DHS Supplier Provides Shooting Targets of American Gun Owners

Company produces cardboard cut-outs of “non-traditional threats”: Pregnant women, elderly & children

Paul Joseph Watson
February 19, 2013

A provider of “realistic” shooting targets to the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies has created a line of “non-traditional threat” targets that include pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds and elderly American gun owners.


Law Enforcement Targets, Inc. is a 21-year designer and full service provider of training targets for the DHS, the Justice Department and thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the country.

The company’s website offers a line of “No More Hesitation” targets ”designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training.” The targets are, “meant to help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusual targets for the first time.”

The targets include “pregnant woman threat,” “older man with shotgun,” “older man in home with shotgun,” “older woman with gun,” “young school aged girl,” “young mother on playground,” and “little boy with real gun.”

Why are top training target suppliers for the government supplying the likes of the DHS with “non-traditional threat” targets of children, pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds, and elderly American gun owners unless there is a demand for such items?

This is particularly alarming given the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has purchased roughly 2 billion rounds of ammunition over the course of the last year, enough to wage a near 30 year war.

In comparison, during the height of active battle operations in Iraq, US soldiers used 5.5 million rounds of ammunition a month.

The DHS also purchased no less than 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles last September, labeling them “Personal Defense Weapons.”

The fact that targets of armed pregnant women, children, mothers in playgrounds, and American gun owners in general are being represented as “non traditional threats” “for the first time” is deeply concerning given the admitted preparations for civil unrest undertaken by Homeland Security as well as other federal agencies.

A leaked US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” also outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.

This also dovetails with the continuing characterization of Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists by DHS-funded studies.

The US military trained last year to take on another “unusual target” – zombies – which some fear is just a ruse to get troops used to engaging crowds of people with deadly force. As Alex Jones documented in his film Police State 2000, numerous “urban warfare” training drills stretching back well over a decade have revolved around incarcerating and battling the American people on domestic soil.

See the other “non-traditional threats” that are being provided in the form of shooting targets to the DHS and thousands of law enforcement agencies below.

Note: The website containing these targets has crashed since this article was published, but this graphic shows a screenshot of the page with the URL visible.





Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center


  • This is high treason.  Why aren't our military taking down Congress and the President and his cabinet?  Doesn't it fall to them to do this as laid out in the Constitution?  I'm pretty ignorant on this, but I do remember reading about it.  Help?


  • All the government has to do is send our troops overseas then call in the united nations military to wipe us out. The illegals will help them. Those of us left will end up in fema camps.

  • Scary shit

  • You know, in response to Daryl's post, I had to google the term 'spic' to find out what he's talking about. Not only is that offensive, but totally untrue. Obama's strike force is increasingly becoming Muslim. Further, we do not, NO, SHOULD not Tolerate bigotry and name calling if we are to win our Constitution back.

  •   it`s the police i think we have to worry about and the special units they are making. i can`t believe as an ex military ssgt that the kids in the military would follow an order to kill other americans. but the police are used to shooting at people and i bet there are more then a few who like it. these military men and women coming home and see the people shake thier hands and saying thank you for your service, do you think that they would fire on families for this joker in the white house. don`t forget there are still almost 2 million viet nam vets who are older now but still know tactics still know how to fire a weapon the vets of the two gulf wars are still young. even korean vets can still fire and tactics, i just cannot see americans killing each other over a lame ass president that is distroying america. follow the constitution it`s worked for over 300 years and one guy who might not even be american wants to distroy it. love for all the patriots out there

  • where do I get some targets with TSA, DHS, Police, FBI and other government agency images so I can be prepared?  You never know when the bad guys might mascarade as one of them.

  • The real question is why after all these years does the government want to take away our guns now? And when this question is researched thoroughly, I'm sure no-one in their right mind would not join the NRA, hold onto their guns ( if applicable) or buy a gun, etc.   

    Our forefathers knew that as long as the American people could protect themselves from government dictatorship via gun ownership, and militia participation, the people would be free.

    Also, foreign invasion is less likely to occur when the people could defend themselves.

  • I suggest everyone who is disgusted with this article go here, read and sign up.


This reply was deleted.