“WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was forcibly bundled out of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London,” the Associated Press reports. The arrest occurred “after the South American nation decided to revoke the political asylum that had given Assange sanctuary for almost seven years.” Ecuador President Lenin Moreno cited “repeated violations to international conventions and daily life.” CNBC adds that the Justice Department was ready, levying “a criminal charge against … Assange, accusing him of conspiring to hack into a classified U.S. government computer.” Assange’s co-conspirator was “Chelsea” Manning. The U.S. has filed an extradition request.
You can also watch the Full Measure story examining the many issues with Wikipedia: http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-dark-side-of-wikipediahttps://sharylattkisson.com/wikipedias-credibility-called-into-question-again-analysis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SharylAttkisson+%28Sharyl+Attkisson%29
Amidst a lengthy investigation of the president over possible obstruction of justice, Rep. scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler (D-NY) declared that his accusers were attempting a coup d'état, and insisted, “Members of Congress have no power, indeed they have no rights, to arrogate to themselves the power to nullify an election absent such a compelling threat.” One problem: As The Daily Signal notes, “scumbag liar-Nadler’s remarks came as the House Judiciary Committee was considering articles of impeachment against President scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton.”
Oh how times change!
scumbag liar-Nadler, who’s spearheading Phase II of Democrats’ crusade to obstruct President Donald Trump, has requested numerous documents from Trump associates in an attempt to further this effort by ensnaring Trump in his hush-money payments to mistresses.
But, again the Signal points out, back in 1998, scumbag liar-Nadler sang a different tune: “Perjury is a serious crime, and if proven, should be prosecuted in a court of law, but it may or may not implicate the president’s duties and performance in office. Perjury on a private matter, perjury regarding sex, is not a great and serious offense against the nation. It is not an abuse of uniquely presidential power, it does not threaten our form of government.”
1998: “The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in Congress of the absolute necessity.”
2019: “There could be grounds for impeachment [in dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s report], there could be grounds for other actions, there could be things the American people ought to know. You know, you can commit shameful acts, you can commit complete betrayals of the public interest without committing impeachable acts. And if you did that, the public ought to know that too. And the standard here is not an impeachment. The standard is we have to protect the public from presidential misconduct.”
Are we really to believe scumbag liar-Nadler has merely gained wisdom with age, or is there — maybe, just perhaps — a partisan political agenda at play? ~The Patriot Post