Sex Religion Government

This is, for sure, a dangerous, delicate, troika.

But, to totally understand just how dangerous, we first recall Cicero.

“To be ignorant of what occurred before you were born is to remain always a child”

Aha, some history.

Our Founders made it clear that Government should keep its nose out of Religion; yours, mine, ours

 = = = = = =

The First Amendment's Establishment Clause prohibits the government from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion.” This clause not only forbids the government from establishing an official religion, but also prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another. It also prohibits the government from unduly preferring religion over non-religion, or non-religion over religion.

 = = = = = =

So, THAT is settled!...KEEP YOUR NOSES OUT OF RELIGION!

 

I’ve not found any specific references to sex in the Declaration, The Constitution, or the Amendments.

They could have made specific instructions to the Government like….

Keep your nose out of sex…. Keep your nose out of sex…. Yours, mine, ours.

But they didn’t. So we are left wondering.

Perhaps they should have said ….. Keep your nose out of sex…. Yours, mine, ours.

They didn’t. But simple WISDOM would counsel Government………..

Keep your nose out of sex…. Yours, mine, ours.

 

Regardless , they didn’t. And now we have Obama plunging the Government deep into the abyss of Sex and Religion and Government

Obama, his ego unchecked, brought us FREE Contraceptives for promiscuous co-eds.

He challenged Congress and even found the nympho Fluke to front for him.

 

He started by putting her in front of congressional committee, begging for pre-paid contraceptives for her promiscuity.

That didn’t go over well…. and Obama was inundated with Letters, Faxes, Petitions , and Lawsuits.

 

He divined the  unfavorable (for him) outcome and offered to negotiate.

His negotiation stance was typical nobummer………

 

I’m here to negotiate… My Position is FIXED…. What can you offer me?

Big Fx*king deal… as his VP once uttered!

 

His first “offering” was……….

OK…. Churches don’t have to provide “FREE” contraceptives; the Insurance Companies will.

 

Well,………… we need a divert at this point.

Obama approaches “negotiation” from a false premise………

  • It is the RIGHT of every female to have free contraception.
  • Based on a false premise that Women have a right to FREE contraceptives,
  • = = = =
  • There is no “right” to free birth control. In fact, there is no “right” to free food, clothing or shelter; all of which are far more essential to human survival than birth control pills.
  • http://www.policymic.com/articles/9581/women-do-not-have-a-right-to...

= = = =  = = = =

His announcement is, nonetheless, ….Let’s Negotiate

His Negotiation strategy is……….

I’ve got my position………what are you willing to give.

 

 

  • Obama jams it thru in obamacare
  • When challenged by public opinion and lawsuits about Churches having to pay,
    • Obama saved the day….. he “negotiated” a compromise by pawning the costs off onto insurance companies
    • NEVER did he “negotiate” the issue of ..” FREE Contraceptives for Women.”
    • NEVER was it debated that Insurance Companies would just roll their new costs into higher premiums ( plus profits)
    • When challenged again, from “affiliated” religious groups ( Colleges, Hospitals, Soup Kitchens)
      • He saved the day….by insisting that insurance Companies provide, but get reimbursed costs from the Gov’t
      • NEVER did he “negotiate” the issue of ..” FREE Contraceptives for Women.”
      • Never did he admit that such practice puts the burden of “free contraceptives for promiscuous females “on my tab”!

 

  • …but… in his PC world, I’m offended.
    • Not only “PCwise”, but he invaded my Religious freedom.
    • Now I have to pay, via higher taxes (where else is he going to get the $$$ ?)
    • Just because I don’t  have the $$$$$$ to hire a Lobby to grease him, I get stuck
    • AGAINST my religious beliefs!
    • …and …. I am offended!
    • …and I DO NOT want  to pay for Flukes condoms!

Now, where is Obama vs. GOD?

IF GOD wanted “no-baby” sex he would have………..

Designed the Menstrual Cycle to be Quarterly or Annual vs. monthly

…. Or he would have bellies change to day-glow-red during ovulation.

 

So we are left with ….. Obama vs. GOD

My message to obummer

Get outta Dodge!

Take a hike!

I hope they sue every last one of your condoms away!

Ooooops….got carried away…. I really don’t want anymore nobammas or Flukes.

I hope they sue his shorts off!

Can anybody HELP ME?

 

 

 

 

Views: 22

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service