{spectator.org} ~ Democrats fighting to expand a woman’s “right to choose,” no matter how far along her pregnancy, claim late-term abortions are rare and done only when the woman’s health or life is at stake or the fetus has a fatal condition... That’s false. Here’s the truth: At least twelve thousand late term abortions are done every year in the U.S., and almost none out of medical necessity. Fetal abnormalities “make up a small minority of later abortions,” according to Diana Greene Foster of the University of California, San Francisco, lead investigator of the largest ever study of women seeking late-term abortions. Foster reports that threats to the health of the mother are even rarer. The study found women’s reasons were all over the place, including travel considerations, expense, indecision, and disagreement with the father. Sixteen percent of abortion facilities terminate pregnancies that are 24 weeks along out of the full 40-week term, when many fetuses are viable outside the womb, according to the Congressional Research Service. Democrats are trying to make it even easier to get late-term abortions in states like New Mexico, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Virginia... https://spectator.org/dems-abortion-lies/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=9f30dd4808-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_13_05_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-9f30dd4808-104608113
“The project, as currently planned, would cost too much and take too long,” declared Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom in his State of the State Address this week.
Oh.
So, after current construction on one leg is done, Newsom laid the track for abandoning the boondoggle, though state Democrats rushed to insist he’s not killing the statewide plan.
Reason’s Scott Shackford writes of the California train, “Voters approved a ballot initiative in 2008 that set aside a $10 billion bond to begin the project of building a high-speed rail line from Los Angeles to San Francisco with the promise that more funding would come through from the feds or from private sources, that the train would not require subsidies to operate, and that it would help fight climate change.” Indeed, Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s infamous “stimulus” redistributed $3.5 billion to California for the train. Gavin’s not entirely giving up primarily because he’s “not interested in sending” that money “back to Donald Trump.”
Not to be completed until at least 2033, the latest estimate for the train’s price tag was $77 billion after initial estimates pegged it at $33 billion. In reality, it would probably end up costing well over $100 billion.
Newsom’s lack of enthusiasm for his predecessor Jerry Brown’s beloved project isn’t new, but the timing of his comments couldn’t have been worse for Green New Deal proponents. Doubly so as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared (with a smirk) that the chamber will actually vote on the resolution to “give everybody an opportunity to go on record and see how they feel about the Green New Deal.”
Dan McLaughlin quips, “If something is too expensive to build once, why not build it everywhere in the country instead?” He’s obviously joking, but don’t be surprised if that’s exactly the argument trotted out by GND chief engineer commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. ~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/61136?mailing_id=4075&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4075&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
Comments