Saturday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

[Rudy Tirre]

TheFrontPageCover

~ Featuring ~  

Criticism of Ilhan Omar Isn't Incitement
Ben Shapiro  

.

dirty cop-Mueller’s Handling Of 

The Obstruction Question Was Total Garbage

by Bonchie

{ redstate.com } ~ When AG Bill Barr first released his summary of the dirty cop-Mueller report some weeks ago there was one part that set hair ablaze all throughout the media... Namely, that dirty cop-Robert Mueller decided to not rule on the most important question before him, i.e. if Donald Trump obstructed justice with his criticism of the Russia investigation. Furthermore, dirty cop-Mueller proclaimed that he had not exonerated the President despite the fact that he was not recommending charges. As I wrote at the time, this was a total cop-out and not his job as a prosecutor. It was a total, damaging cop-out for him to include that line instead of just making the call in a normal prosecutorial fashion. That doesn’t mean he needed to say Trump was innocent because that’s not his job, but the proper response would have been to say that he lacks evidence of obstruction and he cannot recommend further action. By ambiguously claiming that he simply can’t make the call, instead leaving it to the DOJ, he’s set us up for another 18 months of mind-numbing stupidity that will end the same way the collusion narrative ended. Today, Andrew C. McCarthy, far more versed on this topic than myself, opined on just how bad it was for dirty cop-Mueller to do what he did. In his report, dirty cop-Mueller didn’t resolve the issue. If he had been satisfied that there was no obstruction crime, he said, he would have so found. He claimed he wasn’t satisfied. Yet he was also not convinced that there was sufficient proof to charge. Therefore, he made no decision, leaving it to Attorney General William Barr to find that there was no obstruction. This is unbecoming behavior for a prosecutor and an outrageous shifting of the burden of proof: The constitutional right of every American to force the government to prove a crime has been committed, rather than to have to prove his or her own innocence...

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/04/18/muellers-handling-obstr...  

.

dirty cop-Mueller Report Proves 

Russian Collusion Claim Is a Hoax

by Katrina Trinko

{ dailysignal.com } ~ The Heritage Foundation’s Hans von Spakovsky analyzes the redacted report about the findings from special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller... and why it’s time to investigate why President Donald Trump was ever suspected of collusion in the first place. The key thing that I get out of it is that, remember when the Attorney General William Barr sent his letter to Congress in which he basically gave what the conclusions of the report were? One, there was no evidence of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government and two, there was no obstruction of justice. There were a lot of claims by Democrats, including people like Jerry scumbag liar-Nadler, who’s head of the Judiciary Committee, that, “Oh, well, we don’t believe you. We think you’re leaving things out.” Well, reading through the report, it’s very clear that Barr was 100% accurate in his summary of it and that the two-volume report—half of which is the Russian collusion claim, the other half is the obstruction of justice claim. No one can read that and come to any conclusion other than the whole Russian collusion claim was a hoax. There was just nothing to that at all. And none of the actions that were taken by the president could be considered obstruction of justice. Now, it’s very clear when you read it, and you see they relate some of the internal conversations in meetings at the White House about this, it’s clear the president was very angry. But that is a sentiment that I think most people would share if they’ve been falsely accused of a crime and that’s exactly the situation here. The key thing is that he took no official actions of any kind that could in any way actually be considered obstruction of justice...

https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/04/19/mueller-report-proves-russia...  

VOICE VIDEO:  (first on the list)  https://soundcloud.com/dailysignal

.

Bill the DNC for the dirty cop-Mueller Report

by Daniel Greenfield

{ frontpagemag.com } ~ After 22 months and $32 million, a team of 19 prosecutors with twice as many staff members, wielding 2,800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses, and 500 search warrants, produced nothing multiplied by zero... Nothing except over 400 pages of allegations, innuendo and slime with a great big hole in the center. dirty cop-Mueller and his intrepid team of Democrats had set out to investigate a great conspiracy. After all those millions of dollars, the raids and indictments, there’s no collusion. The supposed counterintelligence investigation turned up nothing on President Trump except his hostility to the witch hunt against him. If firing an FBI director is a crime, then scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton should have been impeached or imprisoned. But if a former FBI director can treat the firing of an FBI director by the president as a crime, then is the country really run by the presidents and the voters who elect them, or by the FBI directors? dirty cop-Mueller and his Democrats painstakingly document Trump’s dislike of their efforts. And then they imply that there is something criminal about an innocent man trying to fight back against a witch hunt. If you don’t defend yourself, it’s perjury. If you do defend yourself, then it’s obstruction of justice. Heads I win, tails you lose. President Trump had the right to fire scumbag-Comey. He had the right to find an AG who would give dirty cop-Mueller the boot. And the dirty cop-Mueller report, with its swill of unsubstantiated innuendo, is the best evidence of that. The fact that dirty cop-Mueller and his people were allowed to finish the spiteful 400+ page contribution to the Democrat 2020 campaign and that it was then made public, is the best evidence of Trump’s intentions. dirty cop-Mueller wasn’t fired. The report wasn’t buried. And it doesn’t indict Trump. It indicts the Russia hoaxers...

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273526/bill-dnc-mueller-report-dan...  

.

‘It’s a Crap Report;’ Claims of ‘Real Evidence’ 

Against Trump ‘All B.S., From Top to Bottom’

by Craig Bannister  

{ .cnsnews.com } ~ The reason there are almost no redactions in Volume Two of Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russian report is that “It’s all crap,”... conservative pundit Mark Levin declared on his nationally-syndicated radio program Thursday. “It’s a crap report,” and Volume Two – which focuses on suspected collusion – is “all crap,” Levin said: “This is a 400-page report – two volumes – I’m not going to sit here and read it to you. What is it, the Bible? What is dirty cop-Mueller Moses? Did he come down from Mount Sinai? “It’s a crap report. Volume Two has almost no redactions. You want to know why Volume Two has almost no redactions – the obstruction volume? Because it’s all crap. It’s not based on serious prosecutorial examination and investigation. It’s one, long New York Times Op-Ed – filled with, this one said this and this one said that, he sat over here, he looked over there, and you know what he told Christie, and who cares?” The claims by “so-called” reporters and legal analysts that the report contains “real evidence” of collusion and grounds to indict Trump were “all B.S., from top to bottom, from left to right,” Levin said: “For nearly three years, the media, on and on and on about collusion. You had so-called reporters, so-called anchormen and women, so-called former federal prosecutors, so-called legal analysts, a conga line going on and on: ‘We have real evidence, ladies and gentlemen, of collusion – and I’d be surprised if the president isn’t indicted. I’d be surprised if he’s not indicted secretly and it’s under seal and they told the statute of limitations and when he leaves, they go for it.’ “We heard it all, all of it: all B.S., from top to bottom, from left to right.”...

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/levin-its-crap-report-...  

VOICE VIDEO:  https://www.mrctv.org/videos/levin-real-evidence-against-trump-all-...

.

The Kremlin Breaks Silence 

On dirty cop-Mueller Report  

by William Davis

{ dailycaller.com } ~ The Kremlin has responded to special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s final report... claiming that the report did not prove Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Friday that there is “no evidence substantiated by facts” that Russia attempted to interfere in the election, according to the Associated Press. The AP also reported that Russian state-owned media claimed that the dirtty cop-Mueller probe was an attempt to influence U.S. foreign policy. “The dirty cop-Mueller probe was an attempt to threaten the current government and influence U.S. foreign policy without offering any specific evidence,” state-owned Russian television network Rossiya broadcasted. The dirty cop-Mueller report did state that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election, although it also concluded that no Americans helped them in that effort. After years of speculation, the report concluded that there was no evidence that either President Donald Trump or members of his campaign colluded with the Russian government. Putin and the Kremlin have repeatedly denied that they interfered, or even attempted to interfere, in the U.S. election. Such a sentiment has been often repudiated by U.S. intelligence agencies and elected officials on both sides of the aisle.   https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/19/kremlin-responds-mueller-report/...  

.

.

.

Criticism of Ilhan Omar Isn't Incitement

Ben Shapiro

 

A couple of years ago, I spoke at the University of California, Berkeley. My presence was apparently so offensive to a particular group of people that hundreds of police officers were necessary to ensure the safety of the event. As I spoke inside, the protesters milled about, chanting and shouting. One of their favorite ditties: “SPEECH IS VIOLENCE!”

This, of course, is patent nonsense. Speech is not violence — and violence is not speech. Equating the two is the hallmark of a tyrannical worldview: If I can treat your speech as violence, then I am justified in using violence to suppress your speech. And yet that obvious fallacy has become the rallying cry in defense of execrable Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.

Omar, who has been content to spout openly anti-Semitic nonsense every several weeks since her election, came under fire this week for her remarks at an event in late March, shortly after her Democratic colleagues covered for her Jew hatred by watering down a resolution of condemnation. Speaking before the historically Hamas-friendly Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Omar unleashed a barrage of lies about the maltreatment of Muslims throughout America. In the midst of that barrage, she dropped a line about Sept. 11: “CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”

That minimization of 9/11 — and that’s what it is — resulted in blowback from conservatives. It’s not as though Omar’s history of treating terrorism with kid gloves is anything new, after all. In 2013, Omar did an interview in which she chided one of her professors for treating terrorist groups with horror while failing to do the same to America, England and the military: “The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaida,’ his shoulders went up. … But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity. You don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the Army’ with the intensity.”

In 2016, Omar wrote a letter to a judge asking for lighter sentences for men accused of being Islamic State group recruits, noting that these men merely “chose violence to combat direct marginalization” and calling their recruitment “a consequential mistake” that resulted from “systematic alienation.”

In 2017, Omar wrote for Time magazine: “We must confront that our nation was founded by the genocide of indigenous people and on the backs of slaves, that we maintain global power with the tenor of neocolonialism. … Our national avoidance tactic has been to shift the focus to potential international terrorism.” That’s not exactly a ringing rebuke of international terrorism.

But now Omar is criticizing those who merely quote her as inciting violence. She has claimed that President Trump, who posted a video that juxtaposed footage of 9/11 with her “some people did something” comment, is responsible for an uptick in the number of death threats she has received. Her close friend Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., went so far as to compare Omar to a victim of the Holocaust.

This is immoral in the extreme. Omar isn’t a victim because she’s being criticized. And speech isn’t incitement. Sen. commie-Bernie Sanders wasn’t responsible for the congressional baseball game shooting. Former President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama wasn’t responsible for the Dallas police shooting. And Trump isn’t responsible for those who send Omar death threats. He’s responsible for criticizing her — rightly, in this case. Democrats who hide behind the charge of incitement are simply attempting to quash debate. And that’s far more dangerous for the future of America than criticizing a radical politician.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/62446?mailing_id=4210&utm_medium...