.
.
Seth Rich’s Family P.I. Confirms Our Worst Fears
By Tori McNabb
{ redrightvideos.com } ~ Since DNC staffer Seth Rich was murder in Washington, no solid answers have been found. No motive, nothing… until perhaps now... Rich was shot and killed in Northwest D.C. and police labeled it as a botched robbery. However, the online conspiracy theorist would let it go and have continued to tie his death to his work at the DNC. Now we’ve gotten word that there’s new information which may, in fact, prove the conspiracy theorists right! Seth Rich’s family hired P.I. Rod Wheeler to start digging for answers into his death. And Wheeler believes there is tangible evidence on Rich’s own laptop. And this evidence confirms he was communicating with WikiLeaks prior to his death! With this newfound discover, many questions are being asked. Among them, why did the D.C. police insist that it was a robbery gone bad when there was no evidence of that? Wheeler, a former police homicide detective, is running his own parallel investigation at the families request. Wheeler believes there’s a cover-up and the local police were told to back down…“The police department nor the FBI have been forthcoming,” said Wheeler. “They haven’t been cooperating at all. I believe that the answer to solving his death lies on that computer, which I believe is either at the police department or either at the FBI. I have been told both.”When asked if his sources have told him there is information that links Rich to Wikileaks, he said, “Absolutely. Yeah. That’s confirmed.” Wheeler also told the Fox affiliate in D.C., “I have a source inside the police department that has looked at me straight in the eye and said, ‘Rod, we were told to stand down on this case and I can’t share any information with you.’ Now, that is highly unusual for a murder investigation, especially from a police department. Again, I don’t think it comes from the chief’s office, but I do believe there is a correlation between the mayor’s office and the DNC and that is the information that will come out Tuesday.
.
.
scumbag/liar-nObama National Security adviser comes under heightened scrutiny for the 2017 unmasking’ of Trump officials
by Jerry McCormick
{ patriotnewsalerts.com } ~ In the final days of Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s presidency, numerous Trump campaign officials were “unmasked” by then-National Security adviser liar-Susan Rice... Now, it seems quite clear that the move was both unprecedented and politically motivated, according to One America News Network (OAN). Typically, during investigations as elaborate and secretive as the one into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign team and Russia, the identities of individuals being probed are protected. This is done to protect the individual from being scrutinized prior to the investigation being completed, and to prevent them from being falsely accused, particularly if no indictment ever materializes. Generally speaking, the number of people who can “unmask” a protected individual is kept to a minimum. However, during the latter part of the scumbag/liar-nObama administration, all of those protocols seemed to change. Not only were more officials given the authority to “unmask” the subjects of federal probes, but Trump officials were also unmasked for what seemed to be political reasons, according to OAN. At the time of the unmasking by liar-Rice, the scumbag/liar-Obama administration was investigating back-channel communications between the Trump campaign and the United Arab Emirates. Suspicions had started to arise when Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan came to New York in December 2016. Since UAE diplomats did not notify the United States of his travel, as is customary, everyone’s ears went up. So in early 2017, liar-Rice requested that Americans in a related classified report be unmasked. The overall concern was that the UAE was setting up back-channel communications between Russia and the Trump campaign. But based on the reports of UAE officials, who stated the meeting was nothing more than getting the president-elect’s “view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,” liar-Rice’s unmasking seems completely inappropriate. Now the question remains: What else did the scumbag/liar-nObama administration do wrong?
https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/obama-security-adviser-comes/ .
scumbag/liar-Hillary’s 30,000
deleted ‘yoga’ emails found
by wnd.com ~ Copies of nearly all of the emails scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton sent and received while she was secretary of state – including the infamous missing 30,000 messages... were stored at a cryptically named Gmail address, according to a new Senate report. The Daily Caller News Foundation reported the newly disclosed finding means that copies of classified and deleted emails likely existed on Google’s U.S.-based servers. The FBI, according to the Senate report, was aware of that fact and the suspicious explanation for it but did not alert other intelligence agencies or the public. The suspicious Gmail address was set up by an IT aide, Paul Combetta, who worked for a company that managed scumbag/liar-Clinton’s unauthorized server, Platte River Networks, according to the FBI. It was Combetta who used the software program BleachBit to permanently erase copies of scumbag/liar-Clinton’s emails after they were subpoenaed by the House. Combetta misled the FBI about his actions and was given immunity from prosecution, the Daily Caller noted. He refused to cooperate with the Justice Department Inspector General and with the authors of the Senate report about his use of the Gmail address. He previously pleaded the Fifth before Congress in September 2016 about his deletion of emails. The investigative team of Charles McCullough, the intelligence community inspector general, found that every one of scumbag/liar-Clinton’s emails except four were secretly copied to the the Gmail address,
CarterHeavyIndustries@gmail.com, according to the report. McCullough investigator Frank Rucker told Senate investigators that when he brought the findings to Peter Strzok, the anti-Trump FBI agent seemed uninterested and did not ask any follow-up questions. A redacted and paraphrased version of the interview transcript was released Wednesday...
.
.
Leftists Inciting Violence Against Trump SupportersLouis DeBroux: Democrat politicians are going to get people killed, and they don’t seem to care.
In the aftermath of mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton, anyone standing between a Democrat politician and a TV camera would have been trampled to death in the stampede to publicly blame the shootings on President Trump.
One after another, they blamed the shootings on Trump’s “rhetoric” and his supposed racism, despite the fact that the Dayton shooter was a hard-core Elizabeth dinky-Warren supporter, and the El Paso shooter’s manifesto was comprised of a litany of left-wing grievances.
If Democrats are to be believed, Trump’s insisting that our borders be secured incites violence from the Right (which never seems to appear). But when will Democrats take responsibility for their coarsening of the public discourse, which has led to actual violence?
In the last few weeks, we have seen Democrat activists swarm Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s house screaming death threats, Democrat Rep. worthless-Ilhan Omar celebrating a violent attack on Sen. Rand Paul, and ads for a movie in which liberal elites hunt down and kill Trump supporters for sport. We’ve also seen Democrat Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez refer to ICE detention centers as “concentration camps”, shortly after which an antifa activist firebombed an ICE detention center in Tacoma, Washington.
Not to mention the violent physical assaults against Trump supporters that have been occurring with increasing regularity around the country, as you can see here, here, here, here, and here.
In light of these escalating tensions, it is unconscionable that a sitting Democrat congressman would intentionally incite violence against fellow Americans over political differences. Yet that is exactly what occurred last week.
Democrat Rep. Joaquin Castro (TX), brother of Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro, posted on Twitter the names and employers of 44 San Antonio residents who donated the maximum allowable amount ($5,600) to President Trump’s reelection campaign, claiming, “Their contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders.’” Among these donors were not only local business owners but retirees and homemakers.
Ironically, of the 44 doxxed donors, six had donated to the political campaigns of Juan and Julio Castro. One of those donors, William Greehey, a philanthropist who spent $100 million to fund a homeless campus project that serves mainly Hispanics, was furious, saying “he’s calling me a racist because I’m supporting Trump. I mean, this is just ridiculous… There’s a lot of things you don’t like about the president and his tweeting, but here Castro is doing the same thing with his tweeting.”
San Antonio real-estate developer Donald Kuyrkendall, who also previously donated to Julian Castro’s mayoral campaign, expressed concern for the safety of his wife and children and wondered what Castro’s goal is in outing Trump donors. He asked, “Were his intentions to incite people to picket Bill Miller’s barbecue or to come to Don Kuyrkendall’s house, you know, assault my wife, make nasty comments?” He continued, “This kind of silliness is not good for anybody, especially with the climate we have right now with two mass shootings in a weekend. There’s just no reason to highlight individuals and their companies… I don’t even know what he thinks we are — bad guys, because we support Republicans?”
Following the backlash over his despicable act, Castro disingenuously claimed he wasn’t trying to stoke harassment or violence against the outed donors. What, then, was the goal of the tweet? What did he want his supporters to do with that information?
As Trump campaign director Tim Murtaugh asked “How low have Dems sunk? This is Joaquin Castro, Congressman & chair of his brother’s campaign. Naming private citizens & their employers, targeting them for political views and exercising 1st Amendment rights,” and correctly noting, “At the very least, @Castro4Congress is inviting harassment of these private citizens. At worst, he’s encouraging violence.”
USA Today editor David Mastio called this a “dangerous escalation,” and political commentator Stephen Miller asked “What the [expletive] is this? Democrat candidates are openly targeting private businesses on social media now? … Would love the logic of telling people to give up their guns squared with these same people inciting a mob to attack a private business.”
One wonders if Castro would think this type of doxxing is still benign if the NRA posted a list of Castro’s donors with the caption, “Their contributions are fueling a campaign to strip you of your 2nd Amendment rights, leaving you defenseless!” Or if the National Right to Life doxxed donors to pro-abortion Democrats with the message, “Their contributions are fueling a campaign of death, paying for the murder of a MILLION babies last year!”
The political Left uses doxxing as a tool to intimidate, threaten, and destroy their political enemies. In 1958, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, upheld the right of the NAACP to keep its membership records (i.e., its donors) private, despite a subpoena from the state of Alabama. The reason should be obvious to any intelligent person.
We must now extend those same privacy protections to political donations and strip these disgusting thugs of a tool that is used to suppress free speech, facilitate political extortion, and threaten public safety. ~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/64822?mailing_id=4470&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4470&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
Comments