Is The New York Times now a “conspiracy theorist” news outlet?-You Decide:
Posted on The New York Times-By By DAVID K. SHIPLER-On April 20, 2012:
“THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.
But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.
When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, thought of using a car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland, the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger seat. To trigger the bomb the student punched a number into a cellphone and got no boom, only a bust.
This is legal, but is it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real ones? Judging by their official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department are sure of themselves — too sure, perhaps.
Carefully orchestrated sting operations usually hold up in court. Defendants invariably claim entrapment and almost always lose, because the law requires that they show no predisposition to commit the crime, even when induced by government agents. To underscore their predisposition, many suspects are “warned about the seriousness of their plots and given opportunities to back out,” said Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman. But not always, recorded conversations show. Sometimes they are coaxed to continue.
Undercover operations, long practiced by the F.B.I., have become a mainstay of counterterrorism, and they have changed in response to the post-9/11 focus on prevention. “Prior to 9/11 it would be very unusual for the F.B.I. to present a crime opportunity that wasn’t in the scope of the activities that a person was already involved in,” said Mike German of the American Civil Liberties Union, a lawyer and former F.B.I. agent who infiltrated white supremacist groups. An alleged drug dealer would be set up to sell drugs to an undercover agent, an arms trafficker to sell weapons. That still happens routinely, but less so in counterterrorism, and for good reason.
“There isn’t a business of terrorism in the United States, thank God,” a former federal prosecutor, David Raskin, explained.
“You’re not going to be able to go to a street corner and find somebody who’s already blown something up,” he said. Therefore, the usual goal is not “to find somebody who’s already engaged in terrorism but find somebody who would jump at the opportunity if a real terrorist showed up in town.”
And that’s the gray area. Who is susceptible? Anyone who plays along with the agents, apparently. Once the snare is set, law enforcement sees no choice. “Ignoring such threats is not an option,” Mr. Boyd argued, “given the possibility that the suspect could act alone at any time or find someone else willing to help him.”
Typically, the stings initially target suspects for pure speech — comments to an informer outside a mosque, angry postings on Web sites, e-mails with radicals overseas — then woo them into relationships with informers, who are often convicted felons working in exchange for leniency, or with F.B.I. agents posing as members of Al Qaeda or other groups.
Some targets have previous involvement in more than idle talk: for example, Waad Ramadan Alwan, an Iraqi in Kentucky, whose fingerprints were found on an unexploded roadside bomb near Bayji, Iraq, and Raja Khan of Chicago, who had sent funds to an Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan.
But others seem ambivalent, incompetent and adrift, like hapless wannabes looking for a cause that the informer or undercover agent skillfully helps them find. Take the Stinger missile defendant James Cromitie, a low-level drug dealer with a criminal record that included no violence or hate crime, despite his rants against Jews. “He was searching for answers within his Islamic faith,” said his lawyer, Clinton W. Calhoun III, who has appealed his conviction. “And this informant, I think, twisted that search in a really pretty awful way, sort of misdirected Cromitie in his search and turned him towards violence.”
THE informer, Shahed Hussain, had been charged with fraud, but avoided prison and deportation by working undercover in another investigation. He was being paid by the F.B.I. to pose as a wealthy Pakistani with ties to Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group that Mr. Cromitie apparently had never heard of before they met by chance in the parking lot of a mosque.
“Brother, did you ever try to do anything for the cause of Islam?” Mr. Hussain asked at one point.
“O.K., brother,” Mr. Cromitie replied warily, “where you going with this, brother?”
Two days later, the informer told him, “Allah has more work for you to do,” and added, “Revelation is going to come in your dreams that you have to do this thing, O.K.?” About 15 minutes later, Mr. Hussain proposed the idea of using missiles, saying he could get them in a container from China. Mr. Cromitie laughed.
Reading hundreds of pages of transcripts of the recorded conversations is like looking at the inkblots of a Rorschach test. Patterns of willingness and hesitation overlap and merge. “I don’t want anyone to get hurt,” Mr. Cromitie said, and then explained that he meant women and children. “I don’t care if it’s a whole synagogue of men.” It took 11 months of meandering discussion and a promise of $250,000 to lead him, with three co-conspirators he recruited, to plant fake bombs at two Riverdale synagogues.
“Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr. Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope,” said Judge Colleen McMahon, sentencing him to 25 years. She branded it a “fantasy terror operation” but called his attempt “beyond despicable” and rejected his claim of entrapment.
The judge’s statement was unusual, but Mr. Cromitie’s characteristics were not. His incompetence and ambivalence could be found among other aspiring terrorists whose grandiose plans were nurtured by law enforcement. They included men who wanted to attack fuel lines at Kennedy International Airport; destroy the Sears Tower (now Willis Tower) in Chicago; carry out a suicide bombing near Tampa Bay, Fla., and bomb subways in New York and Washington. Of the 22 most frightening plans for attacks since 9/11 on American soil, 14 were developed in sting operations.
Another New York City subway plot, which recently went to trial, needed no help from government. Nor did a bombing attempt in Times Square, the abortive underwear bombing in a jetliner over Detroit, a planned attack on Fort Dix, N.J., and several smaller efforts. Some threats are real, others less so. In terrorism, it’s not easy to tell the difference.
- David K. Shipler is the author of “Rights at Risk: The Limits of Liberty in Modern America.”
The CIA’s “Founding” of Al Qaeda Documented: The Muslim Terrorist Apparatus was Created by US Intelligence as a Geopolitical Weapon!-Posted on VT News-By Gordon Duff-On April 20, 2013:
"Le Nouvel Observateur’s Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski
Originally published 15-21 January 1998
Translated by Jean Martineau
(Editor’s Note: The following article and interview have been suppressed by Google, now a “black-ops” contractor. The background on US backing for the Chechen rebels totally debunks attempts to assign blame for the Boston Marathon bombings to any group other than American security agencies and their domestic and foreign contractors who were very obvious at the scene, before and after the attack we believe they staged. Without adequate background on how we got where we are, real information can easily be “shaken off” as conspiracy.
If you want real conspiracy, read on and see who the very real conspirators are. G Duff for VT)
Below is our translation of an interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski. It is important for three reasons. First, it flatly contradicts the official US justification for giving billions of dollars to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan in the 1980s, namely that the US and Saudi Arabia were defending so-called freedom fighters against Soviet aggression.
“Not so,” says Brzezinski. He confirms what opponents have charged: that the US began covert sponsorship of Muslim extremists five months before the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. He says that after President Carter authorized the covert action: “I explained to the president that this support would in my opinion lead to a military intervention by the Soviets.” Second, the interview is instructive concerning so-called “conspiracy theory.” To be sure, there are plenty of nutty theories out there. And of course, there are plenty of just plain wrong theories.
But as Brzezinski demonstrates, the US foreign policy establishment did, for want of a better word, conspire. Even as they claimed to oppose Muslim extremism, they knowingly fomented it as a weapon of policy. And they lied about what they were doing, pretending they were helping freedom fighters resist an invasion. In other words, deceit on two levels.
One must ask oneself: if the US foreign policy Establishment used Muslim extremism as a weapon once, how can one argue in principle that they would not use it again? We say they haveused it again; that they have used it continuously; and that we are seeing the fruits of this policy. Most recently we have seen the real essence of the Brzezinski doctrine in the horrendous events this past week in Russia (culminating in the school attack) and Israel (the double bus bombing).
Brzezinski and his protégé, Zalmay Khalilzad, set up a corporation in 1985, funded by the US congress, to train the mujahedeen to sell reporters the lie that the mujahedeen were freedom fighters and victims of aggression (Associated Press
U.S. Provides $500,000 So Afghan Rebels Can Tell Their Story AP, September 16, 1985, Monday, PM cycle SECTION: Washington Dateline, by JOAN MOWER
Guerrillas in Afghanistan are about to get money from the United States government for a public relations campaign intended to bring their struggle against Soviet troops to the world’s attention. The money will train Afghan rebel journalists to use television, radio and newspapers to advance their cause. Reporters will be given mini-cameras to photograph the war inside Afghanistan.
“It is the goal of this project to facilitate the collection, development and distribution of credible, objective and timely professional-quality news stories, photographs and television images about developments in Afghanistan,” said a notice in the Federal Register. The program will be overseen by Uncle Sam’s own propaganda arm, the U.S. Information Agency. Congress appropriated $500,000 to hire experts and may provide more later.
In making the money available, Congress all but instructed USIA to consider an organization like Friends of Afghanistan, a new group whose board includes former Carter administration national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, known for hard-line anti-Soviet views. USIA has solicited proposals, due Sept. 25 (1985).
Friends of Afghanistan includes other American foreign policy luminaries such as Lawrence Eagleburger, a former undersecretary of state, and Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad, a Columbia University political science professor and some-time paid adviser to the State Department on Afghanistan.
Afghan rebels, called the Mujahedeen, have been battling 100,000 Soviet troops who have occupied the rugged, mountainous country since December 1979.
The Associated Press referred to Khalilzad as a ”some-time paid adviser to the State Department on Afghanistan.” This was in the late summer of 1985. Less than three years later Tass, the Soviet news agency, reported that Khalilzad was delivering the mujahedeen an important message from the State Department. Khalilzad told them that the State Department would continue to support them:
a) only if they could consolidate control of Afghanistan and
b) only if they maintained an attitude of implacable hostility to the government in Kabul.
In other words the US ordered the mujahedeen not to make peace:
‘The United States has told the Afghan guerrillas that it would support them in an effort to form a provisional government if they consolidate their control of most of the country and meet other criteria,’ the newspaper New York Times today quoted State Department officials as saying.
A top State Department official made it clear that the government must oppose ‘the soviet-backed regime in Kabul’ and said that the USA did not ‘accept the legitimacy’ of the authorities in Afghanistan. The relevant message was delivered to the rebels in the Pakistani city of Peshawar last week by Zalmay Khalilzad, a special adviser on Afghanistan to under secretary of state Michael H. Armacost. (” To Support Afghan Counter Revolutionaries” New York; The Russian Information Agency ITAR-TASS, May 6, 1988, Friday)
Brzezinski’s interview has tremendous importance today. According to a Dutch intelligence report on Bosnia, in the early 1990s Pentagon intelligence worked with the Saudis and Iranians to bring weapons and mujahedeen terrorists the ‘Afghan Arabs’ – into Bosnia to indoctrinate and lead Alija Izetbegovic’s Muslim extremists in fighting the Bosnian Serbs.
The same terrorists had been used against the pro-Soviet side in Afghanistan. Once again the media lied, claiming the Bosnian Serbs were fighting to destroy the Bosnian Muslims (i.e., genocide) when they were in fact defending their communities from the mujahedeen, and were allied with a large group of moderate Muslims.
This picture appeared in the London Times on December 11, 1995. The caption reads:
One of the Bosnian Army’s Muslim brigades marches through Zenica in a demonstration of strength by 10,000 soldiers.” Note that according to the Times these 10,000 troops constituted only one of “the Bosnian Army’s Muslim brigades…”
During the 1990s, pictures like this were as rare as hen’s teeth in the Western media. Why? Because they graphically demonstrated that the media was lying when it claimed that the Bosnian Government was moderate and multiculturalist and so on.
The white costumes these troops are wearing are the uniforms of Middle Eastern mujahedeen, not Yugoslav Muslims. The Bosnian Muslim troops wore them because they had been indoctrinated by Muslim extremists, including mujahedeen imported by Iran, Saudi Arabia and other extremist states, with the participation of Pentagon intelligence. In the early part of the Bosnian conflict (up until January 1993) Zalmay Khalilzad, the protégé of Zginew Brzezinski, was in charge of strategic planning at the Pentagon.
In Afghanistan (as Brzezinski proudly states) and then in Bosnia, the US sponsored Muslim terror even as the State Department was officially condemning it. Because ordinary people would never support such a policy, it was sold to the public as support for freedom fighters (Afghanistan) or as defense of abused Muslims (Bosnia.)
By the late 1980s Brzezinski’s protégé, Prof. Zalmay Khalilzad, was the top strategist of the Afghan war.
Under the administration of Bush, Sr., Khalilzad was in charge of strategy at the Pentagon. We have substantial evidence that it was under Bush, Sr., not Clinton, that the US began assisting the mujahedeen in Bosnia.
So, in both cases, we have Brzezinski’s protégé directing the use of Muslim extremism as a weapon against a secular state, with the media misrepresenting the nature of the fight. The Brzezinski Doctrine in action.
2001: Brzezinski’s protégé Zalmay Khalilzad was appointed Senior National Security Director for Southwest Asia, the heartland of Muslim extremist terror…
Khalilzad was in charge of US policy on the ground in Afghanistan before and during the 2001 war. He then personally chose the Afghan government. It was under his watch that the US and Iran cooperated in convening a top level conference to give Afghanistan a government based on Muslim religious law. Now he’s Ambassador and Special Envoy to Afghanistan.
Even while Khalilzad was in charge of Afghanistan he was also the key man on the ground before, during and after the invasion of Iraq. He was in charge of political relations with Iraqi exile politicians and the Iranian and Saudi governments up until the fall 2003. A crucial period.
His area of official responsibility included Georgia during the period when the US was intensifying the financing and training of the Georgian military. Russia accuses Georgia of aiding the Chechen terrorists.
So Brzezinski has been the key hands-on strategist, the leader on the ground, in a vast area plagued with Muslim extremist terror during most of the so-called war on terror. Oops – did I say rzezinski? Sorry; I meant Zalmay Khalilzad…
Brzezinski’s Interview with Le Nouvel Observateur
Le Nouvel Observateur: Former CIA director Robert Gates states in his memoirs: The American secret services began six months before the Soviet intervention to support the Mujahideen [in Afghanistan]. At that time you were president Carters security advisor; thus you played a key role in this affair. Do you confirm this statement?
Zbigniew Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version, the CIA’s support for the Mujahideen began in 1980, i.e. after the Soviet army’s invasion of Afghanistan on 24 December 1979. But the reality, which was kept secret until today, is completely different:
Actually it was on 3 July 1979 that president Carter signed the first directive for the secret support of the opposition against the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And on the same day I wrote a note, in which I explained to the president that this support would in my opinion lead to a military intervention by the Soviets.
Le Nouvel Observateur: Despite this risk you were a supporter of this covert action? But perhaps you expected the Soviets to enter this war and tried to provoke it?
Zbigniew Brzezinski: It’s not exactly like that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene but we knowingly increased the probability that they would do it.
Le Nouvel Observateur: When the Soviets justified their intervention with the statement that they were fighting against a secret US interference in Afghanistan, nobody believed them. Nevertheless there was a core of truth to this…Do you regret nothing today?
Zbigniew Brzezinski: Regret what? This secret operation was an excellent idea. It lured the Russians into the Afghan trap, and you would like me to regret that? On the day when the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote president Carter, in essence:
“We now have the opportunity to provide the USSR with their Viet Nam war.” Indeed for ten years Moscow had to conduct a war that was intolerable for the regime, a conflict which involved the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet Empire.
Le Nouvel Observateur: And also, don’t you regret having helped future terrorists, having given them weapons and advice?
Zbigniew Brzezinski: What is most important for world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet Empire? Some Islamic hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Le Nouvel Observateur: “Some hotheads?” But it has been said time and time again: today Islamic fundamentalism represents a world-wide threat…
Zbigniew Brzezinski: Rubbish! It’s said that the West has a global policy regarding Islam. That’s hogwash: there is no global Islam. Let’s look at Islam in a rational and not a demagogic or emotional way. It is the first world religion with 1.5 billion adherents. But what is there in common between fundamentalist Saudi Arabia, moderate Morocco, militaristic Pakistan, pro-Western Egypt and secularized Central Asia? Nothing more than that which connects the Christian countries…
Tamerlan Tsarnaev Attended CIA-sponsored Workshop: Tamerlan Tsarnaev was radicalized by the CIA!-Posted on InfoWars,com-By Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com-On April 24, 2013:
Video: False Flags Of Days Gone By.: When False Flags Dont Fly Anymore!-Posted on Before It’s News-By Josey Wales (Reporter)-On April 17, 2013:
Why Government Should Be The First Suspect In Any Terror Attack: History tells us that false flag is a favored form of statecraft!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Paul Joseph Watson & Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com-On April 19, 2013:
Sinaloa Cartel Challenges the U.S.: FBI, the DEA and various Homeland Security agents in Mexico were actually working with Zambada for more than five years!-Posted on Border Reporter-By Michel Marizco-On April 7, 2013:
Psyops: Mind Control Marathon And Boston Bombings!-Posted on Before It’s News-By BARRACUDA (Reporter)-On April 20, 2013:
Congress Exploits Our Fears to Take Our Liberty!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Ron Paul, Infowars.com-On April 22, 2013:
Global awakening to false-flag terrorism, Copernican revolution!-Posted on PressTV-By Kevin Barrett-On April 21, 2013:
AMERICANS ‘SNAPPING’ BY THE MILLIONS: Exclusive: David Kupelian reveals record fear, stress, suicide – and inspired way out!-Posted on WND.com-By David Kupelian-On April 21, 2013:
Video: The World of Synthetic Manufactured Terrorism!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Infowars.com-On April 22, 2013:
Obama’s blood trail from Benghazi to Boston!-Posted on Homeland Security US-By Douglas J. Hagmann-On April 22, 2013:
NY Times: ‘FBI Staged Terror Attacks’!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Infowars.com-On April 20, 2013:
Glenn Beck says Obama is Covering up Truth of Boston Bombing: “You have til Monday to come clean”!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Infowars.com-On April 20, 2013:
BOMBING USED TO SLAM PATRIOTS AS ‘HATE’ GROUP: Tea partiers wouldn’t have done it, because victims weren’t ‘black’!-Posted on WND.com-By DREW ZAHN-On April 19, 2013:
Video: Boston Bombing: Did You Notice This?-Posted on Before It’s News-By Mort Amsel (Reporter)-On April 20, 2013:
Video: Waco Explosion Caused by Missile Strike? Drills, Explosions, and Lawsuit Info!-Posted on Before It’s News-By Blogdog-On April 20, 2013:
West Texas Explosion Might Have Been Triggered by Militarized Blast, Eyewitness Says ‘It Was a Plane’!-Posted on Before It’s News-By Intellihub-On April 20, 2013:
Air Force Major General Assassinated?-Posted on Before It’s News-By BARRACUDA (Reporter)-On April 20, 2013:
The Case Against the FBI in the Boston Bombing: Ten Perspectives, the First World Trade Center Bombing, 9/11 and Now!-Posted on Before It’s News-By Tom Dennen, the paranoid historian (Reporter)-On April 20, 2013:
Who To Blame for American Terrorism?-Posted on VT News-By Johnny Punish-On April 19, 2013:
Obama: Don’t form opinions on Boston attacks until government decides!-Posted on The Daily Caler-By Neil Munro, White House Correspondent-On April 20, 2013:
Russia Promised to Assist US Even Before Discovering Bombings’ Chechen Connection!-Posted on Restoring Liberty-By Julian Pecquet-On April 20, 2013:
Video: Police perform house-to-house raids in Watertown MA ripping innocent families from their homes!-Posted on YouTube.com-By rambone5-On April 20, 2013:
Report: FBI Searching For “Sleeper Cell” in Connecton with Boston B...: Police believe the pair were specially trained to carry out the devastating attack!-Posted on Mirror.co.uk-By-Christopher Bucktin, Andy Lines-On April 21, 2013:
Hackers Hijack CBS To Claim Obama Involvement in Boston Bombings: Hacktivists expose media’s refusal to report on private operatives at Boston bombings!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars.com-On April 21, 2013:
Military Men Witnessed At Boston Bombing Identified As National Gua...: Finally, an explanation emerges for presence of men in black and tan uniforms!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Steve Watson, Infowars.com-On April 21, 2013:
“False-flag meme goes mainstream on Boston bombings” Part 2: Glenn Beck goes off the reservation!-Posted on VT News-By Kevin Barrett-On April 21, 2013:
Gov. Patrick: ‘No Idea Why Someone Would Deliberately Harm Innocent Men, Women, Children’!-Posted on CBS Boston-On April 21, 2013:
Rep. Peter King on Spread of Radical Islam: ‘We can’t be Politically Correct!-Posted on Restoring Liberty-By News Editor-On April 20, 2013:
Video: Here We Go… Sen. Feinstein Accuses GOP Rep. Peter King of Islamophobia After Boston Bombings!-Posted on Gateway Pundit-By Jim Hoft-On Sunday April 21, 2013:
Mullah Kerry Compares Boston Victims To Gaza Flotilla Terrorists Who Were Killed By Israel!-Posted on Pat Dollard-By Jake Hammer-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Glenn Beck’s Big Story On Obama And The Bombing Released!-Posted onTheAlexJonesChannel-On April 21, 2013:
BECK BREAKS EXCLUSIVE INFORMATION ON SAUDI NATIONAL ONCE CONSIDERED A PERSON OF INTEREST IN BOSTON BOMBINGS!-Posted on The Blaze-By Erica Ritz-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Shocking Footage: Americans Ordered Out Of Homes At Gunpoint By SWA...: This is what martial law in the US looks like!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Steve Watson, Infowars.com-On April 22, 2013:
17 Unanswered Questions About The Boston Marathon Bombing The Media...!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Michael Snyder, American Dream-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Tsarnaev Aunt Claims Naked Man In Video Is Tamerlan!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Infowars.com-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Joel Skousen: Tsarnaev Brothers Were Set Up!-Posted on YouTube.com-ByTheAlexJonesChannel-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Boston Bombing Suspects Were Gov't Assets!-Posted on YouTube.com-ByTheAlexJonesChannel-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Boston Narrative Unravels!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheAlexJonesChannel-On April 22, 2013:
Video: Boston Bombing Manhunt: This is What A Police State Looks Like!-Posted on YouTube.com-By TheAlexJonesChannel-On April 23, 2013:
Video: Callers Don't Believe Official Story Behind Boston Bombings!- Posted on YouTube.com-By TheAlexJonesChannel-On April 23, 2013:
“Best Place to Raise a Family” to be Rattled by Gunfire and Militar...!- Posted on InfoWars.com-By Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com-On April 23, 2013:
Video: Chambliss: Law enforcement agency may have known about Boston bombi...!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By wsbtv.com-On April 24, 2013:
Secret Service tried to block press from bombing questions? Bidondi has told Infowars on record he was threatened before and after the press conference!-Posted on InfoWars.com-By Adan Salazar, Infowars.com-On April 24, 2013:
Video: Media Jumps On Alex Jones In Desperate Attempt To Connect Infowars ...: AP: “Tamerlan took an interest in Infowars”, Salon: “Tamerlan Tsarnaev was an Alex Jones fan”!-Posted on InfoWars,com-By Steve Watson, Infowars.com-On April 24, 2013:
NY Times: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (Part 2)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 26, 2014:
U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11, Non Partisan Review Concludes!
Father Of Alleged Boston Bombers Makes Terroristic Threat To U.S. If Second Son Is Killed!
“Innocent” Saudi has ties to several Al-Qaeda Terrorists!
Eyewitness: Authorities Announced “Drill” Before Boston Explosions!
Vice President Biden Calls for a New World Order!
Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away (Part 17)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On January 25, 2014:
CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up!
Why did a black preacher from Harlem have a “hit” placed on his life?
Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!
Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!
Where Is America Today?
The Fightin Side of Me!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
“Food For Thought”
God Bless Victims Of Boston Marathon-God Bless America!