Monday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

.hIN8-LixPp40uzlYYPVBNPiGIUZt6E9IrtByOnlFeW1-wDHugoEddioZ4s6vzZ4SpnySKldXXOzeOhOWaUExrbDpSZe5mp0_BTJsgsAitxs4jeDT5civZrwRtsTkYh0N3r_sEAcw866uL-dPjJH_6wjzQ31ELdivZbUvNSEuRBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Political Cease Fire Is the Perfect
Thanksgiving Recipe
Eb9IxWLAd9amteRebv63Id9aANi11yOAvgjPoIi2dMcdD8M6eGEr_PQ9I6xn3dlfINxFSMlDFBs3sNY97aCjyzS8lpejJ0M4mTifB4ON7PNuiqZ2jsAovs5CZjNkyN7TbjiNWH8rK2qWd9EcPtryR1Lf-tfYlwVtN_3f1SQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Louis DeBroux
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
The Ukrainian Boogie-Woogie
and Going on Offense
By John Dale Dunn
{ americanthinker.com } ~ George Parry, former DOJ/FBI and state prosecutor/attorney, is a well-regarded blogger, and writer at many newspapers, but also American Spectator and The Federalist... He hit one out of the park recently with an article that starts with a description of routine FBI agent placements at American Embassies as “Legats” (Legal Attaches) to coordinate local law enforcement agencies on matters of criminality and political corruption. FBI guys in American Embassy law enforcement activities -- bet you didn’t know that. Parry says the conversation between Presidents Trump of USA and Zelensky of Ukraine are like the lower level conversations between FBI and Foreign law enforcement officials on matters of mutual interest -- coordination on corruption investigations and criminal activities as a part of foreign affairs. This makes sense, doesn’t it? So, if the perp is a candidate for office in the US or the problem is created by that candidate’s son, is the candidate or the son immunized? Are candidates or their relatives above the law? Is the President of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the US of A constrained from inquiring into the matter of illegal or corrupt activities? Parry asserts: “And it is against the background of this well-established and entirely proper international cooperation by law enforcement agencies that President Trump’s telephone conversation with Ukraine’s President Zelensky must be evaluated. . . save for the fact that the conversation took place between two presidents and implicated possible corruption by a former American vice president and his son and Ukrainian officials, it is not materially different from the type of international investigative assistance requested and rendered every day.” The nut of Mr. Parry’s essay is that Burisma Holdings’ hiring of a son of a sitting vice president’s for $50,000 per month to serve on its board, is a legitimate cause for concern. In addition, the smell of baksheesh was in the air and the Vice President was the Pro Consul on Ukrainian affairs who made it clear he was trading US aid for an end to any law enforcement investigation of Burisma and certainly any Burisma relationship with his son, Hunter. So Parry argues that loose lips liar-Biden corruption problem was a proper subject for discussion between the two presidents. Mr. Parry provides in his essay a long extraction from a ZeroHedge article “The Plundering of Ukraine by Corrupt American Democrats.” That report implicates that Hunter Biden certainly was provided a handsome, excessive fee for being on the board of Burisma hanoi-John Kerry was fingered mistakenly by the Zero Hedge article for taking a position on the Burisma Board, but the more likely story from other sources is that hanoi-John Kerry’s stepson John Heinz was involved in the Burisma influence peddling scam and at least one more Hunter Biden associate was included on the Board...
.
William Barr sat in silence when he saw
this report about scumbag/liar-nObama
spying on Trump
3yab6L9td6EYnLwwShCdgMAwRrPu6bkR9h3sCwJ5tCdeTHPaUn4xqxzDtLa8SR2oR0A0B-gyg9wMTeUW5RgDvRVe_0eHQHzcYdtDL-U8C75_xJClI5VwDrc_yy0_P1n72r6g0iHmtae74O66dstOdFRK9xU=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by renewedright.com ~ Trump supporters have been waiting for this day. The Department of Justice finally is ready to make public its findings on the scumbag/liar-nObama Deep State’s abuse of power in the 2016 election. And William Barr sat in silence when he saw this report about scumbag/liar-nObama spying on Trump... Deep State leakers are already racing to get ahead of Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on the FBI’s use of FISA warrants against the Trump campaign. FBI officials that read the report leaked its findings to the fake news New York Times in order to frame the conclusions in the most favorable light possible. For instance, The Times claims Horowitz will “debunk” President Trump’s claim that the FBI spied on his campaign despite the report outlining the fact that the FBI deployed undercover agents to gather intelligence from Trump campaign aides under false pretenses.The Justice Department’s inspector general found no evidence that the F.B.I. attempted to place undercover agents or informants inside Donald J. Trump’s campaign in 2016 as agents investigated whether his associates conspired with Russia’s election interference operation. …Mr. Trump and his allies have pointed to some of the investigative steps the F.B.I. took as evidence of spying, though they were typical law enforcement activities. For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign. The president decried the revelation as an “all time biggest political scandal” when it emerged last year. The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016. And indeed, another Trump adviser, Peter Navarro, reportedly pushed Mr. Halper for an ambassadorship in the Trump administration. That is the dictionary definition of spying. Horowitz’s report is also expected the criticize the FBI for serious mistakes – including one possible act of criminal conduct – in how the FBI carried out the spying on the Trump campaign.
.
scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff couldn’t believe 
what he just saw on CNN about impeachment
iGRS51XtM721VAaX31xhO-gyPi_LTMVeRYwXNeBt_JBK_Rl9hLGMhPJHZNtRhKiIGXm24HQBwZgmyIoPxvv1JoX6yedplaIXJA7fJvGyXHpHL26OlbibzH3wcSJSeem9ieKLGpQ1y2yL3iaGJwPXl63mDtJomA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by patriotpulse.net ~ scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff handed off control of the impeachment witch hunt after presiding over two weeks of public show trial hearings. Democrats expected these hearings to build momentum behind removing Donald Trump from office... But that all crumbled because scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff couldn’t believe what he just saw on CNN about impeachment. The goal of the public impeachment hearings was to build pressure on Republicans to support impeachment. Democrats hoped the hearings would generate an air tight case that would persuade some Congressional Republicans to vote for articles of impeachment. That bipartisan vote would in turn give 20 Senate Republicans cover to vote with Democrats to remove Donald Trump from office. scumbag/liar-Schiff’s plan collapsed in spectacular failure on none other than CNN when Democrat Senator Chris Coons stated that there were not the votes in the Senate to convict Donald Trump on articles of impeachment. On Tuesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Lead,” Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) stated that he will weigh the evidence in front of him if there is a trial of President Trump in the Senate, and that he finds it “disheartening” that there do not appear to be the votes to remove the president if the case comes to the Senate. Coons said, “Well, as a senator, the pledge I’m going to take is to weigh all the evidence in front of me. So far, I haven’t seen any evidence that’s exculpatory, that would explain the president’s perspective. That’s why I hope he does testify, or that he does have his secretary of State or acting OMB director — or chief of staff, excuse me, testify. I haven’t seen any evidence that gives the president’s side or that explains his conduct as anything other than inappropriate. From what I’ve heard publicly and privately, I don’t think there will be the votes to remove him if this does come to an impeachment trial in the Senate, and to me, that’s disheartening. Because it removes guardrails on presidential misconduct.” As much as the Democrats and the media tried to hype the phony Ukraine scandal, Republicans and large segments of the American public quickly realized this was nothing more than disgruntled bureaucrats trying to overthrow the President. Democrats were happy to go along for the ride because this manufactured crisis was their Hail Mary chance to impeach Donald Trump before the 2020 election. But for once, Republicans did not cave in the face of a Fake News Media onslaught and held their ground that these ridiculous allegations did not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.
.
Iran on the Brink
HqlgjuqEhr_oACX--jnAEIA9aAjjWIIg5ehexSWvd6Z-4m1CsLz_LUKo360EKhLfjh3n_dRI1FNUUk-KhfBV7HNeUCEZi63L-9wa2xS81n4wL5SXe_0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Amil Imani
{ americanthinker.com } ~ Uprisings in Iran have become routine occurrences, albeit without much success. Why? Because Iran is ruled by a totalitarian Islamic ideology like Nazism and communism... In Iran, there is no sovereignty of the people. Instead, there is a perception of the Ummah in Shia theology “rule of Mahdi”, guardianship over the people. In other words, Iran belongs to “Imam Zaman” the Hidden Imam and in his absence, a supreme leader is in charge. In this case, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Any revolt against the State is considered a direct attack against the upcoming “Lord of the Age.” Hence, at the slightest signs of protests, the regime unleashes its wild dogs soldiers of Mahdi on a killing spree. Iranians partook in many protests across the country amidst a failing economic situation, systematic government corruption, and widespread frustration over the lack of political and social freedoms. As always, the regime’s security apparatus reacted to these protests with mass arrests and severe due process abuses. Pundits and experts believe “Khamenei’s tough response could just invite more anger.” Since the Islamic invasion of 1979, the Mullahs have ruled over the unarmed Iranian people with an iron fist and absolute power while draining the nation’s treasury. As a result, millions of Iranians had no choice but to flee their homes to the four corners of the globe. In these recent protests, Iran’s rulers once again revealed their real identity to the world that they don’t value human life. They are simply vicious killers. After the U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA or Iran nuclear deal on May 18, 2018, the US almost immediately imposed several new sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI).The U.S. followed up with further sanctions on the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, his office, and those who were closely tied to him with access to major financial resources. In July 2019, the United States placed sanctions on the regime’s Foreign Minister Mohammad, Javad Zarif. The U.S. also placed sanctions on eight senior commanders of the navy, aerospace, and ground forces components of the IRGC. In April of 2019, President Donald Trump designated Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a foreign "terrorist” organization...  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/iran_on_the_brink.html   
White House chief of operations 
leaving administration
qo9b06rbFmRC4hQMj-VEc4g3NgebL8vMhB6oaBq_rR7mjIme6EBPAeErmS5_IZU3Df0fsW3Nw2QrQassGMlCZdhAoemSurQM4c7M6dm7MQ3oSkx88-HlsN6HKrhUxM6rHj3KuKUW9UB6fhPHYM2Dhpj9cwdbKKDmw_idG2U4_dWChP6ZNwdaeOIgs4oEQXcdHJAVcd7uaUPpt5FdVzDt_Lh2AWEkLCSyQl1ZaitTSuw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By ZACK BUDRYK
{ thehill.com } ~ White House deputy chief of staff Daniel Walsh will leave the Trump administration, the White House confirmed Monday... Walsh was responsible for planning foreign trips for the administration as well as making decisions on White House aides’ use of government resources. He was one of the few current White House officials who had been present since Trump’s inauguration and had been a government employee for nearly three decades,  according to The Washington Post. “Dan Walsh is a fantastic member of the team, and has served the White House and my Administration with the utmost professionalism and honor,” Trump said in a statement to The Washington Post. “He has accepted a great job in the private sector, as almost all of my people who develop experience in the White House have done.” Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said Walsh “possesses a rare combination of talent, integrity and humor in equal measure.” While White House officials said they had identified a likely replacement for Walsh from within the ranks of current White House staff, they did not identify the person, according to the newspaper.
.
Sean Hannity Urges Bill O’Reilly to ‘Go Back 
on Fox… Take the Number One Slot’
By Reed Richardson
{ mediaite.com } ~ Current top-rated primetime Fox News host Sean Hannity interviewed the former top-rated primetime Fox News host Bill O’Reilly on his radio show and urged the latter return to his home network... more than two-and-a-half years after O’Reilly was forced out due to the revelation of massive payouts to settle sexual harassment lawsuits. Hannity’s comments on his Tuesday radio interview were first picked up by the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters. O’Reilly’s firing was a seminal moment in the #MeToo movement and was triggered by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporting by the New York Times, which reported at least six sexual harassment settlement agreements between Fox and accusers of O’Reilly, including one for a whopping $32 million in January 2017. Even more surprising, the Times found that Fox News was aware of the sexual harassment claims against O’Reilly when it granted him a new, four-year $25-million-a-year extension one month later. O’Reilly has consistently denied the harassment allegations. Under the helm of former CEO Roger Ailes, Fox News faced multiple charges and lawsuits alleging it was a hostile workplace for women. Ailes himself was forced out in 2016 when numerous women at the network, including high-profile stars like Gretchen Carlson, came forward to accuse Ailes of harassment and retaliation. Hannity, however, did not seem concerned in the least about dredging up all this history and the signal he sent by calling on O’Reilly to return. Instead, he focused on O’Reilly’s interview with President Donald Trump and commiserated with the former Fox News star about all the “punishment” that Trump, who has been accused of sexual harassment or assault by more than 20 different women, must absorb. “The other thing I did in the interview was I made it a little personal,” O’Reilly explained. I said you know, you — you’re taking more attack and vitriol than any other president with the exception of  Abraham Lincoln.” “I have never seen a human being able to absorb more punishment than Donald Trump,” O’Reilly added. “So true, it’s unbelievable,” Hannity agreed. “You and I, we can identify because we’ve been attacked for more than 20 years, each of us has,” O’Reilly said. “Twenty four to be exact,” Hannity corrected. “By the way, I keep offering you, go back on Fox, and…” “Yeah and why do I want to do that?” O’Reilly cut in to say. “So I can have security guards go with me everywhere, like I used to?” “No, so that you take the number one slot,” Hannity replied, seemingly offering O’Reilly his old 8:00pm primetime slot, currently occupied by Tucker Carlson. “I can tell you it’s easier being number two because we’ll end the — we’ll end the year again number one in all of cable, and with that comes all the crap associated with it.” “You bet” O’Reilly said, “but your listeners should understand there is a price to pay for being a traditional conservative American in this country.” Hannity has teased O’Reilly on returning to Fox News before — as recently as this summer.
.
fYhHLkJDI2yvon4s6zFOhNh8lx7PjKsKI1eHkOxgMDK9HASp-j1B4jJftdBsa0sJ4MWGUNqyxJbJTlfRo7kCbLWMXX-R2uk1rvb0zUIwWismElA8gtmBSL5w0puPIKdG2H6YfSsQnc87wgOiYqsTqY4icMU4kLYfRMiZl9GA6ro=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
.
Political Cease Fire Is the Perfect Thanksgiving Recipe
Eb9IxWLAd9amteRebv63Id9aANi11yOAvgjPoIi2dMcdD8M6eGEr_PQ9I6xn3dlfINxFSMlDFBs3sNY97aCjyzS8lpejJ0M4mTifB4ON7PNuiqZ2jsAovs5CZjNkyN7TbjiNWH8rK2qWd9EcPtryR1Lf-tfYlwVtN_3f1SQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Louis DeBroux:  As we prepare for this wonderful Thanksgiving holiday, a number of media pundits have come out with suggestions and instructions on the best way to for leftist anti-Trumpers to debate politics with their less enlightened, racist, conservative Trump-supporting relatives between bites of turkey and passing of gravy. Well, we think we have a far better plan than MSNBC’s Joy Reid or The New York Times.

Don’t. Just don’t.

If you believe, even for a moment, that a political debate will lead to contention during the holiday festivities, don’t start. Your family relationships and the love you share for one another are far, far too important to put in jeopardy by fighting over Donald Trump, liar-Nancy Pelosi, scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff, or any of the other cast of characters in the ongoing drama that is the DC swamp.

Have we not politicized enough in American life without politicizing the dinner table as well? Religion, sports, television, movies, and even chicken sandwiches are now the subject of raging political debate.

Where is the humility? Where is the grace? “Where is”, as the Black-Eyed Peas sang, “the love?”

MSNBC’s Joy Reid wants to see hostilities between family members. She recently disparaged the “food holiday” and it’s “problematic history,” instructing good progressives everywhere that is their duty to engage in verbal combat with any Trump-supporting relatives, of whose intellectual and moral capacity she thinks very little.

Reid says, “Here’s a hint: Do not worry about trying to explain the cast of characters … or the very overused term, ‘quid pro quo.’ … Most people can’t say it, spell it or understand it. What we’re actually talking about here is not a pithy Latin phrase. It’s something a lot simpler: Bribery and extortion. Beyond the whistleblower and over 100 hours of testimony backing up that fact, Donald Trump admitted to it, and even released edited notes from his call with the Ukrainian president — which, by the way, is not a transcript — that actually proved he did it! Even Uncle Roscoe and Auntie Carol ought to understand that.”

The fact that Reid is wrong on every single one of those points doesn’t seem to matter to her. In fact, it may not even have occurred to her. To Reid and her comrades, only the goal matters; beating those knuckle-dragging, pro-Trump relatives into submission.

This desire in anti-Trump leftists runs so deep that one random Twitter user’s tweet went viral among progressives, gleefully declaring, “I will be changing my wifi password to ‘IMPEACH45’ this Thursday so that my MAGA family members have to put that in their devices to have some of my delicious WiFi.” How sad and pathetic.

This type of maliciousness seems to run deep for political Southpaws. Barack scumbag/liar-nObama called us “bitter clingers,” scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton called us “deplorables” and “irredeemables,” and leftist philosopher Noam Chomsky, beloved by Democrats everywhere, referred to the Republican Party as “the most dangerous organization in world history.” More dangerous than the Soviet Politburo or the Communist Chinese Party Central Committee or the Nazi SS? More dangerous than the KKK or ISIS? That seems a bit of a stretch.

Slate columnist Jamelle Bouie openly laid out the leftist view of those of us in “flyover country,” asserting, “There’s no such thing as a good Trump voter: People voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes. They don’t deserve your empathy.” The Left has made it clear they believe we conservative, Christian, Republican, pro-Trump Americans are not just wrong, we are evil.

And lest some argue these are the comments of isolated individuals, please note that Bouie’s column garnered more than 100,000 shares on Facebook, and scumbag/liar-Hillary received the votes of more than 65 million Americans after relentlessly portraying Trump supporters as awful human beings. Never mind that of the 700 U.S. counties that twice voted for scumbag/liar-nObama, 209 voted for Trump. How does one go from voting twice for a black man for president to suddenly becoming a rabid racist by voting for Trump? Is it possible that reasons other than racism, nationalism, and xenophobia drove tens of millions of Americans to vote for Trump?

Luckily, as it turns out, most Americans are ignoring the exhortations of the division-seekers like Reid and the NYT. A 2017 HuffPo/YouGov survey found that just 3% of Americans said they were “very likely” and 8% “somewhat likely” to get into a political argument with family members during Thanksgiving.

Maybe most Americans are well-schooled in etiquette, and hearkened to the counsel of Lizzie Post, co-president of the Emily Post Institute, who advised, “Not bringing it up is better. … There’s nothing wrong with saying in a really polite and friendly way that ‘I hope you’ll understand, but I’ve actually decided to take a break from politics this holiday.” Or maybe they are just decent human beings who have no desire to bludgeon family over politics.

So, as you enjoy the turkey, stuffing, and pecan pie around the Thanksgiving table remember, you don’t have to engage in political debate. Thanksgiving is a day to celebrate those things that bring joy to our life — family, friends, faith, football, and our love for the greatest nation in the history of the world.

However, if you choose to debate politics, or are dealing with a relative who will not take no for an answer, remember that good and decent people can have opposing opinions, so we can discourse about controversial topics without being contentious.

Or you can, as Andrew Klavan satirically writes, civilly debate your opponent until they are dead.

Happy Thanksgiving!   ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/67031?mailing_id=4693&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4693&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center