Monday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
More 'Right-Wing Violence,' 
or More Furthering an Agenda?
fUn9OmiGXvMgxvzQeHWpYT7OX80JPSi-KaC4qz-a-umSANy7cObTYTrwkC4x--h2GhtpXAGP25d6-EqjKXl3YpiS3VcAHPiAz2T60hpE3g9EygNEG3r_09e6x6kMWu3fBq7LXYPwJMZIt_46jNdkUJH1lL-qL5xp6EesvLg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Michael Swartz  
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=150
.
Feds OK'd sale of top-secret satellite tech to China
x31-g0OyHcGxJFQQZfuQcORwOIKyi5CewxNPQMyE4D2zA53wXaZEV2w4mKep3E4vjG6M5Zs6m10caxnrOQW7NTLDbFZwkrRtgA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by wnd.com  
{wnd.com} ~ The U.S. Commerce Department approved a deal by Boeing to sell a satellite containing top-secret military technology to a startup company financed by the communist Chinese government... After the Wall Street Journal reported the deal Tuesday, Boeing backed out, citing default for nonpayment, the paper reported Friday. But intelligence experts such as Adm. Den­nis Blair, a for­mer U.S. di­rec­tor of na­tional in­tel­li­gence, are baffled by the Commerce Department’s approval. The Journal noted Blair chairs an ad­vi­sory com­mit­tee for a Boeing competitor, Lock­heed Mar­tin Space Sys­tems. Thomas Lifson, editor of the American Thinker, said the Journal “deserves huge kudos for uncovering a genuine scandal involving national security.” The Journal reported workers at a Boeing plant in Los Angeles were nearing completion of a new satellite that uses restricted technology relied on by the U.S. military. According to corporate records, court documents and people close to the project, the satellite was being funded by Chinese state money. Using an offshore channel from a state-owned Chinese financial firm, about $200 million went to Boeing for the satellite project...
.
Paris Is Burning Over Climate 
Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
Xi3Zt1hEwqlgaSZSF_tEO-1AuOiANkYArWfOZo0hgLzwPBXILvNZAHTf9YvKby-Q6f1j4trxYOofq-s3rQD8TgPC8gAOiVWw4H8gEl8PYkAPG3SzSwNI_kV_5TuVePY3cmz140gFkqMOtDxHC5hYZBj7kMYaaHvPxTUfEfx8BuRWzblDZfsnKBgDUDoWbZJbxUSEts-3OL-wNc4ihT0pCAj9ub10hDgXGg6KNW4C-KSIpnLnCdWFag=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Chuck DeVore
{forbes.com} ~ The City of Lights, Paris, has been illuminated in recent days by cars set alight by thousands of protesting “Yellow Vests”... largely middle class people who earn their living by driving or who commute to get to work. The cause of their ire is a scheduled 25 cents-per-gallon increase in gas taxes, and about 10 cents on diesel, to fight climate change. French President Macron, deeply unpopular, just reversed course on the new green tax—Parisians are already paying about $7.06 per gallon for gasoline, almost half of that in taxes. If Paris streets burned over a proposed 25 cents per gallon climate change tax, imagine the global conflagration over a $49 per gallon tax. That’s what a United Nations special climate report calls for in 12 years, with a carbon tax of $5,500 per ton—equal to $49 per gallon of gasoline or diesel. That’s about 100 times today’s average state and federal motor fuels tax. By 2100, the U.N. estimates that a carbon tax of $27,000 per ton is needed—$240 per gallon—to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius. Of course, that isn’t going to happen. The economic wreckage of such a punitive tax would plunge the global economy into a permanent depression—and that’s assuming politicians could enact such huge tax increases over the will of their voters...   https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2018/12/07/paris-is-burning-over-climate-change-taxes-is-america-next/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=theinsider&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWXpnNU5HSTBNVFkwWkdRMCIsInQiOiJpdUZXWVlxelN3TDlmRTFSYnh0UG52VGRpRjZBWEJPTUVmOXhMRDNaSVdSY1VUU1J1Nm5RcEVYRmUzaXpkWWV6TTFWYVVJUEkwa0NHSTRIakFieUQ0a3VJS1wvQ0VTZk1PbWlkZmZwMmxWQmFSbUNIYlY1UjY5Y2hId0orU0RFWkwifQ%3D%3D#62e7a127632e
.
A Survival Strategy for Conservatives
7pWOeSH4G83HWfUs8x5tfjiFH5Vv0Ii54MAxtEzg-4E-qNqEVVx54IpTNh9OTNms5z1K2sWyeGur37ZB4etQ7HvsGE5IKO1dKlX8lKj6dx8cc_l9CPw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Rick Hayes
{americanthinker.com} ~ As Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller racks up the guilty pleas for minor infractions by supporters of President Trump unrelated to Russian collusion while ignoring the crimes committed by members... of the FBI, DoJ, and scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton, it should come as no surprise that conservatives are playing the wrong game. Even after Republicans won the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives, they acted as if they had lost. Always on the defensive and forever begging for forgiveness from an ideology that never grants it, conservatives had better change their tactics or get used to coming in second place in a two-party race. In the current political arena, conservatives are facing off against leftist Democrats in a blood contest in which the current rules favor only the left. It's more than just a lopsided playing field; it's a contest where conservatives are forbidden to score and are the only side charged with penalties. And yet conservatives continue to enter these contests expecting to be treated fairly. A lie is only a lie if it emanates from the lips of a conservative. Otherwise, it's called a “misstatement” leading to no repercussions. Immunity agreements are granted only to those close to Democrats under investigation. Otherwise, everyone associated with a conservative under investigation is blackmailed with career-ending, bankruptcy producing charges. Even as evidence mounts that the entire Russian collusion investigation was a fiasco, the liberal propaganda networks shout Trump's guilt. It mattered not that the whole debacle relied on manufactured evidence paid for by scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton. Serious crimes by scumbag/liar-nObama and scumbag/liar-Clinton such as Benghazi, the VA, Fast and Furious, and IRS abuse that took both the rights and the lives of actual American citizens were covered as if they were of little importance. With all the congressional hearings and contempt of Congress charges, not a single Democrat lost his or her job...
.
Return of Trump’s asylum 
policy blocked by 9th Circuit court
FC8OXmzZSVBCuiygYLBSXwVvpgu5jxgMzIfRt3klLhc1b8WhIFZhWOluIFCUd1xhG1pGN0pVdwO5YIJOXjsMRCNYWzjHPaTDo1bVOVjWz8e_O5pmm5-Sk7sL6HulHdBmhbTjnfbUna67GEqdw-FLKtZ4xxXv2Peq8qQG6fPv9if0i5Cd6dcpXKUYkwlY9wBBispAyI2APz6AlZKXsJ7FvovIGg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Dom Calicchio  
{foxnews.com} ~ The Trump administration’s bid to immediately reinstate its policy of denying asylum to those who enter the U.S. illegally was denied Friday... by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The San Francisco-based court stated in a 2-1 ruling that the policy was likely “inconsistent” with existing law. It marked the latest setback for the Trump administration in a court that President Trump blasted last month as “a disgrace” because of a series of rulings against his policies.“ Because you cannot win, if you're us, a case in the Ninth Circuit," Trump told reporters outside the White House on Nov. 20. “Every case gets filed in the Ninth Circuit ... we get beaten, and then we end up having to go to the Supreme Court.” In Friday’s ruling, the 9th Circuit described the Trump administration’s attempt to restore the asylum policy as an effort to bypass Congress. “Just as we may not, as we are often reminded, ‘legislate from the bench,’ neither may the Executive legislate from the Oval Office," 9th Circuit Judge Jay Bybee wrote in the majority opinion. Bybee was nominated to his seat by former President George W. Bush...
.
IDF fires toward 3 suspected Hezbollah 
fighters who approach border
63As37C5M_mcJCixPnJPlXejxR9N36ifGMPTO10Qkg-tDhDGwLMwNgoZvx2xLYbmLwCI6BG7qVZG6qiiDDv8hUyQG6IMi8euPsiIiXkQp3hQYxrQmpsJH-VHtykX2n0g6EVUzQgKQNiWKoMR4NNE0RXjUD8OZ1bEBC8=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by JACOB MAGID
{timesofisrael.com} ~ Israeli soldiers on Saturday opened fire at three suspected Hezbollah fighters on the Israeli-Lebanese border, the army said... A military spokeswoman said the incident took place close to Yiftah, south of Metula, a town near which a tunnel from Lebanon was found. The military said the three men attempted to approach an “area of technological work” in an enclave north of the security fence, as the IDF continues Operation Northern Shield to destroy Hezbollah attack tunnels dug under the border. The army said it believed the three attempted to use the cover of stormy weather to approach the Israeli forces. Troops fired towards the three “in accordance with the standard operating procedures” and they fled the scene. “Work in the area continues as usual,” it said... Is that a wall? See it dems, fund the wall you idiots.
.
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=150
.
More 'Right-Wing Violence,' or More Furthering an Agenda?
fUn9OmiGXvMgxvzQeHWpYT7OX80JPSi-KaC4qz-a-umSANy7cObTYTrwkC4x--h2GhtpXAGP25d6-EqjKXl3YpiS3VcAHPiAz2T60hpE3g9EygNEG3r_09e6x6kMWu3fBq7LXYPwJMZIt_46jNdkUJH1lL-qL5xp6EesvLg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Michael Swartz:  With the election over, the news cycle slower, and a new year nigh, this is the time of year we begin to take stock of what’s happened since we last switched calendars. One such item is a new report that claims terrorism is down on a global basis. Alas, the good news is tempered by an upswing in “right-wing violence.” At least that’s how The Washington Post framed it:
             Over the past decade, attackers motivated by right-wing political ideologies have committed dozens of shootings, bombings and other acts of violence, far more than any other category of domestic extremist. … While the data show a decades-long drop-off in violence by left-wing groups, violence by white supremacists and other far-right attackers has been on the rise since Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s presidency — and has surged since President [Donald] Trump took office.

             The Trump-deranged WaPo isn’t exactly an honest broker here, as even it admits “many acts of domestic terrorism do not sort neatly across the ideological spectrum.” But it provided a handy excuse for other outlets to further the narrative about “far-right” terrorism or violence on a global scale, thanks to the recently released annual report called the Global Terrorism Index.
               If one were to believe in media bias against a certain American president, the fact that news stories are stressing the minor amount of terror deemed to be “right-wing” at a time when global terrorism is down thanks to the demise of the Islamic State — well, that might be exhibit A.
               Reading beyond the headlines and digging into the data, we see that the nations with terrorism problems tend to have two common factors: open warfare and what’s termed “political terror,” meaning, “extra-judicial killings, torture and imprisonment without trial.” Doesn’t sound like the West is a hotbed for terror given those criteria, does it? We also see that a significant portion of the data on terrorist attacks comes from a group called START, the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, which describes itself as “a university-based research and education center comprised [sic] of an international network of scholars committed to the scientific study of the causes and human consequences of terrorism in the United States and around the world.”
               But like its leftist media brethren, START has focused more on the perceived threat of “far-right” violence. One case in point: research during the scumbag/liar-nObama administration on the “militia/sovereign citizen movement.” A comparison of START projects labeled “left-wing terrorism” and “right-wing terrorism” found that, while there were a number of common projects, the large majority of those found with only one of the labels were deemed “right-wing terrorism.” As another example, they were quick to categorize the Pittsburgh synagogue assault as a right-wing crime, assuming the anti-Semitic attitude exhibited by the shooter was evidence of right-wing leanings despite his professed hatred of President Trump.
               Granted, most of START’s right-wing studies occurred under the scumbag/liar-nObama administration, but there doesn’t seem to be a reciprocal push to study opposition resistance under the Trump administration.
               This disparity of blaming only the Right for violence when it often takes two to tango has drawn comment on our pages before, but columnist David Harsanyi points out the biggest problem in the rote assignment of violence to the right wing:
               To help bolster right-wing terrorist stats, for instance, we would have to perfunctorily include every anti-Semitic act. … Then there is the matter of inconsistently defining terrorism. If throwing a rock through the window of an Islamic center is an act of right-wing terrorism, why isn’t it an act of left-wing terrorism for anti-capitalists to throw rocks through the window of a business in Oregon? Surely, both fall under the description of terror, which the (Global Terrorism Database) defines as “the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor seeking to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation.” As far as I can tell, only one of these genres actually makes the cut for the GTD.
               This is what happens when reporters work backward from a predetermined premise.
               Let’s also consider some of the things that the Right stands for: the Rule of Law, the Second Amendment, and Judeo-Christian values. Somehow, these principles make conservatives the bad guys, the violent terrorists, and the Left’s favorite epithet: Nazis. Yes, there are certainly a wretched few who support Donald Trump while holding noxious views toward people who don’t look, love, or worship like them. But conflating the average conservative American with the so-called alt-right is the most vicious of slanders, especially when the standard-issue liberal is (correctly) given a pass for the violence of antifa, Black Lives Matter, or other anarchist, pro-communist groups.
               It’s time to start telling the truth about the perpetrators of violence — regardless of their politics.  ~The Patriot Post  

https://patriotpost.us/articles/59904?mailing_id=3926&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3926&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center