TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Consumer Confidence Soars 
by Business Review Board
.
Farrell - IG Report Shows liar-nObama 
Ran FBI Operation Against Trump
{ rickwells.us } ~ In welcoming Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch to his program, Lou Dobbs makes what may be his most understated observation of the year... that President Trump “has been very constrained with this Justice Department and FBI,” asking for his opinion on the President’s comments as to whether or not Comey should be locked up. Of course there’s no reason to stop with Comey or to exclude present DOJ and FBI leadership. Trump doesn’t want to tie his own hands by calling for Comey to be locked up, but certainly he’s labeling him a criminal, which the content of the IG report reinforces. Farrell notes that the report itself contains useful information as to the nature of some of the improprieties, illegalities and potential illegalities that occurred. He says, “It’s weak, it loses its horsepower when it comes to recommendations. It’s a standard IG cover up document from that perspective, it’s not hard-hitting.” Dobbs interrupts to give credit to Farrell as the only one of his many guests who correctly predicted the watered-down product that would be the result of this process, noting his earlier statements that “the Inspector General’s office is where truth goes to die.” Farrell describes IGs as being universally, “departments of cover ups, that’s what they do.”...   https://rickwells.us/farrell-ig-obama-fbi-trump/
.
Democrats Exposed as Being Two-Faced, 
Self-Serving Liars and Anti-American Schmucks
by Greg Holt
{ eaglerising.com } ~ The IG’s report was released hours ago and does indeed point to misconduct by former FBI director James Comey as well as at least 5 agents... The report also details the reckless, and against FBI standards, investigation of liar-Hillary Clinton. liar-Hillary committed felonies and got away with it. liar-Hillary’s “interview” with the FBI was a joke, allowing her to bring her friends, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, who were also given immunity. liar-Hillary destroyed evidence and got away with it. James Comey and Peter Strzok rewrote the letter exonerating liar- Hillary Clinton thereby avoiding felony charges against liar-Hillary before liar-Hillary was even interviewed. Political bias is definitely established if only by texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Lisa warns her then lover Peter to, go easy on liar-Hillary, as they did not want to anger the next president of the United States. In another text, Peter reassures Lisa that we will stop him, meaning Trump from becoming president. Conversely, everything with the Trump investigation has been warrants and subpoenas. The Olive Senate Minority Leader Charles clown-Schumer (D-N.Y.) said by meeting with Kim, Trump has given “a brutal and repressive dictatorship the international legitimacy it has long craved.” Let’s go back in time and revisit what Chuck clown-Schumer said about the Iran Nuclear Deal. clown-Schumer, to give him credit did vote against the Iran Nuclear Deal. However, at the same time clown-Schumer supported liar-nObama and his efforts with the Iranian regime. In clown-Schumer’s own words: I give tremendous credit to President liar-nObama for his work on this issue…all fair-minded Americans should acknowledge the President’s strong achievements in combatting and containing Iran...  https://eaglerising.com/59652/democrats-exposed-as-being-two-faced-...
.
No Wray of Sunshine

by Daniel John Sobieski
{ americanthinker.com } ~ FBI Director Christopher Wray’s explanation of Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on the handling of liar-Hillary Clinton’s emails revealed him to be just another deep-state shill... willing to ignore the attempted and ongoing deep-state coup against a duly elected president, Donald J. Trump. Regarding the organized attempt to by FBI leadership to keep liar-Hillary Clinton out of prison and Donald Trump out of the White House, Wray sees no evil, hears no evil, and will speak no evil. In his Orwellian press conference, Wray spoke from  a parallel universe: "It's also important, though, to note what the inspector general did not find. This report did not find any evidence of political bias or improper considerations actually impacting the investigation under review," Wray told a press briefing at FBI headquarters. "The report does identify errors of judgment, violations of or even disregard for policy, and decisions that, at the very least, with the benefit of hindsight, were not the best choices." Of course, Wray took advantage of the IG report’s reluctance to connect all the dots between the actions and the motives of those engaged in obstruction of justice like former FBI Director James Comey and Agent Peter Strzok, who headed the liar-Hillary investigation and joining the Mueller team...
.
Bottom line? liar-nObama single-handedly 
ruined the FBI and the DOJ
by Patricia McCarthy
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Naturally, the political-media left that crowds out saner voices on television was quick as jackrabbits to announce that the FBI was vindicated by the I.G. report that was released on Thursday... "Nothing to see here, move along" was their mantra. But one only has to scroll through the list of columns posted at RealClearPolitics on Friday to grasp the abyss between the left and right re: the report. The report contained an executive summary that said, "We found no documentary evidence of political bias." That means they did not find written confessions by all those Trump-hating higher-ups at the once-great law enforcement agency. But the five-hundred-page body of the report is chock-full of extreme political anti-Trump mendacity.  Why the hundreds of texts between several like-minded agents that reek of profound bias against Trump are not documentary evidence is a mystery. Nevertheless, it is an indisputable fact that a cabal of conspirators on the seventh floor of the FBI building, led by Comey and McCabe, along with John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (DNI), Sally Yates, and Rod Rosenstein at Justice coordinated their attempts to prevent Trump from winning the election by all manner of illegal means. Most likely, much of this was at the bidding and with permission of Barack liar-nObama...  https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/bottom_line_obama_sing... 
.
The Diplomatic Big Bang
by Ahmed Charai
{ gatestoneinstitute.org } ~ The Singapore summit is indeed historic. First, it is so because just a few weeks ago we were closer to a nuclear war than to even the semblance of a peace process... The way we got here is surprising, because it did not obey the usual rules. A few days ago, during the G7 summit held in Canada, US President Donald Trump upheld his decisions on tariffs and his positions on the trade deficit. These stances followed his decision to pull out of the Paris climate change agreement and the Iranian "nuclear deal". It is clear that the new US administration challenged the alliances inherited from the Cold War. President Trump, a businessman, not a politician -- one of the reasons he was elected -- is asking America's trading partners just to have "free, fair and reciprocal" agreements. It is probably not all that unusual to feel affronted when asked for money or to regard the person asking for it as mercenary or adversarial. It does not always mean that this feeling is justified. In short, President Trump's arguments, which sound like a leitmotif, go back to the economic aspect of things. NATO? Why should it be normal that, in order to defend Europe, the American taxpayer pays the heaviest part. Free trade? Why should America suffer a trade deficit with so many countries? Climate change? The results of the Paris Climate Change conference, COP 21, were apparently not only costly but questionable, and to critics, looked like a list of unenforceable promises that would not have come due until 2030 -- if ever...   https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12515/diplomatic-big-bang 
.
.

Consumer Confidence Soars 

by Business Review Board:  The economy is growing, jobs numbers are up, unemployment has hit its lowest level in half a century and as a result consumer confidence is soaring. The Commerce Department released its report on May’s retailers’ sales numbers, which rose 0.8%, the biggest one-month jump since last November. The Wall Street Journal reported, “The report far exceeded economists’ expectations of a 0.4% increase in overall retail sales and a 0.5% rise in sales excluding autos.” The Journal further noted that “the report suggests low unemployment, rising wages, and tax cuts are prodding Americans to spend. That, in turn, is boosting merchants’ sales while stoking stronger growth in the world’s largest economy.”

             Economist Robert Frick of the Navy Federal Credit Union observed, “We may be entering a new level of consumer spending right now.” Does this signal an end to the Barack liar-nObama-era “new normal” of sub 2% growth rates? J.P. Morgan seems to think so, as it recently upped its economic outlook for growth to 4%. James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute further explained:
               All welcome news for an economy that’s been stuck around 2% since the Great Recession and Global Financial Crisis. Indeed, there hasn’t been a full year of 3% growth since 2005. Or look at it this way: There were 18 “hypergrowth” quarters of 4% growth or faster in the 1980s (1980–89) and 17 in the 1990s (1990–99), but just nine so far in the 2000s and 2010s combined.
               What is clear is that Americans all across the nation are feeling the positive impact of the Republican tax cuts and President Donald Trump’s deregulation crusade. Consumers have responded and are confident about the direction of the economy. Democrats, eat your hearts out.  ~The Patriot Pos
t
https://patriotpost.us/articles/56579?mailing_id=3548&utm_mediu...

Views: 23

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Rudy Tirre on June 18, 2018 at 8:08am

Bonnie

I can see it all...But you also forgot the FBI and the IG and the CIA

Comment by Bonnie Somer on June 18, 2018 at 8:04am

U BET YOUR BEHIND OBAMA WAS BEHIND IT ALONG W/HILLARY WHO PD FOR IT

THEN W/O/USEFUL IDIOTS LIKE

BRENNAN

CLAPPER

RICE

POWER

LYNCH

MCCABE

ROSENSTEIN

MUELLER AND 

COMEY

STOZOK AND PAGE

THEN THERE WERE OTHERS BILL PRIESTAP; BRUCE AND NELLIE OHR; STEELE; AND MORE 

IF U CANNOT SEE BIAS U R BLIND.    

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

ALERT ALERT

OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service