TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
'Whistleblower' Unmasked?
Thomas Gallatin
.
Republicans question why 
scumbag-Schiff is running impeachment
by Susan Ferrechio
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ Under normal circumstances, the House Intelligence Committee would not have jurisdiction over the string of witnesses who have filed into the impeachment proceedings... in the Capitol basement or the subject matter they are talking about. None of the material is classified, and those who have appeared before the panel are mostly diplomats whose testimony about a July 25 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would more suitably be scrutinized by the House Foreign Affairs Committee or the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Both the Foreign Affairs and Oversight panels have been invited to participate in the closed-door meetings, but it is scumbag-Schiff and the Intelligence Committee staff Democrats who run the proceedings and who will write the final report that will determine whether the House votes on articles of impeachment. Republicans say the mismatch raises questions about how Democrats are proceeding with the impeachment process and why scumbag-Schiff, and Intelligence, was chosen to run it. “There is absolutely nothing whatsoever in the whistleblower complaint that has any kind of intelligence component at all,” a top GOP aide told the Washington Examiner. “A presidential phone call with a foreign leader is not an intelligence matter.” The whistleblower complaint shifted the impeachment proceedings to the control of scumbag-Schiff and away from the Judiciary Committee and Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler who had declared he was running impeachment proceedings without the blessing of liar-Pelosi...   https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/republicans-questi...   
Rep. John Ratcliffe: scumbag-Adam Schiff’s 
Problem Isn’t That He’s Biased, It’s That 
He’s Running A Corrupt Process
By Sean Davis
{ thefederalist.com } ~ A former federal prosecutor who sits on the committee tasked by Democrats with removing President Donald Trump from office blasted Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., as being unfit to oversee the process... Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Tex., told The Federalist on Friday that scumbag-Schiff’s problem isn’t mere partisan political bias, it’s that scumbag-Schiff has a conflict of interest given his secret interactions with the anti-Trump whistleblower before his false complaint against Trump was even submitted. “It’s more than just bias—it’s an actual legal conflict of interest,” Ratcliffe told The Federalist. “scumbag-Schiff is using his authority as a Chairman presiding over an impeachment inquiry to prevent the investigation and discovery of facts about his own actions or the actions of his staff.” “He is essentially a witness in the trial over which he is presiding,” Ratcliffe continued. “He has a conflict of interest because his testimony is relevant to the origins of the impeachment process that he is simultaneously conducting, directing and managing.” Although scumbag-Schiff initially claimed that he and his staff had never interacted with the anti-Trump complainant and didn’t even know who he was, the New York Times reported that the whistleblower secretly coordinated with scumbag-Schiff’s Democratic staff, who then urged him to file a complaint against the president. “The person who planted fake evidence shouldn’t be the one ruling on the admissibility of fake evidence,” Ratcliffe said on Friday. “Despite initially denying any contact with the whistleblower, scumbag-Schiff had already been briefed about at least one meeting between his staff and that individual prior to the filing of the complaint,” Ratcliffe said. “Material facts about the date, nature and extent of that meeting as well as any other contacts, communication or possible coordination between Chairman scumbag-Schiff, his staff and the whistleblower were never disclosed by any of those parties to ICIG Michael Atkinson—facts confirmed in the sworn testimony of ICIG Atkinson which Chairman scumbag-Schiff is refusing to release.”...   https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/rep-john-ratcliffe-adam-schiff... 
Trump pushes for ‘whistleblower’ to explain 
his fraudulent claim, spy-like deal 
with ‘Shifty scumbag-Schiff’
by Frieda Powers
{ bizpacreview.com } ~ President Trump again took aim at the “whistleblower” who sparked the impeachment inquiry, demanding he “come forward” and explain his actions... The president doubled down on previous attacks on the intelligence community official who filed a complaint about his July phone conversation with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, and his request to investigate former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s son, Hunter.“The Whistleblower must come forward to explain why his account of the phone call with the Ukrainian President was so inaccurate fraudulent?. Why did the Whistleblower deal with corrupt politician Shifty scumbag-Adam Schiff and/or his committee?” Trump tweeted Friday evening, ahead of an exuberant rally in Tupelo, Mississippi. The president’s tweet came just one day after adivided House vote to formalize procedures for the impeachment inquiry. Democrats working along with House Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag-Adam Schiff, as well as lawyers for the whistleblower, have been trying to safeguard his identity. Despite rampant speculation, and claims that his name is an open secret in Washington, the identity of the whistleblower is still protected by law. “Our primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected,” scumbag-Schiff told CBS’ “Face the Nation” in October, speaking of the whistleblower who isbelieved to be a career CIA officer who served on the White House National Security Council in the early months of Trump’s presidency, after being in the position during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration. A new report this week indicated that talks between the whistleblower’s legal team and scumbag-Schiff’s staff had ceased, and a second whistleblower who backed the claims by the first would also not be testifying...  https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/11/02/trump-pushes-for-whistleblo...  
.
Judge Makes BIG Decision 
In Case Regarding Gen. Michael Flynn
by Martin Walsh
{ explainlife.com  } ~ Many are still wondering why corrupt scumbag/liar-nObama-era figures have not been charged or held accountable for their actions... but former White House national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn is still fighting for his freedom. But things kicked up a notch this week when Flynn’s attorney, Sidney Powell, presented evidence in court that was apparently so powerful the judge issued a surprise order. Powell filed a brief on the public docket detailing evidence that federal prosecutors had withheld from her client. The brief also detailed several instances of the FBI’s plot to set up Flynn, which went viral across Twitter last week and led many to call the targeting of Flynn “a disgrace.” Federal Judge Emmett Sullivan, who is presiding over the Flynn criminal case, issued an order that certainly appears to mean even he was taken back by what he had read. “In view of the parties’ comprehensive briefing concerning Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Brady Material, the Court cancels the motion hearing previously scheduled for November 5, 2019,” Sullivan’s order read. The Federalist details what this order could mean: It could mean one of two things. It could mean Sullivan had found the briefing sufficiently clear to allow him to render a decision on Powell’s motion to compel without the benefit of oral argument by the parties. Or it could mean that the briefing was so detailed that Sullivan needed more time to study the arguments before engaging with counsel and intended to reschedule the hearing for later. After Sullivan’s order canceling the November 5, 2019, hearing, the government filed a “Notice of Claims Raised and Relief Sought for the First Time In A Reply Brief,” which suggests federal prosecutors feared Sullivan had made up his mind — and it could be in favor of Flynn. In their filing, the government complained that Flynn’s reply brief “seeks new relief and makes new claims, based on new arguments and new information.”...
.
Army Ranger Vet Announces Congressional 
Run Against Pro-liar-Pelosi 'Moderate Democrat'
By Andrew J. Sciascia 
{ westernjournal.com } ~ A decorated U.S. combat veteran has announced plans to take the fight to incumbent Democratic Rep. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania in 2020... Sean Parnell, a retired Army Ranger and author of the New York Times bestselling memoir “Outlaw Platoon,” tweeted Wednesday that he is gearing up to serve his nation once again — this time as a Republican representative to Pennsylvania’s 17th Congressional District. “I have decided to serve the greatest nation in the world once again and run for Congress in 2020, to represent the great people of Pennsylvania-17,” Parnell wrote. “It’s time that Congress has leaders that listen to the people and are inspired to do what’s best for those they represent,” he said. The Wednesday morning tweet was released in conjunction with an appearance on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” that saw Parnell officially announcing his candidacy on the air. A lifelong Pennsylvanian, Parnell stressed that the people of his state — specifically, residents of rural western counties — are in need of “leadership that truly represents them.” “Right now my opponent does not represent them at all,” he said.“Conor Lamb, he is a self-described moderate Democrat,” Parnell continued. “But the truth of the matter is he voted in lockstep with Speaker of the House liar-Nancy Pelosi 98 percent of the time. “The policies is he advocating for would be absolutely devastating for western Pennsylvania. My job is not only beat him in that district but run for the people and families and children in western Pennsylvania.”...
.
JW Videos of the Week
JW Receives Showing Contacts Between Strzork/Ohr - DOJ Claims it Couldn't Find
Tom Fitton's Weekly Update
Fitton to Trump - Pardon Everyone Caught Up in Mueller's Web
scumbag-Adam Schiff Has Lied Repeatedly About Trump - He's in on The Scam
.
'Whistleblower' Unmasked?
Thomas Gallatin:  Evidently within the Washington Beltway the identity of the anti-Trump “whistleblower” — the hack who submitted a complaint over President Donald Trump’s July 25 phone call with the president of Ukraine — has been an open secret for some time. However, due to House Democrat demands that the whistleblower remain anonymous in order to “protect” him from Trump, the mainstream media has dutifully complied. And House Republicans’ hands have largely been tied by Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has forbidden public comments on the specifics of the closed-door hearings.
 

Thanks to reporting from RealClearInvestigations, however, the secret is out: The anonymous “whistleblower” is likely a 33-year-old government official named Eric Ciaramella. When the Washington Examiner sought to verify the “whistleblower’s” identity with House Republicans, none were willing to give a straightforward confirmation, but several did offer tacit approval.

Tellingly, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) stated, “Well, as far as that particular person, regardless of whether or not he’s a whistleblower, he apparently worked for [former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John] Brennan. He worked for H.R. McMaster. He worked for [loose lips liar-Joe] Biden. He was tasked to the National Security Council on Ukraine.” Gohmert then added, “And, gee, sounds like he’s got bigger problems than being a whistleblower, regardless of whether he is or not.”

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) suggested that reporters should ask scumbag-Schiff. “I can’t tell you what happens in the depositions,” he said, “but I can tell you there’s one person in one’s group of staff members who know who the whistleblower is and that is scumbag-Adam Schiff, and so you need to ask him whether this guy is the real deal.” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) echoed Meadows, stating, “Hey, you need to ask scumbag-Adam Schiff. Don’t ask me.” And Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) made it clear that while many Republicans strongly suspect that Ciaramella is the whistleblower, only scumbag-Schiff can confirm it.

With the revelation that Ciaramella is most likely the “whistleblower,” the evidence of this being another deep-state coup attempt is strengthened. Ciaramella, says RealClearInvestigations, is “a registered Democrat held over from the scumbag/liar-nObama White House, previously worked with former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden and former CIA Director scumbag/commie-John Brennan, [and is] a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia ‘collusion’ investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.” He also worked with a DNC “operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.”

Ciaramella worked in the Trump White House until June 2017, when he left and returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, after “he was accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump,” a former NSC official claimed. Another NCS official said that Ciaramella “didn’t exactly hide his passion with respect to what he thought was the right thing to do with Ukraine and Russia, and his views were at odds with the president’s policies.”

Furthermore, scumbag-Schiff is more deeply tied to the plot than was previously known. Indeed, RealClearInvestigations reports, “Earlier this year, scumbag-Schiff recruited two of Ciaramella’s closest allies at the NSC — both whom were also scumbag/liar-nObama holdovers — to join his committee staff. He hired one, Sean Misko, in August — the same month the whistleblower complaint was filed.” Is it any wonder Democrats have been so adamant over keeping the identity of the “whistleblower” secret?

Again, House Democrats, led by Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi (CA) and scumbag-Schiff, have orchestrated this impeachment charade in a secretive manner in order to control the political narrative surrounding it. Their vote to approve a resolution this morning does little to change that.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66472?mailing_id=4623&utm_mediu...  

Views: 7

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service