.
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
The Myth of Capitalism-Caused Inequityby Political Editors
.
scumbag/liar-nObama Was Hand-Picked, NOT a Natural
Born Citizen, Congress Knew
& Tried to Protect Him
by DEAN GARRISON
{freedomoutpost.com} ~ Let’s kick a dead horse. The debate is settled and the damage is done. But who thinks scumbag/liar-nObama was eligible to be president?... Even President Donald Trump questioned scumbag/liar-nObama’s citizenship in 2014 by offering $50 Million to see his college records, but scumbag/liar-nObama never responded to his offer. Nothing has been done to this point. And sadly, nothing ever will. Let me show you today how Congress protected him from both sides of the aisle and guaranteed the debate would never go too far. In 1975 a representative named Joe Bingham introduced an amendment to remove the “natural born citizen” constitutional requirement to become President. Why is that important? Because it was not until almost 30 years later that the issue would be addressed again. And it was not addressed only once, but multiple times. This is all part of congressional record. Remarkably, it just so happened to coincide with the meteoric rise of a man named Barack scumbag/liar-nObama who would benefit greatly from the happenings by gaining his spot in the Oval Office. I am about to share with you a brilliant piece of research from the Article II Political Action Committee. After reading it the foremost question on my mind is, “If the natural born citizen definition only requires one citizen parent then why did they seemingly try so hard to change the law for Barack scumbag/liar-nObama?”....
'Russiagate' spread by 'highest levels'
of scumbag/liar-nObama admin
{wnd.com} ~ The scumbag/liar-nObama administration was frantically distributing to Democratic senators classified information in support of claims of Trump campaign collusion with Russia... even as Donald Trump was preparing to be inaugurated, according to newly obtained emails. Two sets of emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit and released Friday by Washington watchdog Judicial Watch revealed that the scumbag/liar-nObama State Department was trying to spread the collusion narrative before Trump was inaugurated. “These documents show remarkable evidence of the non-stop, unethical effort in the scumbag/liar-nObama State Department to gather and send its own dossier of classified information on Russia in an effort to discredit the incoming Trump administration,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. One of the emails quoted from an scumbag/liar-nObama official who said, “We made the deadline! Thank you everyone for what was truly a Department-wide effort!” The email batches, 38 pages and 48 pages, show “classified information was researched and disseminated to multiple U.S. senators by the scumbag/liar-nObama administration immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration,” Judicial Watch said. Some were distributed on the day before the inauguration...Why isn't scumbag/liar-nObama charged with linking classified information? https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/russiagate-spread-by-highest-levels-of-obama-admin/ .
'The Weekly Standard' Died Today
Here's What That Means
by BEN SHAPIRO
{dailywire.com} ~ On Friday, conservative mainstay magazine The Weekly Standard was shuttered after 23 years of weekly publication... The ownership of the magazine, Clarity Media, held a meeting with staffers at the magazine in which they announced that everyone was to clear out their offices by 5 p.m., then released this statement: For more than twenty years The Weekly Standard has provided a valued and important perspective on political, literary and cultural issues of the day. The magazine has been home to some of the industry’s most dedicated and talented staff and I thank them for their hard work and contributions, not just to the publication, but the field of journalism. Despite investing significant resources into the publication, the financial performance of the publication over the last five years — with double-digit declines in its subscriber base all but one year since 2013 — made it clear that a decision had to be made. After careful consideration of all possible options for its future, it became clear that this was the step we needed to take. Editor-in-Chief Stephen Hayes told staff, “To put it simply: I’m proud that we’ve remained both conservative and independent, providing substantive reporting and analysis based on facts, logic and reason.” As John Podhoretz, a co-founder of the magazine, has noted, Clarity made no effort to sell the brand. Instead, they sought to integrate the subscribers of the Standard into the subscriber base of their new Washington Examiner weekly magazine. The death of The Weekly Standard has spurred accusations that the magazine was shuttered for its anti-Trump position. But that neglects the fact that the new editor of the Washington Examiner magazine is Seth Mandel, another Trump-skeptical conservative. While the Standard may have taken a more stridently anti-Trump position than any other conservative outlet, it was far from the only outlet to oppose many of President Trump’s policies as well as critiquing his lack of moral fiber. The biggest problem for the Standard, at least in the mainstream conservative mind, was the consistently anti-Trump tone taken by many of its leading voices, even when Trump was accomplishing conservative goals. To a large extent, this was due to the ideological shadow cast by longtime Standard editor-in-chief Bill Kristol, who has been loudly proclaiming that he is seeking a primary alternative to Trump in 2020... Can you say 'Good-bye'. https://www.dailywire.com/news/39376/weekly-standard-died-today-heres-what-means-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=121518-news&utm_campaign=position1.
When scumbag/liar-nObama Was Accused Of
Pre-Election Hush Money Payoff Media Was Silent
by Jeff Dunetz.
Farm Bill Socialism in Senate
by CHRIS EDWARDS
{cato.org} ~ Republicans have criticized the socialism of Democrats such as Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but they should reflect on their own party’s socialist vote in the Senate yesterday... The upper chamber voted 87-13 for the bloated monstrosity known as the farm bill, which funds farm subsidies and food stamps. Republicans in the Senate voted in favor 38-13. It is not hyperbole to call the farm bill “socialism.” It will spend $867 billion over the next decade, thus pushing up government debt and taxes. It includes large-scale wealth redistribution in the form of food stamps. At its core is central planning, which is obvious when you consider that the bill is 807 pages of legalese laying out excruciating details on crop prices, acres, yields, and other micromanagement. Furthermore, the bill lines the pockets of wealthy elites landowners, which is a central feature of socialism in practice around the world. The bill does not represent incremental reform toward smaller government. It is an extension and expansion of big government programs. Many Republican senators who claim to be conservative voted for farm bill socialism yesterday. They voted for wealth redistribution, central planning, and ultimately higher taxes. Yet on their official Senate websites, these members who approved socialism yesterday nonetheless claim to favor conservative budget policies... https://www.cato.org/blog/farm-bill-socialism-senate?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVRJNU5EaGlOR1ExWW1NMiIsInQiOiJNcmp3ZlZ0S0pxQ0hWTkZucHpqb0pkNEcyUVltK3RhRnh3NVR3YnZBXC9pQnJNazl3dk91b2J0YjVLdkNnU2x1RUlvdjNZWkd6Y2h6NDlnQzk1UTcxUllMMktYZDBST25qVWJic2FvRkhDMjY3Nm85Rlo0Y0tqVWFoUVFpbFwvQUNLIn0%3D
.
The Myth of Capitalism-Caused Inequity
by Political Editors: The expressions of greed and envy can be present in both the poor and rich alike. Or to put it another way, wealth does not make one greedy any more than poverty makes one envious. Both of these negative attitudes are manifestations of a deeper condition — that of selfishness. It is this deeper condition that politicians have made a profession of preying upon. And no political movement does this more so than socialism, which preaches that any inequality anywhere is a sure sign of injustice.
This is why leftists continuously point to differences, especially those involving income, and loudly declare, “Injustice!” “Not fair!” Rather than soberly considering the fact that within a free-market economy various income differences exist due to a multitude of social and economic factors, including one of the largest — personal choice — these socialists only play the politics of envy and resentment.
Like the infamous gender-pay-gap trope, which proponents tirelessly claim is evidence of some fictional unjust social order steeped in patriarchal misogyny, socialists dubiously misuse statistics to further their crusade against capitalism by maintaining that it only serves the greedy and the rich. And for “evidence,” they point to the supposed “explosion of income inequality” and blame capitalism for making the rich richer while making the poor poorer.
This was clearly the message of French economist Thomas Piketty in his 2014 bestseller Capital in the Twenty-First Century. In the book, Piketty contended that there was a skyrocketing income-inequality gap within Western societies and that capitalism was to blame. It’s unfortunate that Piketty’s book wasn’t classified under fiction, for it was little else.
Phil Magness of the American Institute for Economic Research notes Piketty’s errors, writing, “In short, the widely reported explosion of inequality in the past three decades is likely a myth, built upon outdated and flawed statistics. … Whereas Piketty … [shows] a massive century-long swing of almost 20 percentage points in the income share of the top 10 percent, the adjusted figures show a much flatter curve with a little over half the variation. Inequality still falls and rises under the revised numbers, but at a comparatively subdued rate. Under the adjustments, the top 10 percent income share seldom strays more than 5 percentage points away from a century-long average of about 35 percent.”
Magness adds, “Perhaps instead of assuming that we’re in the midst of a surging inequality crisis, we should first settle more fundamental issues affecting the accuracy of our measurements over the past century.” Or as James Freeman of The Wall Street Journal observes, “Perhaps we should also focus on ensuring an abundance of opportunity, rather than regarding it as a problem when some people inevitably make more than others.”
Greed and envy are not caused by and are not exclusive to capitalism; rather they are manifestations of the selfishness residing within the human heart. But no other economic system in history has allowed for more economic growth, created more wealth, or raised up more people out of poverty than capitalism. To suggest otherwise is to entertain an economic fiction rooted in resentment of the wealthy rather than concern for the poor. ~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/60036?mailing_id=3947&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3947&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=b
by wnd.com 
Comments
Bonnie
thats correct. thats why so many want to come to America - legally or illegal.
CAPITALISM ANYONE CAN MAKE AS MUCH AS THEY WANT THAT IS NO MYTH