radical (11)

The Conspiracy to Destroy Donald Trump

Fascists and all their lowly comrades, marching under the flag of anti-fascists, abhor this country and everything for which it stands and every free concept on which it was founded.

Leftists blather uncontrollably about hate speech, President Trump, the alt-right, racism, and white people, while enthusiastically embracing lawlessness. Tyrants used the same anarchy for centuries to overthrow free governments and create dictatorships.

Mainstream media, Hollywood, and all local outlets, replay leftwing lunacy on a continuous loop. Attacks on America, President Trump, white people, Christians, and all those believing in the American spirit, consist of talking points and outlandish lies. Their classic drumbeat is that any disagreement with leftist, Marxist tenets is hate speech.

President Trump is the interminable obsession of the corrupt, mainstream media. The Associated Press and New York Times lead the print media with anti-Trump propaganda in nearly every article and Op-Ed. From there it’s picked up by outlets around the globe and repeated as truth. It’s abundantly clear that practically all the MSM are out to destroy Donald Trump and his presidency. Talking head derangement has reached the point where one must question their sanity when engaged in unmistakable delusion.

All public demonstrations by conservative groups invite physical attack, and then vilification by the media. The left classifies as hate speech any demonstrations for free speech by conservatives. This is another effort by totalitarians to squelch debate and free speech.

From where do all these leftist groups come?

Most owe their existence to the continuous hatching of parasitic larvae formulated in government education and academic laboratories. Over ninety percent of college and university instructors and administrators are liberal and devote extraordinary resources toward indoctrinating young people into their leftist orthodoxy. From these corrupt, bureaucratic beginnings, modern Marxists are born.

Others are leftovers from the corrupt and racist presidency of Marxist Barack Obama. They are of the same community organizing, socialist ilk, and hold the identical racist and vitriolic, views about and against America’s founders.  

What unites all leftists is the shocking, surprise victory of Donald Trump over Bill Clinton’s wife in the presidential election. President Trump is doing what he promised; eliminating Obama’s so-called legacy items of presidential orders and decrees. The entire left and much of the Republican Party establishment congregated into a “Hate Trump” coalition. They fear the worst from Donald Trump; that he will do exactly what he promised.

Successfully creating upheaval requires creating wedge issues, crises, and most of all, divisions between races, classes, genders, religions, and anything they can rub together to create friction. None of these abrasive policies can co-exist with personal and economic freedom; therefore, they attack both.

All leftwing groups are collections of vultures and parasites of every species united to destroy our free-market, capitalistic system, and the liberty that defines America. Redistribution of income and wealth are hallmarks of socialism and all other authoritarian governments.

Despite the tragic and deadly results from any leftwing government, the laser focus of all leftist lunacy we see today is primarily to enact a Marxist, Communist government in America. Every phrase, talking point, slogan, and action we hear in the restless streets, read on signs, or watch on television, are duplications of the Maoists, and Communists as they endeavored to crush reigning governments around the globe.

The lawless marauders in America’s streets are strikingly reminiscent of Europe’s Nazi Brownshirts or Storm Troopers, and the Communist useful idiots of Stalin. They operated by overwhelming meetings and brutally attacking any gatherings of opposition political groups; public, or private.      

Multiple cries for diversity, and fairness is left-wing speak for “division.”  Success for them means isolating, and marginalizing their foes. These villainous techniques, most recently taught by Saul Alinsky and Barack Obama, were hand-me-downs from generation to generation by the vilest of men.

Liberal-progressives’ control public education, the media, Hollywood, and academia, thus they hold sway over nearly everything that influences young people and much of the public. Additionally, deep-state bureaucrat extremists control much of government and public institutions.

Moronic speech Nazis attack anyone voicing unapproved words or ideas. Incredibly, using ‘inappropriate’ pronouns is hate speech, as is noting or noticing differences between the sexes. Inconceivably, a person’s gender, is no longer important in showers, locker rooms, and restrooms; even for schoolchildren. Educators tell children to accept this outrage, and they label adults as bigots for standing against this abomination of decency. 

Progressives squeal like wounded animals when they perceive racism everywhere in their long, torturous trek of turning over all of life’s little rocks. They also know when they scream loudly enough; Americans will not exercise their rights as freely if they fear reprisals from tyrannical groups or the media. Equally, it allows them to set what they perceive as a narrative of moral superiority and gain some position of control and advantage. 

It's time Americans drew an unmistakable defensive line.  A line that defines decency, defends constitutional liberties, and protects our culture and religion. Moreover, it must promote American exceptionalism, and outline a vibrant path forward for liberty in this great Republic.  

This line must clearly define the terms of America’s path to victory; this far and no further!

 

Jim Mullen

http://www.freedomforusnow.com/my-new-articles-1.html

 

Read more…

Swilling beer, smoking dope and leering at porn, the other side of hate preacher 'Andy' Choudary


The British live 'like animals in a jungle' with their alcohol, gambling, prostitution and pornography.

That is the stated view of Anjem Choudary, the preacher of hate who this week insulted the families of dead soldiers and branded their marching comrades as cowards.

The extremist wants Britain to be brought under Sharia law, with women forced to wear burkas and put to death for adultery.

Yet before he grew his beard and turned to fundamentalism, Choudary, 41, was very much the life and soul of the party at Southampton University.

Anjem Choudary as a university student

Big night out: The university law student Anjem Choudary's reading list extended to this soft-porn title

Choudary and his followers

New identity: Choudary, centre, moved to radical Islam soon after qualifying as a solicitor

Photographs obtained by the Mail suggest 'Andy' - as he was then known - should be inflicting on himself the 40 lashes he prescribes for drunkenness.

As well as downing cider and lager, the cleric is shown playing drinking games with cards, clearly forbidden under his strict Islamic laws, and holding a cannabis joint between his lips before smoking it.

And the woman on the cover of the Mayfair pornographic magazine he is looking at is certainly not wearing a burka.

On the evidence of friends from his student days, Choudary had sex with numerous white Christian girls.

Under his version of Sharia law, he should be stoned to death for sex outside marriage.

High time: With beer and 'joint'
Down in one: The cider swigger

High time: Choudary with a beer and joint, and right, swigging a cider in one go

One former friend said: 'I can't keep a straight face when I see "fundamentalist Muslim Anjem Choudary" in the papers attacking the British for drinking or having girlfriends.

'When I knew him, he liked to be called Andy, would often smoke cannabis spliffs all day, and was proud of his ability to down a pint of cider in a couple of seconds.

'And he was ruthless with girls. When he briefly worked as an English teacher for foreign students in London, he'd pull one of them every few days, sleep with her, then move on to another.

'If Sharia law was introduced, he would have been whipped and stoned to death many times over.'

Choudary, who was born in South-East London to a market stall-holder of Pakistani descent, has become one of the faces of extremist Islam.

Choudary graphic

But in his days as a law student, he experimented with LSD, hallucinating and laughing hysterically for more than 20 hours.

After he qualified as a solicitor, however, he swiftly moved into ever more radical Islam.

Former acquaintances said this was possibly because he was angered by his failure to land a well-paid job with a big City law firm.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1161909/Swilling-beer-smoking-dope-leering-porn-hate-preacher-Andy-Choudary.html#ixzz3ElwT7mui Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

_________________________________________________________

If You Place or Post Ads Online You Need To Read Our Article Article At Project N Search - 

The EASY Solution for Quickly and Easily Posting One Ad to All High-traffic classified sites

Read more…

Follow the money - specifically - follow the State Department aircraft tail number N-604EP, see where it went and see where US money magically appeared and was spent on mosques, islamic schools, businesses and given to muslim leaders of foreign countries the US has no formal involvement or agreements with..... "read", We have no business being there or giving them money for any purpose.... and Congress, the American taxpayer NEVER approved it.

Anyone still wondering why our deficit is SO high? He is draining our Treasury, I believe for a purpose.
Call it "conspiracy theory" if you will - but this administration is spending millions a minute and it looks very much like Cloward-Piven is hard at work..................

http://patdollard.com/2012/09/investigation-finds-obama-financing-mosques-worldwide-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars/

Read more…

 

Islam means "submission." Muslim means "one who submits."

They have NEVER been separated. Islam never took over Muslims, they have always been in unity. In the 7th century Mohammad coined the Arabic term "Islam" (submission) as the political military entity of his cult and "Muslim" (someone who submits) for his followers. Mohammad originally had less than 50 followers that led to 100 followers, that led to thousands. To grow the numbers of his followers he took jihadi measures by forced submission to Islam - under the sword. Conquering villages by death or submission to Islam, his Muslim followers adhered to his measures of brutality and genocide. In an early jihad military force, Mohammad killed over 600 Jews- beheading them himself, as an example to his followers - all in the name of Allah.

For those confused of the basics of Islam and to give you more wisdom and insight into this threat to our nation, I have condensed some key points from "ISLAM 101" by author Gregory M. Davis.
1. The Basics

a. The Five Pillars of Islam

The five pillars of Islam constitute the most basic tenets of the religion. They are:

1. Faith (iman) in the oneness of Allah and the finality of the prophethood of Muhammad (indicated by the declaration [the Shahadah] that, "There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah").

2. Keeping of the five scheduled daily prayers (salah).

3. Almsgiving (zakat).

4. Fasting (sawm).

5. Pilgrimage (hajj) to Mecca for those who are able.

The five pillars in and of themselves do not tell us a lot about the faith or what a Muslim is supposed to believe or how he should act. To understand Islam and what it means to be a Muslim, we must come to understand Muhammad as well as the revelations given through him by Allah, which make up the Quran.

b. The Quran -- the Book of Allah

According to Islamic teaching, the Quran came down as a series of revelations from Allah through the Archangel Gabriel to the Prophet Muhammad, who then dictated it to his followers. Muhammad's companions memorized fragments of the Quran and wrote them down on whatever was at hand, which were later compiled into book form under the rule of the third Caliph, Uthman, some years after Muhammad's death. The Quran is about as long as the Christian New Testament. It comprises 114 suras (chapters), not to be confused with the Sira, which refers to the life of the Prophet. The Quran comes exclusively from one source: Muhammad. It is through the life of Muhammad that the Quran must be understood, as the Quran itself says. His wars and killings both reflect and inform the meaning of the Quran. Furthermore, the strict literalism of the Quran means that there is no room for interpretation when it comes to its violent injunctions. It is through the example of the warlord and despot Muhammad that Muslims understand the Quran.

c. The Sunnah -- the "Way" of the Prophet Muhammad

In Islam, Muhammad is considered al-insan al-kamil (the "ideal man"). Muhammad is the model par excellence for all Muslims in how they should conduct themselves. It is through Muhammad's personal teachings and actions -- which make up the "way of the Prophet," the Sunnah -- that Muslims discern what is a good and holy life. Details about the Prophet -- how he lived, what he did, his non-Quranic utterances, his personal habits -- are indispensable knowledge for any faithful Muslim. Knowledge of the Sunnah comes primarily from the hadiths ("reports") about Muhammad's life, which were passed down orally until codified in the eighth century AD, some hundred years after Muhammad's death. The hadiths comprise the most important body of Islamic texts after the Quran. Because Muhammad is himself the measuring stick of morality, his actions are not judged according to an independent moral standard but rather establish what the standard for Muslims properly is. The entire Islamic moral universe devolves solely from the life and teachings of Muhammad.

[Personal note: Since Mohammad married Aisha at age 6 - child brides and pedophilia are permitted; since he cut off the hands and feet of thieves - this is condoned; since he stoned adulterers or murdered them - this is allowed; since he beheaded infidels, those who refused submission to Islam, apostacised, dishonored him, or blasphemed - this is the chosen method of execution; since he had multiple wives and concubines - polygamy is accepted; since he abused and beat his wives - wife abuse is permitted; since women and children were captured as sex slaves, booty, stealing, and looting - rape and slavery of infidels is practiced; and since he performed raids of jihadi - this is mandatory that all faithful Muslims partake in jihad]

Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24; Narrated Ibn Umar: Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people (infidels) until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah."

It is from such warlike pronouncements as these that Islamic scholarship divides the world into dar al-Islam (the House of Islam, i.e., those nations who have submitted to Allah) and dar al-harb (the House of War, i.e., those who have not). It is this dispensation that the world lived under in Muhammad's time and that it lives under today. Then as now, Islam's message to the unbelieving world is the same: submit or be conquered.

d. Sharia Law

Unlike many religions, Islam includes a mandatory and highly specific legal and political plan for society called Sharia

(pronounced "sha-rïe-uh"), which translates approximately as "way" or "path." The precepts of Sharia are derived from the commandments of the Quran and the Sunnah (the teachings and precedents of Muhammad as found in the reliable hadiths and the Sira). Together, the Quran and the Sunnah establish the dictates of Sharia, which is the blueprint for the good Islamic society. Because Sharia originates with the Quran and the Sunnah, it is not optional. Sharia is the legal code ordained by Allah for all mankind. To violate Sharia or not to accept its authority is to commit rebellion against Allah, which Allah's faithful are required to combat. [Severe penalties, prison or death may result from one who rebels].

There is no separation between the religious and the political in Islam; rather Islam and Sharia constitute a comprehensive means of ordering society at every level. While it is in theory possible for an Islamic society to have different outward forms -- an elective system of government, a hereditary monarchy, etc. -- whatever the outward structure of the government, Sharia is the prescribed content. It is this fact that puts Sharia into conflict with forms of government based on anything other than the Quran and the Sunnah.

The precepts of Sharia may be divided into two parts:

1. Acts of worship (al-ibadat), which includes:

Ritual Purification (Wudu)
Prayers (Salah)
Fasts (Sawm and Ramadan)
Charity (Zakat)
Pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj)

2. Human interaction (al-muamalat), which includes:

Financial transactions
Endowments
Laws of inheritance
Marriage, divorce, and child care
Food and drink (including ritual slaughtering and hunting)
Penal punishments
War and peace
Judicial matters (including witnesses and forms of evidence)

As one may see, there are few aspects of life that Sharia does not specifically govern. Everything from washing one's hands to child-rearing to taxation to military policy fall under its dictates. Because Sharia is derivate of the Quran and the Sunnah, it affords some room for interpretation. But upon examination of the Islamic sources, it is apparent that any meaningful application of Sharia is going to look very different from anything resembling a free or open society in the Western sense. The stoning of adulterers, execution of apostates and blasphemers, repression of other religions, and a mandatory hostility toward non-Islamic nations punctuated by regular warfare will be the norm. It seems fair then to classify Islam and its Sharia code as a form of totalitarianism.

2. Jihad and Dhimmitude

a. What does "jihad" mean?

Jihad literally translates as "struggle." Strictly speaking, jihad does not mean "holy war" as Muslim apologists often point out. However, the question remains as to what sort of "struggle" is meant: an inner, spiritual struggle against the passions, or an outward, physical struggle. As in any case of trying to determine Islamic teaching on a particular matter, one must look to the Quran and the Sunnah. It is evident that a Muslim is required to struggle against a variety of things: laziness in prayer, neglecting to give zakat (alms), etc. But is it also plain that a Muslim is commanded to struggle in physical combat against the infidel as well. Muhammad's impressive military career attests to the central role that military action plays in Islam

b. Hasan Al-Banna on jihad

Below are excerpts from Hasan Al-Banna's treatise, Jihad. In 1928, Al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood, which today is the most powerful organization in Egypt after the government itself. In this treatise, Al-Banna cogently argues that Muslims must take up arms against unbelievers.

All Muslims Must Make Jihad; it is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded.

Allah has ascribed great importance to jihad and has made the reward of the martyrs and the fighters in His way a splendid one. Only those who have acted similarly and who have modeled themselves upon the martyrs in their performance of jihad can join them in this reward. The weaknesses of abstention and evasion of jihad are regarded by Allah as one of the major sins, and one of the seven sins that guarantee failure.

The rules of jihad according to the Hanafi School, said: 'Jihad linguistically means to exert one's utmost effort in word and action; in the Sharee'ah {Sharia -- Islamic law} it is the fighting of the unbelievers, and involves all possible efforts that are necessary to dismantle the power of the enemies of Islam. It becomes the duty of each and every Muslim to make jihad. He should prepare himself mentally and physically such that when comes the decision of Allah, he will be ready.

c. Dar al-Islam and dar al-harb: the House of Islam and the House of War

The violent injunctions of the Quran and the violent precedents set by Muhammad set the tone for the Islamic view of politics and of world history

Islamic scholarship divides the world into two spheres of influence, the House of Islam (dar al-Islam) and the House of War (dar al-harb). Islam means submission, and so the House of Islam includes those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule, which is to say those nations ruled by Sharia law. The rest of the world, which has not accepted Sharia law and so is not in a state of submission, exists in a state of rebellion or war with the will of Allah. It is incumbent on dar al-Islam to make war upon dar al-harb until such time that all nations submit to the will of Allah and accept Sharia law. Islam's message to the non-Muslim world is the same now as it was in the time of Muhammad and throughout history: submit or be conquered.

i. Taqiyya -- Religious Deception

Due to the state of war between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb, reuses de guerre, i.e., systematic lying to the infidel, must be considered part and parcel of Islamic tactics. The parroting by Muslim organizations throughout dar al-harb that "Islam is a religion of peace," or that the origins of Muslim violence lie in the unbalanced psyches of particular individual "fanatics," must be considered as disinformation intended to induce the infidel world to let down its guard. A telling point is that, while Muslims who present their religion as *peaceful* abound throughout dar al-harb (among un-believers), they are nearly non-existent in dar al-Islam (Muslim countries). A Muslim apostate once suggested to me a litmus test for Westerners who believe that Islam is a religion of "peace" and "tolerance": try making that point on a street corner in Ramallah, or Riyadh, or Islamabad, or anywhere in the Muslim world. He assured me you wouldn't live five minutes.

[Personal note: The word "Taqiyya" literally means: "Concealing, precaution, guarding." It is employed in disguising one's beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies. In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims. Falsehoods told to prevent the denigration of Islam, to protect oneself, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned in the Qur'an and Sunna, including lying under oath in testimony before a court, deceiving by making distorted statements to the media such as the claim that Islam is a "religion of peace". A Muslim is even permitted to deny or denounce his faith if, in so doing, he protects or furthers the interests of Islam, so long as he remains faithful to Islam in his heart. Taqiyya has been used by Muslims since the 7th century to confuse, confound and divide 'the enemy.']

A problem concerning law and order {with respect to Muslims in dar al-harb} arises from an ancient Islamic legal principle -- that of taqiyya, a word the root meaning of which is "to remain faithful" but which in effect means "dissimulation." It has full Quranic authority (3:28 and 16:106) and allows the Muslim to conform outwardly to the requirements of unislamic or non-Islamic government, while inwardly "remaining faithful" to whatever he conceives to be proper Islam, while waiting for the tide to turn. (Hiskett, Some to Mecca Turn to Pray, 101.) Volume 4, Book 52, Number 269; Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah: The Prophet said, "War is deceit."

Historically, examples of taqiyya include permission to renounce Islam itself in order to save one's neck or ingratiate oneself with an enemy (infiltration and immigration). It is not hard to see that the implications of taqiyya are insidious in the extreme: they essentially render negotiated settlement -- and, indeed, all veracious communication between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb -- impossible.

d. Jihad Through History

There has never been a separation of the political-military and the religious in Islam, this development was entirely natural by Islamic principles.

By the time of his death in 632 AD, Muhammad had extended his control in a series of raids and battles over most of southern Arabia

"Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says: "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."

Islam rapidly spread into the territories of Byzantium, Persia, and Western Europe in the decades after Muhammad's death. The Arab Muslim armies charged into the Holy Land, conquered what is now Iraq and Iran, then swept west across North Africa, into Spain, and finally into France. In the history of jihad, the slaughter of civilians, the desecration of churches, and the plundering of the countryside are commonplace.

The Muslim armies traversed the land in every direction, raping women, killing warriors, destroying fortresses, burning and pillaging everything. Most raids they massacred every man and carried off the women and children as captives (slaves).

ii. The Second Major Wave of Jihad: the Turks, 1071-1683 AD

Some twenty-five years before the first Crusading army set out from central Europe for the Holy Land, the Muslim Turkish (Ottoman) armies began an assault on the Christian Byzantine Empire. Constantinople, the jewel of Eastern Christendom, finally fell in 1453 to the armies of Sultan Mahomet II. Lest one ascribe the atrocities of the first wave of jihad to the "Arabness" of its perpetrators, the Muslim Turks showed they were fully capable of living up to the principles of the Quran and the Sunnah.

Paul Fregosi in his book Jihad describes the scene following the final assault on Constantinople:

Several thousand of the survivors had taken refuge in the cathedral: nobles, servants, ordinary citizens, their wives and children, priests and nuns. They locked the huge doors, prayed, and waited. {Caliph} Mahomet {II} had given the troops free quarter. They raped, of course, the nuns being the first victims, and slaughtered. At least four thousand were killed before Mahomet stopped the massacre at noon. He ordered a muezzin {one who issues the call to prayer} to climb into the pulpit of St. Sophia and dedicate the building to Allah. It has remained a mosque ever since. Fifty thousand of the inhabitants, more than half the population, were rounded up and taken away as slaves. Mohomet {II} ordered all the leading nobles, officials, and citizens all arrested and decapitated. He sadistically bought from their owners {i.e., Muslim commanders} high-ranking prisoners who had been enslaved, for the pleasure of having them beheaded in front of him. (Fregosi, Jihad, 256-7.)

e. Dhimmitude

Islam's persecution of non-Muslims is in no way limited to jihad, even though that is the basic relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim world.

After the jihad concludes in a given area with the conquest of infidel territory, the dhimma, or treaty of protection, may be granted to the conquered "People of the Book" -- historically, Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians. The dhimma provides that the life and property of the infidel are exempted from jihad for as long as the Muslim rulers permit, which has generally meant for as long as the subject non-Muslims -- the dhimmi -- prove economically useful to the Islamic state. The Quran spells out the payment of the jizya (poll- or head-tax; Sura 9:29), which is the most conspicuous means by which the Muslim overlords exploit the dhimmi. But the jizya is not merely economic in its function; it exists also to humiliate the dhimmi and impress on him the superiority of Islam.

... just as the dhimmis are prohibited from building churches, other things also are prohibited to them. They must not assist an unbeliever against a Muslim ... raise the cross in an Islamic assemblage ... display banners on their own holidays; bear arms ... or keep them in their homes. Should they do anything of the sort, they must be punished. Forbidden to construct houses of worship or repair extant ones, economically crippled by the jizya, socially humiliated, legally discriminated against, and generally kept in a permanent state of weakness and vulnerability by the Muslim overlords, it should not be surprising that their numbers dwindled, in many places to the point of extinction. By refusing to convert to Islam and straying from the traditional constraints of the dhimma, the dhimmi (infidel) had implicitly chosen the only other option permitted by the Quran: death.

f. Jihad in the Modern Era

In 1876, Muslims massacred 30,000 Bulgarians for allegedly rebelling against dhimmitude; in 1896, 250,000 Armenians were slaughtered; in 1915, a jihad massacre was again waged against the Armenians, no longer protected as they were by the dhimma. The anti-Christian jihad culminated in 1922 at Smyrna, on the Mediterranean coast, where 150,000 Greek Christians were massacred by the (Muslim) Turkish army. All in, from 1896-1923, some 2.5 million Christians were killed, the first modern genocide. Following World War I, various jihads have been fought around the globe by the independent Muslim nations and sub-state jihadist groups. The most sustained effort has been directed against Israel. The fact is, the percentage of conflicts in the world today that do not include Islam is pretty small.

As we have seen, contrary to the widespread insistence that true Islam is pacific even if a handful of its adherents are violent, the Islamic sources make clear that engaging in violence against non-Muslims is a central and indispensable principle to Islam. Islam is less a personal faith than a political ideology that exists in a fundamental and permanent state of war with non-Islamic civilizations, cultures, and individuals. The Islamic holy texts outline a social, governmental, and economic system for all mankind. Those cultures and individuals who do not submit to Islamic governance exist in an ipso facto state of rebellion with Allah and must be forcibly brought into submission. The misbegotten term "Islamo-fascism" is wholly redundant: Islam itself is a kind of fascism that achieves its full and proper form only when it assumes the powers of the state.

The spectacular acts of Islamic terrorism in the late 20th and early 21st centuries are but the most recent manifestation of a global war of conquest that Islam has been waging since the days of the Prophet Muhammad in the 7th Century AD and that continues apace today.

This is the simple, glaring truth that is staring the world today in the face -- and which has stared it in the face numerous times in the past -- but which it seems few today are willing to contemplate.

It is important to realize that we have been talking about Islam -- not Islamic "fundamentalism," "extremism," "fanaticism," "Islamo-fascism," or "Islamism," but Islam proper, Islam in its orthodox form as it has been understood and practiced by believing Muslims from the time of Muhammad to the present.

The mounting episodes of Islamic terrorism in the late 20th and early 21st centuries are due largely to the geostrategic changes following the end of the Cold War and the growing technical options available to terrorists.

With the collapse of Soviet hegemony over much of the Muslim world, coupled with the burgeoning wealth of the Muslim oil-producing countries, the Muslim world increasingly possesses the freedom and means to support jihad around the globe. In short, the reason that Muslims are once again waging war against the non-Muslim world is because they can.

It is paramount to note, however, that, even if no major terrorist attack ever occurs on Western soil again, Islam still poses a mortal danger to the West. A halt to terrorism would simply mean a change in Islam's tactics -- perhaps indicating a longer-term approach that would allow Muslim immigration and higher birth rates to bring Islam closer to victory before the next round of violence. It cannot be overemphasized that Muslim terrorism is a symptom of Islam that may increase or decrease in intensity while Islam proper remains permanently hostile.

3. Conclusion

The chief barrier today to a better understanding of Islam -- apart, perhaps, from outright fear -- is sloppy language. Let us take, to start with, the much-vaunted "war on terror." Upon scrutiny, the phrase "war on terror" makes as much sense as a war on "blitzkrieg," "bullets," or "strategic bombing." The "war on terror" implies that it is perfectly fine if the enemy seeks to destroy us -- and, indeed, succeeds in doing so -- as long as he does not employ "terror" in the process. "Terrorism," it should be obvious, is a tactic or stratagem used to advance a goal; it is the goal of Islamic terrorism that we must come to understand, and this logically.

As should be plain to anyone who has examined the Islamic sources, to take the violence out of Islam would require it to jettison two things: the Quran as the word of Allah and Muhammad as Allah's prophet. In other words, to pacify Islam would require its transformation into something that it is not. [There is no such thing as moderate Islam].

Drawing their inspiration from Muhammad and the Quran, they are invariably disposed to violence. The unhappy (yet, truthful) fact is that Islam today is what it has been fourteen centuries: violent, intolerant, and expansionary. It is folly to think that we, in the course of a few years or decades, are going to be able to change the basic world outlook of a foreign civilization. Islam's violent nature must be accepted as given; only then will we be able to come up with appropriate policy responses that can improve our chances of survival.

Gregory Davis author,

To learn more: Religion of Peace? Islam's War Against the World
producer/director,
Islam: What the West Needs to Know -- An Examination of Islam, Violence, and the Fate of the Non-Muslim World

Read more…

True or False? Will we ever know?

True or false?  We may never know the whole truth. 
 
I've always believed that where there's smoke there's fire.  In the case of Mr. Soetoro/Obama there is so much smoke, you can't see anything else.
 
Here's a man who has an unverifiable past, relatively no experience in government or business.  Gets elected to the Illinois legislature, then to the U.S. Senate, and within 4 years becomes the President of the United States!  WHAT?!
 
He's awarded the Nobel prize; for what?  Being 1/2 black and getting elected?  He had absolutely NO other accomplishments; not even a major academic publication to his credit.
 
His cabinet and advisors are predominately far left politically and have far more experience in academia than in business or government.
 
Yet the media adores him.  The spin never ceases and he is FUNDAMENTALLY changing our country.  The current spin is that he's created 4.5 million jobs.  Well, they fail to say that he's still at a net loss.  They say the private sector is growing, yet they fail to tell you that we are only one quarter away from having an official recession.  They play games about the tax code, yet they fail to tell you that 47% of Americans pay NO Federal income tax (where's the "fair share" in that?).
 
Yesterday I learned that the current amount of INTEREST only on our debt to China is amounts to 70% of their cost for their military; and in less than 4 years, at our current rate of spending/borrowing, we will be paying 100% of the cost of the Chinese military!  You don't hear that on any major networks; not because it's not true, but because they don't want you to hear about it.
 
They are now spinning out of control over the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic radicals killing Americans, attacking embassies, etc.  If you listen to the mainstream media and the administration, you probably think this all started over some video clip released by someone insulting Islam and their Prophet.  Yet, the Libyan leaders say this was a pre=planned coordinated attack that they told Washington about 3 weeks ago!  That makes more sense since it happened on the anniversary of 9/11.  The video in question has been out on YouTube since July.  Also, Bill Maher's movie "Religulous" made fun of/insulted Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.  No riots began over that film.  No statements from Obama's administration about it being disgusting or reprehensible.  Guess what; Maher donated $1,000,000 to the Obama campaign!
 
How is this happening?  Can he be stopped?  Like the author below, this election has me very worried.  It's not just the economy, it's Iran getting a nuke, it's the proliferation of nuclear materials to both rogue nations and terrorists who have no compunction against killing innocents.  It's a Congress so out of touch with the American people that we are borrowing more than we take in in taxes just to keep funding foreign nations who aren't our friends and subsidizing everything from student loans, welfare, food stamps, medicaid, etc., etc., etc.
 
THIS CANNOT CONTINUE!  IT IS UNSUSTAINABLE!
*******************************************************************************************************

 You know who.... A FOREIGN STUDENT
 
This is no surprise........ He claims what ever suits him from one day to the next....

 
TRUE??? FALSE??? Barry Myth buster. Tony
 
 
 
Take a close look at this.
Please read the letter also, as it contains some very interesting questions, that need answers.Written by a female Obama supporter who voted for him for president.
 
Legitimate  Question.

This election has me very worried. So many things to consider. I voted for Obama. McCain was a Washington insider and we don't need any more of them. I have changed my mind three  times, since then. I watch all the news channels, jumping from one to another. I must say this drives my husband crazy. But, I feel if you view CNN, and Fox News, you might get some middle ground to work with. I started  thinking "where does all the money come from for President Obama"? I have four daughters who went to College, and we were middle class, and money was  tight. We (including my girls) worked hard and there were lots of student loans. I started looking into Obama's history for my own peace of mind.

Around 1979 Obama started college at  Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he  had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.
"Barry" (that  was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad  Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan. During the summer of  1981, after his second year in college, he made a "round the world" trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi , Pakistan where he stayed with his  roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's  family.

My  question - Where did he get the money for this trip? Nether I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they were in  college. When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York.  It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack - not  Barry. Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia ?  It's not cheap to say the least.  

My girls asked me; where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe it's none of my business?

After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000. a year.
Why Chicago? Why not New York? He was already living in New York. By "chance" he met Antoin "Tony" Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko  has been convicted of fraud and bribery several times in the past and in  2011. Rezko, was named "Entrepreneur of the Decade" by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association".  About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School.  Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School ? 
 
Where did he get the money for Law School ? More student loans? His family has no money that's for sure.
 
After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a  job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what I discovered? They represented "Rezar", which is Rezko's firm

Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko  threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with "seed money" for his U.S. Senate race.

In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwood District of Chicago for  $1.65 million (less than asking price).  With ALL those Student Loans - Where  did he get the money for this property? On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price.  The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new home was purchased.  Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.

Now, we have Obama running for President.  Valerie Jarrett was Michele Obama's boss.  She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her  first.  Where was Jarrett born?  Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Am I going nuts or is there a pattern here?

On May 10, 2008, The Times reported, Robert Malley advisor to Obama was  "sacked" after the press found out he was having regular contacts with "Hamas", which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran.  This past week, buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq , he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will "Take care of things".  What the heck does that mean?

Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that were born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all  those "small" Internet campaign contribution for Obama.  Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country?  Or could it be from the Middle East ?

And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2009, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos.  Obama on talking about his religion said, "My Muslim faith". When questioned, "he made a mistake". Some mistake, eh?

All of the above information I researched on line.  If you would like to check it - Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama;  Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times - Obama visited Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times - September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.

Now the BIG question:: - 
If I found out  all this information on my own, Why haven't all of our "intelligent" members of the press been reporting this? Is this a Kettle of Fish?? As Arsenio Hall would say."HUMMMMMMM!  Does something stink or is it my imagination?" 
These are legitimate Questions For our PRESIDENT.
  
=
 
Read more…

Dee adds a very unique and tangible perspective to our endeavors here, and I for one am quite grateful for her hard work and obvious grasp of our situations.  Her topic of discussion "Why Are We All Here?" soundly mirrors what we see and hear, feel and think on a minute-by-minute, day-by-day basis.

As Dee points out, the change in the rhetoric of the Left bears paying attention to.  They have made it abundantly clear what they intend to do, even if they refuse to describe how they will do it in many instances.  Apparently, they fail to recognize that actions speak louder than words...or perhaps they are just blinded by their stunning intellectual superiority.  You can hear it in their voices and condescending tones when you talk to them.  It literally DRIPS off the page when they correspond with you...if that's what you'd like to call it.

The answer to the question is quite simple for me: We are all here because we have been called into the fight against absolute, totalitarian evil...an AGE-OLD fight, not unique to us only, but certainly unique to this Nation, particularly because of our Founding Principles and history.  Consider that this is the longest-surviving Constitution in the history of the world.  This is the greatest experiment in liberty in the history of the world, which asks the question "Is man capable of governing himself?"  The question remains at this hour unresolved...we are in the same battle now as our Founders were in their day.  I believe the case could be made that it is arguably WORSE.  Marx & Engles didn't pen "The Communist Manifesto" until 1848, for example.

We have our share of trolls on Tea Party Radio and Founder's Quest.  On Wednesday of last week, March 14, (check it out in the archived shows @ www.blogtalkradio.com/teapartyorg) we had Miki Booth with us as our guest.  Miki was followed by a group of trolls who were in the chat-room and also had called in.  It was rather entertaining.  One caller in particular would be a good case in point; After sentence 2, where he was "we're really REALLY  big fans of yours!", I caught on.  You just can't miss the simpering condescension and hatred lurking behind the facade.  He was trying to bait Miki and then intimidate her (once he was exposed on-air) into making some kind of terrible admission that "they" would use to file some lawsuit or something, some case they had feverishly worked up in their grandmother's basement they use for "strategy sessions" or whatever they use relative's basements for.  Chilling and quite nefarious, I can assure you.  

Chat-room was equally nefarious.  I was berated for hating Obama because he is black.  My reply-I don't care what color he is.  Why do you have a problem with people of color?  End of THAT line of conversation.

The point being, you don't always have to say much.  Just say it well, speak the truth, don't let them get to you, and hold up the mirror.  At the end of the day, we must realize exactly who we are up against.  Trolls for the most part are morally-challenged individuals; they are cowards to a fault; they are generally traitors to any rule of law they claim to understand; they cannot uphold a real position in a real debate because they are devoid of what we in the real world call "facts"---kind of like that petulant Kenyan we will probably have to drag out of the White House in a strait-jacket.

And THAT, my friends, is the biggest TROLL of them all.

 

Read more…

Author: Brian D. Hill


Source: USWGO Alternative News


Note: If you conducted a poll regarding the Sharia Law and want USWGO to add the results to the USWGO poll results article then send aemail to admin @ uswgo.com

USWGO Founder Brian D. Hill is now posting forums threads on David Icke's Forum, MisterPoll, FaceBook, Quizilla, and other places to gather votes on whether the Sharia Law is approvedby the majority of people or whether the Sharia Law is opposed by themajority of the people.

For those who don't know what Sharia Law is USWGO prepared a article a while ago along with it a attached pdf file explaining how Sharia Law threatens Human Rights and the American Constitution.

The Sharia Law being implemented by stealth in America will mean a radical overhaul of the Court system providing a double court systemwhere one religious group gains higher justice then other religious andnon religious groups, one religious group may beat up women and attackpeople of other religious groups, Free speech will be abolished, Freedomof the press will be abolished, Freedom of Religion will be abolished,Freedom of assembly will be abolished, woman can no longer wearswimsuits or even tan and women will be raped if they violate this partof Sharia Law, and other horrors await America as Sharia Law is beingsecretly passed throughout local areas of America until it reaches theCapital for evaluation on whether a National Sharia Law should beenacted.

Sharia law threatens the Constitution and threatens Human Rights groups and even the Court on Human Rights as the Sharia Law was createdby radical Islamic (Not Muslim) groups that don't believe in any form ofHuman Rights or even a Constitution.

Muslims have been attacked and discriminated whether they agree with the Sharia Law or not because that law has turned many people againstMuslims and has even formed secretive hate groups against Muslims. Manypeople now feel as though Muslims are terrorists or support radicalIslam even though it's not true. The hate has spiraled and willeventually lead to violent wars and holocausts if Sharia Law keeps beingpassed throughout the world.

"It will become Us against Them kind of scenario if we let this absurd law be sneaked into every law system throughout the world. Infact it won't lower discrimination against Muslims but will lead to morejealousy, hate, and violate Human Rights" says Brian D. Hill of USWGO.His anti Sharia Law views has led to several facebook users attackinghim, calling him racist, and leading to attacks against USWGO'sreputation.

Will the Sharia law pass or will it be rebelled by the people? Polls will tell and USWGO is allowing 7 days before they publish a articleregarding the poll results.

Read more…

USWGOAlternetHacked

Author: Brian D. Hill

Source: USWGO Alternative News

Note: So far I it is either a really p'oed by Internet user or it was the Pentagon that brought down USWGO on Alternet

A major setback for not just Google Rank but political influence as USWGO's alternet News sector has been destroyed by hackers. Also ourcomputer has been attacked and hacked successfully by a radical hackerthat used my computer to shut down uswgos account on alternet.

USWGO's account is completely gone on alternet, as I am checking USWGO for any hacks and damage as well, all articles whether positive ornegative, whether offensive or unoffensive is all destroyed by aradical hacker that did not agree with any of USWGO's views so insteadof reporting the offensive ones this hacker has destroyed all mirroedarticles on USWGO's alternetpage.

Brian Hill created enemies whenever he spoke against the Unconstitutional Sharia Law because of the fact it's being forced downthe throats of American politics without the knowledge of the Americanpeople. He was being called a racist even though it wasn't true, plusthe founder said he was all for legal immigrant just not illegalimmigration but the radical (Possibly Pentagon) hacker deliberatelyattacked his most influential Syndication Center which is anotherknockout of the Anti New World Order Alternative News Site.

I gathered this screenshot to show everybody how I was hacked.

USWGOHacked

USWGOAlternetHacked2

Also several of my facebook friends after the hack have attempted to contact me telling me I was in a video that I wasn't in an attempt tosend me to a fake facebook login page in order to steal my password andlogin information.

Also my USWGO Syndication Center was completely hacked, my passwords been changed, and I have lost all posting abilities.

USWGOAlternetHacked3

I am investigating the hack and will also send a email to alternet politely demanding they find out the IP Address who hacked me and askthem if they could restore my posting data.

If this hack is deliberate then I will send a message to you all regarding whether high ups (Administrators) of alternet did this to meon purpose or whether I was hacked by a radical elite hacker.

If I was hacked by the Government/Pentagon and if I receive any kind of visit then I will also report back to you because this war againstmy website started today may not be over.

Read more…

We read "Rules for Radicals", "STORM" and now we have a new discovery "Weatherman Manifesto"

Yes, GB found the 1969 blue print to an American Marxist/Socialist Revolution (Oops, Fundament Transformation of America). He wastes no time; started reviewing it on radio today. More to come and we can follow his reveal.

You can find the link on glennbeck.com however you can click on the link below to gain access to the document. When you get to the archive.org site you must register to use their resources. Once registered it’s easy, find the document, pick text or PDF and print (save or put in favorites). "The truth will sent you free, but first it will make you miserable" Thanks Glenn!

This will blow your mind! Marxists (Oops, New Left) are following it today. Yes, after 40+ years they’re back on track….. GrizzlyMama

You Don't Need A Weatherman To Know Which Way The Wind Blows

Submitted by Karin Asbley, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, John Jacobs, Jeff Jones, Gerry Long, Home Machtinger, Jim Mellen, Terry Robbins, Mark Rudd and Steve Tappis.

From /New Left Notes/, June 18, 1969

I. International Revolution The contradiction between the revolutionary peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America and the imperialists headed by the United States is the principal contradiction in the contemporary world. The development of this contradiction is promoting the struggle of the people of the whole world against US imperialism and its lackeys. Lin Piao, Long Live the Victory of People's War! People ask, what is the nature of the revolution that we talk about- Who will it be made by, and for, and what are its goals and strategy-

Click here to access full document: http://www.archive.org/details/YouDontNeedAWeathermanToKnowWhichWayTheWindBlows_925

Read more…

Kagan Must Answer the Question About DOMA

This week the Senate looks to approve or filibuster Elena Kagan as another notoriously radical Obama appointment. Again, going against the will of the people who want a conservative as the next Supreme Court justice, Obama nominates a radical ideologue. If we have any more like Kagan, our constitutional rights, as laid out by our Founding Fathers based on years of experience, will be in serious peril.

Kagan Must Answer the Question About DOMA

She could be the deciding vote on the constitutionality of both DOMA and Obamacare

Read more…