Tues/Med PM ~ TheFrontPageCove

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Someone Get Poor Jim Acosta 
Hazardous Duty Pay, Quick! 
by David Limbaugh  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Nasty, Rude Libtard Went Way Too Far 
in Mocking Sarah Sanders at WHCD
uLg7zsZPUKoHvaIFcBSPupWATPVClJ9k4jynfI_tG2xUN8LJxFC_mDOBM6ToA-Jcd3ZbWwvae6GaLKlpmmHBxqWIoYdi8X1jnCgw6EM7hckg5f2Mmq4P6LWe10-lkm6XMe5s9e4IRenG=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
{ rickwells.us } ~ Sarah Sanders knew she was walking into the serpent’s lair as the prime target... seated next to the no talent liberal scum that was hired to hurl insults loosely described as a comedic appearance. Pathetic and rude do not equate to humorous, but that wasn’t the point. It was nothing more than an opportunity to demean President Trump and his staff, with Sanders as the designated stationary target, for the subhuman mongrels of the libtard left. She must have felt like walking over and decking the smug, nasally voiced twit, but controlled herself, portraying herself in a dignified manner as the trash, particularly this unfunny nobody, showed themselves for exactly what they are. The temptation for Sanders to position the pitcher within her easy reach across the chops of her antagonist must have been almost irresistible. The supposed comedian, Michelle Wolf, bears more resemblance to a 53 Buick than a funny person, as was quickly demonstrated over the course of her painful and antagonistic remarks. It was so bad that even ABC’s Jonathan Karl, seated next to Sanders, found it difficult to pretend her “jokes” were humorous or anything other than a string of mean spirited insults with no redeeming value...
.
Control the Words, Control the CulturelA5S7_uK0ueDLhBE49WiDcBYlyXnoNQF3aGvn2tcok8M1K1Olgw7BBs37hzW1hEsSe-wHBxZjk-zpSPx2JVP2p77P9JotA0MDWj3lV4VaQlnL8lwCUA8u3qU6abMEqO2KImtl4eP40uAMD7Vpp8naBx4_Vo_REhRFNxAUes=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Michael Knowles
{ prageru.com } ~ What’s in a word? Does it matter, for example, whether we call a foreigner who illegally moves to the United States an “illegal alien” or an “undocumented immigrant”?... Because language shapes how we see our world, the culture war is first and foremost a war of words – and the left is winning. The consequences can be seen everywhere: in politics, in education, in media. In this week’s video, Michael Knowles, host of the Michael Knowles Show, explains why we should not cede another syllable.
.
Iranians killed in alleged Israeli strike on military site in Syria
KqSxedQAEEWlqGVGRC3t9fqx2dCITi59cGuZEra_inEBqBBbsc-jzxB5DkGmZbbhdkDYszlG9lMAOY8sfOeEpkaBh_anVLPw6cTho3EhuSr6Wsq-kc-T6jVZ7lQT6WWiyMIVZx_l81-eF80SjsjcrlRY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by ANNA AHRONHEIM
{ jpost.com } ~ The Syrian army confirmed that Sunday that several military bases in northern Syria were struck... in an attack blamed on Israel by the Hezbollah-affiliated newspaper Al Akhbar. According to official news agency SANA, a military source said that “some military sites in the countryside of Hama and Aleppo provinces were exposed at 10:30 PM to a new aggression with hostile rockets.” The explosions following the strike registered as a 2.6 magnitude earthquake by the European Mediterranean Seismological Center, but the weapons used did not cause the quake. Over 18 people were killed and another 60 were wounded, Sky News Arabia reported citing regime media.  Al Akhbar reported the targets of the strike were Syrian army bases being used by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps and Shi'ite militias with troops from Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan...  https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iranians-killed-in-alleged-Israeli-strike-on-military-site-in-Syria-553099?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=30-4-2018&utm_content=iranians-killed-in-alleged-israeli-strike-on-military-site-in-syria-553099
.
Flooding the Voter Rolls in US and Greece
k-oUB4FjOxafJZtzIKYxswTxcBqZRguLWy9jL31BEh7KEto0pjR8gn2XqJ4J0WC9sHykGkymE9LgeO4DxntSqZxznbRVfg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Maria Polizoidou
{ gatestoneinstitute.org }~ As Greece struggles with accelerating economic decline and an increasing lack of public faith in the political leadership... the ruling Syriza coalition appears to be adopting a strategy of garnering votes from immigrants by expediting their naturalization process. According to a recent report in the Greek daily Parapolitika, Interior Minister Panos Skourletis is laying the groundwork to enable hundreds of thousands of immigrants to become citizens and vote in the next elections. Although the mandate of Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras ends in September 2019, some analysts have been predicting a call for elections by the end of 2018. Until now, candidates for Greek citizenship had to be vetted by a committee. Under the new system, applicants will be granted citizenship automatically if they correctly answer 20 out of 30 questions online. In addition, the government is planning to allow immigrants over the age of 65 to obtain Greek IDs, without testing their knowledge of the Greek language. In other words, it will be easier to obtain Greek citizenship than a Greek fishing license. As a result, a total of 800,000 immigrants -- almost one-tenth of the native Greek population -- will soon become citizens. Transposed to the United States, that would be the equivalent of 32,000,000 new voters...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12227/voter-rolls-greece 
.
Trump has the constitutional authority to fire Mueller -- Here's why 
UvySaYTFl3q5rE5Ru6G7yR__j9LRGqusitesGbRVib93sNp05H8ZOMRA5jhspAiWWw4qEiyK2tIW0_orma6mY_KwDWMAktQgv7sBzzN9DwRsCVREup_8fn045d9vboS_zp-09vtBePo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Hans A. von Spakovsky 
{ foxnews.com } ~ It would be unconstitutional for Congress to prevent President Trump from firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller... who is probing Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election. I’m not saying that firing Mueller would be a wise move politically, nor am I urging the president to do so. That’s another issue. But under the Constitution, it is beyond the power of Congress to limit or impose conditions on any president’s authority to remove a political appointee within the Justice Department or any other department in the executive branch. Whether you think Donald Trump is an absolutely wonderful president or an absolutely awful one, this holds true, as it does for all other presidents, regardless of political party. Senators Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Chris Coons, D-Del., are nevertheless pressing ahead to seek passage of legislation they are sponsoring called the Special Counsel Integrity Act. Under this bill, only the attorney general could discipline or remove a special counsel...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Someone Get Poor Jim Acosta 
Hazardous Duty Pay, Quick! 
DVi-qAKMpLGSm-l_dlNGQByHcnUaDNDa3mvYHYMZ3c_06UVXdrc9XrjvYRucm1MDGpi257tgALWNaBo59LkeC0e1SCQbIsy6SIudK6o4bg9DiCbW1-k3RQTZYzrnzOjZNS6tyzr9maWMbIcfXItuOoVsLNI8ZIzZAQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450

by David Limbaugh 
{ townhall.com } ~ In their incessant, mostly baseless attacks against President Donald Trump, his leftist haters reveal much more about themselves than him -- and it's not an attractive revelation.

In what seemed like a parody of a coastal elitist disparaging inferior flyover Americans, CNN's Jim Acosta said that too many Americans can't see through Trump's act because they "don't have all their faculties." This is going pretty far, even for this smug activist masquerading as an objective journalist. But in his defense, who wouldn't unravel at the realization that one's diligent yearlong efforts to remove the president have failed so spectacularly?

Have you ever noticed that leftists often characterize conservative views as bigoted, and sometimes dangerous, to discredit and dehumanize them -- and suppress their speech? I dare say that as recently as a few decades ago even radical leftists wouldn't have openly abandoned the universally shared American ideal of free speech. Today, however, finding themselves defeated in the marketplace of ideas, they increasingly support restrictions on speech they don't like.

They routinely conceal their censorship schemes in handsome packages, such as the Fairness Doctrine, net neutrality, and seemingly innocuous campus speech codes, but their aim is the same -- to restrict or obtain a government-leveraged advantage over the speech of their political opponents. A ubiquitous telltale sign of such ploys is the insistence that they are promoting peace and harmony by protecting groups and society from offensive speech, especially that which could lead to violence.

This is grossly cynical sophistry. I could be mistaken, but I am unaware of any examples of conservatives using such specious reasoning to curtail speech they disfavor, and if I do encounter such efforts, I will oppose them, no matter how obnoxious I might find the speech.

Today, many leftists seem to be unashamed to cashier our unifying ideal of free expression -- to the point that some are outright admitting they value censorship of certain ideas over the principle of constitutionally protected speech. They are so intoxicated by their self-righteous advocacy of so-called diversity and tolerance that they contend that First Amendment guarantees should not apply to what they consider hateful utterances.

Jim Acosta doesn't go this far, but he and many of his leftist pseudo-journalistic colleagues, including CNN's chief White House correspondent April Ryan, have been arguing that by criticizing the mainstream media, Trump could cause anarchy around the globe. Please try not to laugh, because they appear to be serious.

"Fake news, by the president saying this, is not just a simple or cute little statement for some," said Ryan. "This has tentacles that are reaching overseas. ... Think about it. When you are in a country and your citizenry thinks that you're fake, thinks that what the news is saying is fake, there can be anarchy some kind of way. It causes a destabilization of democracies."

Acosta added that people around the country don't realize it's an act. "They don't have all their faculties in some cases -- their elevator might not hit all floors. My concern is that a journalist is going to be hurt one of these days."

There you have it. Red state Americans are too dim to understand that Trump and his evil mouthpieces like Sarah Huckabee Sanders know the press is truthful and are just maligning it as a cover to continue their nefarious schemes.

News flash: Trump and Sanders actually believe the liberal media are advocacy journalists who habitually slant and distort the news to advance their leftist agenda -- the foremost item of which is destroying Donald Trump and his presidency. And, yes, millions of Americans believe this, too -- not because they're being duped, but because it's true. What's somewhat unclear to me is which members of the mainstream press are self-deceived and which are knowingly deceiving others about their mission.

But how is accusing CNN and other liberal media of spreading rubbish tantamount to inciting violence or somehow likely to lead to it? I guess these leftists forget President liar-nObama's ongoing war on Fox News and conservative talk radio. Besides, Americans have been accusing their political opponents of lying since the nation was founded. Since when is that the same as promoting violence? Look around. When calls to violence accompany political speech in this nation they are usually coming from leftists -- and so they are projecting again. The abject hatred and intolerance of opposing ideas isn't emanating from the political right. Just ask Kanye West.

Revealingly, Acosta praises White House press briefings, which he claims expose the administration's "evasions, their lies, their falsehoods." What? Did you say lies? Are you inciting violence there, Jimbo? We're probably all hypocrites to some degree, but Acosta is gifted in the dark art.

The level of contempt these self-styled arbiters of truth have for the rest of us rubes is as astonishing as it is revealing. Are they actually saying that we can't question their veracity without exposing them to danger?

I'm young enough to remember when journalists, even liberal ones, at least pretended the events they were reporting were bigger than themselves. Now they are not as much about reporting the news as making it -- and putting themselves at the center of it. They might as well discontinue the charade -- we're on to them.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center