ANTI TEA Party and anti Climate Change dissenter Newspapers? I heard The Dark Secret Place on KFI Los Angeles (FaceBook page) talking about the LA Times will not publish letters to the opinion page dissenting on human caused Climate Change. I believe that the Long Beach Press Telegram is Anti TEA Party. My message to Suits: "RE: Bill Ives 10/22/2013 Obama is pointing fingers – but this time he is right and Paul V. Bouche 10/23/2013 Misleading headline sends the wrong message
These writers could, if the letters section wanted to offer a forum, have a go at sharin g their rationale behind some things which bother this TEA Partier. I believe that Mr. Bouche gives too much credit to his “lazy thinkers” because there is an obvious lack of gathering and vetting information, and analyzing it. The TEA Party has been maligned and provoked but not reacted with the hoped for response projected upon it by the Left which has the 60s radicals revolutionaries deeply entrenched in it.
I need some clarification because this TEA Partier sees those who support the Progressive Agenda as wanting their team leaders to be a ruling class without checks and balances. That indicates to me that they believe that Madison was wrong when he wrote in the Federalist Papers that men are not angels and we need checks and balances or that laws should not be so long that no one reads or understands them. It does not sound like out of date thinking to me. I see in the Democrat voter of today as a confirmation of the validity of the information in KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov’s 1985 interview.
The Republicans offered several bills which were refused by the Senate. One of those bills required Congress to be covered with Obama Care rather than be exempt from the law which they created. I am a TEA Partier at heart because I believe that a government with too much power is dangerous to personal liberty and a country which does not allow people to enjoy the fruits of their risk and their allocation of time and energy is doomed to join the Collectives throughout history. We see the Executive Branch modifying laws and choosing to enforce or not enforce laws, suing states which pass a law in order to do what the federal government obligated to do, but refuses to do and legally allying with a foreign country against a state in what, pre Obama administration, were the “United” States of America. Governance by fiat is far from our Constitutional Republic’s intended system.I would like to know from these writers:
1. What makes you comfortable supporting a Central Planner who is not accountable and changes the law after it is declared Constitutional because it "is a tax" (jammed through as a budget item using reconciliation because it had to be a budget item, not a tax to pass it using that strategy), but chosen companies and unions and Congress get an exemption from something which was promoted as a “right” and our enjoyment of that right is going to require 16,000 IRS enforcers? Sounds like 1984 Double Speak to me and makes me think that the TEA Party perception is accurate.
2. How do you reconcile the Left’s voter ID opposition because it disenfranchises people with the challenge those same people face with signing up for Obama Care which challenges high powered people? If they are one of the main groups used to justify this federal takeover of American health care, shouldn’t it be easier than obtaining a voter ID? There appears to me to be propaganda campaign to keep the lazy NON thinker in line.
3. How do you explain the huge increase in welfare and poverty during the Obama administration in spite of huge capital sitting ready if the risk-reward analysis warrants an investment? The suppression of full time employment is partially due to Obama Care which is detrimental to companies with over 50 employees. FDR’s treasury secretary testified that they had failed to make good on their promises and had a huge debt to boot. Our fellow Americans who want to work are being held back by the Central Planners hand around the throat of small business. There is a happy Big Business – DC alliance that is doing fine, but the little people are going wanting and the NOT lazy thinker sees that part time employees, people who gave up looking and people getting out of the work force early skews the numbers giving US a better than what is real picture with the numbers that are reported. FDR had to hand off to private enterprise and let the American private enterprise system show the capability of American free enterprise. Crony Capitalism which we have is a Collective suppressing US and the numbers confirm it.
This TEA Partier thinks that we had better get the American working class back active before we lose what we had when FDR made the wise decision to win the war by backing off the intellectuals maintaining restrictive controls and prolonging a bad economy. Thomas Sowell has written several essays about the detrimental effect of unaccountable intellectuals and society and the Professors Lounge mentality compared to the "nothing but an actor" Reagan mentality results brings to mind, “There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.” -- George Orwell