Smarrt Meter WAR

Handicapped Woman Refused Smart Meter, Her Power Is Cut
A handicapped woman in western Ohio had to battle the freezing winter weather this weekend because she refused to allow the local power company to install a “smart meter” on her property. At least, that was until TheBlaze broke the story of this cruel action. Ohio Gov. John Kasich contacted us for more details and three hours later, the power was back. Get all of the details HERE.
 
 Same as Ol Pete was told by Nodal ELEctric-smart meter r NO ELEctricity
 
"Smart Meter" Opponents File Expert Testimony in Supreme Court Case
www.smartmeterdangers.org [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search]
... about health effects and other problems related to wireless smart meters. ... (a published position statement signed by 52 EMF/RF-radiation researchers) ...
 
www.earthcalm.com [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search]
Jun 6, 2011 ... Smart Meter radiation emissions are far more serious than admitted, claim independent EMF ... Protection Against Smart Meters Health Risks ...
 
www.electricalpollution.com [Found on Yahoo! Search]
Transmitting smart meters are a public health ... on the health risks posed by transmitting meters . ... injured by the radiation emissions from Smart Meters ...
 
earthtechling.com [Found on Google]
Aug 25, 2012 ... However, some claim that smart meters are hazardous to human health, emitting dangerous high frequency radio waves that can cause illness ...
 
www.wnd.com [Found on Google]
Dec 18, 2012 ... After watching a video titled “Smart Meters & EMR: The Health Crisis of ... pulsing microwave radiation which Flynn calls “the most dangerous ...
 
www.apfn.org [Found on Yahoo! Search]
Smart Meter radiation emissions are far more serious than admitted, ... Stop KIUC Smart Meter Flyer II, Health Risks . stopkiuc.com [Found on Google]
 
www.emfblues.com [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search]
Dangers of Smart Meter Radiation. There is much controversy over the current installation of Smart Meters both in the USA and ... Smart Meter Health Risks ...
 
www.globalresearch.ca [Found on Google]
Jul 13, 2012 ... Smart Meter Dangers: The Health Hazards of Wireless Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure ... wireless electromagnetic radiation exposure to these new meters, .... Public fears about wireless smart meters are well-founded.
 
www.you-be-healthy.com [Found on Yahoo! Search]
From Jim Waugh who is the Author & publisher of: “Living Safely with Electromagnetic Radiation” Dear Friends, No doubt you are aware of the Smart Meter Program ...
 
www.nowpublic.com [Found on Yahoo! Search]
"Wireless radio-frequency radiation from smart meters can cause medical devices to stop ... All those reports claim there are no health risks from 'smart meters'.
 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   Next
I learned a lot a little too late,Donut learn as I did.  Take care & beware,FTG  The sun shineth upon the dunghill & isnt corrupted. We fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them. Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis  http://wp.me/PmtmV-4W2     
jdD.gif      Image Preview   United States Title IV Flag         Pig flies 3Pig flies 3Pig flies 3

Fully Informed Jury Association

From: Take Back Your Power <info@takebackyourpower.net>

Subject: New post: Maine "Smart Meter" Opponents File Expert Testimony in Supreme Court Case - Take Back Your Power
mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeterslogo

Maine "Smart Meter" Opponents File Expert Testimony in Supreme Court Case

In Maine’s ongoing PUC investigation into the safety of smart meters, opponents turned up the heat this week on Central Maine Power (CMP). Complainants in the case filed their comprehensive expert and lay witness testimony with the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The submissions detail biological and health effects from radiofrequency or microwave radiation (RF) and smart meters.
In his cover letter to the PUC, Bruce McGlaufin of the Portland firm of Petrucelli, Martin and Haddow representing smart meter opponents, noted the comprehensive lay witness testimonies and declarations “provide compelling evidence of the direct adverse health effects related to the radio frequency radiation transmitted by smart meters.” McGlauflin added: "When this direct evidence of real-life human consequences is evaluated together with the expert testimony of some of the most highly qualified scientists and public policy specialists, there is but one conclusion to reach-smart meters pose a significant health risk.”
All of the independent scientists providing testimony for meter opponents are recognized authorities on low-level biological effects of RF or related public health matters. Collectively they have hundreds of peer-reviewed published journal articles to their credit. Experts for the complainants include Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden, the world’s foremost authority on cell phone induced brain tumors and author of over 300 papers on RF issues; Dr. Jerry Phillips, Director of the Center for Excellence in Science, an expert on how low-level RF effects DNA and also expert on the often misused “weight of evidence” approach to evaluating research. Dr. Dariusz Leszczynski of Finland who served on the International Agency for Research on Cancer with Dr. Hardell is another expert who has authored 90 papers and has developed highly specialized screening techniques for transcriptomic and proteotomic analyses showing cell phone effects on gene and protein expression.

"Smart" industry hires law firm which defended asbestos, tobacco, MTBE...

In sharp contrast, witnesses for CMP are hardly published in this field, and are employed by Exponent, a renowned “product protection” firm making its fortune defending products like tobacco, asbestos, benzene and MTBE. Exponent is featured in the book "Doubt is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health" by epidemiologist and former Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety and Health, David Michaels.
“While we have submitted comprehensive, irrefutable, compelling and often tragic testimony” said Ed Friedman, lead complainant in the case, “the fact is the legal burden of proof is on CMP and the PUC to guarantee smart meters are safe, not on us to prove they are not. While the PUC may find there is conflicting evidence on the subject of low-level effects of RF, they still could not meet their statutory requirement to guarantee safety.”
Friedman calls for the complete removal of all smart meters and a return to safe and long-lasting electromechanical meters noting “most possible alternatives shy of this remain unsafe.”
Recent testimony submitted by Maine’s Office of Public Advocate showed several Maine smart meter RF levels below those of the FCC guidelines. “No surprise there,” said Kathleen McGee a complainant in the case adding “the report is as irrelevant as the obsolete government exposure guidelines. Indeed, adverse health effects are occurring at levels lower than the FCC limits. That is our point, well-illustrated by the plain, simple and incontrovertible facts shown in our submitted evidence.”

New health survey

Richard Conrad, a Ph.D. biochemist is another expert and brought his dual perspective as a research scientist and sufferer of electrical sensitivity to designing a survey investigating possible correlations between smart meters and health effects. There were over two hundred survey respondents from around the world. Some significant survey conclusions are that 82% of respondents were in good or excellent health before smart meters and 42% of them developed symptoms prior to any knowledge a smart meter was present (thereby disproving the psychosomatic label industry has tagged smart meter victims with). Before smart meter installation 32% had some electrical sensitivity and this jumped to nearly 68% following smart meter installation. 99% of respondents were very sure (82%) or fairly (17%) sure their symptoms (tinnitus, insomnia, headaches, heart arrhythmias, cognitive difficulties, etc.) were initiated or worsened by smart meters.
A look at survey comments submitted by many respondents tells a story of devastation said Conrad. “Many respondents were forced from their homes, are unable to work anymore and in a constant state of chronic debilitating ill-health following smart meter exposure or installation. Exposure to smart meters has destroyed the ability of many respondents to function normally in their personal and work lives.”
Survey results and other testimony are available on the Maine PUC website and within a few days should be available on the Maine Coalition to Stop Smart Meters website at http://takebackyourpower.net/?email_id=34&user_id=1330&urlpassed=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYWluZWNvYWxpdGlvbnRvc3RvcHNtYXJ0bWV0ZXJzLm9yZw%3D%3D&controller=stats&action=analyse&wysija-page=1&wysijap=subscriptions.
Dianne Wilkins, Coalition organizer, intervenor in this investigation and former complainant in an earlier smart meter case before the PUC had this to say:
“Smart meters threaten our health, our privacy, our security and in no small way our human rights, democracy, dignity and way of life. Smart meters are one of the largest uncontrolled toxic biological experiments of our time. An experiment sanctioned by Maine legislators on unsuspecting and trusting citizens, citizens who are getting ill just going home, making dinner, going to bed; living. Their deployment is unconscionable.”
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center