brewer (4)

     Fast and Furious is a crisis!  Take a walk with me down memory lane.  Let's try to understand how Speaker Boehner would even suggest ending the investigation as alleged since USAG Eric Holder stated he would increase funds to stop "gun trafficking into Mexico."  Isn't Fast and Furious equate to "gun trafficking into Mexico?"  America has been headed into a socialist agenda for decades.  This agenda began prior to the Clinton administration, but reared its ugly head during the Clinton administration.  The Clintons implemented socialist agendas without public resistance by the majority of Americans.  There was a minority of us, who Clinton referred to as patriots, who stood on the front lines exposing the agendas, but patriots were attacked and some were killed, died, suicided, accidents, or jailed.  Today, the attack is the same, but the name has been switched from "patriots" to the "Tea Party" or the "Oathkeepers."  The media and Clinton administration discredited the patriots as  conspiracy theorists, but conspiracies have been implemented since the devil seduced Eve in the Garden of Eden.  Remember, Hitler conspired and nearly exterminated the Jews.

     First, we should ask the question, who is Eric Holder?  After all, we don't know the true identity of the man in the White House elected as a U.S. President known as Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, Bari Shabazz, Harrison Bounell and so forth...born in Hawaii or Kenya....a subject of Britain or a naturalized or legal citizen or an adopted Indonesian citizen, which are unanswered questions all blowing in the wind.  At least we know that Eric Holder is not eligible to be a U.S. President because he was born to two immigrants born in Barbados who immigrated into the U.S. about 1951.  They remained in New York City and Holder is reported to have grown up in Queens.  He's also been reported to be raised as an Episcopalian.  He's the 82nd USAG and the first African American to hold the position confirmed by the Senate.

     Eric Holder admits that he didn't answer congressional questions honestly at least twice while under oath when asked when he learned about Fast and Furious.  He was reported in the news to be uncooperative and not providing credible answers to the questions at the committee hearings, or producing the documents that had been requested, by the committee members. This crisis is just as serious as Obama refusing to uphold Article II, which he swore to uphold and yet, he failed to produce his Certified U.S. birth certificate which a federal judge ordered him to produce in a court of law, but he did not. Obviously, the majority of Americans are concerned about public servants who refuse to identify themselves on public record for public scrutiny. 

     On Tuesday, Holder failed to produce all the requested documents and stated, "I want to make it very clear that I am offering to sit down by myself, offering to sit down with the Speaker, with the Chairman, with whomever to try to work our way through this in an attempt to avoid a constitutional crisis....."  Well, the crisis began in 2009!  If the two U.S. agents hadn't been murdered by untracked guns sold to untracked cartel members on Mexican soil then the 42,000 innocent people, who had been executed, wouldn't have been silenced forever - what I refer to as a genocide - wouldn't have been exposed.  In fact, the executions are continuing as there are untracked guns remaining in the hands of dangerous untracked cartel members reported in the news to be robbing and killing people everyday.

     Furthermore, Holder stated at congressional hearings that he didn't know about Fast and Furious until the hearings commenced or he had just learned about Fast and Furious, but that isn't in line with the fact that he attended a conference in Cuernavaca, Mexico, on April 2, 2009, which may be the same meeting Hillary Clinton and Napolitano attended. Holder spoke at the conference and stated, "First, let me express my thanks to Attorney General Media Moras, Secretary of Government Gomez, mostly for making this conference possible,  This is my first trip to another country as Attorney General.  I wanted to come to Mexico to deliver a single message.  We stand shoulder to shoulder with you on the fight against the narcotics cartels.  The U.S. shares responsibility for this fight and problem and we will take responsibility by joining Mexican collegues here today....on our side, [HLS- Janet] Napolitano and I am committed to putting the resources in place to increase our attack on arms trafficking into Mexico."

     Well, how is it possible to believe that Holder knew very little about Fast and Furious when it was reported that Holder traveled to Mexico and attended the conference with Napolitano and possibly Hillary Clinton, who is reported to have spoken directly with the President of Mexico - Hillary specifically traveled to Mexico to speak  about  gun trafficking into Mexico in 2009!  Remember, Holder stated in his 2009 speech that he was "committed to putting the resources in place to increase our attack on arms trafficking into Mexico." The point isn't about Holder's statements during his speech, but the fact that he has vast knowledge of gun trafficking into Mexico and how could he not have knowledge that Obama launched Fast & Furious and named Holder and Ogden to lead the program on national television back in 2009 as stated by Deputy A.G. Ogden?  Holder's statements under oath during congressional hearings implying that he recently learned of Fast and Furious should be hard to swallow.

     Holder has worked for years under the Clinton-Reno administration and was familiar with Obama, ACORN and Schumer, Rod Blagojevich and many more Chicago and far left players who are activists or politicians.  How could he not know that Obama, Schumer, Hillary Clinton, and Feinstein were seeking gun control laws?  Obama stated loud and clear on Meet the Press back in 2008, which took place during the campaign, that his goal was to disarm Americans.  And Hillary Clinton has made it clear that her allegiance is with the U.N.'s Small Arms Treaty.  In fact, Schumer questioned Holder during the USAG hearings. These same public servants are democrats who support the U.N.'s Small Arms Treaty with the stated goal of disarming Americans. So, how is it that the Obama-Holder-Napolitano-Clinton-U.N. goal is to disarm Americans while simultaneously supplying untracked guns to untracked criminals on foreign soil using U.S. tax dollars turned to blood money?  The irony is that Homeland Security and the DOJ attempted to implement their spying and tracking program of law abiding American citizens, who are  Walmart customers and purchase legal guns to be thoroughly investigated, while Fast and Furious was in full force, and they didn't even apply law enforcement 101 against the cartle members.  Deputy A.G. Ogden, who appeared on national TV about April 2009, stated that Obama approved removing $10,000,000 of  U.S. tax dollars from the Recovery Fund, which he promised for job creation, in order for the BATF, which is under Holder's watch to implement Fast and Furious.  Ogden said on national television that Obama named Ogden and Holder to head up Fast and Furious on or about April 2009, probably prior to USAG Holder's visit, when he attended the Mexican conference on gun trafficking into Mexico.

     In fact, under Clinton's reign, Holder represented Chiquita Brands International who paid an entity using the name - United Self Defense Forces of Columbia -reported by a State Department to be listed as a terrorist organization, who murdered about 4,000 innocent Banana farmers, which is similar to Fast and Furious,except that In Mexico, 42,000 people were slaughtered.  Also, Del Monte and Dole paid the same terrorist group! In fact, news articles alleged that Speaker Nancy Pelosi was reported to have had a financial interest in Del Monte.  So, Holder is very knowledgable about the inner workings of terrorist groups, cartels,  gun trafficking, and money laundering, which makes it difficult to understand how it's possible that he didn't know anything or very much about the Fast and Furious gun trafficking reported in the news for two years.  It's difficult to understand how he didn't know that the news reported that thousands of executions along the borders were recurring on a dialy basis, including beheadings. After all, Holder did attend the conference held in Mexico back in 2009, as a key speaker on gun trafficking, offering his help, Napolitano's help, and the assistance of the U.S. government to control the gun trafficking along the borders.  Can congress overlook his traveling to Mexico and his speech on gun trafficking?

     Obama was the mentor and educator to ACORN.  Also, Bill Ayers is alleged to have some involvement with ACORN prior to the elections.  Holder is alleged to refuse the implementation of an investigation into voter fraud involving ACORN.  In 2009, Holder gave a speech in 2009 and stated, "America is a Nation of cowards" relating to racial issues.  Holder stated at a college with a majority of Black students that "there will be no majority race in the United Stated in 15 years."  Race appears to be high on his list.  In fact, Holder won a judgment against the New Black Panther leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, and chose to drop the case.  White House records reveal that Shabazz visited the private residence at the White House two months later.  It's strange that in 1982, a warrant for a man named Bari Shabazz was issued in Hawaii, but the man fled and almost 25 years later, a mysterious action took place as it was reported that a prosecutor dismissed the warrant. Remember, there weren't any computers back then to have even known about that warrant!  Malcolm X's last name is Shabazz and Obama's daughter is SaSHA.  Could the new leader be related to Malcolm X?  Who is Bari SHAbazz?

          Furthermore, Holder represented Jose Padilla aka Abdullah al Muhajir, an Islamist, who provided material support to al Qaeda and was leading a dirty bomb attack against the United States according to an article by spongedock. Its alleged that during the Clinton administration, Holder was a member of the American Constitution Society (ACS) funded by George Soros, the Streisand Foundation, and the Ford Foundation.  His close friends are Peter Rubin, founder of the ACS, and in fact,  Janet Reno was an advisory member. 

      Eric Holder is reported in alternative news to be the Director of the Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation which is funded by groups such as the Tides Foundation and ACORN.  So, it is apparent that the same public servants and organizations, celebrities, and corporations, who are currrently in control of the United States today have been interconnected for decades. The majority of these same people changing America are long time supporters of the United Nations and strong supporters of the evil Agenda 21 as well as disarming Americans and gun control.

     Holder gave a speech in 1998 while under the Clinton and Janet Reno administrations on drug cartels, weapons, and money laundering, so he is up-to-date on these serious matters.  In fact, Holder is reported in the news to have asked for clemency for 16 FLAM Puerto Rican terror organization members and that resulted in reduced prison sentences.

     There is much more history relating to Eric Holder and his ties to the Clintons, Rod Blagojevich, and many more, along with the Oklahoma City bombing; WACO, Ruby Ridge, and so forth....that it makes the entire federal government appear as one big theatrical stage of players who have been putting people in place since the Clinton years.  They obviously are people who have worked together in the past, belonged to the same socialist or leftist organizations, and are a majority of either democratic, liberal, socialist, marxist, communist, atheists, with a globalist, one world order, mind set.  Those who are socialists within the Congress or senate, or within other government agencies, appear to believe that they are not accountable to Congress or the American people, but the U.N., E.U., NATO, or international powers as expressed by Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, the man who has the U.S. Marines disarmed, during his visits.  Their behaviors reflect a disregard for the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence as well as possible disdain for freedom, liberty, the U.S. flag, the U.S. military, Judea-Christian roots, U.S. and Christian-Catholic-Jewish traditions, unborn babies, U.S. Natural Born Americans, and legal generational Americans who don't support their agendas.

     You can tune into my radio show LIVE on Wednesdays from 4-5 pm (pdt) with untold truth exposing a myriad of legal abuses, injustices, and constitutional violations, at www.blogtalkradio.com/rosecolombo

     You're invited to read complimentary pages of "Fight Back Legal Abuse: How To Protect Yourself From Your Own Attoney" at Amazon or BN.com

     Rose Colombo is referred to by the media as an authority on social injustices; an award winning published writer, author, creator, producer, and host of "Women Fight Back" - "Issues of the Day" - and currently "Rose Colombo's World Views."  www.fightbacklegalabuse.com

 

    

    

    

 

    

      

 

    

   

      

Read more…

IS FINGER POINTING RACIST?

Recently we have heard a lot about the finger pointing incident on The Tarmac by Governor Jan Brewer at President Barack Obama.  The incident is now being proclaimed as a racial situation, and The Governor is being blamed by Jessie Jackson and others as causing division, and calls are being made to smear her name.  It has even being suggested that her actions may cause The President to be assassin...ated. I am not writing this note to debate the ethical question of whether or not this incident is right, wrong, or disrespectful.  I wish here to address the issue of whether or not those that accuse this incident of being racial have any merit. How Race entered into this situation based on a picture is beyond belief.  It seems as if those that will use discrimination as an excuse to divide us will stoop to any level to cause racial strife as a way of maintaining themselves in a position of power. Prior to this event, Governor Brewer has not to my knowledge ever been mentioned or charged as a person with a history of racial discrimination.  If we are to be suspect of any one of the two, the lot would fall on our President as he is the one with the history of promoting class warfare, and standing along the side of the likes of Jeremiah Wright as he proclaimed Black Liberation Theology (a doctrine of hate) from the Church that he attended for over twenty years.  Our President also stands with The Attorney General Eric Holder who refuses to prosecute The Black Panthers for intimidation against Whites. Many Blacks have jumped on the band wagon and are blaming Governor Brewer of being a Racist because they accuse her of wanting to “set a Black man of power straight.”  They accuse her of using the opportunity to promote her new book, and to show the nation that she has the nerve to stand up and put him back in his place publicly. They also point out that it is disrespectful for someone White to ever point a finger in a Black persons face in public because of the dark racial history of our country. They also have failed to take into account that our current President, Barack Obama has himself repeated this gesture on several occasions to State Officials and foreign leaders.  Are we to assume that his actions were Reverse Discrimination? We need to approach this situation with caution and with the facts.  We have enough problems in America and should not add fuel to the fire by placing charges of racial hatred to incidents simply because of a picture or historical stereotypes.  Many people also exercise their freedom of speech with incident hand gestures that may not carry any measure of contempt in their appearance. Let us not rush to judgment and accuse others of such a serious charge before we investigate the facts.  We must move on and tackle the problems that are pressing this country.  We must not use The Race Card to unjustly cause someone to receive scorn.  We must move forward and unite as One America and maintain our respect for one another.
Read more…

The 10th Amendment of the Constitution is just one more part of the United States Constitution that Barack Obama finds objectionable. While NOT deliberately spitting on two different*** Arizona laws (created because of federal government dithering over the little matter of immigration law enforcement to help border states) or on the Constitution itself, Obama’s disdain for real American statesmanship and the real American Constitution is obvious. To think just seventeen short months ago he rose his hand and swore to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" -- after his actions of those past months who can ever believe anything the man says? Obama and his administration have expressed “grave concern” over both Arizona illegal immigration laws but is going to court to fight the most recently written one. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, spoiling for a fight on 10th Amendment grounds called Obama's decision "outrageous" but "not surprising" after Obama administration officials confirmed Friday that they plan to file a lawsuit challenging the state's anti-illegal immigration law. "Our federal government should be using its legal resources to fight illegal immigration, not the law-abiding citizens of Arizona," the fiesty Brewer said.

Meanwhile, the Arizona Attorney General, Terry Goddard, said his office plans to withdraw as the state's lawyers in legal challenges to the law, leaving Brewer's handpicked attorneys to defend it. Goddard, a Democrat said to be planning to run for the Arizona governorship for a third time after two earlier failures to win election, and Brewer a Republican have squabbled repeatedly about the law. To a certain extent that’s not been a bad thing.

After Goddard made his objections known to the earliest permutation of the Arizona law, A) the original law was strengthened B) provisions were added to directly address Goddard’s and Obama’s and many Democrats’ objections to the possibility of police officers using the new law as an excuse for “racial profiling” and C) Brewer had a special provision added saying that the Arizona governor could defend the new version of the law however she chose, rather than being required to fight legal challenges to the law and her state’s rights to protect itself from the illegal invasion from the south (which has made Phoenix the #2 kidnap city in the world only behind drug capital Bogota, Colombia) with a lukewarm state attorney general in center stage. Brewer said "I will ensure the immigration laws we passed are vigorously defended all the way to the United States Supreme Court if necessary, where this reasonable law will ultimately be found constitutional," something she wasn’t sure Goddard was prepared to do whole-heartedly.

The law taking effect July 29 requires state police officers to question a person's immigration status if there's a reasonable suspicion that he or she is in the country illegally. Five or six legal challenges have been filed to the law since April virtually all claiming that the new law will lead to “racial profiling” and it’s the federal government’s responsibility to regulate immigration. Duh! And what about the present climate when the federal government believes illegal immigration benefits it? Mr. Obama has made no pretext of defending the border. He is seeking so-called comprehensive immigration “reform,” a weasel term meaning the power to grant citizenship to the 14-25 million illegals now in the country since it's generally accepted that 80% or more of them would vote Democratic and ensure Obama’s re-election in 2012. He has thus far been told he hasn't the votes to pass such a bill into law.

On Friday evening, June 18, Brewer's defense team asked a federal judge to throw out suits by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups challenging the law's constitutionality. Recently, Obama officials confirmed plans to file their lawsuit after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an interview with a TV station in Ecuador (nice that U.S. citizens hear about the matter from a foreign TV station, eh?) earlier this month that the administration would challenge the law in court, though officials had long said the issue was under review. The administration at this point is just building its case and definitely expects to file suit. Brewer told Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren, she's ready for a fight.

"What a disappointment," Brewer said on Thursday, adding she was shocked the administration would make such an announcement on foreign TV without giving Arizona officials the news first. "We are NOT going to back away from this issue," Brewer said. "We are going to pursue it, we're going to be very aggressive," Brewer said. "We'll meet them in court ... And we will win. The citizens of America agree with Arizona."

Meanwhile the Obama administration has thus far failed to deliver promised National Guard troops to the border states. Obama’s original promise was to send unarmed National Guardsmen to “relieve” the paperwork and other pressures from U.S. Border Patrol officers . . . but even that pathetic pledge has been broken.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
*** Obama has also let known his displeasure with an earlier Arizona law that allows the state to suspend the licenses or refuse licensing of businesses repeatedly violating the national immigration laws by KNOWINGLY hiring illegal aliens. Attorney General Eric Holder has called both laws "unconstitutional." Apparently, in the case of the employers' law, once again Eric Holder has not read the law he's criticizing. The latest provision to the nation's immigration laws along those lines passed in the mid '80's says that the Federal Government canNOT get involved in licensing of businesses and that aspect is left for state regulation.
Read more…

Why does the TEA Party exist? It exists because people who love their country were not only fed up with the string of radical actions raping our wallets and spitting upon our Constitution by the spring of 2009, but also because these patriots felt isolated and helpless in the eye of the media storm of unceasing raucous support for this totally UN-American transformation of America into the nanny-state, abject socialism and now as we see more clearly communism itself. Look at it this way, we are suffering through a crisis created by, managed by and exploited to their great advantage by the progressive (those who feel the need to “progress” FAR BEYOND the Constitution of the United States) element in this country. People are afraid to call them “Communists” because it invokes memories of the McCarthy era, but communists they are . . . .

IF, and it's a big IF, IF the Mainstream media did their jobs instead of engaging in gutless and corrupt partisanship ever-benefitting the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party . . . IF they did their jobs, by 2000 Americans would have been well-informed enough to understand the present crisis was coming and informed enough to do something to ward it off, specifically:

o Presumably, one hundred times as many people would have read “Rules for Radicals” by community organizer Saul Alinsky and understood what and how the Communist Party planned to cleverly and subtlely bring down and replace the U.S. Government. But the media failed to do its job and Americans remained unaware.

o Citizens would have understood the much publicized and discussed (by the left wing) Cloward-Piven Strategy and read their boasting and detailed description of how they deliberately created the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) specifically for the purpose of employing C-P Strategy and used NWRO to bankrupt New York City and almost New York State in 1975, a project that took them roughly eight years to complete. The citizenry would have understood the in-your-face radical affrontery of these radicals that made their uprising work. But the media failed to do its job and Americans remained unaware.

o Americans would have understood the original CRA ’77 (Community Reinvestment Act) was an unneeded GIB (government interference boondoggle). The United States at that time enjoyed the highest home ownership in the world at well over 60% for over thirty consecutive years when it was passed. Then they’d have seen the ’92 expansion into the Freddy Mac and Fannie Mae programs with mortgage-guarantee legislation for the danger it was; the ’95 expansion of M-G programs similarly; and understood why Clinton’s ’98 expansion was the final piece of the M-G puzzle that put the whole process on steroids. These were all both attacks on landlords and unneeded interference in the free market system which has made us the wealthiest and most just country in the world. But the media failed to do its job and Americans remained unaware.

o Americans would not have been surprised by the creation of the C-P organization ACORN and its Saul Alinsky style of operation. They would have understood what radical lawyers like Barack Obama were doing and why and how they were doing it. They would have understood how and why they were able to force banks and lending organizations to hand out hopelessly ill-advised loans, often to people without I.D., without jobs; with abysmally poor credit ratings; without home addresses or rental addresses; even to illegal aliens. But the media failed to do its job and Americans remained unaware.

o If if Americans didn’t discover all the previously items until 2007, when the crisis raised it’s ugly head, if they’d known then what was going on, our country NOW would be markedly different. But the media failed to do its job and Americans still remained unaware.

Today, the media is not only NOT doing its jobs (and much of the country still remains unaware of the truth of our situation, but the media still continues to act as a joyful advocate for the Communist Obama agenda . . .

Presently there are two righteous non-violent uprisings going on in this country, these two protests are based upon the single-most important of our Bill of Rights: the 10th Amendment which says: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

A. On the one hand citizen-activists such as the TEA Party movement are making their outrage known. They are asking for fiscal responsibility, responsiveness by the Congress and President to real concerns; a return to honoring and obeying our Constitution and the Bill of Rights; balanced budgets and elimination of deficits and national debt; and transparency and honesty in government.

B. A second rebellion is marked by the individual states enacting laws that oppose federal legislation and a set of law suits against recently enacted unconstitutional federal programs.

C. There are only 17 specific powers which the Constitution allows our federal government, perhaps ten times that number of powers have been exercised by the federal government up till January, 2009.

D. Since that time perhaps 17,000 federal powers have been enacted by the Obama adminstration . . . pay attention here . . . the New Deal under FDR created 39 brand new federal agencies between 1933 and 1938. In just one law “Obamacare” the federal government has enacted the creation of almost 400 new federal agencies.

E. While the actions and unwise inactions of the progressive Republican President Hoover and the ultra-progressive Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt extended a recession into a twelve and a half year ordeal known as the Great Depression, revisionist history has NOT told the truth and made Roosevelt a hero. They have eliminated the fact that Roosevelt ran on promises of cutting taxes, cutting spending, bolstering the gold standard, and eliminating programs that Hoover had introduced. Why would he run his successful campaign like this?

F. Because the “Unknown Depression” begun in late 1920 under the progressive President Woodrow Wilson, was cleared up quickly by Harding cutting spending 49% and cutting taxes 40%. Harding died in office, but his vice-president Calvin Coolidge continued his policies which reversed the fiscal disaster and ushered in the Roaring Twenties the greatest shift in prosperity ever seen in the world. This is when for the first time, Americans in large numbers came to own their own automobiles, folks in cities and farms all had electricity and 85% came to have indoor plumbing. Virtually every household obtained an ice box or refrigerator, etc.

G. Because the media failed to do its job and Americans remained unaware, we have long lost our way and as we continued in the wrong direction, the media have cheered us on every misguided step of the way. We need, we demand a responsible new journalism interested in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Meanwhile . . . .

Our brothers in Arizona have created a law that mirrors precisely the attributes of the federal anti-illegal immigration statutes while emphasizing the need for police fairness and avoidance of even the appearance of racial profiling. The state and local police may act on this new law, ONLY when a just arrest or detainment is in progress, by asking for identification when an apparent illegal alien is in their custody. Since LEGAL justified aliens are required by law to carry a green card at all times, the Arizona law is a virtually perfect instrument for the state to take back its southern border. Nationally over 60% favor the Arizona law signed by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer. Within its borders 70% of Arizona citizens believe it’s a good law. However, President Obama and the progressives seeking to add fourteen million Pro-progressive votes by enacting an Amnesty law for illegals . . . has now chosen to once again raise the “racism” card. The same media that accused peaceful TEA Party demonstrators of racism, extremism, hate-mongering and radicalism is cheering on and abetting the violent demonstrations in Arizona. The law, is our protection. Non-violence, a la Gandhi is our protection. Quiet persistence is our protection. And ultimately the wisdom of our Founding Fathers is our protection. We must wield these weapons wisely and relentlessly if we are to ever hope to bring this country back to reasonableness and prosperity.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…