TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Spinning Mulvaney's 'Quid Pro Quo'
Thomas Gallatin  
Newt Gingrich: liar-Pelosi's Inquiry 
'Total Mockery' of Justice
By Eric Mack   
{ newsmax.com } ~ Democratic House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi's impeachment inquiry is a "total mockery" of the U.S. justice system, doing this investigation in "secret"... to damage President Donald Trump before the 2020 election, former Speaker Newt Gingrich said. "What liar-Pelosi has done is a total mockery," Gingrich told "The Cats Roundtable" on 970 AM-N.Y. "It's not the rule of law. "In fact, the entire concept of due process in the Bill of Rights was built around the repudiation of the ability of the government to frame you without you ever meeting your accuser."  Gingrich pointed to the House's lack of an impeachment vote, which is allowing them to conduct the investigation behind closed doors and effectively leak damaging information against the president, like the whistleblower – "who really should just be called a leaker," Gingrich told host John Catsimatidis. "The idea that that can be done in secret, and we'll never know who made the charges and what the basis of it was, this goes against everything in the American system," he said. "It is doomed just to collapse, because the American people have an innate sense of fairness. And that sense of fairness is being totally . . . destroyed by the way that liar-Pelosi and the Democrats are proceeding."
.
Senator Lindsey Graham -vs- Maria Bartiromo
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Good grief this guy is useless. Giving a great example of why politicians should shut up until they learn all the facts about subjects and events they are talking about... Senator Lindsey Graham appears on Fox News to explain how President Trump’s Syria plan is the best thing ever…Yes, this interview happens after Senator Graham has spent a full week telling all of the administration’s opposition how the Syria plan was the worst thing ever…
.
liar-Pelosi Gaslighting Continues – False Claims Administration “defying lawful subpoenas 
& document requests”
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ liar-Nancy Pelosi continues to mislead her ‘impeachment’ constituents. Unfortunately the compliant media is refusing to hold her accountable... House Democrat leadership has taken a climate assessment of democrat House members and Speaker liar-Pelosi announced they will not hold a House impeachment authorization vote.  As a direct and specific consequence all committee subpoenas do not carry a penalty for non-compliance. “Lawful subpoenas”, literally require an enforcement mechanism; that’s the “poena” part of the word. The enforcement mechanism is a judicial penalty, and that penalty can only be created if the House votes to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Absent a vote to authorize, the Legislative Branch has not established compulsion authority aka judicial enforcement authority, as they attempt to work through their quasi-constitutional “impeachment inquiry” process. Instead of subpoenas, scumbag-Adam Schiff House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; and Chairman scumbag-Eliot L. Engel House Committee on Foreign Affairs can only send out request letters. The compliance is discretionary based on the outlook of the recipient...
.
Devin Nunes -vs- Maria Bartiromo
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com ~ Ranking member Devin Nunes appears on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo to outline the ridiculously political sate of liar-Pelosi’s impeachment by decree and how scumbag-Adam Schiff has shredded all precedent.
VIDEO:  https://videopress.com/v/SQybVQQF  {copy and paste to view}
.
Durham’s Trail Leading to SSCI – Ali Watkins 
Never Slept With James Wolfe –
It Was a Cover Story
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ With media reporting that U.S. Attorney John Durham has expanded the timeline and scope of his investigation into U.S. government and intelligence community activity during the 2016 election... there’s an interesting quote from NBC: …”Justice Department officials have said that Durham has found something significant, and that critics should be careful.”…The expanded investigative timeline is now into May 2017 when Mueller was appointed special counsel, and would mean all of the preceding and surrounding activity leading up to Mueller would be reviewed.  With that carefully in mind….During the 2016 effort to weaponize the institutions of government against the outside candidacy of Donald Trump, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was headed by Richard Burr and Dianne Fein-stein. After the 2016 election Senator Fein-stein abdicated her vice-chair position to Senator Mark Warner in January 2017. While the SSCI was engaged in their part of the 2016 effort Vice-Chair Fein-stein’s lead staffer was a man named Daniel Jones. Dan Jones was the contact point between the SSCI and Fusion-GPS. After the election, and after Fein-stein abdicated, Dan Jones left the committee to continue paying Fusion-GPS (Glenn Simpson) for ongoing efforts toward the impeachment insurance policy angle...   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/20/durhams-trail-leadi... 
This Agency Is Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren’s Brainchild. The Supreme Court Will 
Decide If It’s Constitutional
by Kevin Daley 
{ thepoliticalinsider.com } ~ The Supreme Court announced Friday that it will hear a constitutional challenge to the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)... a watchdog agency whose existence is largely credited to Massachusetts Democratic. Sen. Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren. The bureau is arranged to insulate its employees and funding streams from political pressure and ensure its independence from big banks and financial institutions. At issue in Friday’s dispute is a provision forbidding the president from removing the bureau’s director except for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” Though the Department of Justice (DOJ) generally defends federal laws as a matter of course, the Trump administration told the justices that for-cause removal restriction on the president’s power violates the constitutional separation of powers. “Vesting such power in a single person not answerable to the president represents a stark departure from the Constitution’s framework,” the Trump administration told the justices in court filings. In a short Friday order, the justices also asked the parties to address whether the contested removal provision can be severed from the rest of the Dodd-Frank law. That gives the justices a path to strike down the removal position without imperiling the landmark Dodd-Frank law. The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act chartered the CFPB with a broad mandate to regulate mortgage servicing, pay-day lending, and stop predatory scams. As a professor at Harvard Law School, dinkyliar-Warren agitated for the creation of a consumer protection agency. Though former President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama tapped her to set up the agency following passage of Dodd-Frank, she was ultimately passed over for the directorship due to protracted opposition to her appointment in the Senate. Like the CFPB, some federal agencies are chartered to operate with a degree of independence from the political branches. In the past, the Supreme Court has allowed independent multi-member panels like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or investigatory independent counsels. The administration argues those precedents don’t apply here, however, because the CFPB director exercises executive power alone with no accountability to the president...
.
.
Spinning Mulvaney's 'Quid Pro Quo'
Thomas Gallatin:  We’ve seen this movie before: Members of the Leftmedia are breathlessly asserting that they’ve finally uncovered the “smoking gun” that will prove President Donald Trump’s guilt. “Mulvaney brashly admits quid pro quo,” CNN’s headline blared. The rest of the Leftmedia dutifully declared that White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney had just undercut Trump’s denial of a quid pro quo with Ukraine. However, as with the story of the boy who cried wolf, few are taking the Leftmedia seriously, nor should they, as this is yet another instance of fake news.

So, what did Mulvaney actually say? During a press briefing on Thursday, Mulvaney explained that the foreign-aid package for Ukraine had been held up due to concerns over possible corruption. Mulvaney stated, “Did [Trump] also mention to me in the past the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it and that’s why we held up the money.”

Aha! Democrats were quick to assert. Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff vacuously claimed, “I think Mr. Mulvaney’s acknowledgment means that things have gone very, very bad to much, much worse.” However, such sentiments only appear to be the case in scumbag-Schiff’s dream world.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, Mulvaney’s statements actually comport with what Trump and the White House have been saying ever since the “whistleblower” complaint arose. As the New York Post observes, “All Mulvaney did was repeat yet again that Trump ‘was worried about corruption with that nation’ — and specifically say those worries extended to cooperation in ‘the look-back to what happened in 2016.’” When pressed by a reporter that withholding the aid package amounted to a quid pro quo, Mulvaney responded, “We do that all the time with foreign policy. … We were holding up aid [to] the Northern Triangle countries [Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador] … so that they would change their policies on immigration.”

And once again Mulvaney reiterated that the temporary withholding of military aid for Ukraine had nothing to do with Trump’s request that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky look into loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s publicly admitted quid pro quo or Hunter Biden’s corrupt dealings in Ukraine.

The reality is that all U.S. presidents have engaged in foreign-policy deals that can be termed “quid pro quo,” as Mulvaney correctly asserts. The only question is whether Trump’s dealing with Ukraine was done solely and primarily for his own political benefit by seeking to take out a political opponent. And there is thus far no evidence supporting such a claim, irrespective of how loudly the Democrats and Leftmedia insist there is. In fact, if there were such damning evidence, liar-Nancy Pelosi and company would have already voted on articles of impeachment. Instead, the fact that House Democrats are holding this not-yet-voted-on impeachment “inquiry” entirely behind closed doors demonstrates that they have nothing. It’s all a game of political smoke and mirrors, which the Leftmedia seeks to convince the American people is real.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66210?mailing_id=4595&utm_mediu...  

Views: 5

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service