Emergency Notification to Chief Justice John Roberts- Will he take a stand for the Constitution?
The ink hasn't yet dried on the opinions of the Justices in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Cases that Chief Justice John Roberts sided on as Constitutional because of the 'legal taxing abilities of Congress' and the Chief Justice has upon his desk an EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION regarding the eligibility of Barack Obama in the competitive race for the Democratic Nomination being held September 5th, 2012 in Charlotte North Carolina.
Cody Robert Judy has pleaded his case through the Judicial Branch in Georgia all the way up to the United States Supreme Court asserting that Obama is not a natural born citizen, and if made the National Democratic Party Nominee may face an Eligibility Challenge from the Republican National Nominee in a tight race that could debilitate the Democratic Parties chances to recover before the General Election in November.
In the Emergency Notification that demands Chief Justice Roberts attention during the Summer Recess of the Court, Petitioner and Registered Democratic Party Candidate for President Mr. Judy asserts that the Court's recess during Summer is in conflict with the Democratic National Convention being held September 5th, 2012, and that unless the Court decides the case in August in a Special Session, the Court may well prejudice itself out of Redressability, as well as open the door for it to be decided in the General Election that could cause much more wide spread discontent, as well as prejudicing himself as the petitioner.
The Emergency Notification to Justice Roberts was sent July 30th,2012 and indeed places the eligibility of Barack Obama as a 'natural born citizen in sharp contrast with the eligibility demands of the United States Constitution.
To date the United States Supreme Court has never heard the case of Barack Obama's eligibility dismissing half a dozen other petitions seeking the Court's supervisory powers due to conflicts in Standing and Jurisdiction.
Cody Robert Judy asserts his case is the first case to come to the Supreme Court of the United States in living action during the race, before a Democratic Party National Nominee was chosen, by another Candidate running for President in the same party.
Cody's case is the first of its kind to also submit evidence to the lower Courts that has reached now the U.S. Supreme Court from a law enforcement investigation. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse released evidence on March 1st, 2012 that included 2200 hours that reasonably questioned and now has concluded that Barack Obama's released long form Birth Certificate is definitely a forgery as well as problems with his Draft Registration.
Judy's complaint surrounds the Eligibility of Barack Obama placed on the Primary Ballot by the Democratic Chairmen's of each State, but is ultimately certified by the Secretary of State(s) whose duty is more to the tax payers who pay for Primaries and the Constitution of which Secretary-Of-States swear an oath to, then to the Democratic Party Chairmen's who have prejudiced his name as a choice for voters in the Primaries.
"If the Democratic Party were to nominate Barack Obama as the National Nominee, and the election were close, the Republican National Party Nominee would have every Constitutional Right to challenge Obama's eligibility after September 5th,2012", Judy said, "Its much better if we deal with it prior to the General Election and the Nominations of both major parties, and that's the reason I've pulled the Emergency handle of the United States Supreme Court which should be used only in rare instances."
The Republican Party's National Convention held in Tampa, Florida precedes the Democratic Parties this year, and is scheduled for August 27th - 30th 2012.
Remember our Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276
In a newly released video The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign reflects the principles and standards of our framers and founders that have been ingrained in us. This certainly presents a genuine reflecting pool for Americans to all ponder.
From one who earned a reputation as a great communicator , Ronald Reagan said, "Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again."
It is very easy to see that in no point in our modern history has our Constitution come under such a heavy domestic threat from the very people who have enjoyed the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Getting close to politicians, the press in many cases now days, must often acquiescetheir stories for Government approval for the politically correct establishment of the State. While
'being in' is certainly "no sin", the price is often compromising professional journalism.
No where in our American history have we seen this placed upon the sacrificial table more then Obama's fraudulent identification transparency by the press. Indeed it may well be said in our future that "The Press" lost itself in the dis-ease of the "State" and they along with the United States Supreme Court Justices become relics to the principle they once served that was surrendered by their own hands.
Remember Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama United States Supreme Court 12-5276
Cody Robert Judy reflects on his childhood and compares the demolition of his fathers house to the demolition of the United States Constitution. "Yet", he reflects, " The founding fathers built on straight and sound principles and those have been ingrained in me". The Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court Case challenges the crooked and twisted path of Obama's fraudulent identification transparency.
Cody Robert Judy continues to raise the voice of warning and fight with courage the onslaught of negativity that comes from the very people he is fighting to protect: Those who actually depend upon the Constitution but "think" they don't or that it will never change.
Asked upon where he draws the strength to continue Cody has no problem acknowledging the Creator whose blessings of love flow from Heaven like the sweetest nectar one could imagine.
"I've endeared things that I thought I couldn't endure", Cody said, " I remember the onslaught of abuse I received from those in power and control who kept me locked down 23 hours a day in a space as big as your everyday bathroom for nearly 4 years of my 8 years of incarceration because of the length of my hair. It didn't make the least bit of common sense but they did it every day just waiting for me to crack."
"The guards would come and mock me and tell me it was NEVER going to change; that the Supreme Court would never rule in my favor. That things were set and that's just the way it was. There were men who didn't cut their hair because of religious reasons who also had suffered this miserable cruel and unusual treatment, but I didn't sue them because of that. I sued them because it wasn't a sanitary or health care problem as they insisted, because the women inmates had a code that was one sentence long, "Women inmates can grow their hair as long as they want", it was a discrimination of gender. Something the Supreme Court agreed on".
"Most people could understand that, but somehow someway the ones who got into powerful positions had lost their common sense. They had gone crazy and were the loons. That's a scary situation to be in and we are very close to that when it comes to the respect of our Constitution, and the understanding of exactly what freedom and liberty creates verses the lock down of an enslaved population."
"What Ronald Reagan said is very true, 'Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again." Much of the press ignores the actions of Obama releasing compromised identification papers, and a host of other willful malfeasance and called it legit, and instead want to focus on my incarceration which is over on an offense of words made in a religious meeting some 20 years ago. That doesn't make any sense."
"I've told people I paid society what they wanted completely and our United States Constitution declares that we will NOT discriminate in the political arena denying people the right to vote, and in such the right to run for office, based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude. In truth this is a great lesson on forgiveness we are pressed to understand. You don't keep asking for freight money on something that has been paid for, while some one who hasn't paid any freight, like Obama, is loading the ship up heavy and walking away with it."
"This case in the United States Supreme Court is not about me and my wrong doing, its about Obama's not telling the truth on his "Declaration of Candidacy" and the fall out from that one lie that continues to rack up points on being the biggest fraud and forgery in our history! For all intensive purposes the Utah Media is Republican.. the majority of Politicians in Utah are Republican, and this "was the place" that had no problem doing to me what they did which is consistent with the national Republican Party sweeping their own complacency under the rug of the biggest fraud and forgery case in American history. How can they deny that?"
"Now asking me how they should feel about it, is not something I care to comment about. Maybe it is something you should ask them about, because it doesn't make any sense to me? That to me is bizarre, loony, crazy, and just plain weird as it relates to the sound conservative principles of the Founders and Framers of the United States of America?"
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign is pleased to report today, July 27th, 2012; a Supplemental Brief was docketed by the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276 dated July 16th, 2012 ;which was the post mark entered upon the Priority Mail Documents.
Priority Mail with the United States Postal Service has been pretty remarkably consistent with the mailings to the United States Supreme Court from between two and four days across the Country, the Campaign reported. However, in the instance of these document sent to the Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court, both packages were delayed until Thursday July 26th, 2012.
The same document sent to the two corroborating Counsels for Barack Obama and Georgia’s Secretary of State Brian Kemp in Atlanta, Georgia were delivered in what we described as usual, landing on the recipients July 18th, 2012. The customary practice of the United States Supreme Court is to docket according to the post mark.
Breathing a big sigh of relief for the intelligence relayed in these documents that wasn’t lost, Cody himself celebrated with a conference call that was warmly received with cheers of enthusiasm expressed by the campaign of volunteers and supporters across the country.
“You know we did it and you know what just happened! Hooray for the safe passage!” Cody exclaimed.
Marred in attacks from the steepest left of the Democratic Party loyal to Obama Cody has been the subject of attack after attack. Unreported by an oblivious media, who hasn’t a clue what’s going on because nothings been reported to them, by the recommendations of Mr. Judy, the Campaign has set up a series of political booby-traps that they have walked right into including mis-information, non-transparency, mistakes, and conjectured relays, until the United States Supreme Court received the intelligence that was so very vital.
Unsupported by conservatives loyal to the Republican Party and in-name Birthers only, Cody has vowed to un-Earth the sophisticated mirage that has secretly been the project of Republicans for quite some time, who in no way wanted anyone but Barack Obama as the National Democratic Nominee.
In an interview after the conference call Cody related privately:
“You know as well as I do that there are a whole bunch of people in this Country who call themselves Conservative, but don’t believe in the Constitution. To me anyone who really believes the Constitution is just a piece of paper has got their conservative values really twisted on a macro- massive scale that far supersedes the devastation that “ right to lifer’s” claim against pro-choice advocates in a false story against their brother.”
“Nowhere in the Republican Party will you find a ‘whimper’ of Obama’s deception, his forged long form birth certificate, his forged draft registration, his sealed College entrance records, his revoked or relocated law license, and his Passport records”, but you all have access to mine because I am laid bare before you and God, so at least you know what you’re getting.”
“Now if you’re a Conservative, ask yourself an honest question,” Because of the Republican Cover-up of these things, yes I said, Republican, you should know you do not know what you’re getting with Mitt Romney anymore then you knew what you were getting with Barack Obama, because he’s covered for Obama right?” He has and to think otherwise is just, well, drinking the Obama-fools-aid."
The Republicans have laid the biggest mirage ever hoaxed upon the America People and it’s no secret anymore. They were the biggest capitulators of Obama’s fraud. They were willingly captivated and over 50% of Republicans drank the fraudulent Obama-fools-aid!”
“In fact, any conservative who has claim on the term, who has refused to help our Campaign, who has sat in idol while this Campaign forged with the sword of truth, the Justice affecting every living American at this time, ought to count themselves imitation and worthy as a Rhino.”
“If you believe that “Obama’s Transparent Gate” has not cost this Country more, time, talent, money than any single devastating event in our history, than you were on a different level of obedience to your conscience because that is the case, and the responsible Republican base has what kind of a record on missing it? It has an impeccable record, it’s incredible, and they have been perfect in missing the biggest crisis our Country has ever gone through in modern day history!”
“There are very few people right now that actually know what is going on when it comes to this United States Supreme Court Case, what it actually portends, and the intelligence it embodies surrounding Barack Obama. The determination and courage of those involved is incredible, inspiring, and honorable and I know when this story is over it is one that will be worth its weight in gold for America’s history books to remember.”
Pressed on what he thought was specifically important about the case Mr. Judy alluded in abit of mystery, stating somewhat guardedly, there were four parts of a puzzle that were swiftly coming together.
“We the People, justice, the transparency of Obama, and the Media represent four pieces of a puzzle. “
"Of course no one can see what the puzzle looks like until all the pieces come together. The Media does not, contrary to what many people believe, represent ‘Justice’” it never has and it never will in its purest form”, Cody said, “The Media represents reporting Justice, and that doesn’t happen until witnesses and evidence are set before a Judgment Bar and a Judgment is had from a Judge who weighs the balance.”
“The important thing to report here is that the Democratic Party is most likely going to have a new nominee other than Barack Obama, and that at this time, the wheels of change are moving very rapidly. What I can assure you is that Mitt Romney will have a much greater challenge than he ever supposed with Barack Obama, especially given his poor record on actually doing what a President is suppose to do when it comes to the oath a President takes.”
“Creating jobs is not the government’s job, in fact our Federal Government has been in the business of trying to overcome the unemployment numbers by created far too many jobs within itself and its placed a burden on the People that is cumbersome and heavy. Mitt Romney’s experience in the business sector has not prepared him to create jobs as President, and his assumption that it has is naïve at best and deceptive at worst.”
“Mitt Romney has a very poor record for understanding that our economy revolves heavily around the opportunity our Constitution affords us. When the taxes get high, and the Constitution is usurped, the wings of the butterfly are pinned down and cannot expand fully for graceful flight”, Cody said.
“With the Democratic Parties National Convention set to happen September 5th, 2012 , August is going to be the hottest Summer Obama’s ever had in his life”, he continued, “but it’s also going to be a very hot one for Republicans and their complacency and actual disdain for our Constitution that will come to trial.”
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Patriots true to the Conservative Movement for America represented by The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Movement are welcome to contribute as their conscience would dictate here:
Obama's long form birth certificate is forged and Cody Robert Judy for President releases his U.S. Supreme Court case no 12-1576 Judy v. Obama that has the Cold Case Posse's investigation included within it.
The newest campaign commercial highlights the arguments of Cody Robert Judy's case against Obama's eligibility and qualification for the Office of President according to the United States Constitution's demands' for a 'natural born citizen.
Today its been 10 days since I mailed the Motion and Order here to the United States Supreme Court. Its just unreal how long its taking. The Pony Express pre civil war across the whole country was 10 days.
1-EXPARTE SUA SPONTE WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BY PETITIONER, AND SCHEDULED ORDER OF PROCEEDING OF THE COURT
2-WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BY PETITIONER, AND SCHEDULED ORDER OF PROCEEDING OF THE COURT
and Mailing Declaration have come by some 10 day delay in the Priority Mailing Service of the United States Postal Service noted as USPS Case No. CA109421272
on USPS tracking item #0310 3490 0000 1692 0068 to your office, and the 11 copies to the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk USPS tracking # 0310 3490 0000 1692 0099.
Because of the time sensitive nature of this Motion and proposed Order I am forwarding this to your office with your email address and the record that opposing Counsels Brian Kemp Secretary of State Esq. Russo and Esq. Cam-anh Le received there copy in email as well as Priority Mail Tracking No. 0310 3490 0000 1692 0082 July 18th,2012 11:27AM
and
Mr. Michael Jablonski Esq., Counsel for Barack Obama, emailed and received his copy as well as Priority Mail Tracking No. 0310 3490 0000 1692 0075 July 18th 2012 9:05AM
Sir, as you are listed on the U.S. Supreme Court docket in Judy v. Obama et.al., Case No.12-1576 as Representative Counsel for Mr. Barack Obama and the urgency of this case is expressed in the Motion and Order, I propose your responsibility to the Court does not include willfully stalling an action out of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices supervisory authority.
By this I also include you as my Solicitor General acting in the interest of Justice and my Federal Government of which if Barack Obama is seen as ineligible for the Office of the President by the virtue of Justice in the Court, he is not apart of the Federal Government of which you represent and you should be acting on my behalf.
Your job, as I understand it, is to represent matters of the Federal Government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States, therefore how can you represent an unqualified candidate before the United States Supreme Court and not represent me as a qualified candidate for President? Sir I have the benefit of having over 2200 hours of investigation from a law enforcement agency that has reported Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate to be a certain Fraud and Forged that he released to the White House Press Core. You have nothing of that sort to contend my evidence is unlawful.
Mr. Obama's occupation of the office albeit, for the Court's consideration, illegally does not warrant your loyalty so much as I should have it and you should be representing me.
With these considerations I must have the Court's attention now Sir, that the "Redressability account of standing" is not diminished by the delay of the Court's ruling before my proposed August 22nd, 2012 Judgement Date in ORDER that 2 weeks to exist prior the Sept 5th,2012 Democratic National Convention.
I would be most appreciative Sir if you would see to this matter and accommodate a working schedule as I have proposed to the Court, and the Court should have had by now already ruled upon, were it not for this infuriating delay of the Priority Mailing Postal Service to your Office and the U.S. Supreme Court that is representative of something out of the pre Civil War Pony Express delivery of 10 days across the Country.
No Sir, I shall not lose my case due to the delay on the Mailing Service, nor should the U.S. Supreme Court Justices lose their hold on the Constitution due to the same, and we must indeed begin communication by phone or electronic email to necessitate the schedule for the court to adopt in protection of its supervisory powers of the United States Constitution, in all diligence to this matter.
I appreciate your response to me directly through my email and phone if the matter presents itself to be an hourly deadline, and perhaps an arrangement for a phone Conference with the appropriate Justices be made immediately upon your receiving this.
My pardon Sir for making this a public matter as you can see on the Correct Copy line of the email, however, this has been done in the interest of WE THE PEOPLE and a transparency the Mr. Obama promised in his campaign of 2008, so I would expect only cooperation in dealing with this matter, rather then unwarranted and tactical delays.
I await your response Sir.
Sincerely Yours,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
There's a friendly SHOWDOWN happening in The Birther Movement Cody Robert Judy Explains
Recall there were about 2 other cases in Georgia happening along with mine in January.
Well...
Its July now and two of them teamed up together after the Georgia Supreme Court and one split away from me - David Farrar represented by Orly Taitz in the Georgia Supreme Court.
Now there are 3 cases in the United States Supreme Court that have come out of Georgia.
1- July 2nd 2012 Docketed DAVID P. WELDEN, CARL SWENSSON, and KEVIN RICHARD POWELL v. OBAMA teamed up with Counsel Van R. Irion and Counsel Mark Hatfield in Case No. 12-5
Between the three (3) teams my case is the only one represented with a Candidate for President. I am a Democratic Party Candidate for President. The other two teams do not have a Presidential Candidate but both the other teams do have something else in common. I suppose in detail the importance of that was discussed in my last blog here
They rejected me as viable..or credible and they are all Republicans.
Prior to the decision I received on June 21st I received a call from Mr. Richard Powell who inquired about the July 1st,2012, or thirty day date that the Court had set to make a decision.
We spoke at length and I explained that because the case was docketed May 31st,2012 that the Supreme Court of Georgia had under normal conditions until July 1st, 2012 to make a decision. Of course that decision came earlier then anticipated on June 21st,2012 which I was delighted with mostly because it gave me an extra week to get to filing my case with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Our cases have all hit the Court within about 15 days of each other so I know they were waiting for a decision in my case before they filed in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Now within The Birther Movement it is no secret that I am not really credited with anything. I'm not on the Conservative Talk Show Circuit and have never been asked to speak at a Tea Party or Birther Event. Whenever there have been events I was not called or asked to speak at them.
You recall even Dr. Rev. James David Manning only used me in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial after Alan Keyes, and Wayne Allan Root didn't show up, as well as Orly Taitz.
I drove out to New York from Nevada strictly on faith not knowing what part I would play, if at all, but I ended up being a big factor, which he acknowledged to me at the time after my day of testimony. However he has never hardly mentioned my name since then and has even endorsed and had on his show, The Manning Report, many more times Lori Roth who is running as an independent.
Lori Roth was on the law suit with me along with Leah Lax as candidates for President but after Taitz was barred from practicing in the Superior Court, they never responded to the case and thus a Motion for Dis-Joinder was necessary removing them from the case in order to proceed.
That left me as the only Presidential Candidate left in all of Georgia's Ballot Challenges.
Orly Taitz took off with David Farrar to the Georgia Supreme Court and left me to filing myself, after I had worked hard to get he and I through the Superior Court in Georgia. So there's a little friendly showdown happening in the Birther Movement. (smile)
The showdown I suppose is which case if any will the United States Supreme Court agree to hear? Or, could they agree to hear them all? We all just don't really know.
The Federal Ninth (9th) Circuit ruled in 2011 only current candidates running for President have standing or credit to bring an eligibility complaint. The other two teams have ignored that opinion where I have worked at accommodating that opinion.
I was never asked to join the WELDON et.al., v. OBAMA case by the attorneys Irion or Hatfield though I know they certainly could have asked me having inquired directly to me regarding the decision of the Georgia Supreme Court through Mr. Powell prior to their case being filed in the United States Supreme Court.
In fact Mr. Powell and Mr. Swensson did not team up until after their respective Georgia Supreme Court cases with their separate attorneys Irion and Hatfield.
Upon learning of their cases I sent the following email to the attorneys and also posted it to Mr. Swensson on facebook:
[Dear Mr. Irion and Mr. Hatfield:
Please accept my sincere congratulations and excitement to see that you have filed in the U.S. Supreme Court. I am so pleased, in the valiant effort to sustain our Constitution, to rub shoulders with you and your clients.
As I saw your stamp from the U.S. Supreme Court I noticed that our Petitions for Writ of Cert actually were stamped the same day by the Court. That was an incredible unplanned phenomenon and I'll just bet you that the Clerks were having a "pull'n out hair day".
I wish you the very best of luck and appreciate your efforts and I hope you will convey this also to all your represented clients.
The attachment file I'm forwarding to you is the only effort, I can see, that might help me in my campaign for President in the Democratic Party.
The urgency is of course mentioned therein as the Democratic Party Convention being held Sept.5th,2012. If my case is dismissed early I sure hope that yours continues and is successful.
This is simply a little bit of a 'heads-up', as I wouldn't put it past SCOTUS if by chance they accepted my case to want to combine all our cases together, if only to hear your own professional Oral Arguments.
I'm simply am just not that practiced in the 'norm' of the court in situations like this, so if that sounds totally off the wall please forgive me.
All the best to you in these unchartered waters!
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
I did not receive any response from either attorney, however, Mr. Swensson graciously responded on Facebook in the hope that we would both meet in Washington DC at the Supreme Court.
In thinking back over the last 4 years and all of the attorneys I have approached, or who have approached me in a tentative conversation about the eligibility case against Barack Obama I begin to feel a little sad that I have not had any of them help me through the Judicial Courts...not a single one.
In fact as I thought back at all the names I've emailed and their legal experience I was even depressed a little more.
Mario Apuzzo, Phil Berg, Gary Kreep, Larry Klayman, Orly Taitz, Van Irion, Mark Hatfield if each had 15 years legal experience that would amount to over 100 years of legal training and experience combined I just never could get the benefit of the doubt from.
My case is very unique and different too, from all the others but its on the same issue. I guess you could say "my approach" to the basketball hoop, or golf T was different. My play on the football field was different. We all could certainly be dismissed, but what if, what if, different was better?
Wouldn't it be like "shock and awe" if my case made it? It would be like hitting the Jackpot or Lotto with about the same odds wouldn't it?
Well, I suppose my hand has been dealt already and we will soon see. Recall Roy McAvoy 'Tin Cup's' words played by Kevin Costner in the golf Movie "Tin Cup" to his Caddie Romeo (Cheech Marin), "Greatness Courts Failure Romeo"?
And it all comes down to this last ball in the bag.. if I don't make this I'm disqualified in that there's no where else to go, kind of re-counted in this scene from "Tin Cup"
Here is a little update on my blog entry HAS THE PRIORITY MAIL gone MIA.
CRJ UPDATE - Has the PRIORITY MAIL gone M.I.A. ?
July 23rd, 2012
This morning (8AM) I called the United States Postal Service expressing my concerns about the two pieces of missing Priority Mail that contained very time sensitive materials to my case Judy v. Obama United States Supreme Court Case No. 12-1576 that are found here:
The United States Postal Service Representative took my information and a case number was assigned to the investigation: CA109421272
I was told that sometimes a piece of mail is not scanned through a sort facility and it may have been delivered already, but that they would check. I was told they would call me and let me know what has happened.
Tonight, 9:30PM , still have not received a call, but ran a check on the numbers again Supreme Court 0310 3490 0000 1692 0099 and Solicitor General 0310 3490 0000 0068 and found that both pieces had in fact today passed through the Washington DC Sort facility just today respectively BOTH at 9:44AM.
If all goes well they should both be delivered tomorrow July 24th,2012 after being stamped by the postal service July 16th,2012 in the 'Priority Mail Service".
The Judicial Courts usually give 3 days for mailing service and with the time sensitive material this is a set-back to the Court even receiving word of the time-sensitive urgency of my case. Nine (9) days to get a Motion to the Court? Excuse me?
With this kind of snail-mail the case might be heard sometime after Obama's second term.
Of course the Motion and Order was emailed to the Court and the respective Counsel(s) and it still hasn't been docketed on the <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5276.htm">Case No. 12-1576 Judy v. Obama Here:</a>
CRJ UPDATE
As always I would certainly appreciate your contributions to my campaign and hope that you would feel that this is a Campaign worth its weight in gold for what it has done in standing up for our Constitution.
The United States Supreme Court marks the 6th Court this election cycle I have been through and that's not counting the 5 others I was involved with from 2008 up till 2012 including Lt. Col. Terri Lakin's Amicus Curia filed in a military court which we all should recall here:
Things are heating up with the recent published globe article citing Obama’s long form fabrication has been forged and the forgery alleged to have been identified here by Sheriff Arpaio:
BREAKING! Arpaio FINDS MAN who forged Obama Birth Certificate!
The March 1st 2012 Press Conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in which a ‘Cold Case Posse’ released some 2200 hours of investigation results finding ‘probable cause’ Obama’s long form birth certificate is really a long formed fabrication as well as Obama’s Draft registration, America is waking up to discover there’s been many a slip between the cup and the lip of their elected representatives.
Understanding the fix Republicans found themselves in when in 2008 they signed on to be the employed silencers on Obama’s gun to the Constitution’s demand for a ‘natural born citizen’ with every Republican Senator voting for the Obama/Clinton co-sponsored U.S. Senate Resolution 511, fermenting the security wanted for Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential qualification quagmire as Panama’s most famous son.
Some have wondered why all those Republican Senators and House Congressmen have been so silent- Well now you know the answer! The elephant was painted into a corner by the jackass and has been afraid to come out owing to their own lack of courage for the Constitution’s demands for the Office of the President repeatedly shot down as a Legislative mandate to encroachment.
The fact the Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen was assaulted some 8-10 times with attempts to change it, just since Obama came into existence on the political stage as a Illinois State Senator is a testimony to the Legislative Mandate secured that the Judicial Branch should not be running rough shod over or avoiding.
Americans are catching a glimpse of what one good Sheriff can do as far as using some intelligence in investigation. Lord knows the House and Senate have the same power but are letting the Sheriff do its bidding.
While the Sheriff has been terrific at releasing the results of the investigations of the Cold Case Posse led by lead investigator Michael Zullo in the March 1st,2012 Press Conference, and the upcoming scheduled July 17th,2012 press conference reported to be even more damaging to Obama’s usurpation and identity cover-up, there’s one thing the good sheriff hasn’t done and that is what Cody Robert Judy, Democratic Party Presidential Candidate, can and has done.
That is taking the investigation results of the Cold Case Posse to an actual formal legal prosecutor!
The Sheriff’s job is largely outlined as an “enforcer” of the law in the executive branch of local government and investigator of crime, but the actual prosecution of the actions always is relayed to a member of the Judicial Branch known as an Attorney General.
Cody Robert Judy is the conduit of Sheriff’s Joe’s investigation result to the Solicitor General of the United States Supreme Court currently held by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
The task of the Office of the Solicitor General is to supervise and conduct government litigation in the United States Supreme Court. Virtually all such litigation is channeled through the Office of the Solicitor General and is actively conducted by the Office. The United States is involved in approximately two-thirds of all the cases the U.S. Supreme Court decides on the merits each year.
As a Candidate for President of the United States in the Democratic Party, Cody Robert Judy has a very unique and tangible standing that has been used to dismiss nearly 95% of the eligibility cases from the judicial branch.
The employment of the Solicitor General’s requirement is found in an organ of the United States Government called the Federal Election Commission , (FEC) , and what that Federal sponsored commission might be doing that is undermining the Republic?
See the first question on Cody’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari for the U.S. Supreme Court found on page ii outlines the office of the FEC as a culprit that amounts to aiding and abetting candidates who are not qualified in Federal election races according to the demands of the Constitution,as well as the Mailing Declaration found after page 38 showing the Solicitor General address.
Whenever a federal agency’s policies are called into question in a Petition for Writ of Certiorari the Petitioner must file a copy with the Solicitor General as is noted by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29(4)(b) and also the Act of Congress that certified Obama’s eligibility by the Electorate.
This amounts to Government protection of unqualified candidates by securing for those unqualified candidates Government cover, especially in the solicitation of campaign contributions to those trusting citizens contributing under a false pretense of a Candidates qualification or eligibility to run, not to mention the Republics peril.
At the heart of America is a Constitutional Republic that represents a very unique form of Democracy where ‘We The People’ are represented as ‘individuals’ who can stand up against the mob and win. Might isn’t right, when it comes to trampling individual rights and if each individual’s rights are not stood up for very quickly ‘We The People’ are subverted to another form of Government such as a fascism-dictatorial government, or an elite Oligarchy much more associated with totalitarianism or despotism.
As an example the rich in America are about to find out that Tax- Mandates that run into Health Care insuring 45 million new consumers all at once will soon be found a strategy to stay poor rather than an incentive to progress which has always been the problem in varying degrees of socialism. Unwilling to yield the claim that it works, ultimately the frustration goes to war as the diversion.
So .. first they try to insure you with socialism, then they kill you when it doesn’t work, one way or the other. I think Donald Trump recognizes this with his claim that Obama will start a war before or to win the election. The result will be catastrophic loss of life that socialist were so worried in a false pretense of insuring, not to mention the complete disregard of passing on the debt to future generations who can’t vote right now.
Taking A Stand is not always the easiest thing to do, but Cody Robert Judy has done it, Taking A Stand for the Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’.
Originating out of a “Georgia Administrative Court” Cody received the first ruling by a Judge on the merits of ‘natural born citizen’ that he appealed directly to the Superior Court. Three other petitioners emerged out of that Ballot Challenge also, but Cody’s complaint was the only one to include Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse 2200 hour investigation and probable cause results.
In a spectacular timing coincidence Sheriff Joe released the results of the Cold Case Posse March 1st,2012 and Cody’s response to Obama’s Motion to Dismiss was due March 2nd,2012. Cody was able to use Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse results in the first Judicial Branch Court, the results of which made the investigations findings very appealable to every higher Court.
Cody’s case begin in 2008 as a Presidential Candidate who filed in Federal court against McCain and Obama, in 2010 testifying at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL in New York, and he continues in 2012 his appeal as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party from New Hampshire’s Ballot Challenge to New Hampshire’s Supreme Court and into the Georgia Ballot Challenge, Georgia’s Superior Court then on to the Georgia Supreme Court- the first State Supreme Court to have the findings of the Cold Case Posse results included!
Today, the process of appeal was finalized in the highest court of the land. Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse results have entered the U.S. Supreme Court through Cody Robert Judy’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari and have been appropriately glued into the weavers beam of the Solicitor General’s Office (as integral as Goliath’s spear was to Goliath), a person appointed to represent thefederal government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States.
You can help by spreading the intricate word that forms the pattern formed by the loom of which the weavers beam is associated and help Cody as a modern day David fighting the Goliath of the eligibility silence of the U.S. House and Senate ultimately through the U.S. Supreme Court!
Help Cody’s campaign now to broadcast the commercials and strengthen the campaign with your contributions that have the first and most devastating chances of not only eliminating Obama from the 2012 Presidential contest, but repealing Obamacare based on it not being signed by a legitimate President of the United States, and most importantly securing Obama’s usurpation in the history books as exactly what it was, illegitimate, ineligible, and a constitutional crying shame in the history books as an example for us all to remember to uphold our United States Constitution.
Projections: WWIII Deaths 613,870 Americans vs. Your Vote for Constitution
The last few days I’ve been thinking of a dream I had just a few days ago actually. It was one of those intelligent dreams where you get information to think about from, but you have no idea where what you were talking about came from.
Someone asked me about the war with Iran coming because they had read about it in my book “Taking A Stand-The Conservative Independent Voice”. I said, “Yes., but it’s going to cost America more lives than WWI,WWII,Korea, and Vietnam.”
That was it..the end of the dream. I woke up thinking that was really strange. Of course I wondered to myself I wonder how many lives that really is. I also did recall the dream that I had that was actually in my book Taking A Stand-The Conservative Independent Voice, that was published in a rush for the 2008 Independent write-in campaign for President.
It really came down to the wire and I had to rush editing and really rushed proof reading, so there is more spelling errors in it then I’d like that spell check didn’t pick up. Anyway the point is I do recall wondering whether I should put the dream in the book that ultimately I did. Of course here it was Iran and we were involved with Iraq and Afghanistan was still in the future.
Saddam Hussein was put to death close to the beginning of 2007, and it’s incredible to think about a war from 2003 clear through 2011, but the point here is there were only 4,409 soldiers killed and a reported 31,928 wounded in action. That is a remarkable small number for that long of a war and then I started wondering about just how many the 4 wars would actually include as far as a tally for what I had said in my dream.
Well, I recalled doing a Veterans Day Memorial Show that I had done some research in on that subject so went back to see what I could find. Watching it I just started adding up the numbers and the impact started to hit me.
WWI – 116,516 WWII – 405,399 Korean War – 33,746 and Vietnam – 58,209
In my dream there was a projected loss of 613,870 soldiers. That is one staggering number.
When I woke up from that dream I was thinking also about the few numbers that actually have read or followed my blog. As of today, July 3rd,2012 I’ve only had 20,685 page views on my blog which was started also in 2008. Also begun in 2008, was my YouTube Station CODE4PRES that as of July 3rd,2012 with 165 videos has 47,024 views in its entire history.
For all intensive purposes you could say the General Public is completely un-aware of any of the work I’ve done. Maybe it just hasn’t quite caught on yet of course the added benefits of advertisement with guest appearances on shows and stories being written about you or your campaign can increase that dramatically as we’ve seen things go viral before and wooed and awed about it.
I started thinking about how many people don’t vote and thinking about the ‘apathy’ in America- reasons that so many Americans didn’t care to vote, or really get in there and push with enthusiasm their preference in voting.
The thought came to me how many people were in the families of the projected 613,870 soldier deaths that would feel affect by those deaths? Of course deaths don’t come close to the number in a war of wounded in battle. If Iraq were a measure we had approximately 5 times more wounded men then we had deaths.
Project that on the projected 613,870 deaths and you get a number like 3,069,350 wounded. With those kind of numbers it would be very difficult not to say everyone in America is going to be affected pretty directly by the war.
The thought of all the mothers in America came to me who would have missing children killed in WWIII.
Voting is such an easy thing to do. If you equated casting a vote meant that you wouldn’t have to choose which one of your children would die, how many people would vote then?
If you understood that defending the Constitution with your vote meant that your children wouldn’t have to die defending it, would you cast your vote for someone TAKING A STAND for the Constitution?
How many politicians in Washington DC have you voted for, that haven’t given a rats ass about Obama not being a ‘natural born citizen’ qualified by the demands of our Constitution?
When I do contemplate the record of Citizens voting for politicians who haven’t raised their voice up, I’m left wondering about the umbrella of God that has surrounded our Nation as the Constitution and the freedoms and liberties kept protected by it, and the prospects of that being removed and what the consequences of that would look like?
America, I encourage you with all my heart to somehow raise your voice and consider this very seriously and consider it very personally as it relates to your own record with our CREATOR.
Cody's Taken A Stand for the Constitution and needs your help for his Georgia Supreme Court Case. He's asking that you send him the 'hope and change' Obama gave you represented by the "Change" in your pocket America. Cody says, 'Help Me Help You" in this funny but true plea for 'change'.
1) Cody Rrt Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama has been docketed in the Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584
2) Within the Application for Review is Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse which concluded there is probable cause that Obama’s long form birth certificate released by Obama is a forged document as well as Obama’s selective service draft registration.
3) With the three questions asked in the Supreme Court Application the Justices will have a candidate with standing, asking about the precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court on ‘natural born citizen’ and the ground work that a denial basically sets starts precedent for a release of anyone who has committed fraud or forgery. The questions asked a Supreme Court are not to be taken lightly. They involve deep rooted issues that often affect each and every person and touch families in the living room.
Our United States Constitution is a document that is considered whole. In other words, deconstruction of any one part of it is a violation of precedent and the rules of construction. In laymen’s terms you can’t start withdrawing bricks from any wall and expect not to have sirens go off.
De-construction of the Constitution is exactly what Obama subscribes to though and has done so since swearing by oath that he was a “natural born citizen” qualified for the office of the President.
While Court clerks and Secretaries of States’ are the gate keepers, they don’t profess to be able to stand up to someone out right lying to them under oath. That is essentially how Obama has managed his way into the White House since his late summer win over Hillary Clinton in 2008 and subsequent win over Republican Sen. John McCain. Drawn into the summer, gave Obama a big strategic advantage. Why sue a candidate if he’s not going to be the nominee? Who knows if a challenge should be mounted? I’m sure you get the point. By the time Obama was declared the Democratic Nominee his snowball chance was rolling with loads of cash to protect him from Ballot Challenges in every state, and any Presidential Candidate chances of getting to a Supreme Court that had not already received Obama favors, ie Sen. John McCain’s Sen. Res. 511 declaring the Panama son an American ‘natural born citizen’, co-chaired by Obama, was left to write-in candidates or third party candidates.
In 2011 the 9th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that Presidential candidates have standing, but those challenging in 2008 didn’t seem to be running in 2012, so couldn’t claim continued damages. Retrospective damage was dismissed by the Court in the ruling of Barnett v. Obama.
2012 dawns a new light. While the Birther movement has continually been scalded by the media and stung as fringe, the true sting is an assault upon the qualification of the President to hold office demanded by the Constitution which is as was said not a document that invites further construction without a 2/3rd majority of Congress. The 8-12 challenges to the clause even from the onslaught of Obama’s political career in Illinois outlining the qualifications of the Office of the President in the legislature have all been soundly defeated. Why main stream media doesn’t champion those defeats in the legislature and accredit the Birther movement to the sound principle championed by the Legislative Branch to Main Street is pretty good writing on the wall that spots a corporate agenda.
Today, June 7th,2012 Cody Robert Judy ( a presidential candidate in the Democratic Party) v. Barack Hussein Obama has been docketed in the Georgia Supreme Court in a application for review. What makes this case so unique is it is brought by a Candidate for President that started at the lowest level – A Ballot Challenge, for the court that means it has roots, and now that is in the highest court of the State of Georgia that ultimately is charged to protect the United States Constitution, things could be different. You can’t find an Obama eligibility challenge anywhere in 2012 that has a Candidate for President in the same party, coming to the highest Court of the State, with time for their decision to make a difference before the Democrat National Convention in September. Supreme Courts have a reputation of making sure if they do rule on a case that their decision is not moot.
If the prospective of the Occupant of the White House being a total fraud offering forged documents as accrediting his qualification isn’t enough to unhinge your gate and you think Cody’s just spouting his mouth, wait just a minute there’s more. You probably have heard of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse that consisted of 2200 hours of law enforcement investigation on Obama’s long form birth certificate? Cody Robert Judy was the first qualified Candidate for the Office of the President to grab hold of that law enforcement investigation with the integrity of upholding the law and on March 2nd,2012 placed that whole investigation into the Superior Court of Georgia’s consideration which now the Supreme Court has as a staggering dismissal on their plate.
A good read of the questions presented to the Supreme Court shows the corner Obama has placed upon Justice in the United States. If the Court hears the case and agrees with precedent, Obama could be placed as a ‘disability’ to the Constitution and Congress could be placed on Notice to act on his removal as a ‘disability’. If the Supreme Court doesn’t act, legal construction exist to free anyone in the Georgia penal system or for that matter the United States, to be set free sentenced by the law on crimes of fraud or forgery, because what’s good for Obama ought to be good for any prisoner convicted or sentenced by the law, if allowed, Obama skirts. That quandary exists in Cody Robert Judy’s 3rd question to the Justices in Georgia.
Obama’s probability to have it both ways is the sort of non-transparency that has existed from Obama’s first executive order sealing all his documents. Only problem with those executive orders is they are no good unless they are signed by an eligible President under the Constitution.
Stay tuned for more action and please help Cody and his courageous campaign by logging on to www.codyjudy.us and making a contribution.
Commemorating Memorial Day in honoring our Military personnel, those who have died, been injured, and those who are fighting for the United States Constitution I am excited to release this new song and video, 'The Lion's Share". In creating this song, and feeling myself to be kind of an instrument from which this music and creation came, I was moved to depict two things:
An honor for military's service and and honor for America's good deeds. So many times the chain reaction of good deeds is unnoticed and I wanted to depict that chain reaction which is amplified clear up to the Constitution of the United States and the honor we as Americans have living under it as The Supreme Law of the Land.
This song is not fiction but a story that is true much of it happening in one day. The song is a celebration of gratitude. Happy Memorial Day - Enjoy! The LION'S SHARE
Commemorating Memorial Day in honoring our Military personnel, those who have died, been injured, and those who are fighting for the United States Constitution I am excited to release this new song and video, 'The Lion's Share". In creating this song, and feeling myself to be kind of an instrument from which this music and creation came, I was moved to depict two things:
An honor for military's service and and honor for America's good deeds. So many times the chain reaction of good deeds is unnoticed and I wanted to depict that chain reaction which is amplified clear up to the Constitution of the United States and the honor we as Americans have living under it as The Supreme Law of the Land.
This song is not fiction but a story that is true much of it happening in one day. The song is a celebration of gratitude. Happy Memorial Day - Enjoy! The LION'S SHARE
CODY ROBERT JUDY 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2, Ogden UT. 84401 801-497-6655 www.codyjudy.us
- - - -
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Mr. WILLIAM D. SUTER -Office of the Clerk 1 First Street N.E. Washington DC 20543-0001
RE: Your May 17th, 2012 letter in re: Judy v. Obama
Dear Mr. Suter: May 20,2012
Thank you for your letter and attention May 17th, 2012 in which you stated : “ Dear Mr. Judy: The enclosed papers were received again on May 17th, 2012 , and are herewith returned for the reasons stated in my letter dated April 10th,2012. Until and unless you receive a decision from a United States Court of Appeals or highest state court within which a decision could be had this Court does not have jurisdiction of your case. Sincerely, William K. Suter, Clerk by: Gail Johnson (202) 479-3038.
Sir, I understand what you’re alluding to, however your statement is just not true and please, follow me as I explain because I do feel, while it is unusual, that the Court has Original Jurisdiction in my case. Now keep reading.. don’t stop there. Please Sir, Let me explain this as I understand it.
While it is true that the Court may only review "final judgments rendered by the highest court of a state in which a decision could be had" if those judgments involve a question of federal statutory or constitutional law, the Constitution specifies that the Supreme Court may exercise original jurisdictionin cases affecting ambassadors and other diplomats, and in cases in which a state is a party, as well as when a Act of Congress is called into question: See #1 in Jurisdiction Statement. i.e. the Court is hearing the The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)- Action by Congress considered in Joint Session is an Action of Congress the Court has jurisdiction to hear in a Direct or Original Appeal as underlined in my Writ.
I do understand that in most all cases, the Court has only appellate jurisdiction and that it considers cases based on its original jurisdiction very rarely; while almost all cases are brought to the Supreme Court on appeal and in practice the only original jurisdiction cases heard by the Court are disputes between two or more states, or when an Act of Congress is called into question- my case involves both- two states with two Secretaries of States official capacity in a Federal Election question in which I as a party INDEED CAN RECEIVE RELIEF FROM INJURY with a favorable decision in future primaries of western States, and also in the Democratic Party National Convention where I am free to court delegates who are un- bound in the Primaries of New Hampshire and Georgia by a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that Barack Obama is not eligible under the U.S. Constitution Art. II, Sect.1, clause 5 referring to us only a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ is eligible for the Office of the President. Arizona’s Secretary State is now in contention of not placing Obama’s name on the Ballot because he’s not eligible. How is this not an Original Jurisdiction moment in our history Sir?
The power of the Supreme Court to consider appeals from state courts, rather than just federal courts, was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789 and upheld early in the Court's history, by its rulings in Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) and Cohens v. Virginia (1821). The Supreme Court is the only federal court that has jurisdiction over direct appeals from state court decisions, although there are several devices that permit so-called "collateral review" of state cases, in my jurisdiction statement I include the act of Congress that also invites original jurisdiction as Joint Session of Congress Action failed to ask for dissention or hear those hands raised in the electorate count of Jan. 8th, 2008.
Since Article Three of the United States Constitution stipulates that federal courts may only entertain "cases" or "controversies", the Supreme Court avoids deciding cases that are moot and does not render advisory opinions, as the supreme courts of some states may do. For example, in DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S.312 (1974), the Court dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a law school affirmative action policy because the plaintiff student had graduated since he began the lawsuit, and a decision from the Court on his claim would not be able to redress any injury he had suffered, however, the mootness exception is not absolute.
If an issue is "capable of repetition yet evading review", the Court will address it even though the party before the Court would not himself be made whole by a favorable result. In Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S.113 (1973), and other abortion cases, the Court addresses the merits of claims pressed by pregnant women seeking abortions even if they are no longer pregnant because it takes longer than the typical human gestation period to appeal a case through the lower courts to the Supreme Court, and it is the same with the contention of one Presidential Candidate against another in the eligibility of a candidate in regards to this very case.
You Sir, are prohibiting the U.S. Supreme Court from acting on a case while the Court still can without desecrating the ‘political doctrine question’ in the 2012 election. As a candidate I have provided the case precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court and the violations of that precedent the NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT, and Georgia lower Courts that with all due diligent conscience could be heard by the 1st Circuit, the 11th Circuit, or the Chief Justice himself in Original Jurisdiction. Original Jurisdiction seems the logical action in my case so I didn’t place “for the 1st Circuit” or “for the 11th Circuit” in the caption of the case.
Regarding your insinuation that action is denied based on a case in which “a decision could be had’, while the Primary is over and a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court cannot undo the results of New Hampshire’s Supreme Court decision, remedy is available by the delegates in the electorate who CAN be unbound with the exclusion of an unqualified candidate especially before the Sep. 2012 Democratic Party National Convention. I remind you Sir, that candidate Obama is NOT elected President 2013, and I am not contending against him as President as your letter blatantly and prejudicially states in the following statement from your letter “RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States.”
Do you see any such mention of my listing him as President of the United States in my action against him? Why have you inserted that if it is not perilously discriminatory to my action? That to me Sir is a blatant representation that you have taken sides actually prohibited by your position and I do note that insertion as insult to my action- Constitutional Authorization of eligibility trumps Declaration by your office.
Yes Sir, this is an unusual case, it’s not normal as far as your regular Appeals from State courts or for that matter U.S. Courts,.. but let me ask you a question Sir:
Where in the law does it state that the U.S. Supreme Court shall be bound, or have their hands tied up as hostages, by the Court Clerk from hearing a case by a Presidential Candidate by reason of avoiding, extending, and stalling until the National Democratic Convention is over regarding the eligibility of a candidate directly in opposition to the Constitution?
That’s the law I need you to please point out for me or I need you to file my case and get me a case number Sir.
If a women by law has a right of choice in an abortion, and she does right now, then I as a Candidate also have a right to be heard before the Democratic Party- a major party in the United States, in which I am running, chooses an ineligible and constitutionally unqualified candidate by those who protect precedent- The United States Supreme Court.
Thank you for your attention to my original jurisdiction argument. Its just amazing to me that I’m having this argument with you in the first place but the American people will see eventually how transparent this has been if you send me my Writ back without a case number and the embarrassment of this argument will undoubtedly last longer than Obama will in any illegal capacity.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 Eligibility Campaign
cc: Scribd link – Media of U.S., all Social Media of United States Citizens
