opposite reaction... No scenario underscores this truth better than the game of give-and-take President Trump must play with two core segments of his voter bloc: farmers and the blue-collar manufacturing workers of forgotten America. This is particularly true with the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which Congress passed in 2005 in an attempt to eliminate U.S. dependence on imported oil. To create more U.S. fuel supply using less oil, the RFS says a set number of fuel gallons annually must contain biofuel, such as ethanol, an additive generally produced from corn. This issue has divided Trump’s base like few others. Crucial battleground states with strong manufacturing bases, like Pennsylvania, point to the recent bankruptcy of Philadelphia Energy Solutions to argue that blending ethanol into the fuel supply has threatened the livelihood of their small businesses and put thousands of jobs at risk. At the same time, however, farm states like Iowa believe that the RFS’ incentivization of ethanol needs to remain in place to maintain some semblance of a level playing field. Undertaking the delicate balancing act of appeasing these two core groups of support may seem like an impossible task, but the Trump administration has done a commendable job of it without violating any of its principles. It has done so through embracing the free market, making use of deregulation for both sides. President Trump’s EPA has prevented many of the RFS’s worst unintended consequences by issuing a steady stream of hardship waivers from the biofuel blending mandate to the small refineries that face disproportionate economic hardship from meeting its requirements. The EPA has had the authority to grant these waivers from the RFS’s inception, but this administration has used them more frequently and effectively. This has given more small refineries relief from the costly, speculative marketplace Big Oil and Wall Street have created out of the RFS, helping to open some of the market mechanisms in the energy industry that have been suppressed for the better part of two decades. Simultaneously, Trump has kept farm states happy by similarly employing deregulation to farmers’ advantage. For example, on June 11, he traveled to Iowa to sign an executive order that rolled back red tape for ethanol producers, a move that helped corn growers without expanding the RFS or affecting the day-to-day operations of the small, independent refineries in need of relief...  https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/15/trumps-approach-renewable-fuel-mandates-win-win-farmers-refineries/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=9f5335681a-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-9f5335681a-83771801    
.
Why Eastern Europeans Fear Islam: 
The Siege of Vienna, 1683
m_wwudsfAwsDyqbVJEiJn8t33glR3-tto7R0D7s-hB_h8veD1W63ealig1tnfqcqCiRpo25iTjUk_vfgqjbClfJ_-aABp-3Hap39XQeEvr10ntcFqAA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Raymond Ibrahim
americanthinker.com } ~ “Austria acts against Muslims almost every day because of their subconscious fear of Turks,” writes Turkish historian Erhan Afyoncu in the Daily Sabah...  “Austrians have not forgotten the fear and their emperor’s escape in the Battle of Vienna in 1683. When Turks were defeated in the Battle of Vienna, Europeans were so happy…” Because this is true, a brief refresher of the Siege of Vienna is in order, particularly as its anniversary is right around now: Around July 15, 1683, the largest Islamic army ever to invade European territory -- which is saying much considering that countless invasions preceded it since the eighth century -- came and surrounded Vienna, then the heart of the Holy Roman Empire and longtime nemesis of Islam. Some 200,000 Muslim combatants, under the leadership of the Ottomans -- the one state in nearly fourteen centuries of Islamic history most dedicated to and founded on the principles of jihad -- invaded under the same rationale that so-called “radical” groups, such as the Islamic State, cite to justify their jihad on “infidels.” Or, to quote the leader of the Muslim expedition, Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa, because Vienna was perceived as the head of the infidel snake, it needed to be laid low so that “all the Christians would obey the Ottomans.” This was no idle boast; sources describe this Mustafa as “fanatically anti-Christian.” After capturing a Polish town in 1674 he ordered all the Christian prisoners to be skinned alive and their stuffed hides sent as trophies to Ottoman Sultan Muhammad IV. Such supremacist hate was standard and on display during the elaborate pre-jihad ceremony presaging the siege of Vienna.  Then, the sultan, “desiring him Mustafa to fight generously for the Mahometan faith,” to quote a contemporary European source, placed “the standard of the Prophet… into his hands for the extirpation of infidels, and the increase of Muslemen.” Once the massive Muslim army reached and surrounded the walls of Vienna around July 15, Mustafa followed protocol. In 628, his prophet Muhammad had sent an ultimatum to Emperor Heraclius: aslam taslam, “submit to Islam and have peace.” Heraclius rejected the summons, jihad was declared against Christendom as enshrined in Koran 9:29, and in a few decades, two-thirds of the then Christian world -- including Spain, all of North Africa, Egypt, and Greater Syria -- were conquered...
.
scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters to ‘SOB’ Trump: 
‘We Don’t Take Sh*t from Nobody’
1dK23adI2XmOMw2RWpGa1LOPdv5D4ekyxSNS4eFO3SwM28JXplKmYw9UHbccwVnqztRoKo3dlHenH-biX9SycpRhRdWbj5KGjFdGfIVBKK8c-JRT268O2aJYIjyP17Mf5hjA27W3_g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by TONY LEE
breitbart.com } ~ Rep. scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters (D-CA) over the weekend reportedly called President Donald Trump an “SOB” and declared, “We don’t take shit from nobody.”... scumbag/mad-Waters ripped Trump at Essence Fest for labelling NFL national anthem protesters like sicko-Colin Kaepernick “sons of bitches” and reportedly said of Trump, “He’s the only SOB I know.” “I’m not intimidated. I’m not afraid,” scumbag/mad-Waters reportedly added. “All of my life I have been trained to deal with demagogues like him. I will take him on any day of the week. And so what I want to leave with you today is this is our time, ladies.” scumbag/mad-Waters, one of the most vocal leaders of the impeach Trump movement, encouraged black women not to get discouraged or disgusted and to never give up while Trump is president. “Show Donald Trump who we are!” scumbag/mad-Waters reportedly yelled before she left the stage. “We don’t take shit from nobody.” She is one very sick person.
.
California lawmakers pass bill requiring 
Trump, presidential hopefuls release 
tax returns to appear on ballot
By MARINA PITOFSKY
thehill.com } ~ The California State Assembly and Senate has passed legislation mandating that all presidential and state gubernatorial candidates release their tax information in order to appear on that state’s primary ballot... The bill, passed overwhelmingly in the State Assembly with a 57-17 vote Monday. It passed with a 29-10 vote in the state Senate on Thursday. The legislation will require candidates to share income tax returns for the previous five taxable years with the California state government. That information will then be available to voters on the state’s secretary of state website. Lawmakers also included an “urgency clause” in the legislation, meaning it would take effect immediately and force the candidates running for president in 2020 to share their financial disclosures. President Trump has long refused to disclose his tax information. Last week, House Democrats filed a federal lawsuit to obtain Trump’s tax returns with a complaint against the Treasury Department and the IRS intended to get a judge to order the administration to respond to requests and subpoenas for the documents. "Presidential candidates need to put their own interests aside in the name of transparency," California state Sen. Mike McGuire (D), who co-authored the legislation, said in a written statement, according to ABC 7 News. "So far, our current President has done the opposite and it's time that President Trump steps up, stops with the obstruction, and follows through with 40 years of time-honored tradition that has made this nation's democracy stronger. This commonsense legislation applies equally to all candidates, from all political parties, including the Governor of California." The legislation will be heard in the California state Senate this week and sent to Gov. scumbag-Gavin Newsom (D) if approved. On Monday, New York Gov. scumbag-Andrew Cuomo (D) signed legislation that would allow chairmen of three congressional committees to request Trump’s state tax documents: the House Ways and Means Committee, Senate Finance Committee and the Joint Committee on Taxation.  https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/452757-bill-passed-by-california-lawmakers-would-require-trump  
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
commie-AOC 'Ignorance' Deepens Demo 
Race-Card Rift
E6-BAYoGK2_6Y1uF7EGKKbx7xxb2Yg7THSt13wfalxQWNYx-JqsaRmNLhEpzq3AiJopZY2XKGpbYl2cAPRY8CPbJEAHepfgklzDZIHxKUna2b3UCXgVM3oZUrsPH2X_MgIftDAUgh-O87Ls0vubXbX8w5DdX9pbVRfoqJ28=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Mark Alexander:  Yesterday, in “liar-Pulosi vs. commie-Ocasio-Cortez,” Nate Jackson noted yet another significant riftopened up between Democrat Party leadership and the new Socialist Democrats headed by commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
 

In response to Speaker liar-Nancy Pulosi’s assertion that commie-Ocasio-Cortez and her trio of useful idiots — worthless-Ilhan Omar, worthless-Rashida Tlaib, and worthless-Ayanna Pressley — are masters at promoting themselves on social-media platforms, commie-AOC responded by asserting that Pelosi was “singling out newly elected women of color.”

That’s right — she accused the leader of her party of being a racist.

In response, another Demo person of more color, Rep. William Lacy Clay of Missouri, fired back at commie-AOC, saying it was asinine for commie-Ocasio-Cortez and her “squad” to accuse liar-Pulosi of racism. “I find it juvenile, their tactics. I find their ignorance to be beyond belief about American history,” he said. “How dare they try to play the race card?” Clay added, “It shows their lack of sensitivity to racism. To fall back on that [trope] is a weak argument. It has no place in a civil discussion. It shows they have no sensibility to different members from our caucus.”

Earlier, liar-Pulosi had chastised the head of commie-Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, for comparing moderate Democrats to segregationists. Chakrabarti said centrist Democrats (yes, there are still a few of those) were the “new Southern Democrats” who “certainly seem hell bent to do to black and brown people today what the old Southern Democrats did in the 40s.”

When your party’s platform is built on identity politics, the inevitable outcome is identity infighting.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/64243?mailing_id=4417&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4417&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center