Saturday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Google's BIG Lie: 'Without Political Bias'
8Wy3FFOPbjQGjpcJlNvSBk-a-CrD7E8fAeCc2lpJk8Z14KtxUIBwhnwqP5akO6n7MZz_CuVKzGfeT3N-hsXztetIslcbtxfOPxPUWuvMkaEve-Q4wzxuadj2sMBXRlZT_5_6br4mGLok9KwbFN4A9Yvl8jEWHk1ZNKbskMY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by Jordan Candler  
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=150
.
We Could Add Obstruction Of Justice To dirty 
cop-Robert Mueller’s 4 Current Criminal Complaints
jkPkCQNzrEOI3rgIDXDXuCz1KH5yIHbko2uxPUTOLJ20WmP8ykaqsMqkPUL9s-aXkuiUz0Sovueo9VIJMyfskqjPAQB-ilbBOC7eaQKoY-97Z4cB6QGS3oKemPuqAulp2phh=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Tim Brown
{thewashingtonstandard.com} ~ Well, it looks like we’re discovering more and more of the corruption of dirty cop-Robert Mueller... It is being reported that the Office of the Special Counsel deleted text messages from the iPhone of fired FBI agent Peter Strzok before turning it over to the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Yes, these are those infamous text messages between Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page. There are literally thousands of text messages that were wiped from the phones by dirty cop-Mueller’s team. Can you say obstruction of justice? The reason the investigation began was that the DOJ/OIG was notified that there was a significant gap in text messaging data from mid-December 2016 through mid-May 2017 from Strzok and Page’s phones. Meanwhile, both of them walk free while the dirty cop-Mueller probe continues to cost the American people $22 million and he still hasn’t discovered one thing the investigation was supposed to be about...  https://thewashingtonstandard.com/latest-revelation-we-could-add-obstruction-of-justice-to-robert-muellers-4-current-criminal-complaints/
.
scumbag/clown-Schumer welcomes departure 
of 'toxic' Zinke from Trump's 'swamp cabinet'
74UFivvID39CnmB1Ad3IiXt8ylWNbqOc4jJyx0fyA1QFJVqmQVX6YL8A3Rzc0aKQvtk0XKJVJVqpbiPM4pJ1RyOxuQQaYNSQtN-_H8G_6u19hzjQobj12Irz04LGECAEyQuMYoegLLxusaVGV1E6JlNY5s9j_4nUJBF8ppvoDg0NqW5SIYTDflC5Te5xT0v2vWA_3AIxNv_0k_iUFvkx831WhQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by Adam Shaw  
{foxnews.com} ~ Senate Democratic Leader Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer, D-NY, welcomed the news of Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's upcoming departure from the Trump cabinet... calling him "toxic" and declaring that the "swamp cabinet will be a little less foul without him.” “Ryan Zinke was one of the most toxic members of the cabinet in the way he treated our environment, our precious public lands, and the way he treated the government like it was his personal honey pot. The swamp cabinet will be a little less foul without him,” scumbag/clown-Schumer said in a statement. President Trump announced Saturday that Zinke will be stepping down from his post at the end of the year, amid a number of ethics controversies. “Secretary of the Interior @RyanZinke will be leaving the Administration at the end of the year after having served for a period of almost two years,” he tweeted. “Ryan has accomplished much during his tenure and I want to thank him for his service to our Nation.” Trump added that he would announce Zinke’s replacement by the end of next week...  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ryan-zinke-secretary-of-the-interior-will-leave-his-post-at-end-of-year-trump-says
.
The Feminist Life Script Has Made Many 
Women Miserable. Don’t Let It Sucker You  
udei9N769W8l-q_Qfyv7FYNbJiSp_-9bLbOaX0PKo39B4W7w1yUeO03Kb072kyZnSLsBAHNdVHoOijDkycwyILcyRtIsxY9XWzdewfSfleSyysjJiINQ0xMTKTnyyi5Fq-pIi2JGpw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by Joy Pullmann  
{thefederalist.com} ~ Our culture is so saturated with feminism that even conservatives and devoutly religious people like me think inside its wheel ruts... This wouldn’t be a problem, except that feminism is antithetical to human flourishing, both individually and corporately, because it has a false view of human nature. No matter how the evidence piles up in heartbreak after heartbreak, many women continue to give themselves cognitive dissonance. We all want to believe that we’re exceptional, that patterns of human behavior don’t apply to us. That while bad things happened to other people who did the same things we are or want to, those bad things won’t happen to us, too. We’re special. We’re different. Refusing to learn from history and experience only hardens people against the feedback from reality they need to make their lives better through smarter decisions. Thinking that the experience and wisdom of humans across time has a claim on our present behavior allows a form of troubleshooting and decision making using billions of accumulated data points. Yes, it requires humility to consider whether your presuppositions and behavior are wrong, but what you may lose in feminist score keeping you reap a hundredfold in a richly happy life. How do I know? It’s happened to me. I got lucky, with an unintended and unwanted pregnancy. We were married, but I was devastated, because I had wanted to do what everyone says you should, and focus on my career right out of college. My husband and I called the baby our “fruitcake”: that present you get that nobody knows exactly what to do with. A finicky baby, he kept that nickname deservedly for his first two years. Now, it no longer fits him...  http://thefederalist.com/2018/12/11/the-feminist-life-script-has-made-many-women-miserable-dont-let-it-sucker-you/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=b1a9906944-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_12_14_08_39&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-b1a9906944-83771801
.
scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton Files New Answers
Under Oath About Illegal Email System
5AheuTooSFUPkwgiklGXcR214Rudn5YoFzJQ9zoh-D3XM2UBNVnOSonHNeknWZEhBM9uizH-fj8sH0896-pQx6_1yubrM2GgN-EoLmRSL5xAW_SOkJ5u9ODfvjVddxqbO2xuncUTpd0tM9CspXc_fQb-2w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Tim Brown
{thewashingtonstandard.com} ~ A US District Court Judge ordered scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton to answer questions last month regarding her implementation and use of her illegal email server while she was Secretary of State...  She initially rejected providing answers, but ultimately submitted them. In her answers, scumbag/liar-Clinton said she disregarded the law against her unlawful server for the “purpose of convenience.” In 2016, scumbag/liar-Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions. She refused to do so. U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled on November 15 that within 30 days scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her illegal email server. Those two questions she had to answer were:  Describe the creation of the scumbag/liar-clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational. - During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts. At the time of the judge’s ruling, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said, “A federal court ordered scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news.  It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about scumbag/liar-Clinton’s email misconduct.”... Why are the Justice Depart still protecting her?  https://thewashingtonstandard.com/purpose-of-convenience-hillary-clinton-files-new-answers-under-oath-about-illegal-email-system/
.
scumbag-Schiff Calls on DOJ to Rewrite Rules Prohibiting
a Sitting President From Being Indicted
by Rusty

{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ Democrat Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff is requesting that the Department of Justice change guidelines that prohibit a sitting President from being indicted... The call comes as President Trump’s former lawyer has been sentenced to three years in prison for tax evasion, lying to Congress, and other crimes. Michael Cohen arranged payment on behalf of Trump to cover up an affair he allegedly. The implication by Democrats is that he did so at the direction of the President himself, something that remains to be proven. scumbag-Schiff believes the DOJ needs to rewrite the rules, established during the Nixon administration, as a means to prevent Trump from allegedly ‘escaping justice.’ “I think the Justice Department needs to re-examine that OLC opinion, the Office of Legal Counsel opinion,” scumbag-Schiff told CNN, “that you cannot indict a sitting president under circumstances in which the failure to do so may mean that person escapes justice.” While many in the mainstream media scoffed at the notion, President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani has already revealed that dirty cop-Mueller has no intention of indicting Trump, as per the DOJ guidelines. “They, the special counsel’s office acknowledge the fact that they can’t indict us,” Giuliani told NBC News in May. “They know they don’t have that power.”...scumbag-Schiff has been against President Trump from day one.  https://thepoliticalinsider.com/schiff-president-indicted/?utm_campaign=TPI_breaking_newsletter_12_14_2018&utm_source=criticalimpact&utm_medium=email&utm_content=4b4ea4948726422aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI
.
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=150
.
Google's BIG Lie: 'Without Political Bias'
8Wy3FFOPbjQGjpcJlNvSBk-a-CrD7E8fAeCc2lpJk8Z14KtxUIBwhnwqP5akO6n7MZz_CuVKzGfeT3N-hsXztetIslcbtxfOPxPUWuvMkaEve-Q4wzxuadj2sMBXRlZT_5_6br4mGLok9KwbFN4A9Yvl8jEWHk1ZNKbskMY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by Jordan Candler:  It’s no secret that Google has already crossed “The Creepy Line.” A lot of sketchy conduct is happening behind the scenes, which implicates not just consumers and privacy but also politics and policy. Not that the tech giant will admit to such deleterious behavior, of course.

             This week, Google CEO Sundar Pichai faced the House Judiciary Committee, where he laughably asserted, “I lead this company without political bias and work to ensure that our products continue to operate that way. To do otherwise would go against our core principles and our business interests.
               Actually, to do otherwise would reinforce Google’s core principles, and that’s exactly what the company has done. Last year, our Thomas Gallatin reported, “Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology … ran an experiment to determine just how biased toward leftist politics were the nation’s leading social media giants. … Epstein found that Google searches returned twice as many pro-scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton news articles as did Yahoo. Even more disturbing was Google’s targeting tactic. Men in blue states saw more than double the pro-scumbag/liar-Clinton articles than did women in red states.”
               Gallatin continued, “Another study conducted by Nicholas Diakopoulos, a professor at Northwestern University, found that in December 2015 Google search results of presidential candidates showed seven out of every 10 articles were positive toward Democrats, whereas less than six out of 10 were positive for Republican candidates. … On election night, only 1% of 113 featured Google election-related searches produced articles from conservative news sources.” Furthermore, “Conservative media outlets began to see more of their content limited on leading social media sites, such as Prager University witnessing much of its content on Google-owned YouTube being labeled as restricted for no apparent reason other than the fact that it promotes conservative ideology.
               There are other machinations as well. Earlier this year, our Louis DeBroux reportedthat “Google finds itself the subject of a lawsuit for discriminatory practices, targeting conservative and white male employees for harassment and mistreatment simply because of their appearance and beliefs.” Google also listed the California Republican Party’s ideology as “Nazism,” censored the word “gun,” and utilizes the Southern Poverty Law Center to police YouTube.
               More recently, The Daily Caller reported, “Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election in 2016, internal Google communications … reveal.
               We’d like to know what Pichai’s definition of “political bias” actually is. Because none of these functions appear to be without it.
               Sadly, Democrats couldn’t care less. In fact, during Tuesday’s testimony, they basically blessed Google with carte blanche. According to Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), “Even if Google were deliberately discriminating against conservative viewpoints, just as Fox News and Sinclair Broadcasting and conservative talk-radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh discriminate against liberal points of view, that would be its right as a private company to do so, not to be questioned by government.”
               Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) chimed in, “You’ve got a right to have whatever politics you have. We could subpoena Fox News and bring them in here and beat them up about how 90% of the references on Fox News to Barack scumbag/liar-nObama or scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton are negative, but they’ve got that right under the First Amendment, and you’ve got a right under the First Amendment to have whatever political views you’ve got.
               While technically true, these aren’t fair comparisons. Unlike some of these other big names, Google — whose consumer base is substantially more sizable — isn’t a political entity. Yet its influence is second to none. As Tony Perkins observes, Pichai has “90 percent of the world’s online searches at his fingertips,” and those searches in some cases are being used as a tool for promotion and/or censorship, depending on the circumstance. Furthermore, guys like Rush Limbaugh are distinguished becausethey brand themselves as politically biased. If the circumstances were flipped and it was conservatives being aggrandized by Google, Nadler and Raskin would argue just the opposite.
               Pichai should be ashamed for doubling down with such an egregious lie. And Democrats should be ashamed for cultivating it.  

~The Patriot Post  

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60035?mailing_id=3947&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3947&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • Bonnie

    You got me on that. Maybe get ahold of your senator or a conservative group.

  • HOW CAN WE START A GOFUNDME PG FOR THE PRES BORDER WALL?

    WE CAN CALL IT THE KATE STEINLE MEMORIAL WALL.    HOW IS THAT DONE?

This reply was deleted.