Saturday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Lesbian Ousted From LGBTQ Commission 
for Believing in Biology
Op44aesnbJEyoIOTtlpYvJA68O4js67E11Soc_aESBg49pp1TfEQvazfxSrzcx6ZKxncog8UjokraKITf5bkWc91bO1d0U1pagdrunER_cdzjuszyiyoJlEFGQW4jYkrg-int3gJC6v0QQKsQszpuPtcusV_3Igzxm4mJ5Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Culture Beat  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Our National Debt Just Hit $22 Trillion. 
Will Congress Finally Take It Seriously?
hDDBkC46BHtlc_bNT3b4gmfKhAbKwvVI6fkka2WVmA0p1QQ0heVoYp_EKR_Yguo7qQPa7mUufLOxWg_QJREne3sRZK-qcllPXTDt66VzXHNVMCcEsvRAAzqFLH1dEgi5rF0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Justin Bogie
{dailysignal.com} ~ Wow. $22 trillion. Let that huge number sink in. It’s the gross national debt reported Monday by the Treasury Department. The question is, now that we have crossed this inauspicious threshold, will Congress finally get serious about changing the nation’s budget course?... For years, the Congressional Budget Office has warned that America’s growing debt is unsustainable, and eventually the repercussions will affect all Americans. Unfortunately, most lawmakers haven’t been paying attention. Instead of implementing reforms to fix the debt problem, Congress largely has ignored it and gone out of its way to avoid making tough budget decisions. The impact of a breathtaking number like $22 trillion is hard to comprehend without context. At more than 107 percent of gross domestic product, as a share of the economy the gross national debt is higher than it has been since 1947. The debt has been higher only three times in U.S. history, all in the immediate aftermath of World War II...   https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/02/13/our-national-debt-just-hit-22-trillion-will-congress-finally-take-it-seriously/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRjeU5qZGhObVZqWmpOaSIsInQiOiJ3a3phOVhOa2RISzU0dHlKZmxwK0dLY1EweUZoQnVnMmYyWE1hMVdveVRUaExEVDJBbUdDUkowdkVHaDNtQjRNQlRcL1o5amhFNmQ5SCtoVzNPMFVSbVAya0pWXC9QaWIrMkkrdWtNczYzQkIwK2thOWlMM1VCZmtLaFROcFMzSFpvIn0%3D
.
Jewish Leaders Aren’t Buying 
Ilhan Omar’s Apologies
2K8ZZRMIZaz3q_GghRizQCOgOYW3IPXYAyJXAdTAamVUYvUMs-q9OSw1-40dcGPiPHxgh2z2wXNog9V-Obwr0j5thcS4KDZZzM2jkHSn_cIWVG7Gl3lKN9jtckuGJ1D5pN5L=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Andrew
{conservativefreepress.com} ~ Not for the first time, Rep. Ilham Omar (D-MN) found herself accused of anti-Semitism this week when she insinuated that Republican politicians were being bought by Jewish lobbying groups so that they would continue to support Israel... The tweets that caused the controversy involved Omar telling journalist Glenn Greenwald that for the GOP,  “It’s all about the Benjamins baby.” When asked specifically who was paying the Republican Party to support Israel, she replied: “AIPAC!” This drew condemnation from across the political spectrum, and Omar – under pressure – released what the called an “unequivocal” apology. Even so, her apology demonstrated the very definition of equivocating. After saying she was sorry for offending Jews with her “THEY CONTROL THE WORLD WITH MONEY” conspiratorial tweets, she said, “At the same time, I reaffirm the problematic role of lobbyists in our politics, whether it be Aipac, the N.R.A. or the fossil fuel industry.” But not CAIR, we assume. In any event, President Trump was not impressed with Omar’s apology. Calling it “lame,” the president said Omar should consider stepping down. “Anti-Semitism has no place in the United States Congress,” Trump said Wednesday. “I think she should either resign from Congress or she should certainly resign from the foreign affairs committee.”...
Religion vs. Free Speech
PG6K1Yf47A4HMBJPqTuzWuHBtCX7dsFDjO2cAHdzAnr-dAGCdMhNiso-mfaOpaz7bvAez35fbMqtnh_9MHTi5OURkg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Denis MacEoin
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Speaking and writing about Islam today requires discretion, sensitivity, and a good grasp of facts. Doing this is harder in most European countries than it is in the United States, where the First Amendment insists on powerful free speech rights... The need for sensitivity stems from the almost universal condemnation of "Islamophobia", a mainly good-hearted response to democratic worries that innocent Muslims may be targeted with violence or hate speech, even as many but far from all seek to integrate themselves and their families into Western society. Raw Islamophobia, like raw prejudice by and against any group, is of course racist, unacceptable and most often expressed by hate groups on the far right of politics. At the same time, it is not surprising that many people will build their attitudes towards Muslims on a perception prompted by Islamist terror attacks, radical Muslim antagonism to Western societies, or uneasiness about Muslims who choose to dress in ways that do not conform to Western norms. The confusion caused also creates problems for many people who have reasonable concerns about Islam as a religion and a political ideology. The problem is that even fair-minded and non-racist authors, websites, members of the media and others end up being tarred with the same brush and condemned as malicious racists themselves. This creates a distorted perception of what has been termed "two Islamophobias," one hateful, the other respectable. The latter, of course, is not Islamophobia at all, any more than presenting a rational critique of any other religion, political thought, or ideology is racist, hate-driven or undemocratic. That confusion between a hate-driven view of Islam and a thoughtful, unbiased criticism of it has led to restrictions on what may and what may not be written or said about Islam or Muslims, while politicians of all varieties, church leaders, and human rights activists have adopted a style of virtue-signalling that tells the world to be silent and accepting, or else they will be called racists or Islamophobes... So what, as long as the facts are shown.  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13539/religion-free-speech 

Worldwide Effort To Restrict Everyone’s 
Right To Travel Is Close To A Reality
pj8HxRLp39RpmY6XL5FL7ZEucXV2apZS_beFVmxRiFbpew3X-BFxwts47abtye_XeS1IFw7yPcmzS37zX7NpYMoqvRsrsYRZ-sxWHMsIaD20GUWG5WHpKr45INl7fDjfNJ69x_mbtGH7UqU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by MassPrivateI
{activistpost.com} ~ According to a recently published white paper there is a worldwide effort to restrict the right to travel of everyone. And you will not believe how the U.N. is involved... A recent  article at PapersPlease.org warns that the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) wants to check every airline passenger’s background and send airlines an “Authority to Carry” before a passenger is allowed to board a plane. An iAPI system allows for a two-way communication in near real-time. The airlines transmit the API message on a per-person basis to the requesting authorities at the time of check-in, while law enforcement agencies have the opportunity to decide whether a certain person is allowed or not to board a plane by issuing a board/no-board message. Think about what this means; the self-proclaimed “largest regional security organization in the world” the OSCE, wants to conduct background checks of every airline passenger in the world. The work of the OSCE spans the globe, encompassing three continents – North America, Europe and Asia – and more than a billion people. Giving a private organization the ability to control the right to travel of nearly 8 billion people is horrifying. The white paper warns that the OSCE and the International Air Transport Association are working together to track every airline passenger...
'The Road to Shariadom' in America
by Janet Levy

{americanthinker.com} ~ The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America (AMJA) is part of an international network of Muslim scholars that preaches shariah rule as a government system, even issuing a fatwa delineating sharia's "superiority" over democracy... 
It is one of many Muslim organizations now dangerously and politically active in the United States. They include the 25-year-old Council of Islamic Relations, CAIR, self-described as a "Muslim civil rights organization" with an Islamic perspective on American public issues. More recent organizations – created in 2015 and similarly politically dedicated – include JETPAC, the Justice, Education and Technology Policy Advocacy Center, which encourages American Muslims to get involved in local politics, and MPower Change, committed to creating a political platform for Muslim issues and organizing around it. All these politically active Muslim-American groups, prominent Muslims and other Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations within the U.S. publicly avow that they have no intention of implementing sharia in the U.S.  Yet, their stated political goals, public statements and recent reports, betray their true intentions: to grow in political strength sufficient to replace our democracy with their religious governance.  More than 100 top Muslim leaders belong to AMJA, which began in 2003. Imams at over 3,100 U.S. mosques look to AMJA for instructional guidance to lead their congregations. The group's name in Arabic, "The Group of Sharia Specialists in America," implies its purpose:  to impel Muslims to follow its comprehensive, sharia-compliant fatwas. Many of the group's leaders attended Egypt's Al-Azhar University, the world's highest academy of Islamic learning and interpreter of the definitive sharia text – The Reliance of the Traveller... What have you done America to let this happen.  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/02/the_road_to_shariadom_in_america.html
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Lesbian Ousted From LGBTQ Commission 
for Believing in Biology
Op44aesnbJEyoIOTtlpYvJA68O4js67E11Soc_aESBg49pp1TfEQvazfxSrzcx6ZKxncog8UjokraKITf5bkWc91bO1d0U1pagdrunER_cdzjuszyiyoJlEFGQW4jYkrg-int3gJC6v0QQKsQszpuPtcusV_3Igzxm4mJ5Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Culture Beat:  Julia Beck is a lesbian woman who was recently kicked off an LGBTQ commission for daring to acknowledge the reality of biology. In an article entitled “How I became the most hated lesbian in Baltimore,” Beck relays her brief experience on Baltimore’s LGBTQ Commission and how her refusal to use a female pronoun when addressing a “transwoman” — i.e., a man claiming to be a woman — got her thrown off.

In her article, Beck argued that treating and viewing “transgender women” as biological females was in fact dangerous to actual women. She writes, “I brought up Karen White, a convicted pedophile and rapist who was placed in a UK women’s prison, despite being legally male and undergoing no steps to socially or medically transition, where he then raped two inmates. White’s case illustrates how easy it is for men to manipulate the law, but Pipitone [a self-identified transwoman] smirked and claimed I was being performative. In delicate tones, he expressed concern with my leadership. He claimed Lesbianism and transgenderism are incongruent political forces (probably the only thing we agree on). Instead of enacting ‘lateral violence’ against transfolk by crashing ‘our parades,’ he argued that lesbians should assimilate with male lesbians to ‘punch up’ at an unnamed oppressor.”

In an interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox News, Beck explained her reasoning for refusing to adopt the transgender paradigm: “I believe in the truth.” That’s debatable given her own life choices, but it’s interesting nonetheless. She added, “When we get down to it, women and girls all share a biological reality. We are all female. But if any man, if any male person, can call himself a woman, or be legally identified as female, then predatory men will do so in order to gain access to women’s single-sex spaces, and it puts every woman and girl at risk.” Hmm… that sounds a lot like the argument we’ve been making since this whole “transgender” crusade reared its twisted head.

It will be interesting to see how many more folks within the Rainbow Mafia ranks start stepping out to call foul over the obviously incongruent ideologies currently being artificially forced together under one big tent.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/61149?mailing_id=4078&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4078&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center