Thursday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

FrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Kavanaugh Accuser’s couples therapy records,
partially leaked to WaPo, may hold the key
quHCHn0gGobw-lczNv-iF9kVXYGtHkg9_2TKjzDxvBj6Tx4a-wCBB6zMbcAaHDmAHKPbmJ_NL5pmKc4cxM2lgP-NLfiv7zskLk8Bb5Gdxt0BVx24RTjYeDk8w5TuVcLvhcEgrnPMl4NjgLkzFaZTXZFI0t65on-w-O8v6SyBDtZEZfOIP-e3OtEYvDr-yl1zyBw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by William A. Jacobson 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
NYT Issues Correction After
Misreporting On Kavanaugh Allegations
w0S9e4CzDlar-tQrtIKguGMeLxyC66NrhHEjI9ynBJZaUMc6ER0_-QH9tMEsCQ_rE2Ozobbl6Gc0Qwg5u1_mXK1uDmikSu9GZ0OoAL2M-ibXf-tAygmF-GZ7qu06qClmvnX8oEFTRl3sLGU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Amber Athey
{ dailycaller.com } ~ The New York Times issued a correction on Tuesday after incorrectly reporting that Brett Kavanaugh’s friend remembered him... allegedly sexually assaulting a girl in high school. Dr. Christine Ford claimed that Kavanaugh groped her at a party over three decades ago and that Kavanaugh’s friend, Mark Judge, was a witness to the incident. NYT reported Tuesday that Ford wants the FBI to investigate her claim prior to testifying in a Senate hearing. They erroneously stated in that article that Judge recalls the alleged incident. Judge has actually said that he does not remember the incident in question and that the allegations are “absolutely nuts.” Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes,” Judge said in a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee...
.
Grassley Gives Kavanaugh Accuser
Strict Timeline If She Wants To Testify
c02ZZQR9kERHt68AlIuYnW1TZA0Cg5LvjTviuG6MGoSH6M7xzRB8A2oJoXMrDNvS9OyrwS0hHI1vSaXmyKA8ka8EgSddd2lrx5oC-QdIZHo7lKMF_YLquK2HArbRFTr5Emt3qq4OsFupBORunXxnq-4ZYMW6xFhnG3fgoIPpKta1Zarwet5QVTxHgblo6BlhnYoX43JnRn_oMLTT4v0X7fho3dRhjMoU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Henry Rodgers
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley told the lawyers of Christine Blasey Ford... the woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of high school-era sexual assault, if she wants to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee she must have prepared testimony submitted by Friday morning. “I remind you that, consistent with Committee rules, Dr. Ford’s prepared testimony and biography are due to the Committee by 10:00 a.m. on Friday, September 21, if she intends to testify on Monday,” Grassley said Wednesday in a letter to Ford’s lawyers. In the letter Grassley also said he is focused on “doing everything” to make sure Ford is “comfortable” with appearing before the committee Monday...We will know if she is going to testify this Friday.  https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/19/grassley-kavanaugh-accuser-timeline/?utm_medium=email
.
Why the Bar Association Calls Kavanaugh ‘Well Qualified’
Ei5lu7Z6DfTBCu_vy3tUfiKoAgis2bfokNUr1CaAR2orxN9RderZdJzk7EO26_3hP8UGGEBkf3C-4BO1PG4avPHhMcKPx-8S5kYNfeunApOKaZjrU9I=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Fred Lucas
{ dailysignal.com } ~ Top spokesmen for the American Bar Association, the leading lawyers group, cited Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s character and integrity in the organization’s decision to give him the top rating of well qualified... The ABA’s high rating for Kavanaugh came days before the surfacing of an allegation by a California woman, Christine Blasey Ford, that he attempted to sexually assault her when the two were teenagers in suburban Maryland. The allegation of an incident about 36 years ago now threatens a nomination to the high court that had appeared near certain. The Senate Judiciary Committee plans to reconvene Monday to hear from both Ford, 51, a research psychologist and professor, and Kavanaugh, 53, a judge on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia since 2006. “We concluded that his integrity, judicial temperament, and professional competence met the highest standards for appointment to the court,” Paul T. Moxley of Salt Lake City, chairman of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee, told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “Our rating of unanimously well-qualified reflects the consensus of his peers who have knowledge of his professional qualifications,” Moxley said in his Sept. 7 testimony...
.
'America is in the throes of a bloodless revolution'
AcGfJEww0E5WT9zmltiDu0pjnDB9djWJhqWs1KMyByk12KkibT3f234_A0bI63_bUYAtd71s2bQsGxGm5t3xano28LYLrcWeZ67VHRsTnJq9BCGDo2i5A-KJhRIo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by BOB UNRUH
{ wnd.com } ~ The headlines are filled with claims by a California left-wing professor that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh tried to sexually assault her while both were drunk and at a high-school party more than three decades ago... Kavanaugh vehemently denies the claim, but dummycrats-Democrats have stated they believe her, and the result could be a failed nomination. Republicans have questioned the timing of the claim being raised, noting Sen. Dianne Fein-stein, D-Calif., was informed of it in July and brought it up only a week ago, after the hearings had been completed. The seat Kavanaugh has been nominated to fill is significant, as it was held by a swing-vote justice who many times sided with the court’s liberal side. dummycrats-Democrats have made dire warnings that confirming Kavanaugh would threaten abortion rights and the rights of gays, women and minorities. Country music superstar Charlie Daniels, in his Soap Box commentary, says it’s worse than that. Far, far worse. “I’m firmly convinced in my heart that America has been and still is in the throes of a bloodless revolution, an attempt to subvert government agencies and resources to take away individual privacy, to create an unbeatable voting base, to regulate medical care, education, media coverage, gun control and authority over every aspect of life in America,” he writes...
.
Pro-liar-Hillary Election Rigging Scandal Erupts 
{ americanlibertyreport.com } ~ liar-Hillary Clinton is no stranger to accusations of election rigging and new evidence shows they were more than accusations. On Tuesday night... Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed in an exclusive that an email from November 8, 2016, has surfaced showing top Google executives talking about how they manipulated search results in order to favor liar-Hillary’s campaign. The next day, Fox News reported, “Carlson said November 9, 2016, email came from Eliana Murillo, Google’s former head of multicultural marketing, and it was subsequently forwarded by two Google vice presidents to more staffers throughout the company.” Of note is that no other mainstream media outlet acknowledged Carlson’s exclusive, choosing instead to mostly focus on more Trump/Russia non-news news. The leaked email came from Google Head of Multicultural Marketing Eliana Murillo and it reveals the scope and objective high-level individuals at Google, Univision, and the Hispanic voter drive organization Voto Latin0. Murillo’s email leaves no doubt Google’s election-related efforts were exclusively aligned with liar- Hillary and the dummycrats-Democrat Party. Every partner and institutional leaders she identifies in her email fully supported and endorsed the liar- Clinton campaign. No Trump supporter was named in the memo. MRC Latino reports that Univision senior news anchor Jorge Ramos co-hosted a televised GOTV rally less than three weeks before the election loaded with explicitly anti-Trump content along with an impassioned call to vote for liar- Hillary... Why isn't the FBI or DOJ investigating?  https://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/pro-hillary-election-rigging-scandal-erupts/
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
. 
Kavanaugh Accuser’s couples therapy records,
partially leaked to WaPo, may hold the key
quHCHn0gGobw-lczNv-iF9kVXYGtHkg9_2TKjzDxvBj6Tx4a-wCBB6zMbcAaHDmAHKPbmJ_NL5pmKc4cxM2lgP-NLfiv7zskLk8Bb5Gdxt0BVx24RTjYeDk8w5TuVcLvhcEgrnPMl4NjgLkzFaZTXZFI0t65on-w-O8v6SyBDtZEZfOIP-e3OtEYvDr-yl1zyBw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450


by William A. Jacobson

{ legalinsurrection.com } ~ When The Washington Post broke the story that Christine Blasey Ford was the person who accused Supreme Court nominee of assault dating back to high school, there were several aspects of the WaPo story that struck me as particularly strange.

First, there was a suggestion that this is a repressed and recovered memory case:

“Years later, after going through psychotherapy, Ford said, she came to understand the incident as a trauma with lasting impact on her life.”

If this is a case of repressed memory, then it changes everything. It’s a convenient explanation for why Ford said nothing to anyone for 30 years despite herself being a clinical psychologist. Repressed and recovered memory, however, is of questionable veracity and admissibility in court.

Second, that repressed memory allegedly was recovered in 2012 during couples’ therapy,

Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.

Why in couples therapy, not in individual therapy? That seems like an odd time to recover memory, particularly for a clinical psychologist who likely underwent or practiced various forms of psychological therapy during her long career.  This suggests that perhaps there was some marital problem which implicated an earlier trauma, if this story is true, or invented an earlier trauma as an excuse, if the story is not true.

Third, Ford volunteered the therapist’s notes to WaPo, but only selective portions chosen by Ford:

The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.

It seems odd for an alleged sexual assault victim to volunteer psychiatric records, particularly since the odious “nuts and sluts” defense so frequently is used against accusers. And why were only selective portions shared? This seems particularly calculating and defensively preemptive.

My gut tells me the therapy records hold a key to what did or did not happen here. Having voluntarily shared a part of those records with a newspaper, it’s hard for Ford to argue confidentiality.

It becomes even more important in light of Sen. Dianne Fein-stein’s statement today that Ford “is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this..I can’t say that everything is truthful. I don’t know.”

Kavanaugh already has agreed to testify under oath at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Monday, September 24, 2018. As of this writing, it’s not clear if Ford will appear though I assume she will.

Without the full couples therapy records Ford already partially shared with the Washington Post, I’m not sure we’ll ever really know how and why this allegedly repressed memory was recovered, or whether it actually is a memory.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • wake up America you must vote

  • amen Charlie Daniels is correct and it is not a revolution we can loose

    we cannot sit home on the mid terms and hope others vote WE MUST GO TO THE POLLS AND DEFEAT THE DEMS 

This reply was deleted.