hearing (2)

In today’s hearing, the Democrats' shameless effort to deliberately and wholly distract attention from Hillary’s felonious behavior with respect to emailgate and AG Lynch’s consistently stonewalling relevant emailgate queries were on full display. It was sickening..

The primary purpose of the Republican committee members’ questions to the AG was to determine whether or not there is a difference between “extreme carelessness” and “gross negligence”, and whether or not “intent” is necessary to prove that US Code Section 793 was violated.  Asked again and again what the legal distinction was, AG Lynch routinely deferred to Comey and her “team “ of career Justice Department attorneys. After all, she’s only the Attorney General. Why would she be expected to answer such a legal question?

Committee Democrats' deflecting attention from Hillary’s “extreme carelessness” by pretentiously asserting their caring about “more important” issues like the death of black victims in Louisiana and Minnesota as well as the assassination of five Dallas police officers was their painfully self-serving way of dodging the burning issue of Hillary's lawlessness and electability--the Rule of Law obviously of considerably less concern to them.

Once again, the ideological lines have been drawn, and there is zero interest on the part of the Democrats to uphold their oath of office and to honestly, objectively address Hillary’s lawlessness. 

Who suffers by this charade and gross irresponsibility: nothing less than the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the United States.  And without either, there can be no equal justice under the law, no Liberty, no republic, and, most certainly, no chance for restoring public trust in government.  

In short, we, once citizens of America but now subjects of Leviathan, have again been duped, dismissed and utterly ignored.  

Get this through your heads: this is no longer a constitutional republic; this is now very clearly a country where the rule of Man, not of Law, is preeminent.

Welcome to the Banana Republic of America—clearly NOT the country for which  I and my veteran friends fought and died, and certainly not the country for which those thousands of patriots who preceded us were maimed and died in her defense.

We must now look to our Founders for solace, yes, but also for their wise counsel and remedies. Those Founder-sanctioned and inherently rightful remedies are Civil Disobedience to express our unwillingness to submit to intolerable acts of government, State Nullification of unconstitutional federal acts in order to restore the State-Federal balance of power, Secession to defend constitutional order on at least the State level, or Rebellion in the face of tyranny. 

The choice before us couldn't be more stark: to restore our constitutional republic--while we are still able to do so--or to accept submission to Leviathan.

What will YOU choose?

"If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify." Alexander Hamilton

Read more…


As seen on:
Kansas Tornado Peals Birthers Who Double Down in SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276 - SOS Kobach says "Its a Federal Issue"
The Kansas Board met today basically in a formality of allowing the withdraw of the complaint filed by the Kansas man Joe Montgomery and essentially doubled down on the fact that this issue must be decided by a Federal Court. In a statement Cody Robert Judy said "This basically was expected and it doubles-down on my case coming to conference in the United States Supreme Court September 24th, where we knew we needed the Constitution upheld."
"Any decision made in Kansas contrary to the general election's forecast of Obama as the Democratic Party nominee would have been met with appeal that ended up in the United States Supreme Court. The letter I sent to Secretary of State Kobach yesterday essentially informed him of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and it was clear that in reference to the 'federal court handling this', he understood that's where it needed to be decided."
In a report from the Huffington Post Kansas State University employee Joseph Montgomery withdrew his appeal under duress from unidentified threats made to him and his family.
It was reported in the Huff - "paperwork submitted by Obama's campaign attesting to the president's citizenship" was accepted however unreported and also very clear was that the paper work Obama's campaign submitted was "unidentified", and another thing that was clear was that Obama's Citizenship was not under scrutiny as much as the 'natural born citizenship' needed as a qualification to run for the Office of President.
Orly Taitz also present at the hearing, in a futile attempt to assume Montgomery's complaint, argued it could not be withdrawn under duress, however that is not generally applied in a civil case so much as it is in a criminal case that is also prosecuted by an elected authority such as a city,county or state attorney general.
While Obama's rambling identification is off the truth charts when it comes to declaring himself 'not' a natural born citizen by the true virtue of his father never having been a U.S. Citizen, as well as being infiltrated with the foibles and folly of the long form fabrication. Its as palatable that Obama was not born in Hawaii as the records of foreign flights into Hawaii just happen to be missing the week of his birth.
Asserting Obama's long form birth certificate is a concoction, the art work never revealed by Hawaii Officials, we cannot prosecute that action criminally but are forced into the Civil seat of prosecution monetarily asserting damages as Mr. Judy has asserted in his complaint to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 as a Presidential candidate in the Democratic Party objecting to Obama's nomination.
To understand this a little more clearly in reverse the nationally broadcast trial in the O.J. Simpson case failed prosecution in the criminal court, but was awarded in the civil prosecution.
Mr. Judy's case sites the nomination won by Obama in the race for the Democratic Party Nomination Mr. Judy was also a candidate for, was only won by conceding the rules of eligibility and qualification demands of the United States Constitution.
This has been cause of action Mr. Judy has cited that Obama was not playing by the same rules in the nomination process of the Democratic Party, and never has in the '08 election as well as the '12 election, citing in direct implication the 2 different wordings Rep Nancy Pelosi used in the 2 separate application certification papers to the States, in order to get Obama on the ballots, according to what the State demanded.
In the last four years Obama has released fabrications as official identification to quell the public's protest of this demand, at least acknowledging that the demands were legitimate and that he had better quell the demand come hook or, as has been the case, come crook.
The mainstream media has fed into the crook part and the 4 years Obama has lived in the White House has turned into a bleeding call to allow the thief-in-chief to get away with the fraud perpetrated upon the Citizenry in campaign contributions that were nothing more then criminal cabal funding as well as the disenfranchisement of every vote placed for Obama.
If it isn't clear to every American now that Obama's deeds don't match his need's in the escalation of crashing America's economy by favoring foreign economies in oil production, stripping America of any superiority in the production fields of nuclear arms, abandoning America's ally Israel, and interjecting a particular religion upon the middle east with favoritism and 1.5 Billion dollars while at the same time fueling domestic occupy movements and no doubt instigating by silence and withdraw the abandonment of embassies under attack, than I don't think arithmetic is your best science. This is what foreign influence in the White House is all about.
If you can occupy the White House as a favor to foreign identity you can level the playing field. If the playing field is leveled guess what comes? War and a big one. For the Democrats to assert they are not the war-dogs in practically inviting the defeat economically in the first four years of Obama, and the planned defeat militarily the second four years, then you had better take another look and you probably won't need to look in a foreign land this time around, but your back yard will be the scene of the bloody battlefield.
Such is the case when the Constitution is abandoned and flat out replaced. Such is the importance not like any other case of Judy v. Obama 12-5276. This is the last stand for the Constitution's demands for a 'natural born citizen' not to be replaced by the 14th Amendment's definition of "Citizen" and the construction argument of the Constitution not to be placed in the open-for-business field of chaos.
Please consider making a contribution to the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign which has rightly predicted and with persistence insisted that Obama was the greatest national security risk America has ever faced. We can't afford to let Obama win in any poll or the general election and not only is Mitt Romney's trailing but more importantly he's not Taking A Stand.
Contribute here:
Here is the Plea from Cody directly for your consideration:
Please make a contribution today and Take A Stand with Cody Robert Judy, as America has a process to amend the Constitution and Obama has just skirted America. Please pass this on to 25 of your friends.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593
Read more…