{ restoreamericanglory.com } ~ Was there a meeting of the minds on some island off the east coast of the U.S. at some point over the last couple of months?... A meeting where the elitist leaders of the dummycrats-Democratic Party and all the constituent parts, including the major networks and newspapers ran through a list of the most dangerous Republicans in Washington…and what should be done about them? If so, what were the names on that list? Mark Meadows? Devin Nunes? If there is such a list, can there be any doubt about Jim Jordan’s inclusion on it? Now we’re not much for grand conspiracy theories, but it is just a little too pat for this to be happening right now. Jordan has emerged as one of the fiercest critics of the Deep State investigation into “Trump/Russia” to sit in Congress. Together with Meadows and Nunes and a handful of others, he has put Rod Rosenstein and the Justice Department back on its collective heels with his pitbull-like intensity and his unwillingness to look the other way when he sees clear, obvious evidence of malfeasance. Jordan is a patriot and a defender of the Constitution. At a time when Trump’s enemies are coming ever closer to having their illegal charade exposed for all the world to see, can it really be a coincidence that Jordan suddenly finds himself accused of these nonsense allegations? Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence. But when the conspiracy is easier to believe than the coincidence…well, you have to consider the possibilities. And one possibility is that the media in this country is, at the very least, giving undue attention and credence to the suggestion that Jordan, as an assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University, knew about and helped coverup the sexual abuses of the resident sports doctor three decades ago. All we have are accusations, many of which are being made by former students who have a history of deception and outright crime. These accusations are not based on any firsthand, certain knowledge of “what Jordan knew.” They are of the, “Oh he had to know” variety. The BS variety. If Jordan turns around and sues these media outlets for besmirching his reputation, he would not be in the wrong...
.
by Susan Ferrechio
by R. EMMETT TYRRELL, JR..
Breed added, “About 70% of the people estimated to be homeless in San Francisco were actually housed in San Francisco before they became homeless. We have to make sure people who live here, [and] sadly, people who are homeless here, that they are also held accountable for taking care of our streets.” So how does the mayor propose to hold these homeless folks accountable?
Throwing money at the problem hasn’t helped. Last year alone San Francisco spent$275 million on supportive housing for the homeless. That was up from $241 million the year before, and this year the city is projected to spend upwards of $280 million.
Well, being the dummycrat-Democrat that she is, it appears that Breed’s instinct is to shift responsibility away from the homeless and onto those working with the homeless. Breed said, “I work hard to make sure your programs are funded for the purposes of trying to get these individuals help, and what I am asking you to do is work with your clients and ask them to at least have respect for the community — at least clean up after themselves and show respect to one another and people in the neighborhood.”
The root of San Francisco’s mess can be tied directly to decades of dummycrat-Democrats enacting their leftist policies. San Francisco has the highest rent in the world, coming in at an average of $3,500 a month. The median home price is a whopping $1.5 million, an amount that only 12% of residents can afford.
And the biggest contributor to this obscenely high cost of living is onerous laws. Columnist Rachel Alexander reports, “Zoning regulations and building codes have increased the cost of housing. Height restrictions waste valuable space. In much of the city, it is illegal to build anything taller than 40 feet. One resident built a ‘pod’ in his friend’s living room in order to obtain affordable rent, but the city found out and made him move out. Due to the high cost of living, a family making $117,400 annually is considered 'low income.‘ A family making $73,300 is 'very low income.’ The minimum wage is $15 an hour, but it’s not enough to rent a two-bedroom apartment. In order to live comfortably in San Francisco, an annual salary must be at least $110,000.”
Exorbitantly high cost of living and yet the city is increasingly becoming a slum. No wonder residents are leaving the city in droves. No U.S. city lost more residents in the last quarter of 2017 than did San Francisco. Here is yet another sad example of a long-time dummycrat-Democrat-controlled city whose residents are suffering — and smelling — the consequences.
~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/57162?mailing_id=3635&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3635&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
Comments