Thursday Afternoon - The Front Page Cover

 The Front Page Cover 
"I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened"
 .
Featuring:
Choice To Do What?
Tom McLaughlin
.
"Rise up together as one voice"
"Be careful where you stand"
~~~lll~~~
.
 Lynch Officially Takes Up Holder's Torch  
On Monday, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch was sworn in, formally taking over for the contemptuous Eric Holder. And to say she entered the position amid chaos is an understatement. Gangs throughout Baltimore continued to wreak violence and havoc, injuring police officers and destroying property in protest over the death of Freddie Gray, the circumstances of which are still unknown. In response, one of Lynch's first acts on the job was to send in the troops. "The Department of Justice will send two officials to Baltimore amid clashes in the city between police and citizens," The Hill reports. We wish we could say she will be an improvement over her predecessor, but all evidence suggests she will continue the Holder legacy. loose lips Joe Biden illuminated this concern at Monday's swearing-in ceremony when he said, "[Lynch] is a woman who is incredibly qualified, just like Eric Holder, who I’ve known and has been my close friend for years and years and years, over 30 years." He added, "He might be one of the finest attorney generals [sic] we have had. He has been in this environment of such political hostility. He has stood his ground on principle. He has never yielded. And he has been right." If he was one of the finest attorneys general in American history, why are sights like Ferguson and Baltimore seemingly becoming the norm? Lynch has a lot of work to do — but at least she'd be hard pressed to make things worse.  -The Patriot Post 
.
HIAH3NWIAglevdUuFtfRbRvMyupWV0FGvKweJORcedVnBDwOQoHdRggLZEbbhniq53ZObFAwDzP_mxtMZUG0F8K6FrXjZK-iJISP=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Arguments Begin in Contentious Same-Sex Marriage Case  
Today is a big day for the Supreme Court as the debate over same-sex "marriage" takes center stage. Two and half hours of oral arguments will be presented to the justices, whose decision on America's biggest social controversy since Roe v. Wade will have monumental implications. And just like Roe v. Wade, as Family Research Council's Tony Perkins points out, the government meddling in what should be an issue left to the states isn't going to end the debate. Forty-two years after that dreadful ruling, America has come no closer to unanimously accepting abortion, and the same fate awaits the gay marriage dispute. Speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday, Perkins explained, "The courts are decided to interpret the Constitution and the constitutionality of laws, not create public policy." And as Jennifer Marshall of The Daily Signal reports, some 50 million Americans have voted in support of traditional marriage — only to have the courts silence the majority of them. "Only 11 states have redefined marriage democratically," writes Marshall. "In the 37 states that currently recognize same-sex marriage, 26 have been forced to do so by courts." Today, Kentucky, Michigan, Tennessee and Ohio will defend their bans on same-sex marriage against 16 plaintiffs, and a decision will be announced before the Court adjourns in June. The Tenth Amendment states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The right ruling rests in those 28 words. More...   -The Patriot Post 
.
HIAH3NWIAglevdUuFtfRbRvMyupWV0FGvKweJORcedVnBDwOQoHdRggLZEbbhniq53ZObFAwDzP_mxtMZUG0F8K6FrXjZK-iJISP=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Russian Hackers Read nObama's Emails  
Regarding the security breach of the White House's computer network, it might be easier to ask what the hackers didn't gain access to. In the early part of April, news broke that a group of hackers — probably with some link to the Russian government — compromised the White House email system and accessed Barack nObama's full schedule. But the White House has remained mum on how deeply the hackers penetrated. According to The New York Times, the hackers were reading some of nObama's unclassified email messages, the ones where he drafted upcoming speeches, worked out upcoming policy, complained about Congress, talked about staffing changes and, yes, even described his golf game. The Times says nObama's account itself was not compromised, nor was the classified email system the White House uses. As Noah Rothman writes at Hot Air, "This administration has a problem with information security, and it's becoming clear that their carelessness is a threat to American national security." When nObama declared his administration was the most transparent in history, none of us thought he was talking about the Russians. More...   -The Patriot Post 
.
HIAH3NWIAglevdUuFtfRbRvMyupWV0FGvKweJORcedVnBDwOQoHdRggLZEbbhniq53ZObFAwDzP_mxtMZUG0F8K6FrXjZK-iJISP=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 Baltimore Mishandled Seeds of Unrest  
The city of Baltimore is reeling after a savage night of rioting downtown that led to the burning of stores, looting and violent confrontations with police officers. The violence erupted in the hours leading up to and following Monday's funeral of Freddie Gray, who died several days after suffering a spinal cord injury while in police custody. Facts are still hazy about Gray's arrest and injury and just how an initially peaceful demonstration devolved so quickly into full-scale rioting.
          Republican Gov. Larry Hogan declared a state of emergency late yesterday and called out the National Guard to assist overwhelmed city law enforcement. "The National Guard represents the last resort in restoring order," Hogan told reporters. "I have not made this decision lightly. 
          Up to 5,000 soldiers could eventually be deployed. There are already at least 100 Maryland State Police officers already in the city, as well as municipal police from surrounding towns and counties. Close to two-dozen Baltimore police officers have sustained injuries in close-quarter confrontations with rioters who assaulted them with rocks, bottles and other objects.
          Schools are closed today in Baltimore, and last night's Orioles game was postponed, with baseball commissioner Rob Manfred suggesting the matchup between the Orioles and Chicago White Sox could be played elsewhere.   -The Patriot Post 
.
HIAH3NWIAglevdUuFtfRbRvMyupWV0FGvKweJORcedVnBDwOQoHdRggLZEbbhniq53ZObFAwDzP_mxtMZUG0F8K6FrXjZK-iJISP=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
 CAN CLINTON COALITION BE REBUILT AMID RACIAL  UNREST?  
Under President nObama, who once offered America the chance for racial healing, the nation is instead experiencing an era of conspicuous racial unrest worse than any in the past 40 years. Like another candidate who ran on ending “nation building” but who launched the most ambitious nation-building project in American history, nObama’s legacy on the subject of race relations will be the opposite of his promise. And as the unrest has grown and now, one hopes, culminated in the burning and looting in Baltimore, the president has mostly been a cipher.
            He condemns violence but sympathizes with its perpetrators. He extolls the service of police officers, but suggests widespread systemic racism in their ranks. It’s complicated, for sure, but the fact that all nObama has produced is a couple of blue-ribbon commissions – Washington’s version of policy euthanasia – shows us a man tested on a core belief and promise and apparently at a loss. Despite the frustration among his supporters, nObama will continue to enjoy enormous support and understanding from black America. But what about his party’s presumptive nominee?    
            Hilly Clinton’s political rise was in part a product of the prior, more severe era of widespread racial unrest. Back when she spoke with an Ozark twang, she and her husband came to the national stage as “New Democrats” – white Southerners, who were moderate and socially conservative. This had particular appeal because of the way the radicalism of the late 1960s and early 1970s had put much of the country off the Democratic brand. And the race riots of the era were a big part of that. If Richard Nixon’s two victories were partly a backlash against urban unrest and Ronald Reagan’s new coalition consolidated such gains, the Clinton Democrats were about trying rebuild the old Democratic coalition.
          Bill Clinton could connect with black voters but put blue-collar white voters at ease. He could be America’s “first black president” but champion welfare limits staunchly opposed by black leaders. He and his wife’s return to the White House, however, was derailed by a politician who no less skillfully bridged the racial divide in the Democratic Party, but did so from the other side of the chasm. Along the way, African American voters grew distrustful of the Clintons and the Clintons, at least Bill, grew resentful of the way black supporters had thrown them over for a “fairy tale” about nObama. It got very ugly. Now, as the Clintons mount another White House quest, the issue of race relations burns far hotter than it did in 2008. So how will they play the issue? So far, Hilly is attempting to channel nObama’s cipher stance – lamenting injustice and calling for healing. But black voters, and white liberals who share their cause, are unlikely to accept opacity on the issue from Clinton. Her top primary rival certainly isn’t going to let her get away with some Twitter sadness as an answer.
           No matter what she does, Clinton will not be able to drive the kind of black turnout and support that nObama enjoyed. But she needs a strong African American showing in her new New Democrat coalition. At the same time, if she overcorrects to the left, she will destroy the fundamental part of her coalition: middle class white voters who are not likely to blame police when they see arson and looting in major American cities. This will be a test for even the most scalene triangulator. nObama was an empty vessel for voters, but there is too much in the Clinton carafe to start afresh.  -Fox News  
 
.
HIAH3NWIAglevdUuFtfRbRvMyupWV0FGvKweJORcedVnBDwOQoHdRggLZEbbhniq53ZObFAwDzP_mxtMZUG0F8K6FrXjZK-iJISP=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
1.
stephanopoulos-abc
 Stephanopoulos Floored as Gingrich Detail Seriousness  
(Matthew Boyle) - The former public face of Bill Clinton’s White House—and current host of ABC News’ This Week—George Stephanopoulos was floored as two prominent journalists and the Republican Speaker of the House from his Clinton days, Newt Gingrich...laid out for him just how bad the “Clinton Cash” book is for his old bosses. “Mr. Speaker, I read that you thought these allegations are starting to reach some kind of critical mass around the foundation that could even force her out of the race?” he asked the former House Speaker. Gingrich dropped bombs on Stephanopoulos in his response, suggesting he thinks criminal charges—at least an investigation—could be on the way. “Look, this isn’t a political problem—this is a historical problem,” Gingrich said. “The Constitution of the United States says you cannot take money from foreign governments without explicit permission of the Congress. They wrote that in there because they knew the danger of corrupting our system by foreign money is enormous. “You had a sitting Secretary of State who radically increased his speech fees and there is a whole series of dots on the wall now where people gave millions of dollars who oh, by the way, happened to get taken care of by the State Department. You raised a good standard.        http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/04/26/stephanopoulos-floored-as-gingrich-bloomberg-editors-detail-seriousness-of-clinton-cash/
.
2.
133-jeff-sessions-940.png
 Sen Jeff Sessions Blisters Outlaw DHS Secretary Johnson  
(rickwells.us) - Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) has clearly had enough of DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson’s efforts to undermine rather than enforce the laws of this nation. The list of failures, or “successful interventions on behalf of non-Americans,” as Johnson might see them, that are directly attributable to him are many...Senator Sessions led off his comments in Tuesday’s Homeland Security Oversight hearings by agreeing with Senator Grassley (R-IA) that he also sees a lack of will in DHS, under his direction and he predecessors as well as from the “president.” He then reads from the Johnson list of failures in a blistering account of the degradation of our national security, border enforcement and interior enforcement under Johnson’s “leadership.” He summarized the current situation as one which has led to the impression among those considering violating our immigration laws that should they choose to do so they will be successful and that “we need to change that fundamentally.”     http://www.rickwells.us/sen-jeff-sessions-blisters-outlaw-dhs-secretary-johnson-over-long-list-of-failures-current-mess/
.
3.
Iran Ayatollah Death to America
 Treason: nObama’s Iran Nuclear Weapons Deal & the Corker Bill  
(George Rasley) - When asked what the lesson of the first Gulf War was General S.F.Rodrigues, formerly Chief of Staff of the Indian Army said, "Don't fight the Americans without nuclear weapons."...The corollary to that observation is “You don’t seek nuclear weapons unless you plan to fight the United States.” The Islamic Republic of Iran, the world’s number one state sponsor of terrorism, has been “fighting” the United States for almost 40 years. And for the same period of time American policy toward Iran has been to prevent the Islamic Republic from acquiring nuclear weapons. To advance that policy the United States Congress has imposed economic sanctions on Iran and past Presidents have made it clear that the United States was prepared to enforce that policy with all means necessary – implying at least the potential for military action if necessary to stop the Iranian nuclear weapons program. The nuclear weapons deal President nObama and Secretary of State hanoi John Kerry have “negotiated” with Iran discards that wise policy and, in conjunction with legislation written and sponsored by Tennessee Republican Senator Bob Corker, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, turns American constitutional processes for ratifying a treaty with other nations on their head.       http://www.conservativehq.com/node/20197
.
4.
 IRS watchdog recovers thousands of missing Lois Lerner emails  
(foxnews.com) - The Treasury’s Inspector General for Tax Administration notified the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday that they have recovered thousands of Lois Lerner emails that were not previously produced to Congress, committee members told Fox News...The inspector general recovered approximately 6,400 Lerner emails and will carefully examine them as part of the committee’s bipartisan IRS investigation. The Hill reported that around 650 emails were from 2010 and 2011, while most of them were from 2012. The inspector general has found about 35,000 emails in all as it sought to recover emails from backup tapes. The IRS, in a statement to the newspaper, said that it was pleased to hear the Treasury’s inspector general found the emails saying it was an “encouraging development that will help resolve remaining questions and dispel uncertainty surrounding the emails.” Lois should of asked Hilly for advice in deleting emails.        http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/29/irs-watchdog-recovers-thousands-missing-lois-lerner-emails/
.
5.
0MT7kyUMWqrxYwPDDJPM_3y-9v30jSjiWkzlIFqI3GZq2APD6KhhDnWQb_HgLvD2d3ODjJo_Rhc6NbkFAJqHb2-l_0reaTQzGy3zAmm2c8TIn8tTMw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
 US Refuses to Condemn Iranian Seizure of Ship  
(Ari Yashar) - Asked how the US defines the attack, whether as an act of piracy or violent aggression, Rathke said he could not define it because the US is still "collecting information."... "This is underway. I’m not going to apply an adjective to it right now," said Rathke. When queried by journalists as to whether he would condemn the violent naval aggression, he again skirted a direct response, saying "we are gathering more information, I don't have further reaction at this point." Iranian naval ships demanded the Maersk Tigris cargo ship enter Iranian waters to be boarded as it was sailing in an internationally recognized shipping lane in the Strait of Hormuz.       http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/194731#.VUD9etJViko
.
6.
 Nigerian Army Rescues 200 Girls from Boko Haram  
(Ben Ariel) - Nigeria's army has rescued 200 girls and 93 women during a militaryoperation to wrest back the Sambisa Forest from the Boko Haram Islamistterrorist group, Reuters reported on Tuesday... "Troops this afternoon rescued 200 girls and 93 women from Sambisa Forest. We cannot confirm if the Chibok girls are in this group," the army said on Tuesday, adding Nigerian troops had also destroyed three camps run by the terrorists there. Boko Haram kidnapped more than 200 schoolgirls near the northern village of Chibok in April 2014, causing an international outcry. Diplomats and intelligence officials say they believed at least some of the girls were being held in the forest about 100 kilometers (60 miles) from Chibok, although U.S. reconnaissance drones failed to find themhttp://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/194716#.VUD_DNJViko
.
7.
A Palestinian woman, shopping at an open-air market in Gaza, complains to Al Jazeera News about a new tax being imposed by Hamas, April 25, 2015.
 The Palestinians No One Talks About  
(Khaled Abu Toameh) - The international community seems to have forgotten that Palestinians live not only in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, but also in a number of Arab countries, especially Syria, Jordan and Lebanon...Western journalists covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict regularly focus on the "plight" of Palestinians who are affected by Israeli security policies, while ignoring what is happening to Palestinians in neighboring Arab countries. These journalists, for example, often turn a blind eye to the daily killings of Palestinians in Syria and the fact that Palestinians living in Lebanon and other Arab countries are subjected to Apartheid and discriminatory laws. A Palestinian who is shot dead after stabbing an Israeli soldier in Hebron receives more coverage in the international media than a Palestinian woman who dies of starvation in Syria.       http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5654/palestinians-oppression
.
8.
Remembering the Mighty Slepak
 Remembering the Mighty Slepak  
(Maxid D. Shrayer) - Vladimir Slepak, lionhearted warrior of the Soviet Jewry movement, died in New York on April 23. He will rest in Israel, which became his home in 1987 after seventeen years of fighting the Soviet regime for the right to live there...Vladimir (Volodya) Slepak was one of the leading figures among the refuseniks—Jews who had applied to emigrate from the Soviet Union but were illegally held back, disenfranchised, and severely persecuted by the KGB and other branches of the regime. He was also a member of the Moscow Helsinki Watch Group, a human-rights organization founded in 1976 and made up mainly of Soviet dissidents. As a dissident, Slepak sought the reform of the ideologically bankrupt Soviet system; as a Jewish activist, he sought to free his own family and others from captivity.       http://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/2015/04/remembering-the-mighty-slepak/
.
9.
61133666_gehad_el_haddad_bbc.jpg
 Clinton Aide Gets Life in Prison  
(Matthew Vadum) - An Islamic terrorist leader who jumped straight from his job at the Clinton Foundation to a post with Egypt’s jihadist Muslim Brotherhood has received a life sentence back home for seditious activities...It provides yet more damning proof of the ties of presidential candidate Hilly Clinton to totalitarian Muslims while throwing more light on the shady goings-on of the terrorist-friendly international cash-for-favors clearinghouse known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. (The endlessly corrupt foundation, which has taken oceans of cash from Islamic regimes that persecute women and religious dissenters, was profiled at length by this writer last week in FrontPage).       http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/matthew-vadum/clinton-aide-gets-life-in-prison/?utm_source=FrontPage+Magazine&utm_campaign=f3dde2b8ec-Mailchimp_FrontPageMag&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_57e32c1dad-f3dde2b8ec-156509103
.
10.
sfj.jpg
 The Pro-Terrorist Front Groups On American Campuses  
(David Horowitz) - Americans are shocked when a news report reveals that an American has turned up in Syria fighting for the terrorists. If the jihadist is then identified as a Somali immigrant who settled in Minnesota but never assimilated to the American way of life...there is a sigh of relief, perhaps accompanied by concern that so many immigrants are currently coming from regions plagued by religious hatreds and terrorist wars. The concern is real but the relief is a false one, based on a misunderstanding of the many dimensions of the “grand jihad” being waged by terrorist parties like the Muslim Brotherhood. This week I traveled to the Midwest to speak at Ohio State, home of the Buckeyes, to an audience of 130 students. My subject was the campus war being waged against Israel by two student fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood – the Muslim Students Association and the Committee for Justice in Palestine. These groups are not themselves terrorists. But they are carrying out a propaganda war crafted by terrorists that is designed to help Hamas “obliterate” the Jewish state by portraying it as a criminal occupier of Palestinian land.        http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/david-horowitz/the-pro-terrorist-front-groups-on-american-campuses/?utm_source=FrontPage+Magazine&utm_campaign=f3dde2b8ec-Mailchimp_FrontPageMag&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_57e32c1dad-f3dde2b8ec-156509103

 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

 
Choice To Do What?
Tom McLaughlin
.
abortion.jpg
(tommclaughlin.blogspot.com) - Thirty years ago, my students did a lot of formal debates in class. After brainstorming current events topics, they usually chose abortion. First, we defined terms. I asked each class if someone could define abortion. Fourteen-year-olds have fully developed brains, but lack nuance. I’d call on a student whose hand was up and he/she would say something like: “Abortion is when a woman is pregnant and she kills the baby inside her.”
inductiondeduction-17-728.jpg
That plainly worded definition is typical of 14-year-olds. They’re refreshingly direct. Every year, in every class, the first student I called on would define abortion in almost exactly the same way.
530fe8142d342.preview-620.jpg
“Does everyone agree with that definition?” I’d ask.
There would be nods all around, and I’d write it on the blackboard. Then I’d explain that people who supported abortion called themselves “Pro-choice” and people who were against it called themselves “Pro-life.” Pointing to the definition, I’d circle the words “kill” and “baby,” then tell them that a seasoned “pro-choice” person would never utter those words in a debate. A pro-life person, however, would nearly always use them. “A definition like that,” I’d say, pointing the board again, “indicates a pro-life bias. I can tell what somebody thinks about abortion by the words they use to define it.” At this point I’d look toward the student who gave it. “Is that your opinion? Are you pro-life?” Usually he or she was, but not always.
090515-abortionPoll-bcol-1.grid-6x2.jpg
Then I’d ask how a pro-choice person would define abortion. Students would ponder what I said and offer suggestions like: “It’s when a woman finds out she’s pregnant and doesn’t want to be, so she goes to a doctor and he takes it out.”
Unknown.jpeg
“Not bad,” I’d say. “A pro-choice person would never say ‘baby’ or ‘kill.’ Instead, he or she would use words like ‘fetus’ for ‘baby,’ and ‘remove,’ or ‘terminate’ for ‘kill.’” Then I’d ask if anyone else could craft a pro-choice definition. Eventually I’d get one that sounded just like something out of NARAL literature, such as: “When a woman terminates her pregnancy,” which I’d also write on the board.
85b61871a7f956d6f975145c0bf68efa.jpg
Often a student would ask my opinion on abortion at this point, and I’d say, “I’ll tell you after the debate is over.”
abortion-debate1.jpg
Then students chose which side they wanted to argue. If there were too many on one side or the other, I’d try to even them up by challenging some to argue the opposite of what they believed. Some of the sharpest students would usually offer to do so.
11.jpg
After that, I let them sit in their groups to prepare. My instructions were that they start recording their side’s strongest arguments on one list, then record their opponents’ strongest arguments on another.
“Why do you want us to list our opponents’ arguments?” they’d ask.
Opposing-Viewpoints.jpg
“So you can prepare counter-arguments to use during the debate when they bring up those points,” I’d answer. “It’s what opposing lawyers would do in a courtroom. You need to research all sides of any issue. As someone said once: ‘You don’t fully understand your own side unless you understand your opponent’s.’”
plannedparenthood65.png
Then I’d write the names of organizations championing one side and the other, and instruct students to write to them, telling them they’re debating abortion in class, and could they please send materials. For the pro-choice side, I’d give contact information for Planned Parenthood, NARAL America - then called The National Abortion Rights Action League, and NOW - National Organization for Women, etc. For the pro-life side I’d give contacts for the National Right to Life Association and a local, Maine group called the PLEA - Pro-Life Education Association, which always responded right away.
baby-5.jpg
Of course this was during years before students could download information from the internet. They’d have to write away for it and I’d allow time for that, usually a couple of weeks. The PLEA information always came first, maybe because they were in Maine - and they’d always send pictures of just what resulted from abortions at various stages. When those pictures arrived, they’d be shown around before my classes began. Students would come up to me in the hallway with solemn looks and ask me if I’d ever seen pictures of aborted babies.
imp20.jpg
“Yes,” I’d say. “Shocking, aren’t they?”
“Can we use these in the debate?”
“I’ll have to think about that,” I’d respond.
margaret-sanger-jewslatinos-human-weeds.jpg
The pictures would be seen by some staff as well. Women, usually teacher aides (now called “ed techs”) who worked in my classroom, would approach me with serious looks just as my students had. “Have you seen the abortion pictures floating around?”
“Some, yes.”
if-abortion-isnt-wrong-then-nothing-is-wrong.jpg
“Are you going to allow them in the debate?”
“I’m not sure. What do you think?”
“Well, it’s hard to argue in favor of abortion after seeing them, and that’s not fair to the pro-choice side.”
551d2f25c8e91.jpg
Now, thirty years later, that is still the crux of the matter. Who can argue the pro-choice side after looking at exactly what the choice is?
.
.
('' YOUR OPINION IS IMPORTANT TO ME WHAT DO YOU THINK ? '')
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center