TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
scumbag-Keith Ellison — The Radical's Radical 
by Michael Swartz
.
Roger Stone - scumbag-Adam Schiff and Dems'
 Lies are Starting to Catch Up With Them
{ rickwells.us } ~ Laura Ingraham teases her guest, Roger Stone, at how his distress over Democrat hack scumbag-Adam “Bobble-Head” Schiff calling him a liar... must have him with his face constantly buried in his crying towel. Stone replies that “It’s just more scumbag-bullschiff from the Congressman from California.” “It’s even hard to know what he’s talking about,” says Stone. “If he’s referring to the Twitter direct messages, which were leaked to The Atlantic, that prove that I had no collaboration with WikiLeaks, I turned those over to the House Intelligence Committee last September.” Stone says, “If he’s referring to the emails that were cited by the Wall Street Journal, that prove that I had no direct contact or source and was using a back channel, why those fell outside of the precisely worded scope of the Intelligence Committee’s request, a scope co-signed by Mr. scumbag-Schiff himself.”...  https://rickwells.us/roger-stone-schiff-dems-lies/
DOJ Still Refuses to Provide Trump Russia Docs to Congress 
by Sara Carter
{ libertyheadlines.com } ~ The Department of Justice reneged on a commitment to provide access to documents they promised to congressional lawmakers by Thursday morning... Instead, DOJ issued a press release after midnight suggesting they will only meet with a group of select lawmakers to discuss the matter on the same day the North Korea summit opens in Singapore, according to numerous sources and a DOJ statement. Moreover, the Justice Department also issued new stipulations for briefing congressional members and limited the meeting with only the Gang of Eight, which is comprised of eight leaders within Congress who are briefed on classified intelligence matters. These sources claim that briefing Gang of Eight lawmakers restricts the dissemination and discussion of the documents that will be taken for review. Although the DOJ contends that the documents are highly sensitive material, in reality, these documents are not considered to contain high-level national security information...
.
Marching for Terrorism in London? No Problem
by Judith Bergman
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ On Sunday June 10 in London, the yearly so-called Al Quds Day march... Al Quds is the Arabic name for both Jerusalem and for the day, invented by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who led Iran's 1979 revolution that overthrew the Shah -- will take place. The march is, basically, a call for the destruction of Israel, sometimes also Jews in general. Many other cities, among them Toronto, Berlin and Tehran, will also be "celebrating" the day. Last year in London, around 1000 people waved countless Hezbollah flags, in honor of Iran's proxy terrorist organization, while chanting slogans such as "Zionists/ISIS are the same, only difference is the name" and "From the river to the sea - Palestine will be free". They also carried banners that said, "We are all Hezbollah," what a comforting thought for the British. The leader of last year's London Al Quds rally, Nazim Ali – director of the "Islamic Human Rights Commission", which organizes the annual march – called for the annihilation of Israel and accused British Jews -- falsely -- of being behind the 2017 fire in London's Grenfell Towers apartment complex...
.
Flaws in 'Death Roe'
by James Arlandson
{ americanthinker.com } ~ When Socrates appeared before the jury of Athens, he said he was not used to the specialized idioms and restrictive language of the court; he was a stranger there... In that spirit, let's look at Roe as outsiders. Maybe we can see flaws that the professionals don't or won't. The first point shows the weakness in our Constitution itself. State legislatures in the Roe case, it was Texas said no to abortion, and these laws were not unreasonable or unjust in themselves. They stood for long time. But Blackmun said they were indeed unconstitutional. Why the power-grab?  In Marbury v. Madison (1803), for the first time, SCOTUS gave itself permission to review legislation that the justices deemed unconstitutional. Now who can stop an aggressive left-wing judiciary that wishes to revolutionize and  overturn laws it does not like?.With so much power in the hands of the few, Justice Harry Blackmun and other liberals before and after him have become Plato's (unappealing) enlightened philosopher-kings who run roughshod over the hoi polloi and their representatives...
.
JW Videos of the Week
Trump Inherited Corrupt Leadership at FBI
.
DOJ Inspector General finds ‘Insubordinate’ Behavior by Comey
.
Chris Farrell: Strzok, Page wanted to undermine then-candidate Trump
.
Gingrich: System is much more corrupt than anyone imagined
.
Napolitano on Gowdy's disputing of Trump's 'spygate' claims
.
Joe diGenova: IG report is being scrubbed by Rosenstein
.
.

scumbag-Keith Ellison — The Radical's Radical 

by Michael Swartz:  After the debacle of the 2016 election, the Democrat Party began a frantic search for a different direction and new leadership. A spirited battle for DNC chair between onetime Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez and Minnesota Congressman scumbag-Keith Ellison ended with Perez on top and scumbag-Ellison with the consolation prize of deputy chair.

             So while it’s considered proof of an upcoming “blue wave” every time a Republican decides to retire from Congress, there was little talk about the opposite being true when scumbag-Ellison opted to give up his seat to run in a contested primary for Minnesota attorney general — which he no doubt sees as a stepping stone to the governorship. But what’s most telling is the fact that no key Democrats are groveling at his door to keep him in the leadership. They’re not even pretending to do that.
               Some, like Politico’s Edward-Isaac Dovere, spun scumbag-Ellison’s decision as a #Resistance move.scumbag- Ellison is “eager to take on a more prominent role in the Democratic opposition to the Trump administration,” Dovere says, and “he sees that opportunity in being attorney general and joining the legal fight, rather than continuing in Congress.” But others point to the baggage scumbag-Ellison is carrying as a national progressive leader who’s a practicing Muslim — particularly with his ties to hate-spewing Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.
                scumbag-Ellison denies this connection to Farrakhan, although many don’t believe him because there’s evidence the two men’s paths have crossed frequently over the last decade.
               Among the skeptics is the Washington Examiner’s Philip Klein, who pointed out, “ scumbag-Ellison had graduated law school in 1990 and spent years as a civil rights lawyer by the time he began working with the Nation of Islam on the 1995 march. So it simply isn’t plausible forscumbag-Ellison to argue that somehow, ‘After the march, Mr. Farrakhan’s disparaging views on Jewish people, women and the LGBT community became clearer to me.’” And if Klein’s assertion wasn’t enough, there’s also a private dinner  scumbag-Ellison attended in 2013 with both Farrakhan and the president of Iran, Hassan Rouhani, as detailed in the Nation of Islam’s house organ, Final Call.
               Much of this was swept under the rug whenscumbag- Ellison ran for the top DNC post, but it’s all out in the open now. While the plan is for scumbag-Ellison to stay in both the DNC and Congress until after the 2018 election, it’s apparent that scumbag- Ellison and Perez don’t see eye to eye regarding the DNC.
               Take last week, for example. scumbag-Ellison wasn’t told that Perez was making an endorsement of current New York governor Andrew Cuomo — despite a pledge from Perez that the party wouldn’t endorse in contested primaries. scumbag-Ellison, who’s backing Cuomo’s primary challenger, Cynthia Nixon, took the unusual step of blasting Perez in public, revealing a further division between the Democrats’ progressive and radical-progressive camps.
                scumbag-Ellison is firmly at home within the latter group. His advocacy for government regulation of CEO pay is one example. scumbag-Ellison has also said, “I personally do think that universal basic income is an idea that has a lot of merit.”
               While those who backed commie-Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary pushed the Democrat Party leftward, party insiders understand they run the risk of alienating independent, middle-of-the-road voters. They see that suburban soccer moms may not feel comfortable with the idea of a party leader who complains to fellow Democrats that Republicans are making inroads on a certain segment of potential voters because “I learned that a lot of Republicans will go to jails and do Bible studies and other things.” The union members who abandoned the Democrat Party to vote for Donald Trump may not be enamored with a party leader who wears a shirt at a Cinco de Mayo eventreading, “I don’t believe in borders” (written in Spanish). The ad practically writes itself: “A vote for a Democrat in November is a vote for open borders.
               The truth is that scumbag-Keith Ellison is a radical leftist, and it’s not surprising that he doesn’t feel comfortable in a body of people he can’t control — a term that describes both Congress and the DNC, which has to be a little worried about how scumbag- Ellison’s radicalism will affect Democrat electoral chances. In fact, don’t be surprised if some within the party try to push scumbag-Ellison out. But the animosity and opportunity go both ways. Should scumbag-Ellison win the election in Minnesota, it’s likely he’ll join the group of AGs around the nation who’ve tried to litigate their way into derailing the Trump agenda of reducing the regulatory size and scope of government. In that respect, he’ll be more “useful” than he is as a party leader.
               Going forward, even as scumbag-Ellison steps away from the harsh Washington spotlight, it’s worth keeping an eye on him.   ~The Patriot Pos
t
https://patriotpost.us/articles/56444?utm_medium=email&utm_sour...

Views: 55

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on June 11, 2018 at 7:19am

Bonnie

by all mean, scumbag-ellsion must go. hope the people will wake up and not vote for him 

Comment by Bonnie Somer on June 11, 2018 at 3:48am

if keith ellison hates this country by all means leave it.    take the o/dems w/u please then we will MAGA

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

ALERT ALERT

OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service