"The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing But the Truth"

As a True American, I like many of you have a deep concern in regard to the path this Tyrannical Government has chosen to take us.

I fully agree with this article as I feel personally that many Americans or in denial through fear of the U.S. Constitution and the power it grants to "We The People"

Ladies and Gentlemen, at the end of the day and when the dust clears it is pertinent that we understand clearly what our founding documents mean to us.

As stated here it may be the difference between living a life of Freedom and Liberty or slavery.

This article (Statement) was written by Dean Garrison of the D.C. Clothesline. As requested by the D.C. Clothesline, the article is granted permission to be posted provided a link is established to the Blog.

Link Is as follows: D.C. Clothesline

I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.

About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.

Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.

Why is a democracy potentially just as dangerous as a monarchy? Let’s look at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin

Even 230+ years ago our founders were perceptive enough to realize that democracy was a dangerous form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country can become just as corrupt as any government. We have seen evidence of this throughout history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population can become corrupt.

I think in 2012 we are seeing evidence of what Franklin was trying to tell us. Just because a majority of people may support certain ideas it does not mean that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just because most Americans love our president and voted for him, it does not mean that he has the power to go against our constitutional rights.

Next I’d like to review the text of the second amendment. It is very clear. This is the law of this land. So when Senator Feinstein or President Obama talk about taking your guns, you need to think about something. Are they honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This is a pretty clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court to even rule on this amendment because it has never been successfully challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to take this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own guns. If you want to research this decision further you can start here.

For those who try to debate the spirit of the 2nd amendment, they are truly no different from people who will try to take Biblical quotes out of context to try to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on the intent of the 2nd amendment. Let me share a few quick quotes here:

The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas Jefferson

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good. -George Washington

The Constitution shall never be construed….to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. -Samuel Adams

I could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who voice their opinions against this right have their free speech protected by your guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments become null and void, simply because “We the People” will lose our power of enforcement.

We need to keep this in mind as our “representatives” try to push gun bans. I don’t care if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and simple.

A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual even when their ideas are very much in the minority. If I were the only person in America who believed in the 2nd amendment, I would still be within my rights to call upon it. You would all think I was insane and possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, but in the end I would be the only true American among us.

Our framers were very clear on this. If my government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.

It is not my right, at that point, but my responsibility to respond in the name of liberty. What I am telling you is something that many are trying to soft sell, and many others have tried to avoid putting into print, but I am going to say it. The time for speaking in code is over.

If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson’s quote. He talks about a “last resort.” I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think about that, but please understand that a majority can not take away your rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights.

Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason we have a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme Court can also become corrupt, in 2008 they got it right. They supported the constitution. It does not matter what the majority supports because America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights of every single citizen, no matter what their “elected servants” say. A majority in America only matters when the constitution is not in play.

I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You are protected by our constitution.

Most of the articles I am reading on the subject are trying to give you clues without just coming out and saying it. I understand that because certain things in this country will get you on a list that you don’t want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is small and growing so I may not be there yet, but I have dreams. I also have my own list of subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my constitutional rights is on that list.

I am not the “subversive” here, it is the political representatives who are threatening to take away my inalienable rights. If they come to take my guns and I leave a few of them wounded or dead, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend a long time in prison and may face an execution. But I would much rather be a political prisoner than a slave.

If I go down fighting then I was not fighting to harm these human beings. I was simply defending my liberty and yours. It is self-defense and it is what our country was built on. We won our freedom in self-defense. We would not be ruled by a tyrannical government in the 1770′s and we will not be ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical government. There is no difference.

This is a case of right and wrong. As of now the 2nd amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein or Barack have a problem with the constitution then they should be removed from office. They are not defending the constitution which they have sworn an oath to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated egos.

I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes that somehow I can make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. 2%? 20%? I am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our government is banking on this.

What I do know is that this country was founded by people who had balls the size of Texas and Patriotic Americans take shit off of no one, especially our own government. For evidence of that, you might research the Revolutionary War. My question is how many Patriots are left?

I would hope that our officials come to realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making us decide if we want to die free or submit to their rule. I can not tell you where you should stand on that. I do know that it may make the difference between living a life of freedom or slavery.

You must start thinking about this because I believe that the day is coming soon and I personally believe it has already been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that you prepare yourself to react.

I mean no disrespect to our elected officials but they need to understand that “We the People” will not be disarmed. If they proceed then it is they that are provoking us and we will act accordingly. We are within our rights to do so.

For those who are in support of taking the guns, you need to ask yourself a very important question, and I am not just talking about the politicians, because if you support them, you have chosen your side.

Are you willing to die to take my guns?

Views: 983


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by A_Nobody on August 3, 2013 at 3:47pm

The truth from a politician or one's lackeys??? LOL

Comment by Michael G. Thompson on July 28, 2013 at 10:43pm

Brian Sevin, while I cannot find error in your line of thinking, there is a facet in the provocaive assertion, "If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty.", that should be made clear.

You can undeed be within your rights to use lethal force when your lfe, liberty, or pursuit of happiness is criminally threatened. You can also be equally dead for defending your rights too.  If the professional paramilitary organizations (police) follow unconstitutional laws, and detect resistance, they will come in swat teams to subdue anyone offering armed resistance. Remember the shootout with the Symbionese Liberation Army back in the 1900s?

Now I have known for years that you can enjoy liberty while living free, or merely exist under slavery, but not truely live or enjoy liberty under slavery. Since slavery is death to me, I see nothing to lose by acting out an example of how not to illegally threaten a free mans liberty  (regardless if I survive or not).

But everyone must come to that realization before such dire straights, or they will hold out for hope against hope and yield. That is how they will trade their freedoms and inheirant rights (like self-defense) for  a continued existance under slavery.

To repeat this critical idea, no one is guaranteed a life in this world, but a tyrant will promise an existance for any individual who subordinates his freedoms and rights to the state, and offers obedience. Everyone needs to decide how they want to live, and express it legitimately to their representitives of this Republic, before events get to that point.

Reality wont care if you are ready or not, if you dont.


Comment by John Thomas Dunlap on July 28, 2013 at 1:58pm

 really!!!!!! republic rember free speach!!!!!!

Comment by John Thomas Dunlap on July 28, 2013 at 1:55pm

It's because we have let them they an we have forgotten that we are a constitutional republic and NOT a Democracy,we use a slight form of domocracy to make a smoth transition of goverment servants,and some decisions as long as it's not on the supreame law of the land,our represiniteves unfortunatly have become corrupt and lust after power and wealth which are to very powerful motivaters in them self's. that they have become a monarchey and dictators unstead of the elected survents of we the people that put them their and pay to keep them their.they have forgoten , that the law and the constitution  and bill of rights are our's they belong to all of us to protect ,perserve and defend people have lost sight of this . THESE and are great Republic is who we are,and makes us  enviable of all the world.And this man is right we  ,I have a duty to stand up for my God given Right as a freeman to defend my legal right under the constitution to Kill anyone that tries to take that right and all my rights with out being a criminal for if they try to take my Bill of Rights and Constitutional rights it is them that are the tresonous,criminals.And I ,WE have a right to defend ourselfs from criminals who choose to brake tthe law no matter who it is .

Comment by Stephen Kazmer on July 28, 2013 at 9:50am

How can our lawmakers Senate and Congress sit and allow our president to comit crimes and do nothing to stop it?

Comment by Linda Heartland on July 28, 2013 at 9:49am

Comment by Linda Heartland on July 28, 2013 at 9:48am

Comment by Stephen Kazmer on July 28, 2013 at 9:47am

I want to know why this Lawful government body of Senators and the Congressmen would sit by and ALLOW this sitting president to lie, cheat ans steal and allow our people to be murdered in a foreign land and DO NOTHING ABOUT IT. It's clear that this president was aware of gunrunning along the Mexican Border and over 300 deaths came from that stunt, and that this president went against Congress when he also ran guns to Libyan rebels and Syrian rebels and that's a War Powers Crime and the Senate and congress who set the laws and tone of justice in America just sit and allow this criminal activity to continue then on TO the IRS targeting of conservative groups. DOES THIS SENATE HAVE NO SHAME? To do nothing and allow the president this amount of criminal latitude it SCREAMS of collusion between our senators and an out and out criminal President and Cabinet. What has happened to our Law Makers that they let this happen here in America. What kind of a message does this tell the rest of the world-Its says: We're just as criminal as you and we'll do it out in the open now, just to prove it to you that, We ARE a Banana Republic....not America anymore.

*** This IS The Obama Legacy***

Comment by Linda Heartland on July 28, 2013 at 9:41am

THE AFRICAN USURPER....acts without hesitacion,without hiding,..he knows he has the country divided...between the Black Panthers(all blacks),communists,Socialists Bourgeois,corrupt and immoral politicians,parasites,dependents of his government,the Mexican invaders,the Marxist left,which are composed of the "'shit parks",violents,Latinos parasites and spies,the "'occupy wall street",the proud GAYS..with Barry Soetoro as his ''PRIDE GAY"...

The other half,are frightened,intimidated,entranced by stupids and proselytizing speeches,of ''BRAINWASHING","cult of personality",full of terror,division,spied,blackmailed,deceived,which remain inert,expectating a ""DIVINE MIRACLE",for elections,with voters,for a democ-RATS,voters fraudulents,rigged elections 2014-2016,manipulated for the left,the fraudulent and usurper African,fuul of prevends,alms...

With the position of the other half,..they are making accomplices of the communist dictator,the Muslim,''THE WORST ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES",Barry Soetoro or KING HUSSEIN NOBAMA...

The other half,not lift a finger,for his nation,for future generations..they are going strong,the African usurper,the gay...the dictator totalitarian,....and he knows that so acts without impunity,impudence,laughs and mocks his scandals,the minimized,ridicules,...and the all of Americans,believe the lies...

Comment by Buck Crosby on July 28, 2013 at 8:12am

    I concur one hundred percent with this article and I am more than willing to die for my rights . After all, I spent nine years in the military protecting YOUR rights , why are my rights any less important  ?



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel


Judicial Watch->  Emails Show Dossier-Connected Obama State Dept Officials Set ‘Face-To-Face’ Meeting On ‘Russian Matter’ Shortly Before 2016 Election

Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation on Thursday released 84 pages of documents showing Obama’s State Department was central to pushing the ‘Trump-Russia’ hoax shortly before the 2016 election.

The email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a very close associate to Christopher Steele, show them discussing a ‘face-to-face’ meeting in New York on a ‘Russian matter’ in September of 2016.

Via Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch and The Daily Caller News Foundation today released 84 pages of documents, including a September 2016 email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a close associate of dossier author Christopher Steele, discussing a “face-to-face” meeting on a “Russian matter.”

(In June 2016 Nuland permitted a meeting between Steele and the FBI’s legal attaché in Rome. Nuland told CBS News that the State Department knew about the Steele dossier by July 2016.)

According to an op-ed Winer wrote for The Washington Post in 2018, also in September 2016, “Steele and I met in Washington and discussed the information now known as the “dossier… I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nuland, who indicated that, like me, she felt that the secretary of state needed to be made aware of this material.”

A September 17, 2016, email exchange between Nuland and Winer – that was classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy – discusses the political situation in Libya, but also brings up a “Russian matter:”

From: Winer, Jonathan
Sent: September 17, 2016 at 12:40:00 PM EDT
To: Nuland, Victoria J
Subject: Re: Libya Update

Would like to discuss this and a Russian matter.

From: Nuland, Victoria J
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:31 PM
To: Winer, Jonathan
Subject: Re. Libya Update

In ny face to face?

From: Winer, Jonathan
Sent: September 17, 2016 at 1:56:05 PM EDT
To: Nuland, Victoria J
Subject: Re: Libya Update

Yes that was [sic] be good.

From: Nuland, Victoria J
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:58 PM
To: Winer, Jonathan
Subject: Re. Libya Update

Good. I’ll reach out when im there Sunday. [Redacted]

If Victoria Nuland’s name sounds familiar it’s because she has been on Judicial Watch’s radar for a long time and in many of TGP’s previous reports.

In December 2018, Judicial Watch released documents revealing that Victoria Nuland was involved in the Obama State Department’s urgent gathering of classified Russia investigation information and disseminating it to members of Congress within hours of Donald Trump taking office.

In a related lawsuit, Judicial Watch is suing the State Department communications between Ambassador Nuland and employees of Fusion GPS, as well as top ranking Department of Justice, FBI, and State Department officials.

“The Obama State Department was central to the effort to target President Trump with the Russia smear,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These new emails further show that senior Obama State Department advanced the Russiagate hoax just before the 2016 presidential election.”

Tom Fitton   @TomFitton

BREAKING: Obama State Department was central to the effort to target President @RealDonaldTrump with the Russia smear. New emails show how senior Obama State Department advanced the Russiagate hoax just before the 2016 presidential election.

Embedded video

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service