TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
RIP, GOP?
Arnold Ahlert  
.
“For God’s Sake” Trump’s 
Tweet is Not “Witness Intimidation”’
by thegreggjarrett.com ~ During an appearance on Fox News’ Hannity program, Gregg Jarret dismantled the claims that President Trump committed the crime of “witness intimidation.”... Gregg points out that there are only three ways to commit witness intimidation under the law: “physically harming a witness, bribing a witness, or coercing a witness to lie.” President Trump did none of these things. The only person who has come close to doing this is Representative scumbag/liar-Schiff himself when he tried to strong-arm Former United States Special Representative for Ukraine Negotiations Kurt Volker into agreeing with his fictional movie script that he has created in his head. Gregg concludes his argument by pointing out that, “simply pleading your case and criticizing a witness, who is leveling false accusations based on multiple hearsay, is not witness intimidation for God’s sake. The President was right to tweet it. He has no other choice.”
.
scumbag/liar-nObama Left An Ambassador to 
Die, But We’re Supposed to be Outraged 
Over Trump's Yovanovitch Tweet?
By MATT MARGOLIS
{ pjmedia.com } ~ On Friday, as former Ambassador Maria Yovanovitch was testifying, President Trump made a series of tweets criticizing her performance as ambassador... which got Democrats so triggered, his tweets were read soon after they were made, and the narrative presented was that the tweet was witness intimidation. "Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad," Trump tweeted. "She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors." "They call it 'serving at the pleasure of the President,'" Trump continued. "The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First!" Trump also noted that he's done far more for Ukraine than his predecessor than scumbag/liar-nObama. This triggered scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff. "What we saw today is it wasn't enough that Ambassador Yovanovitch was smeared. It wasn't enough she was attacked. It wasn't enough that she was recalled for no reason, at least no good reason. But we saw today witness intimidation in real-time by the president of United States," scumbag/liar-Schiff said. "Once again going after this dedicated and respected career public servant in an effort to not only chilled her but to chill others who may come forward. We take this kind of witness intimidation and obstruction of the inquiry very seriously," he added. Really? First of all, Yovanovitch wouldn't even had known about the tweet until after her testimony had scumbag/liar-Schiff not posted the tweets in the first place, but regardless, where's the intimidation? I can't see any. If scumbag/liar-Schiff was taking this seriously, he wouldn't be lobbing absurd charges for the purpose of piling on more ridiculous charges against Trump hoping something will stick. But what really gets me is how it's been almost seven years since Barack scumbag/liar-nObama left one of his ambassadors to die in a terrorist attack on a U.S. consulate, and the same people who defended the scumbag/liar-nObama administration endlessly over that, are feigning outrage over Trump's tweet expressing his opinion. Democrats have been crying "impeach!" over everything for years, and now every time Trump expresses an opinion, we're hearing "intimidation." The same party that defended the scumbag/liar-nObama administration's failure to protect our consulate in Libya from an attack that claimed four American lives, including that of a U.S. ambassador, are now trying to tell us that we should be outraged over a harmless tweet—a tweet that, regardless of what one thinks of the content, was written after Yovanovitch started testifying, and as far as Trump knew, she wouldn't have even had an opportunity to see until well after her testimony concluded? A tweet that she'd have been oblivious to had scumbag/liar-Schiff not brought it up. As White House spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham said in a statement, the tweets were “simply the President’s opinion, which he is entitled to.”...  https://pjmedia.com/trending/obama-left-an-ambassador-to-die-but-we...   
MacCallum Slaughters scumbag-Swalwell Over Blatant Hypocrisy: Would You Investigate 
Eric Trump if the Roles Were Reversed?
by Beth Baumann
{ townhall.com  } ~ Fox News' Martha MacCallum asked Congressman scumbag-Eric Swalwell (D-CA), point blank... if he would be interested in investigating Eric Trump if his situation mirrored that of Hunter Biden's. "Let me ask you this. If Eric Trump got a job on the board of a company in Turkey, would you be okay with that?" MacCallum asked. "Would you think that should be something that would be looked into?" Naturally, scumbag-Swalwell tried to deflect and say the Trump kids are benefiting business wise from their father's presidency. MacCallum quickly shut that down and reminded him of the question at hand. "Would you, or would you not, if one of them, after he became president, suddenly became an advisor to an energy company in Turkey or Ukraine, you would say, 'I’m not interested in that'? That is what you’re saying right now," she explained. "We have open investigations into the Trump family for their corrupt practices, Martha," he replied. Democrats have continually tried to compare Hunter Biden sitting on Burisma with the various business dealings the Trump kids have had around the world. The Fox News host reminded him that he's comparing apples to oranges. "Those situations are not parallel!" MacCallum replied. I’m asking you a specific question. I’m saying if they had never been in those businesses before, they got into them only after their father became president, wouldn’t you want to investigate that?" scumbag-Swawell hesitated but ultimately agreed with her. "I would want to go through former channels — formal channels," he replied. "I don’t think it is okay for the president to ask another leader to involve ourselves in the policies."...  https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/11/13/watch-maccallu...  
.
Bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus 
Calls on liar-Pelosi to Pass USMCA
by SEAN MORAN
{ breitbart.com } ~ The bipartisan House Problem Solvers Caucus called for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to hold a “timely vote” on the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement... The Problem Solvers Caucus, which represents 48 House Republicans and Democrats, called on House Speaker liar-Pelosi to pass the USMCA trade agreement. The caucus, which is co-chaired by Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Tom Reed (R-NY), noted that the USMCA could bring about significant economic growth in the United States. For the good of the American people, and a strong economy, the Problem Solvers Caucus believes both sides of the aisle should find a way to unite together behind passage of USMCA. We applaud the bipartisan efforts of both Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer on this important agreement that has the potential to bring NAFTA into the modern era, with added predictability and certainty for business growth. We are proud of the work by labor groups, American workers, the business community, and farmers who continue to be a part of the process in this matter. Given the impact on our economy, we request a timely vote on USMCA. The bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus follows as House Speaker liar-Pelosi said that Democrats have moved closer towards passing the USMCA in Congress’s lower chamber. Speaking to reporters, liar-Pelosi said, “we are moving positively” toward a deal. “I do believe that if we can get this to the place it needs to be, which is imminent, this can be a template for future trade agreements. A good template,” she added. Many Republicans, including White House Policy Director Joe Grogan, have noted that liar-Pelosi and House Democrats have become too “distracted by impeachment” to focus on more important issues such as health care and passing the USMCA.   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/14/bipartisan-problem-so...   
Elise Stefanik Fires Back At ‘Misogynist’ 
George Conway After He Calls Her ‘Trash’
by PETER HASSON
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Republican New York Rep. Elise Stefanik fired back at George Conway on Saturday, calling him a misogynist and criticizing him for spreading a doctored image of her... Conway, the husband of White House aide Kellyanne Conway, called Stefanik “lying trash” and urged voters to support her Democratic challenger. Conway, a longtime Republican lawyer, became a sharp critic of President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans.  Stefanik ripped Conway in a tweet, writing: “the one thing I’ve NEVER been called in my life is TRASH,” adding: “You need serious help. My opponent Taxin’ Tedra Cobb can have your sick mysogynist [sic] support.” Conway on Saturday also apparently spread a doctored image of Stefanik, that appeared to show her flipping the middle finger. “The photoshopped picture that the Leftist Twitter mob led by George Conway is circulating is FAKE – I’ve been so busy exposing scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff’s #regimeofsecrecy that I haven’t had time for a manicure in weeks!” Stefanik wrote on Twitter.  Conway’s account deleted the tweets after facing criticism for spreading misinformation.  https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/16/elise-stefanik-george-conway-tra...  
.
Ukraine ambassador Gordon Sondland 
did NOT confirm quid pro quo
By WILLIAM HOEL
{ dailychristiannews.com } ~ The mainstream media is at it again. Recently, U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine Gordon Sondland revised his impeachment hearing testimony... in a move that had Democrats and the media rushing to claim that it was the smoking gun confirming a “quid pro quo” in the Ukraine scandal. But it turns out that it was all a lie. Joel Pollack, the senior editor at Brietbart, points out in a fact check article: Sondland said that he “presumed” there was a “quid pro quo.” But he did not have any first-hand knowledge of one, and other witnesses have testified that there was no such “quid pro quo” at all. Of course, it’s worth pointing out that there’s no issue with a quid pro quo in foreign policy in the first place. In fact, it’s a technique that the Democrat House itself has used. The Ukraine scandal is nothing but a political chisel that the Democrats are using to chip away at President Trump’s 2020 chances. Will they succeed?   https://www.dailychristiannews.com/ukraine-ambassador-gordon-sondla...  
.
.
RIP, GOP?
Arnold Ahlert:  “A remarkable transformation is underway in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The birthplace and final resting place of George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson — and once one of the most reliably-red of red states — is being rapidly turned into a progressive stronghold.” —Breitbart News in 2015

From 2016-2018, the Republican Party controlled the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. A large part of that control, as well as the unlikely triumph of President Donald Trump — against what we now know was just about every conceivable organized opposition in the country — was based on the idea that the glaring problems associated with mass immigration, both legal and illegal, would finally be addressed in a meaningful way.

Much of that expectation was based on the reality that the GOP’s standard excuse for inaction — as in they were always one chamber short in Congress, or didn’t control the presidency when they controlled the House and the Senate — was no longer operative. Finally, they had at least two years in which many of the conservative-based campaign promises they made to get themselves elected would come to fruition.

It was all an infuriating charade. And the worst part of it is, Republicans appear completely sanguine about the demographic time bomb that will doom them to permanent irrelevancy at best, or complete obliteration at worst.

Virginia is the bellwether. And as the date of the above Breitbart article indicates, it’s been evolving into a blue state for at least four years. “Hey, Republicans! Did you enjoy Election Night last week? Get ready for a lot more nights like that as immigration turns every last corner of the country blue,” Ann Coulter warned in 2017, following the defeat of Republican gubernatorial candidate Ed Gillespie.

And like Virginia’s latest election last week, where Democrats won a 21-19 majority in the State Senate, and a 55-45 margin in the House of Delegates — completely reversing the supermajorities of 66-67 seats Republicans held between 2011 and 2017 — politics had far less to do with the outcome than demographics did.

Coulter revealed what has been evident for quite some time. “In 1970, only one out of every 100 Virginians was foreign-born,” she explained. “By 2012, one in nine Virginians was foreign-born.” Why does that matter? “According to the Pew Research Center, 75 percent of Hispanic immigrants and 55 percent of Asian immigrants support bigger government, compared to just over 40 percent of the general public,” Coulter adds. “Even third-generation Hispanics support bigger government by 58 percent.”

Columnist Sabrina Tavernise confirms that reality. “It was a stunning political realignment for a Southern state, and prompted days of prognosticating about President Trump’s own standing with suburban voters nationally in 2020,” she writes. “But while political leaders come and go, the deeper, more lasting force at work is demographics. Once the heart of the confederacy, Virginia is now the land of Indian grocery stores, Korean churches, and Diwali festivals. The state population has boomed — up by 38 percent since 1990, with the biggest growth in densely settled suburban areas like South Riding. One in 10 people eligible to vote in the state were born outside the United States, up from 1 in 28 in 1990.”

Her conclusion? “The influx of immigrants and their US-born children, the spread of high-density suburbia, and the growth of higher education all tilt the field toward the Democrats.”

With such a blatant inevitability staring them in the face, one might think Republicans would be a bit more circumspect about the massive influx of legal immigrants that brings more than a million would-be citizens into our nation every single year. One might think they’d be alarmed by birth tourism, as in foreigners coming to America to give birth to “anchor babies” that add a U.S. passport holder to the family, or the “curious” interpretation of the 14th Amendment whereby hundreds of thousands of children are born to illegal aliens are automatically granted U.S. citizenship. One might think clarion calls from Democrats and their media allies about fundamentally transforming our nation would resonate.

One would be utterly wrong. Aside from the orchestrated inaction on illegal immigration, Republicans have been actively collaborating with Democrats this year to more than double the number of H-2B visas made available to low-skill foreign-born workers. That follows last year’s collaborative effort to double the number of H-1B visas for high-tech foreign-born workers.

That low-income Americans’ wages remain stagnant or get depressed? That the so-called shortage of American-born STEM workers precipitating the increase in H-1B visas is a complete myth? That what happened in Virginia is a pattern repeating itself in places like Houston and Atlanta?

The GOP will support the globalist agenda of open borders and unlimited immigration to the point of suicide.

Moreover, Republicans are abetted by pseudo-conservatives like columnist Matthew Continetti. “As Virginia has moved into the Democratic column, the state Republican party has become more populist, more nationalist, and more culturally conservative,” he asserts. “The dwindling number of Republicans who spoke the language of suburbia could not escape their party’s national reputation for hostility to immigrants and opposition to progressive ideals. A similar process occurred in states like California, Colorado, and Nevada. It may also be underway in Arizona and Texas(!).”

Translation: Putting America first, and cherishing our exceptionalism, culture, and traditions, must give way to unchecked immigration and progressive ideals.

What “ideals” are those? As Victor Davis Hanson astutely notes “a radical progressive revolutionary movement that serves as a touchstone for a variety of auxiliary extremist causes, agendas, and cliques — almost all of them radically leftwing and nihilistic.” A movement that embraces “the Green New Deal, reparations, abolishing the Electoral College, welfare for illegal aliens, open borders, amnesties, wealth taxes, a 70-90 percent income tax code, Medicare for all, and legal infanticide.”

In short, all-encompassing, Liberty-crushing, Nanny State government, courtesy of a Democrat Party seeking permanent power. They are aided and abetted by “principled” Never-Trumpers, Chamber of Commerce RINO globalists, an educational system that fosters  national self-loathing, and millions of foreign-born voters who remain willfully oblivious to the irony of abandoning the insufficiencies of their former countries only to heartily support those insufficiencies here.

According to a 2015 report by the Pew Research Center, immigrants and their descendants are projected to account for an astounding 88% of the U.S. population increase, or 103 million people, as the nation grows from 320 million people to 441 million between the years 2015 and 2065.

Anyone who questions this trend? A bigot or a xenophobe.

“It’s been a long time coming, albeit a slow, gradual march to the abyss, but the land of the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and ‘sic semper tyrannis’ has now become the land of the snowflakes and social justice warriors,” columnist Scott Morefield states about Virginia.

In 2020, we’ll know if the rest of the nation follows suit. If it does, the GOP can kiss its future goodbye. But then again, maybe the party surrendered it a long time ago.   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/66782?mailing_id=4657&utm_mediu...  

Views: 4

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Joe Biden Vows: Give Taxpayer-Funded Obamacare To All Illegal Aliens In U.S.

Former Vice President and 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidate Joe Biden is vowing to give Obamacare, funded by American taxpayers, to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the United States.

During an interview with Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart, Biden forgot that Obamacare technically bans illegal aliens from enrolling in healthcare plans — although illegal aliens are still able to obtain subsidized and free healthcare at Americans’ expense — and promised that under his plan, all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens would be able to get Obamacare.

The exchange went as follows:

DIAZ-BALART: When I … NBC moderated that first debate with you, I didn’t … I don’t recall a clear answer, under your plan should … would the 11, 12 million undocumented immigrants that live in the United States, that have been here many for generations, would they have access …

BIDEN: Yes.

DIAZ-BALART: — to health insurance.

BIDEN: Yes, they … if they can buy into the system like everybody else.

DIAZ-BALART: Because you know, in [Obamacare] they can’t.

BIDEN: Yeah. Yeah, I know. Well they can, that’s my point. They continue to be able to do that.

DIAN-BALART: They cannot under the ObamaCare.

BIDEN: Well and that’s my point, they will though. They will be able to buy into … [illegal aliens] would be able to buy in, just like anyone else could.

Biden joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg — among other 2020 Democrats — in committing to forcing American taxpayers to pay for healthcare for illegal aliens who arrive in the U.S.

Already, due to loopholes, American taxpayers are spending nearly $20 billion every year to provide illegal aliens with subsidized healthcare, emergency room visits, and other health services.

Under the 2020 Democrats’ plan to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare to all illegal aliens living in the U.S., Americans would be billed potentially $660 billion every decade just to cover the costs. Other research has found that the plan would cost Americans at least $23 billion every year.

As Breitbart News has reported, experts have said that giving taxpayer-funded healthcare to effectively all foreign nationals who can make it to America’s borders would drive “strong incentives for people with serious health problems to enter the country or remain longer than their visas allow in order to get government-funded care.”

Despite 2020 Democrats’ continued push for taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal aliens, American voters are overwhelmingly opposed to the plan. The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey revealed that the healthcare-for-illegal-aliens plan is the least popular policy position, with opposition from 62 percent of U.S. voters.

Similarly, a CNN poll from July discovered that 63 percent of likely swing voters oppose providing healthcare to illegal aliens, along with nearly 6-in-10 of all likely U.S. voters and 61 percent of moderates. A Rasmussen Reports survey also found that likely voters, by a majority of 55 percent, oppose giving healthcare to even the most low-income illegal aliens.

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service