Monday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

~ Featuring ~
Dems Pass Impeachment Inquiry 
on Party-Line Vote
Thomas Gallatin
scumbag-Schiff's Impeachment
Train to Nowhere
By Clarice Feldman
{ } ~ Like the expensive California fast train to nowhere, scumbag-Schiff’s funhouse impeachment hearings are a useless waste of time and money, and subject him to well-deserved ridicule... They are certain not to prevent President Trump’s reelection in 2020 and may well cost the Democrats their majority in the House. With a pack of losing candidates and a series of “now we got him” flops ahead of them, this is a losing desperation ploy. Roger L. Simon notes that the market figured this out this week.  What does it mean after the House of Representatives -- on an almost one-hundred-percent pure partisan vote, save for two Democrats who wisely demurred -- decides to expand an impeachment investigation on what they claim to be serious charges when... the very next day... the stock market zooms to all-time highs, breaking records substantially on all major indexes, and black unemployment goes to all-time lows? Well, the latter spells big trouble for the Democrats a year from now and the former means the investment world thinks impeachment is a bunch of horse hockey that will never happen the Republican Senate will never convict Trump, not even envious rino-Mitt and the real news was the job figures. And it's easy to see why both of those are true. No matter what polls tell you, it's not just Kanye. African Americans are wising up to the fact they've been royally you-know-what'd by decades of Democratic Party rule. Under Trump, their paychecks are going up faster than anybody's. Even black youth unemployment is at record lows. You think they're not making the connection? To the dummies of their far left base, the Democrats hope this week’s vote signals that the president will be impeached, but the vote was not to impeach, nor even to begin a formal impeachment inquiry. It was to set the procedures for any impeachment hearing in the house. And what a lulu it is. Under these rules scumbag-Adam Schiff can block testimony from witnesses called by Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee he chairs. It does not require the previous secret proceedings of the committee, held without even a semblance of due process, be disclosed. For those of you muttering angrily about the selective, clearly partisan leaks to compliant press and demanding that Republicans release the transcripts, bear in mind they don’t have them. scumbag-Schiff has withheld them. scumbag-Schiff and the Democrats can subpoena whoever they want; Congressman Devin Nunes and the Republicans must make a showing of relevance in writing to scumbag-Schiff’s satisfaction.” The president and his counsel will have no opportunity to participate until after the scumbag-Schiff inquiry is done and a report filed with the Judiciary Committee of the House...
liar-Nancy Pelosi letting scumbag-Schiff lead impeachment inquiry after scumbag liar-Nadler hearing 'disasters,' Mollie Hemingway says
By Charles Creitz 
{ } ~ House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is allowing Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., to control the Trump impeachment inquiry  because... she does not trust another one of her senior colleagues, according to Mollie Hemingway. scumbag-Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has led several closed-door hearings related to the inquiry rather than House Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., Hemingway noted Wednesday on "Special Report." "It's also very  interesting that liar-Nancy Pelosi is having scumbag-Adam Schiff run the impeachment inquiry instead of scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler," she said, alluding to the fact the Judiciary Committee has taken a leading role in past impeachment proceedings. Then-Chairman Peter Rodino, D-N.J. took a top role during Nixon proceedings and former Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., did the same during former President scumbag/liar-Bill Clinton's impeachment process. Recently, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., told Fox News his Republican caucus largely utilized Rodino's model when pursuing their case against scumbag/liar-Clinton. On "Special Report," Hemingway expanded upon that difference, claiming liar-Pelosi sees scumbag liar-Nadler as a weaker chairman than scumbag-Schiff." She recognizes that scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler is very bad at running hearings," she said. "He's had disasters when he's had people -- whether it was Robert Mueller, Corey Lewandowski or John Dean. Those hearings did not go well. It's really a testament to how little she trusts scumbag liar-Nadler." Leading into Hemingway's interview, anchor Bret Baier played a clip of Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla, claiming the impeachment process has been set up differently than in the past. "The process laid out in the resolution before us is different than the processes used for both President Nixon in 1974 and President scumbag/liar-Clinton in 1998," he said. However, in another clip, Rep. scumbag-Al Green, D-Texas, offered a different take, claiming when Congress held its first impeachment hearing -- against then-President Andrew Johnson in 1868 -- there was less controversy. "It really was not this complicated," scumbag-Green said.  
liar-Pelosi Says She’s ‘Not a Big Fan of Medicare 
for All,’ as dinky/liar-Warren Faces 
Criticism for Her Plan
by Madison Summers
{ } ~ House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) isn’t the biggest fan of Medicare for All backed by a few of the 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls... “I’m not a big fan of Medicare for All,” liar-Pelosi told Bloomberg on Friday, adding, “I welcome the debate. I think that we should have health care for all. I think the affordable care benefit is better than the Medicare benefit.” liar-Pelosi called the specific health care plan too costly. Her remarks come as Sen. Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren (D-Mass.) released her Medicare for All plan cost on Friday, which would cost $20.5 trillion over a decade. Asked if Medicare for All would help “win the electoral college,” liar-Pelosi said it would in her district but its “not what we need to do in order to win the electoral college.” While dinky/liar-Warren previously wouldn’t say if her health care plan would raise taxes on the middle class, Sen.  commjie-Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has said that his plan would. dinky/liar-Warren faced criticism on Friday after releasing the cost of her plan, including from former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden, who called it “a hard truth that underscores why candidates need to be straight with the American people about what they’re proposing.” loose lips liar-Biden’s campaign said the plan “dramatically understates its cost, overstates its savings, inflates the revenue, and pretends that an employer payroll tax increase is something else.” 
Islamists in Office: Salma Yaqoob 
a Warning for Americans
By Shireen Qudosi
{ } ~ Last week, a chilling video made the rounds in social media of UK’s Labour candidate Salma Yaqoob at an anti-Israel protest in London... The protest, which stood against Israel hosting Eurovision, saw Salma Yaqoob’s anti-Semitic “rolodex” scroll through some of history’s most notorious Jew-hating tropes reminiscent of Nazi Germany. While Yaqoob has a long history of hate — common in Islamist office-seekers in the West — her rhetoric this time was absolutely unhinged. Here statements didn’t come without considerable pushback from counter-extremist experts and peace advocates. In messages, Faith Matters founder Fiyaz Mughal, a UK-based organization working toward peace, shares: “We cannot expect equality as British Muslims if we treat other communities with disdain. Equality is not only one way, it is earned by valuing others.” In October, the UK’s Commission on Counter Extremism published an in-depth report on countering extremism, detailing a new marker: hateful extremism. Salma Yaqoob’s language would fall under “hateful extremism.” Speaking with me directly, British political analyst Wasiq warns: If the American constitution means anything, then it means challenging hate when it rears its ugly head. In the UK we have seen how, over time, we have become desensitized to hatred against Jews, when prospective parliamentary candidates are openly being anti Semitic. Slowly being drip fed conspiracy theories and questioning Jewish national identity under the cloak of Palestinian rights has left UK as a de facto anti-Semitic society. The same is now happening in the States by the likes of worthless-Ilhan Omar. Therefore, unless we call it out now and challenge it, then we are doomed to make the same mistakes the UK made in letting down the Jewish community...
Left Is Happy to Report Smugglers Are 
Cutting Through the New Wall
By M. Dowling
{ } ~ The Washington Post reported on Saturday that smugglers and gangs have been using cordless reciprocating saws to cut through the new sections of the border wall... The violent transnational gangs want to continue smuggling drugs, guns, and people into the United States. They are not easily stopped. Reporters and other people of the left seem to think that is good news. They think it’s funny that criminals are getting into the USA through the border wall so they can destroy our youth, our culture, and put Americans in danger. Lawlessness is fine with them, but border walls are not. We must continue to let the riff-raff into the country in response to their new ideological belief that walls have no value. They suddenly care about the cost of the wall but want to spend us into default with absurd healthcare plans and the Green New Deal. On the other hand, their ideology also demands law-abiding Americans give up their guns. They seem to believe criminals won’t be able to get guns somehow, although Democrats are encouraging the gun smugglers’ illegal activities by cooperating with cartels who want an open border. The wall has slowed the influx. Everyone should want that, but not everyone does. They would rather see failure. The wall is one tool to slow the criminals down until agents can get to them. Would Democrats prefer to see nothing done? This isn’t Trump’s wall, it’s America’s wall...
Turkey: Arming Genocide of Christians in Nigeria?
by Raymond Ibrahim
{ } ~ Concerning Turkey's increasingly suspect role in supporting jihadists — most recently, ISIS's slain leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was found hiding in Syria's "last refuge" for jihadi rebels... just three miles from Turkey's border — one of the least mentioned is Turkey's apparent alliance with the "other" ISIS, that in Nigeria, Boko Haram. On a recent episode of bi'l waraqa wa'l qalam "With Paper and Pen", an Egyptian news program that airs on TenTV, its host, Nasha't al-Deyhi, said: "Leaked information confirms that Turkey is a terrorist state; it supports terrorists — including with weapons. It supports terrorists with weapons. This time, however, not in Syria ... Today's leak confirms without doubt that Erdogan, his state, his government, and his party are transferring weapons from Turkey to — this is a shock, to where you may ask — to Nigeria; and to whom? — to the Boko Haram organization." He then played an intercepted audio of what he said were Mustafa Varank currently Turkey's Minister of Industry and Technology and Mehmet Karatas a manager at the partly state-owned Turkish Airlines. The gist of their brief conversation in Turkish, according to the Arabic transcript, is that weapons were being transferred from Turkey to Nigeria — and that there was a concern that the weapons might kill not just Christians but Muslims. This audio clip would seem to be the same leaked recording that was first reported by international media outlets in 2014. Varank served as Senior Advisor to Recep Tayyip Erdogan between 2011 and 2018. According to al-Deyhi, the recording is proof positive that Turkey is the one supplying Boko Haram with its weapons — including sophisticated weapons — the source of which has long puzzled observers. He also offered to send the audio with translations to the Nigerian government, and apparently anyone else interested...
Dems Pass Impeachment Inquiry 
on Party-Line Vote
Thomas Gallatin:  The Democrat-controlled House finally voted Thursday on Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi’s anti-Trump impeachment-inquiry resolution, which easily passed 232 to 196 along party lines. Not a single Republican voted in favor of the Democrats’ “inquiry,” while two Democrats broke with their party in voting against it. In any case, the resolution merely rubber-stamps the coup 2.0 charade Democrats have already been running. Let’s just say it’s ironic that this witch hunt advanced on Halloween.

Following the vote, liar-Pelosi bloviated, “We gather here … to proudly raise our hands to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” What outrageously phony claptrap. She then disingenuously asserted, “This is not any cause for any glee or comfort. This is something that is very solemn, that is something prayerful, and that we had to gather so much information to take us to this next step.”

Following the vote, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy noted the Democrats’ real motivation: “Democrats are trying to impeach the president because they are scared they can’t defeat him at the ballot box. This impeachment is not only an attempt to undo the last election; it is an attempt to influence the next one too. If this approach becomes the new norm, it would be a disaster for democracy. The balance of power between the sovereign people and their representatives will shift further away from the people.”

Irrespective of liar-Pelosi’s almost comical assertions, she and her fellow Democrats have been planning and orchestrating this purely partisan charade ever since they retook control of the House. Impeaching President Donald Trump, regardless of anything he has done, has been the Democrats’ goal since his improbable election victory.

That said, it does appear that liar-Pelosi’s hand was somewhat forced as it became clear that the optics of the Democrats holding an impeachment inquiry without a resolution was damaging the “credibility” of their case. Now liar-Pelosi can somewhat blunt Republican criticism that the impeachment inquiry is illegitimate.

However, Republicans have also gained from this vote. They now have a record of where all House members stand on impeachment. This will certainly come into play in swing districts Republicans lost in 2018.

So, back to the actual impeachment inquiry. What does it do and what does it not do? The inquiry is still controlled by Democrats, with Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff retaining his lead position. Greater transparency is positive, as it increases the possibility of due process being respected — a factor that has been sorely lacking to date. But as long as the hyper-partisan scumbag-Schiff remains the face of this inquiry, it will be transparently partisan. In any case, Republicans need to shift focus away from process complaints and toward defending against the charges being raised.

Speaking of which, the “bombshell” claim from Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council’s top Ukraine expert — that the transcript of Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had conspicuously omitted further comments about loose lips liar-Joe Biden and Hunter Biden — was contradicted in Thursday’s closed-door hearing with former White House official Tim Morrison. He stated that he was “not concerned that anything illegal was discussed” and argued that the transcript did not omit any relevant information or key details. This serves as yet another reminder of why this whole inquiry needs to be as transparent as possible, not held behind closed doors while bits and pieces of information are leaked to an overwhelmingly partisan press.   ~The Patriot Post  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center