freedom (110)

Patriotism: a High-Demand Commitment

Part II: Guaranteeing Our Freedoms

Audacity of Presidential Power-Grabbing

Abhorent to Nation’s Founders

In the first installment of this series on constitutional-conservativism
(,_mainstream_media_label_tea_party_insurgents.thtml) we looked at freedom, per se. Rajjpuut continues with a close look at personal and state freedoms as discussed in the all-important 10th Amendment, sometimes known as the “Federalism Amendment.”

Barack Obama is the national nightmare that some supporters of the Articles of Confederation and other anti-constitutionalists back at the nation’s founding strenuously condemned. Seemingly ignoring all seventeen of the allotted powers (enforcing our borders; standing up to our nation’s traditional enemies; obeying the uniform laws of bankrupties; and keeping treaties with our friends are all powers which Barack Obama has not chosen to exercise according to the folks in Arizona; South Korea; certified creditors of GM in Indiana; and allies in Poland to name just a few instances), Obama has made himself a picnic in abusing the constitution by advancing powers NOT granted by the Constitution. Many thought that Franklin Delano Roosevelt grossly overstepped the bounds of federalism with the 40 new agencies his administrations created. Barack Obama created almost 390 new agencies just in one law: Obamacare.

The powers of the federal government are listed in Article I, Section 8. They are available for anyone to read and simple to understand. More importantly, these powers

A. follow a simple, predictable pattern and

B. Much discussion was also made of which powers the federal government definitely did not have and should not have.

In its obvious general outline of powers for the federal government which amount to the 17 specific powers allowed, the Constitution provides for a government which protects the nation’s borders and defends against foreign invasion by maintaining an efficient army and navy; deals with custom and tariff matters; conducts foreign relations including war and treaties; settles disputes among the states and facilitates trade and intercourse among the American people and states and with the peoples and states within sovereign foreign nations.

Before looking at the powers the founding fathers refused to grant to the federal government, it’s crucial to understand that in a federal system such as ours the efforts over the entire two hundred plus years of the nation’s existence to turn the states into “departments or extensions” within the federal government . . . that is, into mere “administrative units” of the national govermnet is the greatest single threat to our nation’s survival as the founders foresaw and planned for it. Recent “States Rights” discussions (that is, up until the contemporary furor in Arizona over that state’s immigration laws and the 21 State “rebellion” against Obamacare directiives for the states that would literally bankrupt every state both calling for a new appreciation of the 10th Amendment to the Constitution) arguments were as insipid as the notion that people wishing upon stars might somehow influence the cosmos to somehow influence our fates. Lyndon Johnson’s expansion of the “Welfare State” is the prime example of this insidious trend both in Welfare itself and in Medicaid especially . . . the states were turned into administrative arms of the federal government’s policies. Nixon’s policies of “federalistically” turning over large grants of federal monies to the states has undoubted great practical value, but only confuses the issue . . . why is that money in the federal hands in the first place?

Federalism, and specifically the 10th Amendment, is the single greatest system ever devised for the protection of individual and state liberties and for providing counter-balance to over-reaching by the federal entities. Powerful centralized government is the threat to our listed freedoms and to freedom of action. That is, because we don’t have LISTED LIBERTIES for the individual or the states . . . but they are free to do whatever is not listed as criminal . . . we have true liberty. Confusion about the limits of federal government must be cleared up and must be always aligned with the intents of the founding fathers if this blessed state of liberty is to prevail. All powers NOT listed in the Constitution are specifically reserved for the states and individual citizens.

And just how far has the nation strayed from this wise path? Virtually no one today understands the breadth of discussion, consideration and debate that ensued once it was popularly agreed that the Articles of Confederation were too weak. During the argument going on over possible adoption of the Constitution, the Constitution’s advocates also enumerated powers the federal government absolutely would not have. The Bill of Rights was, one answer to critics. The most Republican document in the world still stands us in good stead 223 years after its creation. But the biggest protection, the thing that satisfied virtually all the Constitution’s detractors was the addition to the Bill of Rights of the last of the original Amendments: the 10th Amendment. The federal government would NOT be granted the potential for unlimited power but severely limited in power and abuse potential and all powers NOT specifically enumerated for the federal government would be reserved to the individual states and to individual citizens.

In addition, moreover, the Constitution’s proponents publicly told the people some of the important subjects which fell within the states’ exclusive jurisdiction - and outside the federal government’s control in a variety of speeches, newspaper articles, letters, and pamphlets. Chief among these proponents were, of course Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. Other names of note include:

James Wilson (convention delegate and chief proponent in Pennsylvania), Edmund Pendleton (chancellor of Virginia and chairman of his state’s ratifying convention), James Iredell (North Carolina judge, pro-Constitution floor leader at his state’s ratifying convention and later U.S. Supreme Court Justice), Maryland Congressman Alexander Contee Hanson, Nathaniel Peaslee Sargeant (a Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court), Alexander White (Virginia lawyer, ratifier, and later U.S. Senator), prominent businessman Tench Coxel and John Marshall (ratifier and later U.S. Chief Justice).

Here are some of the powers they solemnly promised would be outside the federal sphere:

  • governance of religion
  • training the militia and appointing militia officers
  • control over local government
  • most crimes
  • state justice systems
  • family affairs
  • real property titles and conveyances
  • wills and inheritance
  • the promotion of useful arts in ways other than granting patents and copyrights
  • control of personal property outside of commerce
  • governance of the law of torts and contracts, except in suits between citizens of different states
  • education
  • services for the poor and unfortunate
  • licensing of taverns
  • roads other than post roads
  • ferries and bridges
  • regulation of fisheries, farms, and other business enterprises.

The vast majority of these areas have been encroached upon by the federal government already. For example, the national endowment for the arts and other such organization is not a federal matter; involvement in the welfare state is forbidden; as is educational involvement; interstate highways; income taxes; inheritance taxes; family affairs; the national guard as we know it; control of personal property; and a hundred other areas where the federal government has crossed the line drawn by the 10th Amendment.

Right now our National Debt is approaching $14 TRillion; more shockingly our national obligation for Government Spending Boondoggles and Government Interference Boondoggles (GSBs and GIBs such as Social Security, Medicare and the federal side of Medicaid) has reached $109 TRillion . . . all this problem debt was created in areas where the Constitution forbid the federal government to tread. The lifeblood of the nation has been poisoned by this wanton and total ignorance and denial of the 10th Amendment. Most Americans not only don’t understand the provisions of the 10th Amendment, but because of the welfare state and the gross entitlement sentiment many citizens would also feel threatened by the loss of federal government involvement. The problems are exacerbated when its realized that these programs were all created as set asides and that congress never obeyed its own laws and set the money aside for these programs. Here, then lies the root cause of our present fiscal unaccountability and the potential for danger from the Obama administration’s headlong power grab . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,


Read more…


America The Beautiful
Bad Bad America - Hated by the world
Down goes Haiti, and what great flag unfurls?
Can it be that same great Satan - With food and ships and planes?
Can it be the flag of freedom - Bringing medicine and grains?
...and where are the haters - With all their pomp and gore?
Where are all the pundits - Who say She'll be no more?
Where is the world - That says She's always wrong?
America the Beautiful - To Heaven She belongs
Come fly the flag of freedom! - Come sing us Liberty's song
America the Beautiful - So proud so brave so strong.

Lord knows She is surrounded - With troubles of her own
Lord knows this time she has to, - Face them all alone
But still she reaches out, - To save and give relief
America the Beautiful, - In mercy still believes.

The world will show it's darkness - And throw it's ugly stones
But Her blazing light of freedom – Will surely guide Her home.
Just one question I will leave, For long as man has eyes to see
Oh say does that Star Spangled Banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free - and the home of the brave?
by Neil Brian Goldberg
Read more…

Barack Obama Sets Another Record for Incompetence

with Elena Kagan Nomination to Supreme Court

With the Sotomayor nomination and now the Elena Kagan nomination to be a United States Supreme Court Justice, Barack Obama is setting a record. Yes, yes he is attempting for the first time to place three women on the nation’s highest court. Yes, yes, for the first time it will be possible that the U.S. Supreme Court will not have a Protestant justice (Kagan is Jewish) . . . but more importantly, for the first time it will be possible that the U.S. Supreme Court would feature two justices who have seen their interpretations of American law overturned by a 9-0 or 8-0 contrary vote (against a Sotomayor judicial decision; and a Kagan advocacy position). The obvious assumption? Kagan, like Sotomayor, is a “living constitutionalist” that is she believes in creating law or attempting to create it from the bench or the advocate's chair or even the Dean's chair rather than making sincere efforts to respect the United States Constitution.

The shocking matter is that both cases featured the two ladies advocating great expansion of government powers against individual liberties. Sotomayor was clearly unqualified for the Supreme Court seat because in her two cause celebre`s one favored affirmative action that took away earned (by test scores) promotion from twenty-some firefighters of mixed races but NO Blacks in favor of affirmative action promotion of Black candidates who failed the test; and in another she sided with the state’s power to force an individual to sell his land over his objection so that a corporation could build a potentially lucrative shopping center. Like Sotomayor, Kagan, also, stands right in the crosshairs of legal philosophy. You’ll recall that Barack Obama insulted the Supreme Court attendees at his state of the union speech by cutting them down for their alignment 8-0 on corporate free speech and campaign donations. Kagan was the lawyer, technically the “solicitor general,” arguing the case for Obama when he tried to shutdown corporate free speech.

Kagan’s most clearly controvrsial actions as Dean of Harvard’s Law School were banning the presence of military recruiters on the campus and her defense of the action by referring to her distaste for “don’t ask don’t tell” standards for soldiers and other military citizens. Conservatives across the board favor denying federal funds to schools that oppose military presence (ROTC programs, recruiters’ visits and guest speakers for the most part) and this alone makes her highly suspect. Voicing her opposition to the policy is totally, OK. Rajjpuut disagrees mightily with her opinion, but free speech is guaranteed. Banning the recruiters is totally out of line . . . she was taken to court on the matter and when it reached the Supreme Court, surprise, surprise, her lower court wins were overturned and the school was denied government funding.

Kagan has been very guarded and even ingenuous about her views. Feigning a belief in constitutional limits regarding one matter in her only semi-open interview, she was pushed later in the interview for clarification and she would only say, she was referring to present status of the law, not necessarily her own views. The Obama administration has not allowed her since then to talk to the press. They engineered a phony-interview with an Obama administration sending her softball question and released that videotaping to the various press outlets apparently fearing another gaffe. So the opponent of free-speech is protected by denying the country a free-speech interchange with the news media??

She’s lived a circumscribed life in Academe and government, never had a real job and has always been aligned with the progressive-left leadership. Every action and word indicates that she’s like all those who in their ivory-towered stupidity believe we must “progress” well beyond the U.S. Constitution . . . ready, perhaps eager, to progress us over every available cliff in search of political correctness and expansion of government. Elena Kagan will definitely NOT exhibit a “principled view of the U.S. Constitution. Nor of common sense . . . she kicks the United States military off her campus and want federal funding for her unilateral UN-American show of political correctness??? Horse Pucky! Peter Beinart, no conservative he, puts it this way:

“On the day he or she is unveiled, conservatives will announce that they are approaching the selection with an open mind. Ten minutes later they will declare, more in sadness than anger, that the nominee has the judicial philosophy of Chairman Mao and the temperament of Dennis Rodman. Ten minutes after that, liberals will rise en masse to defend the nominee as wise, brilliant and humane, a person who restores our faith in humankind. And the kabuki theater will continue like that all summer long.

“I can’t blame my fellow liberals for playing along; if the other side fires, we have to fire back. But there’s one exception. If Solicitor General Elana Kagan gets the nod, conservatives will beat the hell out of her for opposing military recruitment on campus when she was dean of Harvard Law School. And liberals should concede the point; the conservatives will be right.”

Beinart has just committed the ultimate sin of political incorrectness in supporting a conservative argument and been proved right beyond the shadow of a doubt by the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of Kagan's ugly argument 8-0, If only the United States Senate had Beinart's guts and integrity . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,


Read more…

The Liberal distortion of equality.

I have been doing some real thinking on how this nation and it's political parties see liberty. After hearing certain people on this site declaring they believe in it's core values and what the TeaParty is all about, I have come to the conclusion they only seek to discredit our cause. The left is so terrified of us that they have sunk to the level of divisions in society. They know all to well what it means to label a group our a person racist. They have no respect for free speech or the people who truly fight for it. Like when Janeane Garofalo called the TeaPartiers " Racist redkneck tea baggers". How are those words not racist? She doesn't know every TeaPartier personally, she can show no proof of racist bigoted behaviour, she has never actually spent any time talking with anyone in the TeaParty nor has she giving any credible reason for calling them "racist redkneck tea baggers", other then the sole fact they are mostly white. So who is the real racist?

So where is the racism coming from? good question. Let's look at some names being tossed around and there source. "Oreo" was used to label black teapartiers who are trying to keep their freedoms. Why are they being called "oreo's"? because the left is trying to call them traitors for not supporting a black president's agenda. Meaning they are black on the outside but white on the inside. Wow, and we are the racist? Now how about redkneck? that term is used to label dumb uneducated white's who because are uneducated they have to be racist. Interesting, considering the education level within the TeaParty is actually higher then the nation as a whole. Which is why they behave with respect for others and their political and racial background. And "tea baggers", this term can not be used for any other definition then a sexual act of immorality. And all this racist double standard B.S. is coming straight from the left!! Hmm..... it can't be? their for civil liberties and individual freedoms. Right?

Civility has also become a tactic of the left. They describe the TeaParty as behaving in an uncivil protest. Really? And how many buildings or businesses have the TeaParty attacked or vandalized? None. How many credible threats have come from the Teaparty Protest? None. How many civilians have been harmed in the TeaParty protest so far? None. So once again, how is this uncivil? But wait, let's see how civil the protest are coming from the left. How many buildings have the left attacked or vandalized?15. How many threats have been from the left? All. How many civilians have been harmed from the left? All. So this uncivil behaviour seems to only come from the left. With threats to shoot police officers by the left protesters in Arizona. with the threats to attack white Americans with axes and shovels by those calling the TeaParty racist, the left. With white students being unable to wear their nations flag to school because of those on the left. Or how about the black principle up north who told his white students they could not go on his field trip that allowed all blacks. Again from the left!! And where is our President who promised us civility in government? Well, he is from the left. He has done nothing while in office to unite the American people. He has only been able to call the American people uncivil, misguided extremist from the right.

Here is what is going to happen. The left will continue to label the TeaParty "Racist redkneck tea baggers" in every approach because they are unable to find an actual cause to target or discredit us. We will continue to fight for real freedoms and real liberties that the left is so terrified of. And we will still protest with dignity and civility that the left has been unable to proclaim in their speeches, arguements, ideals and laws. So continue your assualt on us because we will neither fall or surrender!! We will not give you our freedoms without a fight!! The rule of law will prevail with real equal justice and real civil liberties!! God Bless all those who oppose tyranny and fight for Liberty!! I love all of you!!

Read more…

I joined a Tea Party April 15th , I met many Patriots!

I found the The Tea Party Revolution is….

our revolution for equal liberty and fair confirmation of our laws ….

our liberation of pure unalienable rights that lead to our constitutional value….

our resolution to renew the truths of freedom in the United States of America…

our absolution in life for our children’s future....

The children, in Washington D.C., leading our country these days are in large part from a distant young generation shredded by political turmoil and fantastic worldly advances surrounding the sixties decade. This past forgotten generation, part my generation, the self acclaimed Aquarius movement, moved to inspire beautiful idealistic dreams of a future where all mankind could live in equality, equal in love without true charity, equal in peace without rule, equal in life without work.

They fingered the man, spat on our soldiers, trampled on equality --- with celebrations that delighted in burning our beloved stars --- bleeding the very stripes of our precious freedom. They became disillusioned in government --- angered at the all powerful big brother, hateful of political oppression, violent against our nation’s best morals, they immerged from some darkened pit and dawned a new age of grimacing indignation toward the American family core.

These distant immoral minorities --- now eyes entrenched in red with bygone rage, minds clouded in storms of lost psychedelic futures --- now wade deep gorging on thick governmental waste --- blindly marching forward in time devouring the futures of our children. These now immoral majorities smirk in closed governmental caucuses communing with each other to ignite intentional fires that would consume our United Statehood Constitutional fabric --- all the while waving their arms high in allegiance over blue fielded cloth they will use to cover the very coffin that will entomb our solemn brave few blessings of liberty --- our Bill of Rights.

The children who rule this day in Washington trumpet the wave of socialistic politics in the name of public care --- are the governmental well fare, the big brother, the omnipotent oppressor!

Today, in our nation’s capitol, politicians railroad imperialist laws --- ushering in this new dawning age --- this new enlarged age of taxation.

Today, in the world, our politicians give way ------ of giving away the inspired treasures of our great nation.

Today, in our homes, these leaders raise nightmares --- haunting our very endeared American dreams.

Now, Mr. VP Joe Biden, Ms. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Mr. Nobel President Obama ----- You are the socialistic justifier!

You are the man!

Read more…


When I listen to Obama lately, or even Eric Holder, it is so apparent how negative and angry they are. Listening to Holder last night, making his grand appearance at the capture of the latest Islamic terrorist (as if he had anything to do with it), my heart was saddened. How long has it been since we have heard praise, good will, blessings, and above all -- encouragement from our leaders? This administration is pathetic when it comes to leadership, foreign or domestic.


Read more…

National Association for Gun Rights:

Even if you don't have a gun, or never plan on using one, please sign petition to support 2nd amendment rights.

STOP UN SMALL GUN TREATY! If they can't take our guns through the front door, they try the back door. We must stop it.

Read more…

Verterans Mobilizing to Face Radical Islam

A loud Thank you to our military and verterans! check the website - please share.

Veteran Defenders of America

Web Site


Vets are Mobilizing to Face Radical Islam

BrigitteBrigitte Gabriel

American Veterans are getting mobilized nationwide through Veteran Defenders of America (VDA) to face the threat of the rise of radical Islamic terrorists in the homeland. ACT! for America, the nation’s largest national security organization with 80,000 members and 380 chapters nationwide, is launching Veteran Defenders of America and organizing the Veterans. The combined forces will provide organizational and strategic synergy that will optimize the effectiveness of patriotic Americans protecting their community.

CALL SANDY NOW at 516-735-5468 or e-mail Sandy to schedule interviews with Brigitte Gabriel and Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (


New attached imageMG Paul E. Vallely

Brigitte Gabriel, President of ACT! for America, and Major General Paul Vallely (U.S. Army, ret.), head of Stand Up America have teamed up together to speak to the media about this venture.

“There are 18 million veterans in the United States all highly trained in many areas,” says Brigitte Gabriel. “This training came at a high cost to the taxpayers and we have heard loud and clear from veterans that they still want to put this training to good use in the volunteer service to their country.”

With the arrest of over 50 home grown Islamic terrorists in the last 12 months plotting to kill Americans and commit terrorist attacks on American soil, it has become clear that concerned Americans must be the eyes and ears in their community, working with first responders to protect their community.

Veterans have training, skills and experience that uniquely enable them to respond to our government’s message that encourages family and community preparedness, citizen awareness and service to our families and our communities. From detecting suspicious activity prior to a crisis to helping with emergency management should a crisis occur, America’s veterans are being actively mobilized nationwide.


“I meet veterans everywhere who are concerned about threats to our security and our cherished liberties, especially the threat of radical Islam,” says Major General Paul Vallely. “As veterans, we swore an oath to defend our nation, and Veteran Defenders of America is going to give veterans a new vehicle to be the eyes and ears of freedom. I am proud to join hands with my good friend and fellow patriot, Brigitte Gabriel, in this exciting new venture!”

“Veterans are my heroes,” proclaims Ms. Gabriel. “I lost the country of my birth to radical Islam, so like our veterans, I know freedom isn’t free. I am honored to be partnering with General Vallely in this clarion call to veterans – America needs you!”

They Must Be Stopped by Brigitte Gabriel

Read more…

Is Freedom Fading?

Will The Government’s Flawed-Logic Replace Freedom? Washington is so anxious to pass the national health-care scheme they are forgetting the most precious point, the freedom of the people. An odd combination of flawed-logic and self-centered reasoning has tainted the thinking of those we placed in office, thereby creating a cataclysmic distortion of the very ideals held dear for over 330 years. As you might guess, the term, flawed-logic is an oxymoron, how can logic be flawed? Something like this: If a flaw in a logical progression of thought, is discovered, then the reasoning process is obviously tainted, and therefore is not logical, except in Washington. The ‘flawed-logic thinking’ phenomenon only occurs in the deep caverns of Washington, behind closed doors, whispered in committee meetings as a unfathomable secret truth the ‘unenlightened Citizens’ cannot grasp. Believe it or not, the tune of the flawed-logic think-tank is being whispered throughout the Halls of Congress as members of both Houses bellow their mission as if it made sense. All the while, the light of freedom continually grows dim. Capitol Hill’s flawed-logic is spun in this manner: Health-care is good, the government will provide health-care, and therefore the government is good. Consider this fact, in a single breathe the Washington blatherskites jabber their nonsense claiming their flawed-logic is a scientific fact and only the simple-minded lacking in mental acuteness would challenge the deep wisdom of the Washington gifted brainiacs! The leap from logic to lunacy makes prefect sense to the confused progressive mind-set, they snicker: “as if common man could understand the extreme logic of the Washington anointed.” The Washington lunatics proudly proclaim: This is why you need us, to lead our constituents through the deep waters of understanding! It is at this point the light of freedom begins to shine unsteadily. It turns out, the first piece of the Washington flawed and confused logic nightmare unfolds with a possible truth. Yes, good health-care is good, who can argue this point, and of course, the antithesis of this is poor health-care, and who wants that? No one, therefore, the foothold of agreement takes anchor. We all must agree that enjoying good heath-care is good. In addition, the second component departs from logic by making the assumption Washington can do anything well, especially the type and style of health-care the Washington Progressive think-tanks are cooking up. In truth, Washington holds an abysmal record of doing anything well. From exterminating the American Indians to a failed Social Security systems to being unable to balance the national budget by the very ones who can print as much money as they want! The argument of the Government fails on every point as they have a near to zero success record. At this point, the argument mutates as the progressive thinkers try to force feed the idea that their plan will be good for the nation! What poppycock! The lamebrain government Franken-Plan is irreparably flawed for it damages freedom. Simply put, the Health-care scheme will mandate Citizens to join, or, fines, jail-time and/or confiscation of assets will be levied against them! The light of freedom that is being extinguished cries for your help. Furthermore, the assumption is made that all Citizens even want some type of health-care. This begs the question, what about Citizen’s who does not choose organized health-care. Many homeopathic and naturopathic organizations’s success rates have been conveniently excluded from the Washington equation simply because tens of millions of people choose not to participate in ANY health insurance coverage. Do you blame them? Do you think the Government will make those people feel better because Big Brother can now be their proctologist? KEEP READING I am telling you the final flaw in Washington’s logic is their belief that they are good, so they will provide good health-care; therefore they are good at providing health-care. This is their flawed-logic. Here is the big question: Since when does a politician become good simply by denying the will of the people? In short, what made them so good at creating a health-care scheme, which is inferior to so many other truly proven existing plans? Furthermore, the Government has never been in the health-care business before, therefore they are the new kid on the block, the start-up! Are you willing to bet your life on the notion the government will get it right in your lifetime? If the National Health-care scheme is not stopped, you will be betting your life on it, and so the health of our beloved nation for generations to come. Therefore, they cannot justify their logic by claiming they are doing the greater good for the greatest number, because the greatest number doesn’t want it! Another flaw! Here’s the kicker, the Washington egomaniacs believe they are on a holy mission. By fulfilling their calling to be sympathetic statesmen, all the while their actions strip the American people of their freedoms, forcing them into a plan which is not only more expensive but also provides less benefits stemming from a source that has one of the worse performance records in human history. How disingenuous for the politically confused to presume they know what is best for the people all the while being blind servants, doing their masters bidding at the expense of the very people they were elected to serve. Here’s the scary part, the Washington scallywags are boasting how they are doing the ‘good thing’ by providing benefits to the great unwashed masses, all the while, dislocating their arms as they pat each other on the back at the same time while they wallow in their government mandated health-care cesspool of flawed-logic. There is only one-way to fight these inflated egos and that is to deflate their hype! The American people must stop the passing of Bill 3539, the National Health-Care Bill. A.k.a., the National Health-Scare Bill. Listen up my friend; the people do not want the Washington Franken-Bill. We The People must stop the illogical madness by taking massive action. The light of freedom needs oxygen; you are that breath of fresh air rekindling the flame of freedom. A word of caution; we no longer can wait until November of 2010, by then the National Health-care scheme will be signed, sealed and delivered. Amnesty will be installed and 20 to 30 million new confused pro-progressive voters will emerge unto the voting ranks insuring a win for the confused progressive side of the aisle. Furthermore, through a pending U.N. directive, America will lose it’s right to bear arms. If that is not bad enough, the silencing of conservative talk radio will become law, not to mention the government funding of the genocide of the unborn, i.e. government funded abortion, and a host of other diabolical legislative actions that are clandestinely waiting in the wings. Remember, these actions will become law unless We The People rise up and say, No You Can’t. Yes, the time for action is here. The Washington madness of their flawed-logic and self-dealing is destroying the very fabric of America. Make no mistake; good health cannot come from the hand of a sick government, nor should it be mandated at the expense of hard working taxpaying American Citizens. Thus, it is not ‘good people’ who trample freedom. ‘Good people’ do not take away the rights of their constituents, they look for ways to preserve and protect them. Therefore, can you call those we placed in office ‘good people’? You tell me. You see, there is only one action necessary and that is to sound the alarm and awaken the dazed, politically diseased from their liberal coma. There must be a substantial increase of action, millions of phone calls, letters, e-mails and faxes sent to Washington followed up by marches and demonstrations. Anything less and the mesmerized glossy eyed narcissistic, self-aggrandizers will continue in their never-ending glutton-fest at the expense of U.S. taxpayers. This is a truth, in less than 1 year, if the Nationalization of key industries is not stopped, America will become uninhabitable by such types as freedom loving Patriots, Wealthy Industrialists, and those who long for the late great America. Unless We The People act quickly, tomorrow may be the day after America disappears forever. Stephen Eichler J.D. is a Legal Analysis having graduated from Trinity Law School with additional studies in International law. Eichler is also a founding student of Liberty University being personally taught by Jerry Falwell. Stephen Eichler is a business owner for over 30 years and is now dedicating his time to bringing national awareness to issues that challenge the security, sovereignty and domestic tranquility of the United States. He is the President of FaxDC, Executive Director of the Minuteman Project, Inc. led by Jim Gilchrist and Executive Director of the Nom de plume: Minuteman Steve Stephen Eichler is represented by Tim Bueler and may be contacted at for Radio/TV and Print media bookings.
Read more…