case (3)

4063683733?profile=original      Will White Students be denied entrance to College Admissions Office

If you are a white student walking into a Michigan college admissions office, you have to be wondering whether you are going to be admitted based on your grades or denied because of your ethnicity. This may soon become the reality for a countless number of white college students across the wolverine state, or America if the U.S. Supreme Court rules to invalidate state voters that voted against using race to determine college admittance in 2006.

Of course racial discrimination is unfair, repugnant and dangerous to the social viability of a nation when it is used to deny the rights of its citizens. The problem which voters in Michigan thought had been corrected was to toss out race-conscious affirmative action admission plans with a fairer race-neutral approach.

At the core of the case is the notion that fifty-eight percent of Michigan voters were seriously in error in amending the Michigan constitution to prohibit discrimination in admission to state colleges on the basis of national origin, sex, race or ethnicity.

To most voters in Michigan this seemed like a relative no-brainer. How could anyone oppose not using discriminatory practices to deny a prospective student entry to college?

It seems that the liberals and race baiters who thrive on erecting barriers to race neutrality and color blind solutions wanted a different result. Instead of desiring to work to determine real solutions to any potential problems minorities might be experiencing in matriculating from high school to college admittance, they took the more convenient route to cry racism!

This approach taken by the civil rights organizations in the state and nationally have determined without much effort, to use a formula that strips sanity from the law and replaces it with fear and racist scare tactics. The goal is to scare the judicial community and moderates who are lukewarm on everything, to abandon common sense and support a fraud which has no foundation in law or on recent facts.

Where is the proof that there is continued discrimination against minorities since the voters in Michigan decided that reverse discrimination is unjustified and beneath the dignity of a state that wants equal treatment for all of its citizens? What about a state’s sovereignty under the 10th Amendment, where the state and its citizens have a right to determine its own course in order to balance justice and equality under the law?

Another key question of law which the court must grapple with is whether or not a state amendment that bars discrimination in its constitution can be found to be unconstitutional because it does not allow discriminatory practices and remedies.

Are you confused now?

You should be, because in effect, what the advocates of affirmative action are arguing is that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment should allow a state to openly and intentionally discriminate against a race or ethnic group as a means to remedy previous discriminatory practices.

( click to read more )

Read more…

The Obama Stain Revealed


Obama Stain Revealed

As seen on:
Republicans failed - Cody Robert Judy, (I am), the only Democratic Party Presidential Candidate to take Obama's Eligibility to the U.S. Supreme Court and showcase Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse result.
I have placed Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse results into the very first Judicial Court- The Superior Court of Georgia March 2nd,2012. This was appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court and now the U.S. Supreme Court.
Why? Well it wasn't because Sheriff Joe is my good friend because I've never met him. It was because Sheriff Joe decided by the order of his constituency to investigate for truth. I credit the people who surround Sheriff Joe who have hired and elected him as truth loving people. God bless them all.
That truth is what I've represented since suing McCain and Obama in 2008; the same truth that was used when I testified at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL in Harlem New York and he was found "Guilty" by a Jury of American Citizens who I had never met before and who came from every corner of the Nation.
The truth is a hard thing for those who make a lie. Obama can't say anything against the truth and not be seen as a Circus act and a Carnival Barker. The devil gets very angry at the truth because its the lie that gives him his power, and its the truth for Gods sake, that takes it away!
Boy I'll tell you the list of Judges and Courts and Public Figures that have chosen to align themselves with Obama's malignant fraud and massive forgery will have something of a ding on their resume for a long time won't they?
The stain of Obama they will be trying to wipe away from the public's eye for their entire life.. may they live a long life.
Ordinarily, I would feel more pity for them but these are people who have sworn oaths to the Constitution, had money or fame or the spot light of the MSM in which they were such cowards for the truth rather then standing up boldly for our United States Constitution.
When a politician tells a lie and the people support it, the cup is filled with a lie and its just a matter of time before it spills and the resulting action stains what its spilled on.
How many people really believe a lie can be covered up for long; or is a good thing when it hurts the very fabric of our election process; when it undermines the credibility of the United States to the core; When it makes the beacon on the hill of freedom and light seem more like a joke then a light?
Who of the media will be able to hold their heads high and not look like a Obama's fool?
Who has had him on their show and called him "President" rather then the usurping idiot with nothing to hide his nakedness, but his own dis-dain for our Constitution?
Obama own words have dug a hole for him. He has trumped that "Responsibility, Accountability, Transparency, and Law" are the hallmarks for Businesses whose practices he has called into question because of their gambling on the stock market with so much that if they lost they would need a public bail out AGAIN.
What example is Obama to "good practices"? What shall those businesses say to him, "Well, your the one whose setting the example for us?"
Obama understands that when these checks and balances or values leave the market, the market is doomed to fail, yet he doesn't have the respect for the White House, for the U.S. Constitution, for "We The People" to employ those values to himself?

What exactly do you call someone who applies great laws and goodness to businesses and everyone else, but won't employ them to himself in the Office of the President requiring a 'natural born citizen?
What should we call him?
The 'devil' come down to us?
The truth shall set you free from the lie Mr. Obama. The truth shall set you free from Mr. Obama Democratic Party.
Make the choice, and free yourself from Obama's malignant narcissistic personality disorder join The Birther Movement and become an Article II Patriot who supports Politicians who support, defend,protect, and preserve the Constitution in truth and real power.
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Read more…

I read with baited breath; "Anthony G. Martin - North St. Paul News"  article that was posted somewhere on this site by Anthony J Thannisch.    I hesitantly (hopefully) question his source for this statement;

"Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. .."    


I hope and pray it is true but Justice Clanence Thomas is on record as saying the Supreme's are avoiding the issue.    I've spoken with Attorney Orly Tiatz a week ago since Sheriff Joe Arpaio has gone public with his Cold Case Possee and has valuable expert evidence that she could use next MONDAY.  According to her, Sheriff Arpaio is just trying to sell books and has refused to appear as her witness so I have been trying to put pressure on Sheriff Joe Arpaio out here where I live to appear April 16th (next Monday) in a Circuit Court in Mississippi and be a witness for Orly Tiatz in a lawsuit she is involved in concerning Obama eligibility.  (She's filed a dozen or so eligibility lawsuits for different people and all Judges to date have thrown them out for one reason or another).  If it is denied or thrown out, she can appeal to the Supreme Court from there.  Hoping to get Arpaio's evidence recorded in a court of Law!

Read more…