Saturday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Thirty years of 'global warming' panic 
by Cal Thomas
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
mad-Maxine Waters Paid $56,000 
for Endorsement Mailers This Cycle 
Y7QJF5PF9ftBybFg2Xy2JHITUPTgmn3FyrUZtwTAIJJWQ4ndvTVyQnEJWucOzONGL-MKckOSdjOJqQzLvVOvpsfrNUptYctYDZ-1n6U8vVYA-U09=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=300by Joe Schoffstall
{ freebeacon.com } ~ Rep. mad-Maxine Waters's campaign has pulled in $56,000 this cycle through her "slate mailer" operation, filings show... The mailers are sent out to more than 200,000 people in South Central Los Angeles and contain an "official sample ballot" and quotes from mad-Waters on the candidates or measures she supports. In exchange for placement on the mailer, mad- Waters's campaign committee receives a donation. The payments to Citizens for mad-Waters this cycle range from $2,000 to $12,000 and have come from a handful of California judicial candidates. mad-Waters's campaign has collected the $56,000 from seven committees, filings show. Citizens for mad-Waters, mad-Waters's campaign committee, runs the program. Karen, mad-Maxine's daughter, has collected more than $750,000 in "professional fees" from the campaign since the practice first was given the green light by the Federal Election Commission (FEC)...
.
How Gulf States can get Europe to Abandon Iran 
-uL6UoDie-ERzg0e7LzeNcE0F_FDriyuR-ukzC46Cd-9bgX-vMgvbznysHWHk0HpaAu-yEx4nFyHa_cHKe_X3VJiPGe92EIHLZnINg5BDgH3cssrTf5b8HTUujCmCRDUZjEP9SLthjJC6R-Vco9e3QAW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Benjamin Weinthal
{ defenddemocracy.org } ~ The protests sweeping across Iran are a clear sign the country’s economy and its Islamic revolutionary system are ready to buckle... The Gulf states can play a critical role in stymieing the Tehran regime’s financing of terrorism across the Middle East by pushing Europe to pull the plug on investments in Iran. Take for example the economic and diplomatic measures taken by Saudi Arabia against Germany for Chancellor Angela Merkel’s largely pro-Iranian regime foreign policy. The kingdom’s Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman is “deeply offended” by the German government and froze new business with the Federal Republic. In November 2017, Riyadh withdrew its ambassador from Berlin, to punish then-foreign minister Sigmar Gabriel’s claim that Lebanon “could not tolerate the adventurism that has spread there,” a reference to Saudi efforts to stunt the ever-increasing control by Hezbollah and Iran of the Land of the Cedars...
.
Kaspersky and Beyond: Understanding 
Russia’s Approach to Cyber-Enabled Economic Warfare 
RwoJop2uzGN-p3YfpiMydVIZNlDBVEjkNW0Dl2EHgcxC7Mw_vapr6KUQ7w4ZqkgSPABfReEAnHQqdn0_1g9GnqaJwrN-ustoJvubcLS7zVLnhTntXRk2svDnODh2GCjhzF-SndrI5w8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Boris Zilberman
{ defenddemocracy.org } ~ One of the most iconic images of the 20th century is that of U.S. Army troops wading ashore onto Omaha Beach from their landing craft on June 6, 1944... under Nazi machine gun fire to create a beachhead for the Allies. The beachheads of the future, however, are being established today in cyber space. In military strategy, creating a beachhead means concentrating efforts on one area which can become a jumping-off point for a bigger operation. For America’s adversaries, penetrating our technology sector is a smart and cost-effective beachhead strategy – whether the end goal is economic warfare, influence operations, or support for kinetic military operations. It is through the technology sector that America’s adversaries can infiltrate the supply chains of the national security industrial base and establish backdoors into government and private networks. Hostile cyber actions against a nation’s private industry are an increasingly dangerous and effective component of modern-day economic warfare, or “cyber-enabled economic warfare (CEEW),” as my colleague Dr. Samantha Ravich described it. “Both states and non-state actors are increasingly able to contemplate and deploy pernicious cyber attacks against the critical economic assets and systems of their adversaries, targeting their national security and military capabilities,” Ravich and another colleague, Annie Fixler, explain. In 2016 alone, malicious cyber activity cost the U.S. economy as much as $100 billion, and analyses of the direct cost of cyber crime estimate that the total will reach $6 trillion by 2021...   http://www.defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/boris-zilberman-kaspersky-and-beyond-understanding-russias-approach-to-cyber-enabled-econom/
.
The Netherlands Approves Burqa Ban
J6GXfGUnRbCk_k5j_-xGJvxYNLRMRS9TixbyLYOa1OOF5cASdfx9k1OpGxlu7xSI0eYZzXTHBXUFnGGl_tXRs0dE9c0fkQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Soeren Kern
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ The Dutch Senate has approved a law that bans the wearing of "face-covering clothing" in public buildings... including hospitals, schools and government offices, as well as on public transportation. Although the ban does not extend to public streets, the law authorizes police to ask individuals to remove face-covering clothing to establish their identity. Those found flouting the ban — which includes Islamic veils and robes such as burqas which cover the entire face and niqabs which cover the entire face except for the eyes, as well as balaclavas and full-face helmets — will be subject to a fine of 410 euros ($475). The new law, previously adopted by the Dutch House of Representatives in November 2016, was approved on June 26 by 44 to 31 votes in the 75-seat Senate...
.
Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte 
Discusses Strzok and Rosenstein Testimony
by sundance

{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ The House Judiciary Committee has primary oversight authority over the DOJ.  House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte discusses the testimony from FBI Agent Peter Strzok, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, along with the next steps.  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/29/judiciary-chairman-bob-goodlatte-discusses-strzok-and-rosenstein-testimony/
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Thirty years of 'global warming' panic 
FN6zZb5EQzigLf-3WAbY5Qke1k-66NUBaaZDelu_RHCMrsQ_C68qcqadN9CL8N_ce3kIbEVU5NR4V2WeGmfsaQGW35ucG8v4FqbjiEWNPNSzA1WMX0bADzQ_d7lNQ_yrf9J3Yw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Cal Thomas
{ jewishworldreview.com } ~ This year marks the 30th anniversary of the beginning of the "global warming" now known as "climate change" panic.

As noted by The Wall Street Journal, it was on June 23, 1988 that NASA scientist James E. Hansen testified before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and asserted a "high degree of confidence" in "a cause-and-effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and observed warming."

Predictions, especially those of global significance, should be rigorously examined to see if they have come true. In the case of Mr. Hansen, it's apparent they have not.

Hansen offered three possible scenarios. One would see the earth's temperature rising 1 degree Celsius by this year; the second would see a 0.7 percent temperature increase and the third would see a smaller increase that would flatten out by 2000.

The third scenario was the most accurate. Hansen made many other predictions, including stronger hurricanes related to global surface temperatures. "The list of what didn't happen," notes the Journal, "is long and tedious," adding, "...it's time to acknowledge that the rapid warming he predicted isn't happening. Climate researchers and policymakers should adopt the more modest forecasts that are consistent with observed temperatures."

That isn't about to happen, because, as with immigration reform, most politicians prefer the issue to any solution.

Richard Siegmund Lindzen is an American atmospheric physicist known for his work in the dynamics of the atmosphere, atmospheric tides and ozone photochemistry. In an interview posted on wattsupwiththat.com, the global warming and climate change website, Lindzen says:

"The mostly non-scientist proponents of climate hysteria realize that distant forecasts of remote problems by inadequate models are unlikely to motivate people to shut down modern industrial society. They, therefore, attempt to claim that we are seeing the problems right now. Of course, the warming that has occurred over the past 200 years or so, has been too small to have been a major factor. However, objective reality matters little when it comes to propaganda -- where repetition can effectively counter reality."

Repetition is precisely what we are experiencing in the major media, which have selectively interviewed people who promote the climate change myth. These include some politicians, who see it as another way to regulate and dominate our lives.

As if to confirm this, climatedepot.com notes: "NBC News is hyping a report that claims meteorologists are supporting the George Mason and Climate Central effort to promote climate change fears on your nightly weather forecast.

"The climate information being promoted by the activist meteorologists is highly suspect and the groups behind the effort have supported shutting down any scientific debate by supporting RICO statutes against skeptics and they have benefited greatly from federal funding of their efforts."

When the hype subsides the facts catch up. In 2015, the UK Daily Telegraph reported: "Two events last week brought yet further twists to one of the longest-running farces of our modern world. One was the revelation by the European Space Agency that in 2013 and 2014, after years when the volume of Arctic ice had been diminishing, it increased again by as much as 33 per cent. The other was that Canadian scientists studying the effect of climate change on Arctic ice from an icebreaker had to suspend their research, when their vessel was called to the aid of other ships trapped in the thickest summer ice seen in Hudson Bay for 20 years."

Numerous apocalyptic predictions of an imminent end of the world because of "climate change" have proved wrong. Their objective of big government robbing us of more of our freedoms and spending trillions of dollars on a made-up problem has been exposed.

We can and should recycle and not pollute the atmosphere, water or land, but not because it will lower the earth's temperature.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center