~ Featuring ~
Americans Need Plain Sight: 
The IG Report Hides the Truth
by Justin O. Smith
Stunning Confirmation: Judicial Watch Obtains IRS Documents
Showing rino-McCain Staff Urging IRS To Target Tea Party Groups

by sundance
{ } ~ It has long been suspected; the footprints and fingerprints were always present; rino-McCain repeatedly denied it…. now the evidence surfaces. For those who remember the issues when the IRS, White House and DOJ organized the post 2010 election “shellacking” targeting of Tea Party groups, the latest discovery from Judicial watch is confirmation of a long-held opinion. rino- John McCain was instrumental in supporting the weaponization of the IRS to target tea party groups. […] In the full notes of an April 30, 2013, meeting, rino-McCain’s high-ranking staffer Henry Kerner recommends harassing non-profit groups until they are unable to continue operating. Kerner tells Lerner, Steve Miller, then chief of staff to IRS commissioner, Nikole Flax, and other IRS officials, “Maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is  financially ruinous.” In response, Lerner responded that “it is her job to oversee it all:”...
"New Rules of Engagement": Hamas Provokes
Israel with Incendiary Aerial Devices

{ } ~ Hamas is attempting to create "new rules of engagement" in its war against Israel... as the terrorist organization recognizes that Israel's military will likely avoid direct responses against terrorist cells launching incendiary kites and balloons into Israel territory. This tactical and strategic shift is outlined in a new Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center report. On Tuesday, Israel's air force struck several Hamas' military targets after terrorists deployed incendiary kites and balloons that caused severe fires in Israeli communities on the Gaza border. Hamas escalated the violence by launching 45 mortar shells and rockets at Israel. Two days earlier, Hamas fired three rockets into Israel following Israeli strikes responding to Palestinian arson terrorism. This Hamas-provoked tit-for-tat resembles similar sequences of events that took place two weeks ago in a violent escalation between the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Israel...
House Passes Farm Bill with Reform of SNAP Program
by Joe Scudder
{ } ~ This farm bill attaches work requirements to food stamps, but will it pass the Senate?... Supposedly, the House’s farm bill is “dead on arrival” in the Senate, in part because of the work requirements for food stamps. Hopefully, the Trump Administration has a plan to convince the Senate to go along with the House bill. One of the key pieces of “fake news” is treating the opponants of the work requirement for food stamps as advocates for the poor. On the contrary, Walmart and other parts of the “big food” industry lobby against any change to the SNAP program. They do very well by it! The Washington Post reports, “House narrowly passes farm bill that includes stricter work requirements for food stamps, a month after failing on first try.”...
U.S. Urges Saudis to Stabilize Oil Prices, 
Underscoring Continued Energy Insecurity

by John Hannah
{ } ~ Tomorrow in Vienna, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) will meet with several non-OPEC producers... including Russia, to chart the future of the global oil market. The group – informally known as OPEC plus – will decide whether to ease production cuts that were implemented in 2016 in an effort to drive up prices, which had crashed to a 13-year low. Those production cuts together with unanticipated supply disruptions and rising global demand proved extremely successful, with prices last month rising to their highest levels in more than three years. The fear now is that if the current cuts are sustained, the market could tighten too much, triggering a major price spike that would damage global growth. Two emerging situations are of particular concern: the continued implosion of Venezuela’s oil sector and re-imposed U.S. sanctions that could significantly reduce Iranian exports. The United States has been pressing OPEC to amend its production-cutting scheme. Just before President Donald Trump’s May 8 decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, a senior U.S. official called Saudi Arabia to seek its help in making up for lost Iranian barrels. That request was bookended by two blunt tweets from Trump blasting OPEC’s role in driving up prices. “Looks like OPEC is at it again,” Trump wrote in April. “Oil prices are artificially Very High! No good and will not be tolerated!” Ten days ago, he reiterated the point: “Oil prices are too high. OPEC is at it again. Not good.”...
Trump’s Order is Not Final: The Decision Rests With the Judiciary
by Keith Koffler 

{ } ~ Just to be clear, what President Trump signed does not “solve” the problem of separation of illegal immigrant families... It just punts it to the courts. The White House is being vilified in the press for supposedly lying when it claimed that it could not legally keep the families together. It was not a lie, it is true, and the order seems contingent on whether a judge will change what is legally permissible. Here are the relevant clauses from the order.( The case has been filed with Judge Dolly Maizie Gee, a Los Angeles-based, liar-nObama-appointed federal judge)... ;
Americans Need Plain Sight: 
The IG Report Hides the Truth
by Justin O. Smith

{ } ~ The FBI brass must have needed hazmat suits to scrub DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on agency misconduct in the 2016 elections, since the evidence of high crimes at the highest level of government was abundant. The truth is being hidden, by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and the result is a sort of fiction representative of something out of George Orwell's '1984.' So, we must do everything within our power to force the issue, quite contrary to status quo voices in government and the media, who are not representing the U.S. Constitution and its objectives based on our founding virtues. We must, in fact, hold these perpetrators, in the FBI, the DOJ, and elsewhere within the government, accountable for illegally conspiring to prevent Donald Trump from winning the election and afterwards trying to unseat him from power. 
The five-hundred page IG report was released to Congress on June 12, 2018, and it barely scrapes the surface. It doesn't really reveal anything that the American people were not already aware had occurred. I made note of the Peter Strzok and Lisa Page texts in January 2018, just as the IG report recently did.
As reported by John Bowden on June 14, at The Hill,  Page texted Strzok in August 2016 and asked, "Trump's not ever going to become president, right? Right?"  "No. No he won't," Strzok responded. 
Why are these two FBI agents still working for the FBI?
And yet, in regards to investigative decisions by FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, the lead investigator on the liar-Clinton email case and the Russia investigation, and Lisa Page, an FBI attorney, Inspector General Michael Horowitz incredibly offers us that there was "no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations."
Radio host Mark Levin really put things in their proper perspective, on Thursday June 14, when he spoke with Fox News personality Sean Hannity and observed that the "cabal" of Strzok, Page, FBI Director James Comey, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and others intentionally tried to sabotage Donald Trump's run for president and worked to protect liar-Hillary Clinton from indictment. Levin further explained to Sean Hannity, as he observed: 

"I went through this major report here. I see several things. Number one, out of all the texts, all the documents, all the emails that have been reviewed. You know what's interesting, Sean? There is not a single pro-Trump text. There's not a single anti- liar-Hillary text. There's not a single pro-Trump senior FBI official. There's not a single anti- liar-Hillary FBI official. This was a cabal. And what these people had as their purpose, to interfere with a presidential election."

Among several other important items, the report also givesliar-Hillary Clinton a pass on the mishandling of Top Secret information, even though it's unfathomable that any career government official would not realize that an insecure system was not any place for those conversations. Seven email chains were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level and went through liar-Clinton's private server in an unsecured manner, Steven Lee Myers reported on July 5, 2016 for the New York Times, and it is now known, that "foreign actors" Russians? did, in fact, access them, according to a recent report by Catherine Herridge and Adam Shaw at Fox News.
This was willful and criminal misconduct by liar-Hillary Clinton, because the gap between unclassified and Top Secret was so wide and obvious. She had to know her actions were criminal and illegal, and there was a purpose and a deception at work here, namely to cover up the illegal actions she and liar-nObama took in Libya and across the Middle East.
Horowitz's report split hairs with the definition of "gross negligence" -- concluding that the term encompassed conduct "so gross as to almost suggest deliberate intention" or something that falls just short of being willful.
Horowitz found that liar-Hillary Clinton did not intend to violate the law, much in the disingenuous fashion that former FBI Director James Comey also claimed. Any person capable of reading the law and cogent thought knows that our prisons are full of people whose crimes were not intentional, but they were still prosecuted and imprisoned for breaking the law.
This report has all the appearances of a whitewash and an evasion of the FBI's troubling role in this garbage barge of institutional roguery. Americans remain in the dark, due to questions left unanswered, such as what really transpired between former President liar-Bill Clinton and liar-nObama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch during their July 2016 airport tarmac tete-a-tete, a few days before Comey let liar-Hillary, a presidential candidate, off the hook on the email server issue. How was it not a conflict of interest for Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe's wife to receive $700,000 for her state legislative race, from liar-Clinton's campaign bag-man, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe? How did the wife of a top Justice department official, Bruce Ohr, get on the payroll of Fusion GPS, the company that brokered the Steele dossier? And how did the FBI conceal the fact from the judges who ruled on FISA warrants against President Trump and his associates, that the Steele dossier was bought and paid for by the liar-Clinton campaign?
There isn't a hint of any IG report on other FBI abuse of power,  like inserting an actual spy, reportedly Stefan Halper, into President Trump's campaign. Neither is there any attention given to the FBI concealment of liar-nObama's mendacious denial that he knew anything aboutliar-Clinton's secret server.
What alternate universe is Horowitz from and when are these lawbreakers to the United States going to be prosecuted and thrown into the deepest, darkest dungeon, underneath a prison?
U.S. Attorney John Huber has supposedly been investigating several of these crimes since November 2017. His boss, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has informed House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) that such an investigation is within the full scope of Huber's existing mandate. With 470 investigators, Huber has enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel.

Americans need plain sight and new leaders with plain sight, pure and simple, because something evil is coursing through the halls of our government and in the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation these days. Anytime an average citizen can recognize the multiple acts of treason that were committed by Barack liar-nObama, liar-Hillary Clinton and their minions, through the State Department, the FBI and the Department of Justice, but career federal agents dismiss them as oversights or "unintended," something is terribly wrong, and if the Inspector General's report is any indication, our Republic is on its last dying legs, unless the patriots of America can right the Republic, peacefully or not. 
Make a public demand for justice.

Views: 14


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center


Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester


Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.


Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors. adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service