Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Thought Police Target 'Homophobic' Athletes
vzME9wORogugM2BCIQ4l0tl8YfjI-cJfRQnzNzZUZnXrN-vL_m-mwZ1X5WvnJbYNrR-4sHpwum5yZ7KemoB0q-Mi5Xb3gbEUe-w5VNLtyKvOzttq2SaZ_WHYid4YmEgmpZdEuWCzu98lVq48jZKyHtQbko4pvwk4eoLM1Dw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Nate Jackson
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=150.
Trump’s ‘Great Wall’ Isn’t What’s Being Built
3IqkC3q86QFbDSL5HZCDBgBMMa3Cn3znKpdlNj3rgIyJz5eDBzEue2nISiWW9hUPMuVwmymstjoxrm-2Jk_TuxA5Db2ScwHNAVae1sX6swBGTZcaPgCGDyTCcLev15IRpTATWXi5xh-DaGvlwDGRk0vg1CFx7AtoR6us6N5yP3v3H0rShgEnhy-5flfUxTNyis3eWLkgrx4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by JIM GERAGHTY
{nationalreview.com} ~ Making the click-through worthwhile: what you’re not hearing about the slowly spreading wall or bollard fence along our southern border... trying to make sense of President Trump’s negotiating strategy in the funding fight, an ugly scene in France, and some kind words for the Three Martini Lunch podcast.  Trump in yesterday’s meeting with Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer and Nancy Pulosi: “One thing that I do have to say is, tremendous amounts of wall have already been built, and a lot of — a lot of wall. When you include the renovation of existing fences and walls, we’ve renovated a tremendous amount and we’ve done a lot of work.” As I’ve detailed in two  articles for NRO, it is more accurate to say that under previously passed legislation, U.S. Customs and Border Protection continues to pay contractors to replace sections of spotty or insufficient fencing with 18-foot-tall bollard walls — tall steel bars with gaps in between them so that Border Patrol officers can see what’s happening on the other side. A border-wall contractor argued in March, “If your wall is see-through, you’re basically a fence.” For what it’s worth, the Border Patrol prefers the slats because it’s easier to see migrants approaching, attempting to climb the wall, or trying to evade authorities. You can get a sense of the bollard wall in this CBP photo of Commissioner Kevin K. McAleenan touring the San Ysidro port of entry with Rodney S. Scott, the chief patrol agent for San Diego Sector, and CNN reporter Chris Cuomo...  https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/trumps-great-wall-isnt-whats-being-built/  
.
Was Cyntoia Brown sentenced 
to life in prison for self-defense? Nope.
MYWW17KdCtwBtWO5xZbd8hfyf4x2caVOOmpEaJymXJb7tIUPqfnt5U964oMdu-duZz3kCl9tZm2Ucw4RQIY4hfrBdkVcij2YthYvg6QWsYEUO3-o2axLlGErsuLXvVPnCb_FAm08RnA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Andrew Branca
{legalinsurrection.com} ~ A lot of people have been forwarding me articles about Cyntoia Brown, who was convicted of first-degree murder and aggravated robbery when she was a 16-year-old prostitute... Recent news coverage includes this very sympathetic piece from CNN and another from NPR, as well as a deluge of similarly sympathetic coverage from a variety of other sources. Brown unsuccessfully argued self-defense at her trail. The court sentenced her to life in prison. She will first be eligible for parole after serving 51 years of her sentence. It seems Ms. Brown has been getting a great deal of attention in recent years, arguing that she deserves clemency because of her status as a victim of sex trafficking. This attention includes a full-blown documentary, a social media campaign (#FreeCyntoiaBrown), and support from such people I guess I’m supposed to know as Rihanna, Snoop Dogg, and Kim Kardashian: This attention reached a crescendo last week when the Tennessee supreme court unanimously affirmed Ms. Brown’s conviction and life sentence in this decision (embedded below). The case is a combination of arguably legitimate public policy issues should a 16-year-old be subject to a life sentence, even for murder? and social hysteria nonsense victims of sex trafficking, which I guess means prostitutes should be immunized not just against minor offenses such as truancy and underage drinking, but also murder. I’m sure reasonable people could take opposing positions on all those issues...
.
Ted Cruz Criticizes Pulosi For Wanting To Turn
Cameras Off During White House Meeting
By6lWRGeHL-oqgR0egQdBSLKlj7O-YIqILBE9arS2Grjq1zUDLfYIKd3IE8Jd5A_FJeys31-smGjjaxgsBkhMxcg3Em8bg0arr3Lt2wPTObAtVXnt2eR-k2yi5NwSUAAyV4dm7WQHOdKrFfEKph-N186M2BSZ7zs5o27fyAnJcEW7V2tfxza1uHDzAPzA5P7n7xDrsRt6CPbzbVigUXLBWbBniXlEXlL-unU2f5VBGKhBwZ-2d44LBKtbNVRGos=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Scott Morefield
{dailycaller.com} ~ Texas Senator Ted Cruz lauded President Trump’s performance during Tuesday’s Oval Office exchange with Democratic leaders... During Tuesday night’s edition of Fox News’ “Hannity,” Cruz also criticized Rep Nancy Pulosi, calling her stated desire to take the discussion off-camera a result of being “scared” because she’s on the “losing end of the argument.”Fox News host Sean Hannity began the segment by comparing Cruz’s own 2013 filibuster on healthcare to Trump’s “fighting on borders now.” “Why don’t we see more of this in the Republican Party?” he asked. “I think you are exactly right,” Cruz responded. “The American people have for a long time been frustrated with Washington, frustrated that too many elected officials don’t follow through on their promises, and they want us to do what we said we would do.” Cruz called the president’s Oval Office debate with Democratic leaders “terrific.”...
VIDEO at the site.
.
Now That The Supreme Court Isn’t Their Puppet,
Liberals Want To Destroy It  
GjaxZXGNLqK9HHyJEr4anw_KQGAtAEK-MfvwgUPXqItIzp3pDh46KmH1R0WM6_suNlji6-vsD5L-pKucv_Yzwgd6W5ja5MyTDN-D0wmHd8c7CyAIqlA1B0CvkszMZUQc2unAAJQQWPcW-Kw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Ryan Fazio
{thefederalist.com} ~ Concerted opposition to the independent judiciary has begun to percolate on the left with little scrutiny... Last week, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez, scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s former spokesman Brian Fallon, and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna rallied activists seeking to enervate judicial independence through proposals like court-packing and term limits for justices. Left-wing influencers like Democratic Rep.-Elect commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and attorney Michael Avenatti have endorsed the former propositions already. Progressive websites like Vox.com have repeatedly challenged the notion of judicial review. And dozens of leading lawyers on the left are organizing academic support for such ideas. The list goes on. Yes, the proximate cause of the movement is the most contentious Supreme Court confirmation in history. But while it appears to be mostly a reaction to a single nominee’s confirmation to a single seat, the fever pitch is really 60 years in the making. For most of that time, progressive jurists circumvented the normal constitutional amendment process by reading into the law meanings that were never there to impose desired social policies on the nation, exceed the enumerated powers, and traverse protections of individual rights. Their jurisprudence was innocuously rationalized by the existence of a “living Constitution.” Sometimes such decisions were characterized by activism of the court imposing its preferred policies on legislatures, like in the Miranda, Roe, and Obergefell decisions. Other times they were characterized by restraint, permitting the political branches to act contrary to statute or the Constitution, like in Chevron, Gonzales, and Sebelius cases. Often they were joined by liberal justices appointed by Republicans. They might have been earnest and well-meaning, but their rulings were also offensive to the rule of law and to millions of informed and motivated voters...
.
.Reveal the Congressional Hush Fund Hypocrites
FpnStjVMaRk5hwWwf12DfSz4LyqzT8DmahiafRgWuWb2i2D8pUj9YoMZSsdzw03MMPAlYH-K9gMIw1Z06hagm_ve9rISiEGpwi_yUcmkNjgSzeJjdbU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=350by Daniel John Sobieski
{americanthinker.com} ~ Which is worse: candidate, businessman, and then still private citizen Donald Trump using his own money to make what scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton might call "bimbo eruptions"... go away to protect his brand and himself from personal embarrassment, or Congress using taxpayer money in a slush fund to pay off those sexually harassed by sitting officeholders? As Penny Nance, president and CEO of Concerned Women for America, notes in USA Today: Literally a year ago – as the #MeToo era was erupting – the nation was waking up to news that a secret congressional "hush fund" had been used by Members of Congress to pay off accusers of sexual misconduct. Taxpayer money – yours and mine – was used to pay off these alleged victims. ...Nobody knows how many congressmen and Senators are involved, and if  Pulosi is a willing participant to keep all of this a secret she will forfeit credibility on every other issue. ...What we know already is devastating. We know congressmen John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Blake Fahrentold (R-Tex.) used this "hush fund" to settle with alleged victims. Both men have already left Congress. We also know that none of the beneficiaries of this slush fund has been threatened with indictment and incarceration for campaign finance violations since suppressing such information, as Rep. Nadler puts it, amounts to committing a fraud on the American people using their own money...
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=150
.
Thought Police Target 'Homophobic' Athletes
vzME9wORogugM2BCIQ4l0tl8YfjI-cJfRQnzNzZUZnXrN-vL_m-mwZ1X5WvnJbYNrR-4sHpwum5yZ7KemoB0q-Mi5Xb3gbEUe-w5VNLtyKvOzttq2SaZ_WHYid4YmEgmpZdEuWCzu98lVq48jZKyHtQbko4pvwk4eoLM1Dw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Nate Jackson:  Celebrities and athletes are enlightened philosophers who can pontificate from on high to impart their profound wisdom upon the unwashed masses. Unless they deviate from leftist groupthink, that is. A recent spate of rhetorical assaults upon rogue celebrities and athletes by the Rainbow Mafia reminds us again that some Americans seem to think freedom of speech and individual liberty are things to be mercilessly crushed under the jackboots of the thought police.

             The man getting the most attention is University of Oklahoma quarterback Kyler Murray, who won the Heisman Trophy Saturday night only to be dragged through the mud by USA Today’s Scott Gleeson over “homophobic” tweets Murray made … when he was 15. Murray went from what should have been one of the greatest moments of his life to a perfunctory apology for his “poor choice of word that doesn’t reflect who I am or what I believe.” And it was all thanks to a vindictive Leftmedia eager to punish “wrongthink” about any favored group such as homosexuals.
               Murray, who was drafted to play baseball for the Oakland A’s, is hardly alone, however. Gleeson wrote (as if he were merely an innocent observer), “Murray, 21 now, joins several other famous athletes to find themselves thrust in a negative spotlight as a result of their old tweets resurfacing in the midst of big accomplishments. The Milwaukee Brewers’ Josh Hader had racist, homophobic and misogynistic tweets resurface from when he was 17 years old this past summer. Buffalo Bills quarterback Josh Allen saw racist tweets resurface from his teenage years ahead of the NFL draft. And Villanova Final Four Most Outstanding Player Donte DiVincenzo had a profane tweet with racist rap lyrics surface on the Internet right after he helped the Wildcats win a national title.”
               Gleeson is part of the problem, waiting for a moment of accomplishment to destroy a target. Baltimore Ravens lineman Patrick Ricard, Portland Trail Blazers forward Al-Farouq Aminu, and Atlanta Braves pitcher Sean Newcomb are also recent victims of media-generated outrage over using the “wrong” words. And then there’s comedian Kevin Hart, who will no longer host the Oscars after “homophobic” comments just happened to surface after the Academy Awards organizers asked him to host. The list could — and unfortunately will — go on.
               To be clear, we’re not defending some of the words in question, which are indeed crass and offensive and aren’t part of what should be a better response to gender dysphoria. But humans have always had a knack for saying awful things about one another. In this case, it’s the rabid heterophobic gender deniers who ought to apologize for aiming to destroy accomplished people over offhand teenage snark.  

~The Patriot Post  

https://patriotpost.us/articles/59970?mailing_id=3935&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3935&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center