they (4)

Read more…
 Landlord must pay Muslim couple $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices


41

This is an outrage. If you don’t step and fetchit for Islam, be prepared to be sued and lose. Not only did the victims of this Islamic supremacist lawsuit have to pay $12,000 “for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect”; they must also take an e-learning course on “Human Rights in Rental Housing.” Welcome to 1984, or should I say الف وتسعمائة واربعة وثم.

When can the infidels sue the Muslim world for the bloodshed, genocide and hate their ideology mandates? When can we sue for the hateful verses that call for slaughter of the unbeliever? When can we sue for the oppression and subjugation of non-Muslims under Muslim law? When can we sue for incalculable cost in security apparatus, TSA, law enforcement, intel agencies and attendant costs (not to mention the loss of our freedoms) because of Islamic terror?

Canada increasingly is unlivable for those yearning to be free.

Now the small landlord who rented out the main floor of his Brampton home to a Muslim couple must pay them $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices when showing their apartment to prospective tenants.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario also found that he “harassed them and created a poisoned housing environment.”
 
His sins? John Alabi refused to remove his shoes when showing the bedroom where the couple prayed and while he always gave them the mandated 24-hour notice before showings, he didn’t always provide the five-minute heads-up they’d requested to ensure the wife was modestly dressed (meaning  and they weren’t in the midst of their five daily prayers.
The opening line of this article tells you all you need to know about the West’s craven submission to the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth. Do not joke!

Human Rights Tribunal rules Brampton landlord must pay Muslim couple $12,000

By Michele Mandel, Toronto Sun April 26, 2017:

It didn’t help his case that he shared a joke about a devout Muslim on his Facebook page.

Now the small landlord who rented out the main floor of his Brampton home to an Arab Muslim couple must pay them $12,000 for failing to accommodate their religious practices when showing their apartment to prospective tenants.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario also found that he “harassed them and created a poisoned housing environment.”

His sins? John Alabi refused to remove his shoes when showing the bedroom where the couple prayed and while he always gave them the mandated 24-hour notice before showings, he didn’t always provide the five-minute heads-up they’d requested to ensure the wife was modestly dressed and they weren’t in the midst of their five daily prayers.

“There was absolutely no evidence that the applicants’ requests for additional notice and for the removal of shoes in this case were an attempt by them to impose their way of life on the respondent or anyone else,” ruled vice chair Jo-Anne Pickel. “(They) were merely making simple requests for the accommodation of their religious practices … their requests easily could have been met without any hardship to the respondent, let alone any undue hardship as that term is used in human rights law.”

In December 2014, Walid Madkour and his wife Heba Ismail moved from Montreal into Alabi’s ground-floor apartment. Following several disputes, including the couple allegedly wanting their landlord to be quiet after 10 p.m., they agreed to terminate the lease on Feb. 28, 2015.

In the meantime, Alabi tried to rent out the unit. Madkhour wanted a one-hour notification of any showing in addition to the 24-hour notice.

Alabi told him that by law, only 24 hours was necessary. Madkhour accused him of “racism and violation of our civil rights:” Since his landlord was well aware that Ismail was unemployed and always home, “he considered it harassment for (Alabi) to continue to say that he would enter the premises without permission.”

Alabi texted back: “Welcome to Ontario, Canada.”

The landlord told the hearing that he meant that apartment viewing rules were different in Ontario than in Quebec where the couple had last lived. The human rights tribunal saw it as another example of discrimination.

That same evening, Ismail heard loud pounding on the steps outside their door; Alabi said he was just shovelling the snow; she said it was intimidating and frightening.

The couple called police.

They were told that contrary to their understanding, their landlord had a right to show the apartment when they were home. As a “courtesy,” Alabi agreed to give them five minutes notice in addition to the 24 hours. But that negotiated detente ended two days later after Ismail videotaped Alabi refusing to remove his shoes when entering their bedroom. “She said it was disrespectful and an act of racism.”

Alabi told the hearing that his shoes had never been an issue before and accused his tenants of trying to set up roadblocks to his renting their flat. He also accused them of trying to impose their way of life on him and said “the fact that someone belongs to a religion does not permit them to inconvenience others.”

The tribunal didn’t see it that way — especially after the tenants introduced their landlord’s Facebook page that had a “joke” about a devout Arab Muslim that they found offensive. Alabi told the hearing “he had freedom of speech and could post what he wanted on his Facebook page … He did not share the post to attack anyone. He said he shared it only because it made him laugh.”

Be careful what you post online — Pickel saw it as further evidence of his bias.

“When considered together, I find that the comment ‘welcome to Ontario, Canada,’ the making of loud pounding noises outside the applicants’ door shortly after making that comment, and (Alabi)’s refusal to remove his shoes when entering (their) prayer space amounted to harassment under the Code.”

In addition to paying them $6,000 each for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect, Alabi must also take an e-learning course on “Human Rights in Rental Housing.”

The watchman on the wal sounding the wall sounding the ALARM

Read more…

Deport Illegals, Families Too

I agree with TRUMP,  They got to GO,  The answer is that every True American Citizen should volunteer to HELP with Deportation.  I can take a car load in my car to the boarder every Tuesday,  I would pay for gas and food and drive NON STOP till I got them safely delivered to the boarder,  Let's everybody (USA Citizen) volunteer to sign up to help with the deportation.   Thank You Four Your Support. TEM

Read more…

The Truth Pass it On...

          Pass It On....

 

           I've been saying this for years, but this email probably explains it better and more clearly. This is NOT a political message but rather a clarification to remind us all of the correct facts.

           Remember that on October 9, 2007, 11 months before our "economic crisis" occurred (that was actually created), the Dow hit it's highest point ever. Closing at 14,164.53 and reaching 14,198.10 intra-day level. 2 days later Unemployment was steady at 4.7%.

            Things were already being put in place to create the havoc we've been experiencing since then. It all started as this email explains, on January 3, 2007.

            I'm sending this to each of you reguardless of your party preferences because I believe it is something you may not have considered.

            This tells the story, why Bush was so "Bad" at the end of his term.

             Don't just skim over this' it's not very long, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out!!!

              The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd, 2009.It was actually January 3rd. 2007, which was the day the Democrats took over the House and Senate. The very start of the 110th Congress.

              For those who are listening to the liberals saying that everything is "Bush's Fault", Think about this: January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress.  (The Democrats Controlled Congress and The Senate for the entire last 2 years of Bush's final term.)

            At the time:

           

           The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77

           GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%

           Unemployment was 4.6%

           George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH!

           Remember the day...

           January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee. The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy? BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!

            Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!

             Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie- starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy.

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA! And who fought against reform of Fannie & Freddie? OBAMA and the Democrat Congress.

              So when someone tries to blame Bush. REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"

              Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.

              Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.

              In that first year, they had to contend withGeorge Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush got somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

               For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.

               And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all or these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.

               If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets.

               If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is "I inherited a defecit I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th."

 

            There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

 

      PLEASE DO YOUR PART!!!

              

 

 

Read more…